SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mt.) speaks during Dr. Saule Omarova's confirmation hearing to be the Comptroller of the Currency with the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill on November 18, 2021. (Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Given Cover by Red-Baiting GOP, Corporate Dems Rebuked for Tanking Biden Nominee for Top Bank Regulator
"If you think that Senate Democrats rose up to [Republicans'] shameful display of modern McCarthyism by rallying around President Biden's nominee or her ideas that banking should work for the middle class, then you don't know the soul of today's Democratic Party," wrote one columnist.
Dec 08, 2021
While a number of Democratic senators joined the White House is decrying the "red scare McCarthyism" that Republicans lobbed at President Joe Biden's nominee for a top bank regulatory position, progressives on Wednesday argued that the GOP's attacks on Saule Omarova simply gave cover to corporate Democrats who also objected to the nomination.
Omarova on Tuesday withdrew herself from consideration to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is tasked with regulating the largest banks in the country, telling the White House that it was "no longer tenable" for her to continue in the confirmation process.
"In failing to defend Saule Omarova against the brutal McCarthyism of her Republican critics, the Democrats' centrist wing is hitting a moral low to coincide with their lack of political foresight."
The Cornell Law School professor's decision followed a blatant smear campaign by Republicans including Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and John Kennedy (R-La.), who suggested Omarova has not sufficiently distanced herself from Communism following her childhood in the former Soviet Union.
As Toomey demanded to see a paper on Marxism that Omarova wrote while a student at Moscow State University "in the original Russian language" and Kennedy asked the nominee whether he should address her as "professor" or "comrade" during her confirmation hearing, powerful banking lobbyists painted Omarova as a threat to the U.S. economic system.
Lobbying groups expressed objections to a paper Omarova wrote in 2020 about the Federal Reserve potentially providing bank accounts using its own digital currency and circulated a Wall Street Journal editorial questioning the professor's trustworthiness considering her place of birth, with Independent Community Bankers of America chair Brad Bolton tweeting, "This nomination must be stopped!"
What Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) referred to as "outrageous red-baiting," however, was not what harmed Omarova's chances of being confirmed.
Instead, five centrist Democrats--Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.)--told the White House they had their own concerns about Omarova's nomination.
Tester questioned Omarova about comments she previously made about the oil and gas industry, which she said would likely "go bankrupt in short order"--something that would have to happen "if we want to tackle climate change." He also joined Warner in objecting to Omarova's opposition to a 2018 bill the two senators supported, which the professor said would have created regulatory loopholes for big banks.
Omarova has also proposed an infrastructure program under which the federal government would provide funding for projects that private companies don't see as profitable and has criticized Wall Street banks from benefiting from government bailouts after damaging the economy, telling the Wall Street Journal last month, "I want to protect the American taxpayer, basically, from holding the bag."
"If you think that Senate Democrats rose up to [Republicans'] shameful display of modern McCarthyism by rallying around President Biden's nominee or her ideas that banking should work for the middle class, then you don't know the soul of today's Democratic Party," wrote Will Bunch at the Philadelphia Inquirer after the centrists expressed their concerns to the White House. "In failing to defend Saule Omarova against the brutal McCarthyism of her Republican critics, the Democrats' centrist wing is hitting a moral low to coincide with their lack of political foresight--as the party melts down and an opposing party that no longer believes in democracy is advancing on the capital, again."
Journalist Alex Yablon tweeted that Kennedy did the centrists "a huge favor" by ensuring the corporate media focused on the McCarthyism displayed at the confirmation hearing.
"It's the backstabbing of the five bought Democratic senators that's the real story," added civil rights attorney Chase Madar. "Here as elsewhere, no effective party discipline."
Matt Duss, foreign policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), denounced the corporate Democrats for doing "bank lobbyists' bidding" and helping Republicans to sink Biden's economic agenda.
Centrists including Tester and Warner are "basically co-signing GOP' Socialism!' attack ads in 2022 and '24," tweeted Duss. "And then they'll blame progressives for losses."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
While a number of Democratic senators joined the White House is decrying the "red scare McCarthyism" that Republicans lobbed at President Joe Biden's nominee for a top bank regulatory position, progressives on Wednesday argued that the GOP's attacks on Saule Omarova simply gave cover to corporate Democrats who also objected to the nomination.
Omarova on Tuesday withdrew herself from consideration to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is tasked with regulating the largest banks in the country, telling the White House that it was "no longer tenable" for her to continue in the confirmation process.
"In failing to defend Saule Omarova against the brutal McCarthyism of her Republican critics, the Democrats' centrist wing is hitting a moral low to coincide with their lack of political foresight."
The Cornell Law School professor's decision followed a blatant smear campaign by Republicans including Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and John Kennedy (R-La.), who suggested Omarova has not sufficiently distanced herself from Communism following her childhood in the former Soviet Union.
As Toomey demanded to see a paper on Marxism that Omarova wrote while a student at Moscow State University "in the original Russian language" and Kennedy asked the nominee whether he should address her as "professor" or "comrade" during her confirmation hearing, powerful banking lobbyists painted Omarova as a threat to the U.S. economic system.
Lobbying groups expressed objections to a paper Omarova wrote in 2020 about the Federal Reserve potentially providing bank accounts using its own digital currency and circulated a Wall Street Journal editorial questioning the professor's trustworthiness considering her place of birth, with Independent Community Bankers of America chair Brad Bolton tweeting, "This nomination must be stopped!"
What Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) referred to as "outrageous red-baiting," however, was not what harmed Omarova's chances of being confirmed.
Instead, five centrist Democrats--Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.)--told the White House they had their own concerns about Omarova's nomination.
Tester questioned Omarova about comments she previously made about the oil and gas industry, which she said would likely "go bankrupt in short order"--something that would have to happen "if we want to tackle climate change." He also joined Warner in objecting to Omarova's opposition to a 2018 bill the two senators supported, which the professor said would have created regulatory loopholes for big banks.
Omarova has also proposed an infrastructure program under which the federal government would provide funding for projects that private companies don't see as profitable and has criticized Wall Street banks from benefiting from government bailouts after damaging the economy, telling the Wall Street Journal last month, "I want to protect the American taxpayer, basically, from holding the bag."
"If you think that Senate Democrats rose up to [Republicans'] shameful display of modern McCarthyism by rallying around President Biden's nominee or her ideas that banking should work for the middle class, then you don't know the soul of today's Democratic Party," wrote Will Bunch at the Philadelphia Inquirer after the centrists expressed their concerns to the White House. "In failing to defend Saule Omarova against the brutal McCarthyism of her Republican critics, the Democrats' centrist wing is hitting a moral low to coincide with their lack of political foresight--as the party melts down and an opposing party that no longer believes in democracy is advancing on the capital, again."
Journalist Alex Yablon tweeted that Kennedy did the centrists "a huge favor" by ensuring the corporate media focused on the McCarthyism displayed at the confirmation hearing.
"It's the backstabbing of the five bought Democratic senators that's the real story," added civil rights attorney Chase Madar. "Here as elsewhere, no effective party discipline."
Matt Duss, foreign policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), denounced the corporate Democrats for doing "bank lobbyists' bidding" and helping Republicans to sink Biden's economic agenda.
Centrists including Tester and Warner are "basically co-signing GOP' Socialism!' attack ads in 2022 and '24," tweeted Duss. "And then they'll blame progressives for losses."
While a number of Democratic senators joined the White House is decrying the "red scare McCarthyism" that Republicans lobbed at President Joe Biden's nominee for a top bank regulatory position, progressives on Wednesday argued that the GOP's attacks on Saule Omarova simply gave cover to corporate Democrats who also objected to the nomination.
Omarova on Tuesday withdrew herself from consideration to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is tasked with regulating the largest banks in the country, telling the White House that it was "no longer tenable" for her to continue in the confirmation process.
"In failing to defend Saule Omarova against the brutal McCarthyism of her Republican critics, the Democrats' centrist wing is hitting a moral low to coincide with their lack of political foresight."
The Cornell Law School professor's decision followed a blatant smear campaign by Republicans including Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and John Kennedy (R-La.), who suggested Omarova has not sufficiently distanced herself from Communism following her childhood in the former Soviet Union.
As Toomey demanded to see a paper on Marxism that Omarova wrote while a student at Moscow State University "in the original Russian language" and Kennedy asked the nominee whether he should address her as "professor" or "comrade" during her confirmation hearing, powerful banking lobbyists painted Omarova as a threat to the U.S. economic system.
Lobbying groups expressed objections to a paper Omarova wrote in 2020 about the Federal Reserve potentially providing bank accounts using its own digital currency and circulated a Wall Street Journal editorial questioning the professor's trustworthiness considering her place of birth, with Independent Community Bankers of America chair Brad Bolton tweeting, "This nomination must be stopped!"
What Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) referred to as "outrageous red-baiting," however, was not what harmed Omarova's chances of being confirmed.
Instead, five centrist Democrats--Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.)--told the White House they had their own concerns about Omarova's nomination.
Tester questioned Omarova about comments she previously made about the oil and gas industry, which she said would likely "go bankrupt in short order"--something that would have to happen "if we want to tackle climate change." He also joined Warner in objecting to Omarova's opposition to a 2018 bill the two senators supported, which the professor said would have created regulatory loopholes for big banks.
Omarova has also proposed an infrastructure program under which the federal government would provide funding for projects that private companies don't see as profitable and has criticized Wall Street banks from benefiting from government bailouts after damaging the economy, telling the Wall Street Journal last month, "I want to protect the American taxpayer, basically, from holding the bag."
"If you think that Senate Democrats rose up to [Republicans'] shameful display of modern McCarthyism by rallying around President Biden's nominee or her ideas that banking should work for the middle class, then you don't know the soul of today's Democratic Party," wrote Will Bunch at the Philadelphia Inquirer after the centrists expressed their concerns to the White House. "In failing to defend Saule Omarova against the brutal McCarthyism of her Republican critics, the Democrats' centrist wing is hitting a moral low to coincide with their lack of political foresight--as the party melts down and an opposing party that no longer believes in democracy is advancing on the capital, again."
Journalist Alex Yablon tweeted that Kennedy did the centrists "a huge favor" by ensuring the corporate media focused on the McCarthyism displayed at the confirmation hearing.
"It's the backstabbing of the five bought Democratic senators that's the real story," added civil rights attorney Chase Madar. "Here as elsewhere, no effective party discipline."
Matt Duss, foreign policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), denounced the corporate Democrats for doing "bank lobbyists' bidding" and helping Republicans to sink Biden's economic agenda.
Centrists including Tester and Warner are "basically co-signing GOP' Socialism!' attack ads in 2022 and '24," tweeted Duss. "And then they'll blame progressives for losses."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.