Refugees Already Detained as Groups Race to Stop Trump's Muslim Ban
'The courts must do what President Trump will not—ensure that our government refrains from segregating people based on their faith'
Rights groups are amassing in opposition to President Donald Trump's executive order banning immigrants from Muslim countries, which he signed Friday after a meeting with British Prime Minister Theresa May.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said it would file a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the memorandum, which bans immigrants from Syria indefinitely and halts arrivals from Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Somalia for 90 days.
Refugees who were in the air on the way to the U.S. on Friday when Trump signed his order were detained when they landed, the New York Times reported Saturday.
Meanwhile, the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) called on Trump to rescind the order, cautioning that the U.S. resettlement program was critical, particularly in a time of global turmoil.
"The needs of refugees and migrants worldwide have never been greater and the U.S. resettlement program is one of the most important in the world," the organizations said in a joint statement.
"Tears are running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight as a grand tradition of America, welcoming immigrants, that has existed since America was founded, has been stomped upon," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
"Taking in immigrants and refugees is not only humanitarian but has also boosted our economy and created jobs decade after decade. This is one of the most backward and nasty executive orders that the president has issued," he said.
The plan was announced earlier this week amid a flurry of executive orders cracking down on immigration.
The order, officially titled the Protection of the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States--which Trump termed "extreme vetting" designed to "keep terrorists out"--was more severe than expected and effectively blocks Muslims traveling to the U.S. from wide swaths of the Middle East and North Africa.
That's despite the fact that the U.S. already has the most rigorous screening process in the world, as the Washington Post points out. The memorandum also prioritizes admission for Christians and caps the total number of refugees entering the country in 2017 at 50,000, less than half what it was the previous year.
Moustafa Bayoumi, a Brooklyn College professor, wrote in an op-ed for the Guardian that the order means Trump is "now officially gunning for Muslims."
"The order is nothing short of a Muslim ban by another name. It is cruel and callous, espouses positions contrary to the professed values of the United States, and will certainly produce more problems than it purports to solve," Bayoumi wrote. "In other words, it's exactly like Donald Trump."
Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), likewise warned Friday, "'Extreme vetting' is just a euphemism for discriminating against Muslims. Identifying specific countries with Muslim majorities and carving out exceptions for minority religions flies in the face of the constitutional principle that bans the government from either favoring or discriminating against particular religions. Any effort to discriminate against Muslims and favor other religions runs afoul of the First Amendment."
Announcing the lawsuit Friday, CAIR national litigation director Lena F. Masri said in a statement, "There is no evidence that refugees--the most thoroughly vetted of all people entering our nation--are a threat to national security. This is an order that is based on bigotry, not reality."
Gadeir Abbas, a co-counsel in the lawsuit, added, "The courts must do what President Trump will not--ensure that our government refrains from segregating people based on their faith."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Rights groups are amassing in opposition to President Donald Trump's executive order banning immigrants from Muslim countries, which he signed Friday after a meeting with British Prime Minister Theresa May.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said it would file a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the memorandum, which bans immigrants from Syria indefinitely and halts arrivals from Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Somalia for 90 days.
Refugees who were in the air on the way to the U.S. on Friday when Trump signed his order were detained when they landed, the New York Times reported Saturday.
Meanwhile, the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) called on Trump to rescind the order, cautioning that the U.S. resettlement program was critical, particularly in a time of global turmoil.
"The needs of refugees and migrants worldwide have never been greater and the U.S. resettlement program is one of the most important in the world," the organizations said in a joint statement.
"Tears are running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight as a grand tradition of America, welcoming immigrants, that has existed since America was founded, has been stomped upon," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
"Taking in immigrants and refugees is not only humanitarian but has also boosted our economy and created jobs decade after decade. This is one of the most backward and nasty executive orders that the president has issued," he said.
The plan was announced earlier this week amid a flurry of executive orders cracking down on immigration.
The order, officially titled the Protection of the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States--which Trump termed "extreme vetting" designed to "keep terrorists out"--was more severe than expected and effectively blocks Muslims traveling to the U.S. from wide swaths of the Middle East and North Africa.
That's despite the fact that the U.S. already has the most rigorous screening process in the world, as the Washington Post points out. The memorandum also prioritizes admission for Christians and caps the total number of refugees entering the country in 2017 at 50,000, less than half what it was the previous year.
Moustafa Bayoumi, a Brooklyn College professor, wrote in an op-ed for the Guardian that the order means Trump is "now officially gunning for Muslims."
"The order is nothing short of a Muslim ban by another name. It is cruel and callous, espouses positions contrary to the professed values of the United States, and will certainly produce more problems than it purports to solve," Bayoumi wrote. "In other words, it's exactly like Donald Trump."
Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), likewise warned Friday, "'Extreme vetting' is just a euphemism for discriminating against Muslims. Identifying specific countries with Muslim majorities and carving out exceptions for minority religions flies in the face of the constitutional principle that bans the government from either favoring or discriminating against particular religions. Any effort to discriminate against Muslims and favor other religions runs afoul of the First Amendment."
Announcing the lawsuit Friday, CAIR national litigation director Lena F. Masri said in a statement, "There is no evidence that refugees--the most thoroughly vetted of all people entering our nation--are a threat to national security. This is an order that is based on bigotry, not reality."
Gadeir Abbas, a co-counsel in the lawsuit, added, "The courts must do what President Trump will not--ensure that our government refrains from segregating people based on their faith."
Rights groups are amassing in opposition to President Donald Trump's executive order banning immigrants from Muslim countries, which he signed Friday after a meeting with British Prime Minister Theresa May.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said it would file a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the memorandum, which bans immigrants from Syria indefinitely and halts arrivals from Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Somalia for 90 days.
Refugees who were in the air on the way to the U.S. on Friday when Trump signed his order were detained when they landed, the New York Times reported Saturday.
Meanwhile, the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) called on Trump to rescind the order, cautioning that the U.S. resettlement program was critical, particularly in a time of global turmoil.
"The needs of refugees and migrants worldwide have never been greater and the U.S. resettlement program is one of the most important in the world," the organizations said in a joint statement.
"Tears are running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight as a grand tradition of America, welcoming immigrants, that has existed since America was founded, has been stomped upon," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
"Taking in immigrants and refugees is not only humanitarian but has also boosted our economy and created jobs decade after decade. This is one of the most backward and nasty executive orders that the president has issued," he said.
The plan was announced earlier this week amid a flurry of executive orders cracking down on immigration.
The order, officially titled the Protection of the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States--which Trump termed "extreme vetting" designed to "keep terrorists out"--was more severe than expected and effectively blocks Muslims traveling to the U.S. from wide swaths of the Middle East and North Africa.
That's despite the fact that the U.S. already has the most rigorous screening process in the world, as the Washington Post points out. The memorandum also prioritizes admission for Christians and caps the total number of refugees entering the country in 2017 at 50,000, less than half what it was the previous year.
Moustafa Bayoumi, a Brooklyn College professor, wrote in an op-ed for the Guardian that the order means Trump is "now officially gunning for Muslims."
"The order is nothing short of a Muslim ban by another name. It is cruel and callous, espouses positions contrary to the professed values of the United States, and will certainly produce more problems than it purports to solve," Bayoumi wrote. "In other words, it's exactly like Donald Trump."
Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), likewise warned Friday, "'Extreme vetting' is just a euphemism for discriminating against Muslims. Identifying specific countries with Muslim majorities and carving out exceptions for minority religions flies in the face of the constitutional principle that bans the government from either favoring or discriminating against particular religions. Any effort to discriminate against Muslims and favor other religions runs afoul of the First Amendment."
Announcing the lawsuit Friday, CAIR national litigation director Lena F. Masri said in a statement, "There is no evidence that refugees--the most thoroughly vetted of all people entering our nation--are a threat to national security. This is an order that is based on bigotry, not reality."
Gadeir Abbas, a co-counsel in the lawsuit, added, "The courts must do what President Trump will not--ensure that our government refrains from segregating people based on their faith."