Democratic voters attend the caucus at the Wells Fargo Arena in Des Moines, Iowa, the United States, Feb. 3, 2020. (Photo: Li Muzi/Xinhua via Getty) (Xinhua/Li Muzi via Getty Images)
'This Is a Big Deal': Iowa Gov. Ends Voting Ban for People With Felony Convictions
The new executive order means there is now no U.S. state categorically banning people with former convictions from voting.
In a development heralded as "a historic sea change," Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed an executive order on Wednesday overturning the state's policy of permanently banning those with felony convictions from voting.
"Today we take a significant step forward in acknowledging the importance of redemption, second chances, and the need to address inequalities in our justice system," said Reynolds, a Republican, whose order (pdf) is expected to restore voting rights to roughly 40,000 people.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, welcomed the order.
"This is a big deal," Gupta tweeted. "Iowa was the last remaining state that permanently and categorically banned people with former convictions from voting."
Previously, those who'd completed felony sentences had to individually appeal to the governor for possible re-enfranchisement.
Eliza Sweren-Becke, voting rights and elections counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, responded similarly to the order, tweeting, "This is a HUGE--now NO state in the country has a policy of permanently and categorically banning people from voting because of past convictions--a historic sea change."
The change is also good news for racial justice.
"This action will benefit people regardless of race or ethnicity, but with the grave racial disparities in our criminal justice system, it will very significantly benefit African Americans and other people of color," Betty C. Andrews, president of the Iowa-Nebraska NAACP, said in a statement.
As KPBS reported:
Reynolds' order restores voting rights to felons who have completed their sentence, including probation, parole, and special sentences that are associated with sex offenses. Reynolds' order does not require payment of victim restitution or any other fines or fees as a condition of being able to vote, a point of contention in Florida that has been caught up in court.
The order doesn't cover those convicted of felony homicide offenses--an exclusion lamented by ACLU of Iowa executive director Mark Stringer, who said his group would "continue to work to ensure that all Iowans who have completed their sentences can once again participate in the democracy that so profoundly affects them."
Voting rights advocates also recognized that Wednesday's win could be easily yanked away--they saw that happen in 2011 when then-Gov. Terry Branstad rescinded a 2005 executive order that had restored voting rights to Iowans who had completed sentences for felony convictions.
As such, said Stringer, "it's important that we continue to pursue a more permanent fix to the problem of felony disenfranchisement in our state. Another governor could issue a different executive order to reverse this current executive order."
"That's why we'll continue to advocate for an amendment to the Iowa Constitution," he said.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a development heralded as "a historic sea change," Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed an executive order on Wednesday overturning the state's policy of permanently banning those with felony convictions from voting.
"Today we take a significant step forward in acknowledging the importance of redemption, second chances, and the need to address inequalities in our justice system," said Reynolds, a Republican, whose order (pdf) is expected to restore voting rights to roughly 40,000 people.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, welcomed the order.
"This is a big deal," Gupta tweeted. "Iowa was the last remaining state that permanently and categorically banned people with former convictions from voting."
Previously, those who'd completed felony sentences had to individually appeal to the governor for possible re-enfranchisement.
Eliza Sweren-Becke, voting rights and elections counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, responded similarly to the order, tweeting, "This is a HUGE--now NO state in the country has a policy of permanently and categorically banning people from voting because of past convictions--a historic sea change."
The change is also good news for racial justice.
"This action will benefit people regardless of race or ethnicity, but with the grave racial disparities in our criminal justice system, it will very significantly benefit African Americans and other people of color," Betty C. Andrews, president of the Iowa-Nebraska NAACP, said in a statement.
As KPBS reported:
Reynolds' order restores voting rights to felons who have completed their sentence, including probation, parole, and special sentences that are associated with sex offenses. Reynolds' order does not require payment of victim restitution or any other fines or fees as a condition of being able to vote, a point of contention in Florida that has been caught up in court.
The order doesn't cover those convicted of felony homicide offenses--an exclusion lamented by ACLU of Iowa executive director Mark Stringer, who said his group would "continue to work to ensure that all Iowans who have completed their sentences can once again participate in the democracy that so profoundly affects them."
Voting rights advocates also recognized that Wednesday's win could be easily yanked away--they saw that happen in 2011 when then-Gov. Terry Branstad rescinded a 2005 executive order that had restored voting rights to Iowans who had completed sentences for felony convictions.
As such, said Stringer, "it's important that we continue to pursue a more permanent fix to the problem of felony disenfranchisement in our state. Another governor could issue a different executive order to reverse this current executive order."
"That's why we'll continue to advocate for an amendment to the Iowa Constitution," he said.
In a development heralded as "a historic sea change," Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed an executive order on Wednesday overturning the state's policy of permanently banning those with felony convictions from voting.
"Today we take a significant step forward in acknowledging the importance of redemption, second chances, and the need to address inequalities in our justice system," said Reynolds, a Republican, whose order (pdf) is expected to restore voting rights to roughly 40,000 people.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, welcomed the order.
"This is a big deal," Gupta tweeted. "Iowa was the last remaining state that permanently and categorically banned people with former convictions from voting."
Previously, those who'd completed felony sentences had to individually appeal to the governor for possible re-enfranchisement.
Eliza Sweren-Becke, voting rights and elections counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, responded similarly to the order, tweeting, "This is a HUGE--now NO state in the country has a policy of permanently and categorically banning people from voting because of past convictions--a historic sea change."
The change is also good news for racial justice.
"This action will benefit people regardless of race or ethnicity, but with the grave racial disparities in our criminal justice system, it will very significantly benefit African Americans and other people of color," Betty C. Andrews, president of the Iowa-Nebraska NAACP, said in a statement.
As KPBS reported:
Reynolds' order restores voting rights to felons who have completed their sentence, including probation, parole, and special sentences that are associated with sex offenses. Reynolds' order does not require payment of victim restitution or any other fines or fees as a condition of being able to vote, a point of contention in Florida that has been caught up in court.
The order doesn't cover those convicted of felony homicide offenses--an exclusion lamented by ACLU of Iowa executive director Mark Stringer, who said his group would "continue to work to ensure that all Iowans who have completed their sentences can once again participate in the democracy that so profoundly affects them."
Voting rights advocates also recognized that Wednesday's win could be easily yanked away--they saw that happen in 2011 when then-Gov. Terry Branstad rescinded a 2005 executive order that had restored voting rights to Iowans who had completed sentences for felony convictions.
As such, said Stringer, "it's important that we continue to pursue a more permanent fix to the problem of felony disenfranchisement in our state. Another governor could issue a different executive order to reverse this current executive order."
"That's why we'll continue to advocate for an amendment to the Iowa Constitution," he said.