

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Weeks of negotiation and compromising -- which a reasonably populist
job creation and economic recovery bill turned into a tepid plan
weighted down with conservative tax schemes -- still did not gain a
single vote from House Republicans for the federal stimulus plan.
The House on Friday approved the $787 billion measure by a 246-183 vote.
The votes in favor of the stimulus came from 246 Democrats.
The votes against it came from 176 Republicans and seven Democrats.
The only real shift from the vote on the original House bill --
which included a great deal more spending for school construction,
state aid and health care initiatives with the potential to create jobs
and ease the pain of the economic downturn -- was the decline in
Democratic opposition.
When the measure was initially considered, 11 Democrats -- most of
the conservative Blue Dogs -- vote "no." On Friday, only seven
Democrats voted against it. (Among the switchers was Tennessee
Congressman Jim Cooper, a prominent Blue Dog. Another switcher was
Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski, the chair of the Chairman of
the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets,
Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.)
The bill now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass with the
support of all Democratic caucus members and three Republicans -- Susan
Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.
Though they account for less than one percent of the overall
membership of the Congress, Collins, Snowe and Specter have
successfully redefined the legislation as something less than the
majority Democrats proposed -- and, unsettlingly, something less than
may be needed to renew a sagging economy.
Collins, Snowe and Specter did not, however, succeed in convincing
any Republicans that they changes they made were close enough to the
opposition party's generally agreed upon goal of doing little or
nothing to address the current crisis.
For Americans who would like to do something most members of
Congress have not, the bill -- including scribbled changes -- can be read here.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Weeks of negotiation and compromising -- which a reasonably populist
job creation and economic recovery bill turned into a tepid plan
weighted down with conservative tax schemes -- still did not gain a
single vote from House Republicans for the federal stimulus plan.
The House on Friday approved the $787 billion measure by a 246-183 vote.
The votes in favor of the stimulus came from 246 Democrats.
The votes against it came from 176 Republicans and seven Democrats.
The only real shift from the vote on the original House bill --
which included a great deal more spending for school construction,
state aid and health care initiatives with the potential to create jobs
and ease the pain of the economic downturn -- was the decline in
Democratic opposition.
When the measure was initially considered, 11 Democrats -- most of
the conservative Blue Dogs -- vote "no." On Friday, only seven
Democrats voted against it. (Among the switchers was Tennessee
Congressman Jim Cooper, a prominent Blue Dog. Another switcher was
Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski, the chair of the Chairman of
the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets,
Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.)
The bill now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass with the
support of all Democratic caucus members and three Republicans -- Susan
Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.
Though they account for less than one percent of the overall
membership of the Congress, Collins, Snowe and Specter have
successfully redefined the legislation as something less than the
majority Democrats proposed -- and, unsettlingly, something less than
may be needed to renew a sagging economy.
Collins, Snowe and Specter did not, however, succeed in convincing
any Republicans that they changes they made were close enough to the
opposition party's generally agreed upon goal of doing little or
nothing to address the current crisis.
For Americans who would like to do something most members of
Congress have not, the bill -- including scribbled changes -- can be read here.
Weeks of negotiation and compromising -- which a reasonably populist
job creation and economic recovery bill turned into a tepid plan
weighted down with conservative tax schemes -- still did not gain a
single vote from House Republicans for the federal stimulus plan.
The House on Friday approved the $787 billion measure by a 246-183 vote.
The votes in favor of the stimulus came from 246 Democrats.
The votes against it came from 176 Republicans and seven Democrats.
The only real shift from the vote on the original House bill --
which included a great deal more spending for school construction,
state aid and health care initiatives with the potential to create jobs
and ease the pain of the economic downturn -- was the decline in
Democratic opposition.
When the measure was initially considered, 11 Democrats -- most of
the conservative Blue Dogs -- vote "no." On Friday, only seven
Democrats voted against it. (Among the switchers was Tennessee
Congressman Jim Cooper, a prominent Blue Dog. Another switcher was
Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski, the chair of the Chairman of
the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets,
Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.)
The bill now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass with the
support of all Democratic caucus members and three Republicans -- Susan
Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.
Though they account for less than one percent of the overall
membership of the Congress, Collins, Snowe and Specter have
successfully redefined the legislation as something less than the
majority Democrats proposed -- and, unsettlingly, something less than
may be needed to renew a sagging economy.
Collins, Snowe and Specter did not, however, succeed in convincing
any Republicans that they changes they made were close enough to the
opposition party's generally agreed upon goal of doing little or
nothing to address the current crisis.
For Americans who would like to do something most members of
Congress have not, the bill -- including scribbled changes -- can be read here.