May, 05 2010, 02:31pm EDT
![Earthjustice](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012672/origin.jpg)
New EPA Testing Method Identifies Higher Coal Ash Threat; Must Drive Agency's Rulemaking
Arsenic, among others, leached at 1,800 times federal safe drinking water levels
WASHINGTON
A new testing method by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
reveals that pollutants such as arsenic, antimony, chromium and
selenium, can leach from coal ash at levels dozens and sometimes
hundreds of times greater than the federal drinking water standard. This
news comes on the heels of EPA's proposal to regulate coal ash, in
which the agency offered two options: a plan to regulate coal ash as
hazardous waste and another to regulate it as non-hazardous.
According to EPA's new testing data, cited in the agency's proposed
rule released yesterday, pollution from coal ash can shatter the
"hazardous waste" threshold, an important factor as the EPA is facing
pressure from industry to avoid defining coal ash as hazardous waste.
The new testing procedure emphasizes the need for the EPA to make the
right decision and choose the stronger of the two proposals for
federally enforceable coal ash safeguards that use the strongest limits
of the law to protect the communities living near coal ash sites.
In December 2009, the EPA produced a report examining the fate of
pollution captured in smokestacks at coal-fired power pants. The report
was quietly posted to the EPA's website, but offered groundbreaking
results. The EPA tested over 70 samples of ash and sludge from numerous
power plants. The results revealed the potential for some ashes and
sludges to release large concentrations of toxic chemicals. According to
new testing methods on coal ash applied by the EPA's Office of Research
and Development:
- Arsenic, a potent carcinogen, leached from one coal ash at 1,800
times the federal safe drinking water standard, more than 3 times the
threshold of hazardous waste and over 76 times the level of previous
leach tests; - Antimony, which causes heart, lung and stomach problems,
leached from a coal ash at 1,800 times the federal safe drinking water
standard and over 900 times the level of previous tests; - Chromium, which can cause cancer and stomach ailments, leached
from one coal ash at a level 73 times the federal safe drinking water
standard, over 1.5 times the hazardous waste threshold, and 124 times
the level of previous leach tests; and - Selenium, which causes circulatory problems in humans and is a
bioaccumulative toxin extremely deadly to fish, leached from one coal
ash at nearly 600 times the federal drinking water standard, 29 times
the hazardous waste threshold and nearly 66 times the level of previous
leach tests.
"The writing is on the wall, the floor, the ceiling, everywhere,"
said Lisa Evans, senior administrative counsel at Earthjustice. "Coal
ash pollution poses a significant threat to human health and our
environment. The EPA's new testing methods are much more precise and
clearly determine that arsenic, selenium and other pollutants from some
coal ashes pose a toxic threat to drinking water, fish and wildlife
populations, and our health."
Adding air pollution controls to existing power plants is shifting
toxic pollution from the smokestacks to the fly ash, FGD gypsum and
other air pollution control residues commonly referred to collectively
as "coal ash." Increased concentrations of toxic metals in coal ash
increases the potential for them to leach into water.
Read
an Earthjustice report summarizing the EPA's findings
"This new EPA report confirms just how significant the threat is to
aquatic life," said A. Dennis Lemly, Research Professor of Biology at
Wake Forest University. Dr. Lemly is an expert in aquatic toxicology of
selenium. "It shows that selenium quickly moves into water, often at
levels that are thousands of times greater than what is necessary to
poison fish. With this degree of contaminant mobility, concentration,
and toxicity, coal combustion waste, or coal ash, is an extremely
hazardous material."
These new testing methods show that arsenic can leach from coal ash
at 3 times, chromium can leach over 1.5 times, and selenium can leach at
29 times the threshold of what is considered hazardous waste. For
decades, the EPA, state agencies and industry relied on a 1990 leach
test, known as the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP),
which often failed to accurately predict levels of pollutants leaching
from coal ash. For years, the National Academy of Sciences and the EPA's
own Science Advisory Board questioned the reliance on such an
inaccurate testing method for coal ash and explicitly recommended that
EPA replace the old test. In 2006, the EPA itself acknowledged the need
for a more accurate and sensitive test and began using an alternate
framework. The new EPA proposed coal ash rule explicitly states that "a
considerable body of evidence has emerged indicating that the TCLP alone
is not a good predictor of the mobility of metals in CCRs under a
variety of different conditions."
The EPA's new test method provides a more accurate assessment of the
potential of toxic chemicals to leach from the waste, showing that coal
ash pollution is an obvious threat to drinking water and in some cases,
far exceeds the thresholds for hazardous waste.
"Sound science should inform decision making," said Mary Fox, PhD,
MPH, Assistant Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health. "Reliable scientific testing methods ensure the most accurate
data are available to regulators when they set protective standards. The
EPA's new testing methods clearly show the threat coal ash poses to
drinking water supplies and the communities that rely on them. These
findings provide critical information for establishing coal ash waste
management strategies that protect water supplies."
"The new leaching data is cited in EPA's proposed rule, and this
should end, once and for all, the reliance on a test that has no
scientific basis." Evans said. "The utility industry and coal ash reuse
industries argue that coal ash is not hazardous waste, relying on
obsolete testing methods that are nearly 20 years old. But there is new
science now being used by the EPA that shows unequivocally that some
ashes and sludges behave just like hazardous waste."
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular