

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a New York Times op-ed published late Tuesday evening, Sen. Bernie Sanders issued a stark warning to the Democratic Party leadership that if they don't wake up to the profound dissatisfaction of the poor and working classes in the United States, they may very well experience a similar shock to the one experienced by many in the United Kingdom last week when a majority—fueled largely by financial frustrations—chose to leave the European Union.
"Could this rejection of the current form of the global economy happen in the United States? You bet it could." --Bernie Sanders: "Surprise, surprise. Workers in Britain, many of whom have seen a decline in their standard of living while the very rich in their country have become much richer, have turned their backs on the European Union and a globalized economy that is failing them and their children," Sanders writes.
"Could this rejection of the current form of the global economy happen in the United States?" he asks. "You bet it could."
Citing troubling metrics of massive income and wealth inequality both in the U.S. and around the globe, Sanders said the xenophobia and regressiveness represented by the rise of Donald Trump within the Republican Party and Friday's vote in favor of Brexit in the UK is the result of increasing numbers of people around the world who recognize that the economic system is designed to benefit the rich and powerful, not them disproportionately.
Progressives voices in the U.S. and Europe have been warning throughout the economic downturn which began with the financial meltdown of 2007 that if governments continued to ignore the root causes of inequality and the political demands of working class people, they would ultimately empower the xenophobic and fascist forces of the far-right.
Sanders' public warning comes as many establishment figures within the Democratic Party and in the corporate media express increasing frustration that Sanders has yet to formally suspend his campaign and endorse the presumptive nominee, Hillary Clinton. However, many rank-and-file Democrats have said they support Sanders' staying in the race to the convention. Meanwhile, besides saying he will vote for Clinton in November, he has repeatedly explained that his primary goals are to push the party in a more progressive direction while ensuring that Donald Trump is not elected president in the fall. The warning contained in his op-ed does not appear to contradict any of these aims.
"Let's be clear," Sanders writes. "The global economy is not working for most people in our country and the world. This is an economic model developed by the economic elite to benefit the economic elite. We need real change."
What's not needed and must be vigorously opposed, he added, is "the demagogy, bigotry and anti-immigrant sentiment that punctuated so much of the Leave campaign's rhetoric--and is central to Donald J. Trump's message."
What's needed instead to combat those forces, according to Sanders, is:
Amid an ongoing battle over drafting a new Democratic Party platform, Sanders argues that it is precisely the wrong time to put a lid on the populist demands that so many Democratic, progressive, and independent voters so clearly desire.
"The notion that Donald Trump could benefit from the same forces that gave the Leave proponents a majority in Britain should sound an alarm for the Democratic Party in the United States," the Sanders op-ed warns. "Millions of American voters, like the Leave supporters, are understandably angry and frustrated by the economic forces that are destroying the middle class."
But in what is a "pivotal" historical moment, he concludes, "the Democratic Party and a new Democratic president need to make clear that we stand with those who are struggling and who have been left behind. We must create national and global economies that work for all, not just a handful of billionaires."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a New York Times op-ed published late Tuesday evening, Sen. Bernie Sanders issued a stark warning to the Democratic Party leadership that if they don't wake up to the profound dissatisfaction of the poor and working classes in the United States, they may very well experience a similar shock to the one experienced by many in the United Kingdom last week when a majority—fueled largely by financial frustrations—chose to leave the European Union.
"Could this rejection of the current form of the global economy happen in the United States? You bet it could." --Bernie Sanders: "Surprise, surprise. Workers in Britain, many of whom have seen a decline in their standard of living while the very rich in their country have become much richer, have turned their backs on the European Union and a globalized economy that is failing them and their children," Sanders writes.
"Could this rejection of the current form of the global economy happen in the United States?" he asks. "You bet it could."
Citing troubling metrics of massive income and wealth inequality both in the U.S. and around the globe, Sanders said the xenophobia and regressiveness represented by the rise of Donald Trump within the Republican Party and Friday's vote in favor of Brexit in the UK is the result of increasing numbers of people around the world who recognize that the economic system is designed to benefit the rich and powerful, not them disproportionately.
Progressives voices in the U.S. and Europe have been warning throughout the economic downturn which began with the financial meltdown of 2007 that if governments continued to ignore the root causes of inequality and the political demands of working class people, they would ultimately empower the xenophobic and fascist forces of the far-right.
Sanders' public warning comes as many establishment figures within the Democratic Party and in the corporate media express increasing frustration that Sanders has yet to formally suspend his campaign and endorse the presumptive nominee, Hillary Clinton. However, many rank-and-file Democrats have said they support Sanders' staying in the race to the convention. Meanwhile, besides saying he will vote for Clinton in November, he has repeatedly explained that his primary goals are to push the party in a more progressive direction while ensuring that Donald Trump is not elected president in the fall. The warning contained in his op-ed does not appear to contradict any of these aims.
"Let's be clear," Sanders writes. "The global economy is not working for most people in our country and the world. This is an economic model developed by the economic elite to benefit the economic elite. We need real change."
What's not needed and must be vigorously opposed, he added, is "the demagogy, bigotry and anti-immigrant sentiment that punctuated so much of the Leave campaign's rhetoric--and is central to Donald J. Trump's message."
What's needed instead to combat those forces, according to Sanders, is:
Amid an ongoing battle over drafting a new Democratic Party platform, Sanders argues that it is precisely the wrong time to put a lid on the populist demands that so many Democratic, progressive, and independent voters so clearly desire.
"The notion that Donald Trump could benefit from the same forces that gave the Leave proponents a majority in Britain should sound an alarm for the Democratic Party in the United States," the Sanders op-ed warns. "Millions of American voters, like the Leave supporters, are understandably angry and frustrated by the economic forces that are destroying the middle class."
But in what is a "pivotal" historical moment, he concludes, "the Democratic Party and a new Democratic president need to make clear that we stand with those who are struggling and who have been left behind. We must create national and global economies that work for all, not just a handful of billionaires."
In a New York Times op-ed published late Tuesday evening, Sen. Bernie Sanders issued a stark warning to the Democratic Party leadership that if they don't wake up to the profound dissatisfaction of the poor and working classes in the United States, they may very well experience a similar shock to the one experienced by many in the United Kingdom last week when a majority—fueled largely by financial frustrations—chose to leave the European Union.
"Could this rejection of the current form of the global economy happen in the United States? You bet it could." --Bernie Sanders: "Surprise, surprise. Workers in Britain, many of whom have seen a decline in their standard of living while the very rich in their country have become much richer, have turned their backs on the European Union and a globalized economy that is failing them and their children," Sanders writes.
"Could this rejection of the current form of the global economy happen in the United States?" he asks. "You bet it could."
Citing troubling metrics of massive income and wealth inequality both in the U.S. and around the globe, Sanders said the xenophobia and regressiveness represented by the rise of Donald Trump within the Republican Party and Friday's vote in favor of Brexit in the UK is the result of increasing numbers of people around the world who recognize that the economic system is designed to benefit the rich and powerful, not them disproportionately.
Progressives voices in the U.S. and Europe have been warning throughout the economic downturn which began with the financial meltdown of 2007 that if governments continued to ignore the root causes of inequality and the political demands of working class people, they would ultimately empower the xenophobic and fascist forces of the far-right.
Sanders' public warning comes as many establishment figures within the Democratic Party and in the corporate media express increasing frustration that Sanders has yet to formally suspend his campaign and endorse the presumptive nominee, Hillary Clinton. However, many rank-and-file Democrats have said they support Sanders' staying in the race to the convention. Meanwhile, besides saying he will vote for Clinton in November, he has repeatedly explained that his primary goals are to push the party in a more progressive direction while ensuring that Donald Trump is not elected president in the fall. The warning contained in his op-ed does not appear to contradict any of these aims.
"Let's be clear," Sanders writes. "The global economy is not working for most people in our country and the world. This is an economic model developed by the economic elite to benefit the economic elite. We need real change."
What's not needed and must be vigorously opposed, he added, is "the demagogy, bigotry and anti-immigrant sentiment that punctuated so much of the Leave campaign's rhetoric--and is central to Donald J. Trump's message."
What's needed instead to combat those forces, according to Sanders, is:
Amid an ongoing battle over drafting a new Democratic Party platform, Sanders argues that it is precisely the wrong time to put a lid on the populist demands that so many Democratic, progressive, and independent voters so clearly desire.
"The notion that Donald Trump could benefit from the same forces that gave the Leave proponents a majority in Britain should sound an alarm for the Democratic Party in the United States," the Sanders op-ed warns. "Millions of American voters, like the Leave supporters, are understandably angry and frustrated by the economic forces that are destroying the middle class."
But in what is a "pivotal" historical moment, he concludes, "the Democratic Party and a new Democratic president need to make clear that we stand with those who are struggling and who have been left behind. We must create national and global economies that work for all, not just a handful of billionaires."