Clinton Camp says She's Been Forced to the Left Enough Already
Clinton ally tells The Hill, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Fresh after Bernie Sanders' call for "a fifty-state strategy... to plant the flag of progressive politics" nationwide, new reporting on Friday suggests that Hillary Clinton's campaign won't budge further to the left.
After Clinton claimed more victories in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania this week, Sanders said, "We are in this race until the last vote is cast," adding that his campaign would head "to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia with as many delegates as possible to fight for a progressive party platform."
Observers say that steps forward on issues that would constitute such a platform can already be seen in the race. As Max Ehrenfreund writes at Washington Post's Wonkblog Friday,
In the course of fending off Sanders's challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders's views.
Ehrenfreund writes that that's not all that surprising, given the factors that are different from Sanders. He points to data from the Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues, including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy, are becoming more progressive. He notes the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security.
However, Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former Secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."
While political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that Clinton should not "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else, including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.
Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
As Sanders sees it, the Democratic Party as a whole is in crisis, saying Thursday that it "has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."
Speaking to thousands at a rally in Eugene, Ore., Sanders said, "The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side of working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?"
Sanders added, "Now our job is not just to revitalize the Democratic Party—not only to open the doors to young people and working people—our job is to revitalize American democracy."
Ehrenfreund concludes in his piece that despite securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders' successful pushes on key issues mean "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Bloomberg's delegate tracker shows Clinton leading Sanders with 1,645 pledged delegates compared to his 1,318.
The next Democratic primary is in Indiana, with 92 delegates, on May 3.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Fresh after Bernie Sanders' call for "a fifty-state strategy... to plant the flag of progressive politics" nationwide, new reporting on Friday suggests that Hillary Clinton's campaign won't budge further to the left.
After Clinton claimed more victories in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania this week, Sanders said, "We are in this race until the last vote is cast," adding that his campaign would head "to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia with as many delegates as possible to fight for a progressive party platform."
Observers say that steps forward on issues that would constitute such a platform can already be seen in the race. As Max Ehrenfreund writes at Washington Post's Wonkblog Friday,
In the course of fending off Sanders's challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders's views.
Ehrenfreund writes that that's not all that surprising, given the factors that are different from Sanders. He points to data from the Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues, including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy, are becoming more progressive. He notes the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security.
However, Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former Secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."
While political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that Clinton should not "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else, including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.
Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
As Sanders sees it, the Democratic Party as a whole is in crisis, saying Thursday that it "has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."
Speaking to thousands at a rally in Eugene, Ore., Sanders said, "The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side of working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?"
Sanders added, "Now our job is not just to revitalize the Democratic Party—not only to open the doors to young people and working people—our job is to revitalize American democracy."
Ehrenfreund concludes in his piece that despite securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders' successful pushes on key issues mean "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Bloomberg's delegate tracker shows Clinton leading Sanders with 1,645 pledged delegates compared to his 1,318.
The next Democratic primary is in Indiana, with 92 delegates, on May 3.
Fresh after Bernie Sanders' call for "a fifty-state strategy... to plant the flag of progressive politics" nationwide, new reporting on Friday suggests that Hillary Clinton's campaign won't budge further to the left.
After Clinton claimed more victories in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania this week, Sanders said, "We are in this race until the last vote is cast," adding that his campaign would head "to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia with as many delegates as possible to fight for a progressive party platform."
Observers say that steps forward on issues that would constitute such a platform can already be seen in the race. As Max Ehrenfreund writes at Washington Post's Wonkblog Friday,
In the course of fending off Sanders's challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders's views.
Ehrenfreund writes that that's not all that surprising, given the factors that are different from Sanders. He points to data from the Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues, including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy, are becoming more progressive. He notes the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security.
However, Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former Secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."
While political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that Clinton should not "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else, including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.
Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
As Sanders sees it, the Democratic Party as a whole is in crisis, saying Thursday that it "has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."
Speaking to thousands at a rally in Eugene, Ore., Sanders said, "The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side of working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?"
Sanders added, "Now our job is not just to revitalize the Democratic Party—not only to open the doors to young people and working people—our job is to revitalize American democracy."
Ehrenfreund concludes in his piece that despite securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders' successful pushes on key issues mean "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Bloomberg's delegate tracker shows Clinton leading Sanders with 1,645 pledged delegates compared to his 1,318.
The next Democratic primary is in Indiana, with 92 delegates, on May 3.