Ryan's GOP Regurgitates "Anti-Poverty" Policies that Amount to War on Poor
"It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate."
Continuing the GOP's war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new "anti-poverty" plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, "much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals"--and the last time around, those ideas weren't very popular.
Politico's John Bresnahan reports that much of the plan is
focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for those receiving federal welfare, food or housing assistance; more "flexibility" for state and local governments to improve programs, although what that means isn't always fully defined; consolidation of dozens of existing federal programs into fewer, better run efforts; improved accountability for federal programs while "rewarding" those which show the best results; more effectively target those Americans in greatest need of help; and reducing waste and duplication, a mantra for politicians in both parties every election year.
House Republicans call for the use of more "public-private partnerships" to fight poverty, better technology, and vastly improved metrics in measuring the effectiveness of federal programs, as well as more oversight by Congress into the hundreds of billions of dollars funneled to low-income Americans annually. "Altogether... total federal and state spending on programs for low-income people currently equals about $1 trillion per year," the GOP report states.
The plan also seeks to expand "school choice," which allocates public funds for charter schools and other alternatives; slash support for higher education Pell Grants; repeal the Labor Department's "fiduciary rule," which protects retirees from greedy brokers; and dismantle parts of the Dodd-Frank bank reform law--all in the name of reducing poverty, Ryan claims.
"The Republicans would like to shed their 'party of the rich' image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that."
--Simon Maloy, Salon
Unfortunately, Ryan's core argument--that anti-poverty spending has been inefficient--is spurious, political writer Simon Maloy wrote at Salon on Tuesday. In fact, programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have done their job quite well, he argued, pointing to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analysis that showed the program "kept about 10.3 million people out of poverty, including about 4.9 million children" in 2012 alone.
Yet "[w]hat Ryan and the House Republicans want to do," Maloy said, "is alter its funding mechanism and cut its overall funding to make it (and other anti-poverty programs) less responsive and less effective."
Indeed, Maloy wrote:
The Republicans would like to shed their "party of the rich" image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that - they're going to gut social programs that are working as they should be, all the while claiming that they're "fixing" a problem that doesn't really exist. It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate.
The anti-poverty plan is one of several proposals the GOP will unroll over the next three weeks as part of its election-year blueprint, titled "A Better Way." According to the Huffington Post, a proposal on national security will be released on Thursday while initiatives on regulation, constitutional authority, healthcare, and tax reform are in the pipeline.
On Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers lambasted not only the proposal itself but also Ryan's choice of location for the unveiling: a drug and alcohol rehab facility in Washington, D.C.
But perhaps it's not surprising that Ryan and establishment Republicans are so out of touch. As Philadelphia mom Tianna Gaines-Turner wrote in a powerful op-ed on Monday: "How would Congress ever know what they should do to address poverty if they don't ever speak to us?"
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Continuing the GOP's war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new "anti-poverty" plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, "much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals"--and the last time around, those ideas weren't very popular.
Politico's John Bresnahan reports that much of the plan is
focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for those receiving federal welfare, food or housing assistance; more "flexibility" for state and local governments to improve programs, although what that means isn't always fully defined; consolidation of dozens of existing federal programs into fewer, better run efforts; improved accountability for federal programs while "rewarding" those which show the best results; more effectively target those Americans in greatest need of help; and reducing waste and duplication, a mantra for politicians in both parties every election year.
House Republicans call for the use of more "public-private partnerships" to fight poverty, better technology, and vastly improved metrics in measuring the effectiveness of federal programs, as well as more oversight by Congress into the hundreds of billions of dollars funneled to low-income Americans annually. "Altogether... total federal and state spending on programs for low-income people currently equals about $1 trillion per year," the GOP report states.
The plan also seeks to expand "school choice," which allocates public funds for charter schools and other alternatives; slash support for higher education Pell Grants; repeal the Labor Department's "fiduciary rule," which protects retirees from greedy brokers; and dismantle parts of the Dodd-Frank bank reform law--all in the name of reducing poverty, Ryan claims.
"The Republicans would like to shed their 'party of the rich' image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that."
--Simon Maloy, Salon
Unfortunately, Ryan's core argument--that anti-poverty spending has been inefficient--is spurious, political writer Simon Maloy wrote at Salon on Tuesday. In fact, programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have done their job quite well, he argued, pointing to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analysis that showed the program "kept about 10.3 million people out of poverty, including about 4.9 million children" in 2012 alone.
Yet "[w]hat Ryan and the House Republicans want to do," Maloy said, "is alter its funding mechanism and cut its overall funding to make it (and other anti-poverty programs) less responsive and less effective."
Indeed, Maloy wrote:
The Republicans would like to shed their "party of the rich" image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that - they're going to gut social programs that are working as they should be, all the while claiming that they're "fixing" a problem that doesn't really exist. It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate.
The anti-poverty plan is one of several proposals the GOP will unroll over the next three weeks as part of its election-year blueprint, titled "A Better Way." According to the Huffington Post, a proposal on national security will be released on Thursday while initiatives on regulation, constitutional authority, healthcare, and tax reform are in the pipeline.
On Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers lambasted not only the proposal itself but also Ryan's choice of location for the unveiling: a drug and alcohol rehab facility in Washington, D.C.
But perhaps it's not surprising that Ryan and establishment Republicans are so out of touch. As Philadelphia mom Tianna Gaines-Turner wrote in a powerful op-ed on Monday: "How would Congress ever know what they should do to address poverty if they don't ever speak to us?"
Continuing the GOP's war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new "anti-poverty" plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, "much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals"--and the last time around, those ideas weren't very popular.
Politico's John Bresnahan reports that much of the plan is
focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for those receiving federal welfare, food or housing assistance; more "flexibility" for state and local governments to improve programs, although what that means isn't always fully defined; consolidation of dozens of existing federal programs into fewer, better run efforts; improved accountability for federal programs while "rewarding" those which show the best results; more effectively target those Americans in greatest need of help; and reducing waste and duplication, a mantra for politicians in both parties every election year.
House Republicans call for the use of more "public-private partnerships" to fight poverty, better technology, and vastly improved metrics in measuring the effectiveness of federal programs, as well as more oversight by Congress into the hundreds of billions of dollars funneled to low-income Americans annually. "Altogether... total federal and state spending on programs for low-income people currently equals about $1 trillion per year," the GOP report states.
The plan also seeks to expand "school choice," which allocates public funds for charter schools and other alternatives; slash support for higher education Pell Grants; repeal the Labor Department's "fiduciary rule," which protects retirees from greedy brokers; and dismantle parts of the Dodd-Frank bank reform law--all in the name of reducing poverty, Ryan claims.
"The Republicans would like to shed their 'party of the rich' image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that."
--Simon Maloy, Salon
Unfortunately, Ryan's core argument--that anti-poverty spending has been inefficient--is spurious, political writer Simon Maloy wrote at Salon on Tuesday. In fact, programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have done their job quite well, he argued, pointing to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analysis that showed the program "kept about 10.3 million people out of poverty, including about 4.9 million children" in 2012 alone.
Yet "[w]hat Ryan and the House Republicans want to do," Maloy said, "is alter its funding mechanism and cut its overall funding to make it (and other anti-poverty programs) less responsive and less effective."
Indeed, Maloy wrote:
The Republicans would like to shed their "party of the rich" image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that - they're going to gut social programs that are working as they should be, all the while claiming that they're "fixing" a problem that doesn't really exist. It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate.
The anti-poverty plan is one of several proposals the GOP will unroll over the next three weeks as part of its election-year blueprint, titled "A Better Way." According to the Huffington Post, a proposal on national security will be released on Thursday while initiatives on regulation, constitutional authority, healthcare, and tax reform are in the pipeline.
On Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers lambasted not only the proposal itself but also Ryan's choice of location for the unveiling: a drug and alcohol rehab facility in Washington, D.C.
But perhaps it's not surprising that Ryan and establishment Republicans are so out of touch. As Philadelphia mom Tianna Gaines-Turner wrote in a powerful op-ed on Monday: "How would Congress ever know what they should do to address poverty if they don't ever speak to us?"