October, 08 2009, 11:56am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Robyn Shepherd, ACLU, (212) 519-7829 or 549-2666; media@aclu.org
Nadine Wahab, Rights Working Group, (202) 365-6071 or 296-2300; nwahab@rightsworkinggroup.org
UN Human Rights Body Issues Decisive Observations on Racial Discrimination in US
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Finds Progress Lacking and Calls for Legislation
NEW YORK
In
a letter to the Obama administration made public by the American Civil
Liberties Union today, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination
of Racial Discrimination expressed concerns over a lack of progress to
end racial discrimination in the United States. The letter urged the
Obama administration and Congress to do more to end racial profiling,
strengthen efforts to provide adequate and affordable housing to the
victims of Hurricane Katrina, end the practice of sentencing juveniles
- most of whom are persons of color - to life sentences without parole
and address the deprivation of Western Shoshone American Indians of
their ancestral lands.
"The message from the committee is a
stark reminder of how much remains to be done to achieve racial
equality. Full implementation and enforcement of human rights treaty
obligations are critical for making real progress at home and for U.S.
leadership on human rights abroad," said Jamil Dakwar, Director of the
ACLU Human Rights Program. "The Obama administration must change gears
and prioritize human rights at home. The committee's recommendations
offer a blueprint to end racial discrimination and promote equal
opportunity."
The committee's observations came
after reviewing a one-year follow-up report submitted by the U.S.
government to the committee in January 2009, days before the end of the
Bush administration. That report aimed to demonstrate compliance with
the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination (CERD), which the U.S. ratified in 1994. Based on shadow
reports from nongovernmental organizations - including an ACLU and
Rights Working Group (RWG) report on racial profiling - the committee,
in its letter to the Obama administration, urged the U.S. to "make all
efforts to pass the End Racial Profiling Act (ERPA)" and to review the
2003 Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement
Agencies, "with a view to avoiding any ambiguous language that may
provide a loophole allowing for actions to constitute racial
profiling."
In its letter, the CERD committee
also urged the U.S. government "to review the National Entry and Exit
Registration System (NSEERS), with the view of avoiding racial
profiling in migration policies," and to reconsider a program - known
as 287(g) - that allows certain state and local law enforcement
agencies to engage in federal immigration enforcement activities and
has been widely criticized as fostering racial profiling and draining
local police resources.
"After 9/11, the U.S. government has
increasingly used immigration enforcement as a proxy to target Muslim,
Arab and South Asian communities," said Margaret Huang, Executive
Director of the Rights Working Group. "The conflation of immigration
law with 'national security' concerns has resulted in immigration
enforcement programs that foster illegal racial profiling for immigrant
communities across the board. The United States government should
implement the committee's recommendations and should work to end
programs like NSEERS and 287(g) which have been applied
discriminatorily, resulting in racial and religious profiling and
numerous human rights violations."
"The best way to rid the nation of
the scourge of racial and ethnic profiling and bring this country into
conformity with both the Constitution and international human rights
obligations is to pass the End Racial Profiling Act (ERPA)," said
Chandra Bhatnagar, staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program.
"ERPA would ban the practice of racial profiling by federal law
enforcement agencies and provide federal funding to state and local
police departments if they adopt policies to prohibit the practice.
Passing this act would demonstrate that the U.S. is committed to
meeting the standards set by the CERD."
The committee is an independent
group of 18 human rights experts that oversee compliance with CERD. In
March 2008, the committee issued a strongly worded critique of the U.S.
record on racial discrimination and recommendations for U.S. compliance
with the CERD treaty. The Bush administration report submitted in
January to demonstrate compliance was criticized by many human rights
groups as a last-minute whitewash report and full of omissions.
The CERD letter to the U.S. Government is available online at: www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/racialjustice/41258res20090928.html
The Bush administration's January submission to CERD is available online at: www.state.gov/documents/organization/113905.pdf
The ACLU and RWG's report to CERD is available online at: www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/racialjustice/40055pub20090629.html
The CERD 2008 concluding recommendations are available online at: www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/racialjustice/34375res20080307.html
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Warren Bill Would Stop Companies From Placing Shareholder Paydays Over Worker Rights
"Following the most lucrative election in history for special interests," said the senator, "my bill will empower workers to hold corporations to responsible decisions that benefit more than just shareholders."
Dec 11, 2024
Aiming to confront "a root cause of many of America's fundamental economic problems," U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday unveiled a bill to require corporations to balance growth with fair treatment of their employees and consumers.
The Massachusetts Democrat introduced the Accountable Capitalism Act, explaining that for much of U.S. history, corporations reinvested more than half of their profits back into their companies, working in the interest of employees, customers, business partners, and shareholders.
In the 1980s, said Warren corporations began placing the latter group above all, adopting "the belief that their only legitimate and legal purpose was 'maximizing shareholder value.'"
That view was further cemented in 1997 when the Business Roundtable, a lobbying group that represents chief executives across the country, declared that the "principal objective of a business enterprise is to generate economic returns to its owners."
Now, Warren said in a policy document, "around 93% of American-held corporate shares are owned by just 10% of our nation's richest households, while more than 40% of American households hold no shares at all."
"This means that corporate America's commitment to 'maximizing shareholder return' is a commitment to making the rich even richer, while leaving workers and families behind," said Warren in a statement.
The Accountable Capitalism Act would require:
- Corporations with more than $1 billion in annual revenue to obtain a federal charter as a "United States corporation," obligating executives to consider the interests of all stakeholders, not just investors;
- Corporate political spending to be approved by at least 75% of a company's shareholders and 75% of its board of directors; and
- At least 40% of a company's board of directors to be selected by employees.
The bill would also prohibit directors of U.S. corporations from selling company shares within five years of receiving them or within three years of a company stock buyback.
Warren noted that as companies have increasingly poured their profits into stock buybacks to benefit shareholders, worker productivity has steadily increased while real wages have gone up only slightly. The share of national income that goes to workers has also significantly dropped.
"Workers are a major reason corporate profits are surging, but their salaries have barely moved while corporations' shareholders make out like bandits," said Warren told The Guardian. "We need to stand up for working people and hold giant companies responsible for decisions that hurt workers and consumers while lining shareholders' pockets."
The senator highlighted that big business interests invested heavily in November's U.S. presidential election.
"Following the most lucrative election in history for special interests," she said, "my bill will empower workers to hold corporations to responsible decisions that benefit more than just shareholders."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Crushing Blow to the Labor Agenda' as Manchin, Sinema Block Biden NLRB Nominee
"These two senators effectively handed Trump control of the board when his term begins," noted one observer.
Dec 11, 2024
In a move likely fraught with major implications for worker rights during the impending second administration of Republican President-elect Donald Trump, Democratic-turned-Independent U.S. Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema on Wednesday blocked Democrat Lauren McFerran's bid for a second term on the National Labor Relations Board.
With every Republican senator except Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas voting against President Joe Biden's nomination of McFerran for a new five-year term, the fate of the woman who has led the agency since 2021 was up to Manchin and Sinema—who, as More Perfect Union founder and executive director Faiz Shakir put it on social media, "consistently spoiled the story of 'what could have been'" by years of fighting to thwart their own former party's agenda.
Sinema struck first, her "no" vote on McFerran grinding the confirmation tally to a 49-49 tie. Manchin, who showed up later, cast the decisive vote, negating speculation that Vice President Kamala Harris, the Senate president who lost the presidential contest to Trump last month, would break the stalemate.
"It is deeply disappointing, a direct attack on working people, and incredibly troubling that this highly qualified nominee—with a proven track record of protecting worker rights—did not have the votes," lamented Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Chris Jackson, a former Democratic Lawrence County, Tennessee commissioner and longtime labor advocate, called Manchin and Sinema's votes "a crushing blow to the labor agenda."
"By casting decisive NO votes against President Biden's NLRB nominee, they've guaranteed Democrats will lose control of the national labor board until at least 2026," Jackson said. "Their votes effectively hand Donald Trump the keys to the board the moment he takes office again. This is a betrayal of working families—and a gift to corporate interests, which is par for the course for these two."
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA union, said on social media that while "Manchin and Sinema are responsible for killing voting rights, worker rights, women's rights, LGBTQ rights, childcare, vision, and dental for seniors, and an economy built for the people," the two obstructionist senators "are not the story."
"Don't bury the lede," implored Nelson. "The entire GOP has relentlessly fought against anything good for the vast majority of the people of this country. The GOP shows once again their total disdain for their constituents."
"But they better watch what they do in implementing their plans to make it worse," she warned. "These laws are set up to mostly protect corporations and getting rid of the last pathetic bits of worker rights under the law will simply lead to more disruption and CHAOS."
Trump's first term saw relentless attacks on workers' rights. Critics fear a second Trump administration—whose officials and agenda are steeped in the anti-worker Project 2025—will roll back gains achieved under Biden and work to weaken the right to organize, water down workplace health and safety rules, and strip overtime pay, to name but a handful of GOP wish-list items.
The latest votes by Manchin and Sinema—who are both leaving Congress after this term—sparked widespread outrage among workers' rights defenders on social media, with one account on X, formerly known as Twitter, posting: "Manchin is geriatric and Sinema has a long fruitful career ahead of her in a consulting firm that advocates child slave labor, but at least they kicked the working class in the teeth one last time. Nothing to do now but hope there's a hell."
Keep ReadingShow Less
With Defeat of Megamerger, Sanders Thanks Khan for Taking On 'Corporate Greed'
"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said the Vermont senator.
Dec 11, 2024
Praise for Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan continued to pour in on Wednesday after a pair of judges blocked the merger of grocery chains Kroger and Albertsons following challenges by the FTC and state attorneys general.
"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders. "Let me thank FTC Chair Lina Khan for successfully fighting this merger and standing up to corporate greed."
Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) also welcomed the rulings and sent "a big thank you to Lina Khan and her team at the FTC."
Their comments on Wednesday followed similar applause from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal as well as groups including the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) and Groundwork Collaborative.
Khan addressed the win during a Tuesday stream with political commentator Hasan Piker, noting that "this is the first time that the FTC has ever sought to block a merger not just because it's gonna be bad for consumers, but also because it's gonna be bad for workers."
Khan, an appointee of outgoing Democratic President Joe Biden, has won praise from progressives for taking on not only grocery giants and other companies trying to build monopolies but also Big Pharma and Big Tech.
Sanders recently called her "the best FTC chair in modern history" and AELP earlier this year published a document detailing how, under Khan's leadership, the agency "has entered a new era of more effective, modern, and democratic enforcement to better protect consumers, workers, and independent businesses."
Examples included in the AELP roundup include Khan's "crackdown on deceptive 'junk fees,'" a ban on noncompete clauses that's being challenged in court, a historic lawsuit against Amazon.com, and a "click-to-cancel" rule that requires sellers to "make it as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up."
However, the new era of the FTC is set to soon come to an end. Since President-elect Donald Trump's victory last month, speculation has been building that he would replace Khan with someone who would do the bidding of big business. Amid celebrations of the rulings against the Kroger-Albertsons merger on Tuesday, the Republican announced Andrew Ferguson as his pick for chair.
As Common Dreamsreported earlier Wednesday, Basel Musharbash, principal attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel, said that elevating Ferguson, who already sits on the FTC, to chair, "is an affront to the antitrust laws and a gift to the oligarchs and monopolies bleeding this country dry."
Although the agency is expected to be friendlier to mergers under the next Trump administration, Albertsons responded to the Tuesday rulings by bailing on the $24.6 billion deal and suing Kroger for billions of dollars on Wednesday, rather than appealing or moving to in-house FTC hearings.
That move could reflect industry fears of U.S. courts that are willing to block major mergers, as The American Prospect executive editor David Dayen pointed out after the federal court decision on Tuesday.
"The important thing here is not that Biden's enforcers blocked a merger... it's that courts are increasingly comfortable with merger enforcement," he said. "States can sue under the Sherman Act, and they will. The real change to track is in the judiciary. Wall Street, take note."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular