SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New Polls Serve as a Wake-Up Call: Trump Could Win Presidency
The blunt assumption has dominated much of the political world's thinking for months: "There's simply no way Americans will elect an unqualified, racist television personality to be president of the United States. That's just not just who we are as a people."
And throughout most of the 2016 election season, there's been a steady stream of evidence to bolster the thesis. Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump has never reached insurmountable heights, but her national advantage has nevertheless had the benefit of longevity.
Sep 15, 2016
The blunt assumption has dominated much of the political world's thinking for months: "There's simply no way Americans will elect an unqualified, racist television personality to be president of the United States. That's just not just who we are as a people."
And throughout most of the 2016 election season, there's been a steady stream of evidence to bolster the thesis. Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump has never reached insurmountable heights, but her national advantage has nevertheless had the benefit of longevity.
But as summer gets ready to turn to fall, it's time to take a fresh look at old assumptions about the presidential race.
Yesterday afternoon, the latest national Quinnipiac poll showed Clinton leading Trump by five, 48% to 43%, which is half the advantage she enjoyed in the same poll in late August. Once third-party candidates are added to the mix, the Democrat's lead shrinks to just two points, 41% to 39%.
This morning, another major national poll pointed to an even closer contest.
With less than eight weeks before Election Day, Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton are locked in a tight contest, with both candidates still struggling to win the confidence of their respective bases, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.
Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic nominee, has the support of 46 percent of likely voters nationwide, to 44 percent for Mr. Trump, the Republican, including those who said they were leaning toward a candidate.... In a four-way race, Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton are tied at 42 percent each.
Note, both of these polls were conducted late last week through early this week, so respondents were likely aware of intense media coverage of Clinton's pneumonia and "deplorables" comment in reference to Trump's extremist supporters.
And if these survey results weren't quite enough to cause Democratic handwringing, new state-based polling from CNN almost certainly did the trick.
In fact, CNN found Trump leading Clinton in the nation's two largest swing states - Ohio and Florida - by margins of five and three points, respectively, in polls that included the third-party candidates.
This data followed a new poll from Monmouth University, which showed Trump also inching past Clinton in Nevada, where the Republican leads 44% to 42% in a four-way contest.
As things stand, Clinton is still widely seen as the favorite and the odds remain in her favor. But there's also no denying the fact that the race has tightened and the possibility of Donald Trump getting elected president is quite real.
Don't be too surprised if the polls themselves have some effect on the outcome: it seems quite plausible to me that there are voters who might have been tempted to sit this one out, assuming that Trump could not win, who'll be more inclined to show up in light of polling showing a nearly tied race.
On a related note, the more uncertain the outcome, the greater the possibility that engaged Americans will give a darn. Matt Yglesias noted on Twitter last night, "If you're freaking out about the polls, [it's] also worth asking yourself how much time you plan to spend volunteering over the next seven weeks."
It's a fair point. If you want Trump to win, there's fresh evidence that your preferred candidate is within striking distance of actually getting elected. If you want Clinton to win, you can no longer assume this race is in the bag - you and your allies are going to have to go earn it.
Election Day is 54 days away. The first presidential debate is 11 days away.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 MSNBC
The blunt assumption has dominated much of the political world's thinking for months: "There's simply no way Americans will elect an unqualified, racist television personality to be president of the United States. That's just not just who we are as a people."
And throughout most of the 2016 election season, there's been a steady stream of evidence to bolster the thesis. Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump has never reached insurmountable heights, but her national advantage has nevertheless had the benefit of longevity.
But as summer gets ready to turn to fall, it's time to take a fresh look at old assumptions about the presidential race.
Yesterday afternoon, the latest national Quinnipiac poll showed Clinton leading Trump by five, 48% to 43%, which is half the advantage she enjoyed in the same poll in late August. Once third-party candidates are added to the mix, the Democrat's lead shrinks to just two points, 41% to 39%.
This morning, another major national poll pointed to an even closer contest.
With less than eight weeks before Election Day, Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton are locked in a tight contest, with both candidates still struggling to win the confidence of their respective bases, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.
Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic nominee, has the support of 46 percent of likely voters nationwide, to 44 percent for Mr. Trump, the Republican, including those who said they were leaning toward a candidate.... In a four-way race, Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton are tied at 42 percent each.
Note, both of these polls were conducted late last week through early this week, so respondents were likely aware of intense media coverage of Clinton's pneumonia and "deplorables" comment in reference to Trump's extremist supporters.
And if these survey results weren't quite enough to cause Democratic handwringing, new state-based polling from CNN almost certainly did the trick.
In fact, CNN found Trump leading Clinton in the nation's two largest swing states - Ohio and Florida - by margins of five and three points, respectively, in polls that included the third-party candidates.
This data followed a new poll from Monmouth University, which showed Trump also inching past Clinton in Nevada, where the Republican leads 44% to 42% in a four-way contest.
As things stand, Clinton is still widely seen as the favorite and the odds remain in her favor. But there's also no denying the fact that the race has tightened and the possibility of Donald Trump getting elected president is quite real.
Don't be too surprised if the polls themselves have some effect on the outcome: it seems quite plausible to me that there are voters who might have been tempted to sit this one out, assuming that Trump could not win, who'll be more inclined to show up in light of polling showing a nearly tied race.
On a related note, the more uncertain the outcome, the greater the possibility that engaged Americans will give a darn. Matt Yglesias noted on Twitter last night, "If you're freaking out about the polls, [it's] also worth asking yourself how much time you plan to spend volunteering over the next seven weeks."
It's a fair point. If you want Trump to win, there's fresh evidence that your preferred candidate is within striking distance of actually getting elected. If you want Clinton to win, you can no longer assume this race is in the bag - you and your allies are going to have to go earn it.
Election Day is 54 days away. The first presidential debate is 11 days away.
The blunt assumption has dominated much of the political world's thinking for months: "There's simply no way Americans will elect an unqualified, racist television personality to be president of the United States. That's just not just who we are as a people."
And throughout most of the 2016 election season, there's been a steady stream of evidence to bolster the thesis. Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump has never reached insurmountable heights, but her national advantage has nevertheless had the benefit of longevity.
But as summer gets ready to turn to fall, it's time to take a fresh look at old assumptions about the presidential race.
Yesterday afternoon, the latest national Quinnipiac poll showed Clinton leading Trump by five, 48% to 43%, which is half the advantage she enjoyed in the same poll in late August. Once third-party candidates are added to the mix, the Democrat's lead shrinks to just two points, 41% to 39%.
This morning, another major national poll pointed to an even closer contest.
With less than eight weeks before Election Day, Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton are locked in a tight contest, with both candidates still struggling to win the confidence of their respective bases, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.
Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic nominee, has the support of 46 percent of likely voters nationwide, to 44 percent for Mr. Trump, the Republican, including those who said they were leaning toward a candidate.... In a four-way race, Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton are tied at 42 percent each.
Note, both of these polls were conducted late last week through early this week, so respondents were likely aware of intense media coverage of Clinton's pneumonia and "deplorables" comment in reference to Trump's extremist supporters.
And if these survey results weren't quite enough to cause Democratic handwringing, new state-based polling from CNN almost certainly did the trick.
In fact, CNN found Trump leading Clinton in the nation's two largest swing states - Ohio and Florida - by margins of five and three points, respectively, in polls that included the third-party candidates.
This data followed a new poll from Monmouth University, which showed Trump also inching past Clinton in Nevada, where the Republican leads 44% to 42% in a four-way contest.
As things stand, Clinton is still widely seen as the favorite and the odds remain in her favor. But there's also no denying the fact that the race has tightened and the possibility of Donald Trump getting elected president is quite real.
Don't be too surprised if the polls themselves have some effect on the outcome: it seems quite plausible to me that there are voters who might have been tempted to sit this one out, assuming that Trump could not win, who'll be more inclined to show up in light of polling showing a nearly tied race.
On a related note, the more uncertain the outcome, the greater the possibility that engaged Americans will give a darn. Matt Yglesias noted on Twitter last night, "If you're freaking out about the polls, [it's] also worth asking yourself how much time you plan to spend volunteering over the next seven weeks."
It's a fair point. If you want Trump to win, there's fresh evidence that your preferred candidate is within striking distance of actually getting elected. If you want Clinton to win, you can no longer assume this race is in the bag - you and your allies are going to have to go earn it.
Election Day is 54 days away. The first presidential debate is 11 days away.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.