To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
  • Home
  • jeff merkley
  • lead
  • troy jackson
  • michael brown
  • senate
  • center for biological diversity
  • arizona
  • election 2022
  • self-immolation
  • ukraine
  • russia
  • gaza
  • critical race theory
  • palestine
  • jan 6 insurrection
  • covid-19
  • george floyd
  • black lives matter
  • stacey abrams
  • trumpism
  • kyle rittenhouse
  • georgia
  • selma
  • john lewis
  • marjorie taylor greene
  • jared kushner
  • bernie sanders
  • sarah huckabee sanders
  • joe biden
  • kamala harris
  • jon ossoff
  • raphael warnock
  • election
  • midterm elections
  • big oil
  • fossil fuels
  • workers
  • inequality
  • minimum wage
  • poverty
  • environment
  • africa
  • food
  • hunger
  • animal rights
  • julian assange
  • amnesty international
  • united kingdom
  • wikileaks
  • biodiversity
  • new mexico
  • democracy
  • taxation
  • campaign finance
  • us supreme court
  • public health
  • oxfam
  • afghanistan
  • congressional progressive caucus
  • fight for the future
  • net neutrality
  • open internet
  • free press
  • anti-semitism
  • bend the arc
  • texas
  • cop26
  • 350.org
  • fcc
  • corporate power
  • jamie dimon
  • jpmorgan chase
  • stop the money pipeline
  • coronavirus
  • imf
  • jubilee usa
  • vaccines
  • florida
  • sustainability
  • center for responsive politics
  • amazon.com
  • drug policy alliance
  • marijuana
  • public citizen
  • environment america
  • renewable energy
  • aclu
  • war crimes
  • war on terror
  • immigration
  • refugees
  • arctic national wildlife refuge (anwr)
  • fossil fuel divestment
  • veterans
  • veterans for peace
  • oklahoma
  • racism
  • democratic party
  • people's action
  • republican party
  • us congress
  • budget
  • hyde amendment
  • reproductive rights
  • women
  • food & water watch
  • codepink
  • militarism
  • pentagon
  • us military
  • sunrise movement
  • filibuster
  • us house
  • war on drugs
  • common cause
  • indivisible
  • mitch mcconnell
  • stand up america
  • arctic
  • muslim ban
  • g7
  • patriotic millionaires
  • oregon
  • chris murphy
  • education
  • jamaal bowman
  • civil rights
  • ed markey
  • technology
  • infrastructure
  • moveon.org
  • egypt
  • journalism
  • barack obama
  • epa
  • pollution
  • war on science
  • voting rights
  • environmental working group
  • friends of the earth
  • icc
  • shell
  • methane
  • indigenous
  • line 3
  • healthcare
  • privatization
  • unemployment
  • labor
  • green new deal
  • data for progress
  • islamophobia
  • virginia
  • us department of justice
  • us senate
  • genocide
  • coal
  • iea
  • new york
  • facebook
  • police
  • big pharma
  • justice democrats
  • social security works
  • extreme weather
  • pesticides
  • bds
  • israel
  • plastics
  • fda
  • greenpeace
  • afge
  • alexandria ocasio-cortez
  • arms trade
  • benjamin netanyahu
  • cair
  • minnesota
  • super pacs
  • janet yellen
  • oil change international
  • wall street
  • factory farms
  • extremism
  • endangered species act
  • civil liberties
  • colombia
  • tony blinken
  • paris agreement
  • campaign legal center
  • fec
  • wto
  • criminal justice system
  • philadelphia
  • 9/11
  • center for food safety
  • monsanto
  • central america
  • mexico
  • children
  • mark pocan
  • rashida tlaib
  • chuck grassley
  • aipac
  • chuck schumer
  • jewish voice for peace
  • china
  • guantanamo
  • roe v. wade
  • jay inslee
  • at&t
  • corporate personhood
  • media
  • baltimore
  • naral
  • nina turner
  • center for reproductive rights
  • elon musk
  • jeff bezos
  • earthjustice
  • moveon
  • privacy
  • japan
  • rahm emanuel
  • apartheid
  • progressive international
  • coronavirus relief
  • agriculture
  • federal reserve
  • g20
  • people power
  • pennsylvania
  • wolves
  • demand progress
  • massachusetts
  • union of concerned scientists
  • human rights
  • nafta
  • asia
  • boris johnson
  • idaho
  • debt
  • sudan
  • world bank
  • keystone xl
  • syria
  • ilhan omar
  • kirsten gillibrand
  • usda
  • people for the american way
  • ron desantis
  • conservation
  • chevron
  • ecuador
  • steven donziger
  • deb haaland
  • us department of interior
    US-POLITICS-TRUMP-RETURN

    Fearing Midterm Loss, Trump Once Again Says 'We Shouldn't Even Have an Election'

    "Take Trump at his word here," said one Minnesota attorney. "But know his word isn’t law."

    As armed federal agents roam the streets of American cities and amid threats to declare the Insurrection Act and use military force to quell protests in Minneapolis, President Donald Trump said once again that the next elections should be canceled because he expects his party to lose.

    “It's some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don't win the midterms,” Trump said in a closed-door interview published by Reuters on Thursday. He added that because he's accomplished so much during his first term, “when you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election.”

    It's at least the second time this month that Trump has floated the idea. He previously did so less directly during a speech commemorating the five-year anniversary of the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection, during which his supporters attempted to violently overturn his 2020 election loss to former President Joe Biden after he told them it was the result of fraud.

    During that speech at the Kennedy Center, Trump described it as an outrage that Republicans even have to contest elections against Democrats later this year, suggesting canceling the election, but later backing off the idea.

    "How do we even run against these people?" Trump said. "I won't say cancel the election; they should cancel the election, because the fake news would say: 'He wants the elections canceled. He's a dictator.' They always call me a dictator."

    In the same speech, he warned: "You gotta win the midterms. Because if we don't win the midterms, they'll find a reason to impeach me. I'll get impeached."

    — (@)

    Trump is correct that sitting presidents rarely see their parties do well in midterm elections two years after being elected. No sitting president has seen their party gain seats in both the House of Representatives and the Senate since 2002, when former President George W. Bush's Republican Party was able to capitalize on fears of terrorism following the September 11 attacks just over a year before.

    The president's grip on a legislative trifecta is nearly as thin as it could possibly be, with Republicans holding just 218 seats to the Democrats' 213.

    Democrats were already favored to retake the House in November, and now appear even more likely to do so amid Trump's consistent unpopularity. On Thursday, the nonpartisan Cook Political Report moved a total of 18 House races in the Democrats' direction in its latest assessment of the odds to win the chamber.

    — (@)

    However, Trump is wrong that elections can be "canceled," at least legally. Under the Elections Clause in Article I, Section 4 of the US Constitution, the administration of elections is vested in the states, with Congress holding the power to "make or alter such regulations." The president has no authority to determine the timing of federal elections.

    The United States has never once postponed a presidential election in its nearly 250-year history: They were carried out on schedule during periods of extraordinary crisis, including the Civil War in 1864, the influenza epidemic in 1918 and 1920, and World War II in 1942 and 1944.

    Elections were also carried out on schedule in 2020, though Trump, who was then the president running for a second consecutive term, also suggested that they should be delayed then due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

    At the time, he claimed that the widespread use of mail-in ballots, necessitated by the illness, would make it "the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history” and asked if he should "delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???” But Trump never pursued the idea seriously, as it was shot down by top Republicans.

    After losing the election, he wrote in 2022 that what he called “a Massive Fraud” allowed for the “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution" in order to address the 2020 result.

    Trump has more recently suggested that a war could give him the ticket to cancel elections. While speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in August of 2025, he spoke approvingly of the leader's invocation of martial law and suspension of elections following Russia's invasion three years prior.

    — (@)

    "So during war, you can't have elections?" Trump said with a smile. "So let me just say, three and a half years from now— so you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections? Oh, that’s good.”

    Since then, Trump has notably launched a war to take over Venezuela's oil and threatened to launch several more, including with Greenland, Iran, and Mexico.

    Asked on Thursday about why the president keeps talking about canceling elections, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: "The president was simply joking. He was saying, 'We're doing such a great job, we're doing everything the American people thought, maybe we should just keep rolling.' But he was speaking facetiously."

    Ryan Broderick, the writer of the political newsletter Garbage Day, said that with his latest comments—and "the threats of invoking the Insurrection Act in Minnesota this morning—he is very clearly exploring how to cancel the midterms."

    Trump has in recent days suggested using the National Guard to seize voting machines, stating that he regretted not doing so as he attempted to overturn his loss in 2020. His handpicked election officials have previously urged him to declare a "national emergency" that they said would give the federal government unprecedented powers to override the states and write their own election rules.

    On the question of canceling the midterms outright, Ken White, a criminal defense attorney and First Amendment litigator, agreed that Trump "wants to, it’s plausible he’ll try, and his people would support it," but said "it’s vastly harder and more complicated than people are suggesting and can’t be done by his fiat."

    New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie argued that even if Trump wanted to cancel the midterms, he would face many logistical hurdles in doing so.

    "How does Trump force 50 separate state boards of election to cancel their midterms?" he asked on social media. "How does he convince Republican House members to quit their jobs and give up their paychecks?"

    "[US Immigration and Customs Enforcement] can't even deal with irate middle-aged Midwesterners. How does he occupy hundreds, if not thousands, of polling sites and precincts?" he continued. "Trump v. Illinois clarified that he has no legal authority to unilaterally commandeer national guards. How does he move forward from there?"

    Minnesota lawyer Andrew Rothstein encouraged people to "take Trump at his word here... but know his word isn’t law."

    Even if this year's elections go forward as planned, Trump is working to influence the results by bullying Republican state legislators to rig their congressional maps for the GOP and attempting to seize sensitive voter data.

    Fearing Midterm Loss, Trump Once Again Says 'We Shouldn't Even Have an Election'

    As armed federal agents roam the streets of American cities and amid threats to declare the Insurrection Act and use military force to quell protests in Minneapolis, President Donald Trump said once again that the next elections should be canceled because he expects his party to lose.

    “It's some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don't win the midterms,” Trump said in a closed-door interview published by Reuters on Thursday. He added that because he's accomplished so much during his first term, “when you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election.”

    It's at least the second time this month that Trump has floated the idea. He previously did so less directly during a speech commemorating the five-year anniversary of the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection, during which his supporters attempted to violently overturn his 2020 election loss to former President Joe Biden after he told them it was the result of fraud.

    During that speech at the Kennedy Center, Trump described it as an outrage that Republicans even have to contest elections against Democrats later this year, suggesting canceling the election, but later backing off the idea.

    "How do we even run against these people?" Trump said. "I won't say cancel the election; they should cancel the election, because the fake news would say: 'He wants the elections canceled. He's a dictator.' They always call me a dictator."

    In the same speech, he warned: "You gotta win the midterms. Because if we don't win the midterms, they'll find a reason to impeach me. I'll get impeached."

    — (@)

    Trump is correct that sitting presidents rarely see their parties do well in midterm elections two years after being elected. No sitting president has seen their party gain seats in both the House of Representatives and the Senate since 2002, when former President George W. Bush's Republican Party was able to capitalize on fears of terrorism following the September 11 attacks just over a year before.

    The president's grip on a legislative trifecta is nearly as thin as it could possibly be, with Republicans holding just 218 seats to the Democrats' 213.

    Democrats were already favored to retake the House in November, and now appear even more likely to do so amid Trump's consistent unpopularity. On Thursday, the nonpartisan Cook Political Report moved a total of 18 House races in the Democrats' direction in its latest assessment of the odds to win the chamber.

    — (@)

    However, Trump is wrong that elections can be "canceled," at least legally. Under the Elections Clause in Article I, Section 4 of the US Constitution, the administration of elections is vested in the states, with Congress holding the power to "make or alter such regulations." The president has no authority to determine the timing of federal elections.

    The United States has never once postponed a presidential election in its nearly 250-year history: They were carried out on schedule during periods of extraordinary crisis, including the Civil War in 1864, the influenza epidemic in 1918 and 1920, and World War II in 1942 and 1944.

    Elections were also carried out on schedule in 2020, though Trump, who was then the president running for a second consecutive term, also suggested that they should be delayed then due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

    At the time, he claimed that the widespread use of mail-in ballots, necessitated by the illness, would make it "the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history” and asked if he should "delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???” But Trump never pursued the idea seriously, as it was shot down by top Republicans.

    After losing the election, he wrote in 2022 that what he called “a Massive Fraud” allowed for the “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution" in order to address the 2020 result.

    Trump has more recently suggested that a war could give him the ticket to cancel elections. While speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in August of 2025, he spoke approvingly of the leader's invocation of martial law and suspension of elections following Russia's invasion three years prior.

    — (@)

    "So during war, you can't have elections?" Trump said with a smile. "So let me just say, three and a half years from now— so you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections? Oh, that’s good.”

    Since then, Trump has notably launched a war to take over Venezuela's oil and threatened to launch several more, including with Greenland, Iran, and Mexico.

    Asked on Thursday about why the president keeps talking about canceling elections, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: "The president was simply joking. He was saying, 'We're doing such a great job, we're doing everything the American people thought, maybe we should just keep rolling.' But he was speaking facetiously."

    Ryan Broderick, the writer of the political newsletter Garbage Day, said that with his latest comments—and "the threats of invoking the Insurrection Act in Minnesota this morning—he is very clearly exploring how to cancel the midterms."

    Trump has in recent days suggested using the National Guard to seize voting machines, stating that he regretted not doing so as he attempted to overturn his loss in 2020. His handpicked election officials have previously urged him to declare a "national emergency" that they said would give the federal government unprecedented powers to override the states and write their own election rules.

    On the question of canceling the midterms outright, Ken White, a criminal defense attorney and First Amendment litigator, agreed that Trump "wants to, it’s plausible he’ll try, and his people would support it," but said "it’s vastly harder and more complicated than people are suggesting and can’t be done by his fiat."

    New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie argued that even if Trump wanted to cancel the midterms, he would face many logistical hurdles in doing so.

    "How does Trump force 50 separate state boards of election to cancel their midterms?" he asked on social media. "How does he convince Republican House members to quit their jobs and give up their paychecks?"

    "[US Immigration and Customs Enforcement] can't even deal with irate middle-aged Midwesterners. How does he occupy hundreds, if not thousands, of polling sites and precincts?" he continued. "Trump v. Illinois clarified that he has no legal authority to unilaterally commandeer national guards. How does he move forward from there?"

    Minnesota lawyer Andrew Rothstein encouraged people to "take Trump at his word here... but know his word isn’t law."

    Even if this year's elections go forward as planned, Trump is working to influence the results by bullying Republican state legislators to rig their congressional maps for the GOP and attempting to seize sensitive voter data.

    Common Dreams. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
    Common Dreams Globe
    LATEST NEWSOPINIONCLIMATEECONOMY POLITICS RIGHTS & JUSTICEWAR & PEACE
    LATEST NEWS
    OPINION
    Common DreamsTo inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

    hindutva

    Narendra Modi speaks to supporters

    ​Modi Slammed for 'Direct Attack on Muslims of India' in Campaign 'Hate Speech'

    "Modi's rhetoric against Muslims is extremely divisive and dangerous," warned one critic. "It would only fuel more hate and violence against the already battered community."

    Brett Wilkins
    Apr 22, 2024

    Critics on Monday condemned far-right Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for what one group called a "hateful and dangerous" campaign speech in which he claimed that Muslim "infiltrators" would steal Indians' wealth if the opposition wins parliamentary elections that began last week.

    Speaking to supporters at a rally in the western state of Rajasthan on Sunday, Modi said that the manifesto of the opposition Indian National Congress (INC) party details how to calculate "the amount of gold that mothers and sisters have" so that it can be redistributed to Muslims.

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    islamophobia
    india
    Indians protest the arrest of Arvind Kejriwal

    Modi Government Crackdown on Dissent Hits 'Crisis Point' Before Indian Elections

    "The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," said one Amnesty International campaigner.

    Brett Wilkins
    Mar 22, 2024

    As India's right-wing government cracks down on opposition ahead of next month's general elections, Amnesty International on Friday urged authorities to "stop weaponizing the criminal justice system to intimidate and harass" political candidates, activists, and others.

    Protests broke out in the capital New Delhi and other Indian cities after police on Thursday arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, an opposition leader from the Aam Aadmi Party, over corruption allegations AAP members say are politically motivated. Two other AAP leaders were previously arrested in connection with the same case, which involves the alleged favoring of certain alcohol vendors and illegal campaign financing.

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    bjp
    india
    Narendra Modi consecrating Ram Mandir in Ayodhya

    'India Lurches Toward Full-Fledged Fascism' as Modi Opens Contentious Hindu Temple

    "The people of India have struggled for decades to secure a democracy that is secular, just, and equal. Modi must not be permitted to rob them of it now," admonished Progressive International's cabinet.

    Brett Wilkins
    Jan 22, 2024

    The executive body of Progressive International warned Monday of the accelerating erosion of Indian democracy as right-wing Prime Minister Narendra Modi officially consecrated a highly controversial Hindu temple on the former site of a 16th-century Muslim mosque destroyed a generation ago by a Hindu nationalist mob.

    Modi heralded the "advent of a new era" as he spoke outside Ram Mandir, a temple to the Hindu deity figure Ram—who epitomizes the triumph of good over evil—in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The small city of approximately 55,000 inhabitants is known for its religious diversity and long history of peaceful coexistence between Hindus and Muslims.

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    india
    india
    Nuh, India home demolitions

    Indian Court Suggests BJP-Led State's Demolition of Muslim Homes Could Be 'Ethnic Cleansing'

    The tribunal's order to stop razing buildings comes amid escalating deadly violence perpetrated primarily by far-right Hindu supremacists against Muslims and other minorities.

    Brett Wilkins
    Aug 08, 2023

    An Indian high court on Monday ordered a halt to the destruction of Muslim homes and businesses in a district of Haryana state by the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party-led government, acts the tribunal suggested are "an exercise in ethnic cleansing."

    Justices G.S. Sandhawalia and Harpreet Kaur Jeewan of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Chandigarh issued a notice to the BJP-led Haryana state government stating that no demolitions could be carried out in the Nuh and Gurugram districts unless proper legal procedures are followed, The Hindu reported.

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    bjp
    india

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

    Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

    subscribe
    below
    * indicates required
    True
    True
    Follow Us
    Most Popular

    Top DOJ Officials Resign After Being Cut Off From Renee Good Killing Probe

    Schumer, Jeffries Refuse to Join Democrats' Growing Calls to Slash ICE Spending

    Kristi Noem Goes on TV and Lies Through Her Teeth (Again) About ICE Killing of Renee Nicole Good

    Ex-Presidents, What More Do You Need to See Before Calling for Trump's Impeachment?

    After Claiming Maduro Was Its Kingpin, DOJ Now Admits in Court That 'Cartel De Los Soles' Isn't a Real Group

    Hours After US Citizen Shot Dead by ICE, JD Vance Says ‘Door-to-Door’ Operations Are Coming

    'You Are Murderers!' 'Get the F*ck Out!': Fury at ICE Agents Boils in Minneapolis

    Omar Warns Trump Aims to Provoke Enough Agitation in Minnesota So He Can Declare 'Martial Law'

    'Goebbels Could Not Have Improved On This': DHS Spreads 'Propaganda' on ICE Killing as Violence Mounts

    'Where Were You Born?' ICE Conducting Show-Me-Your-Papers Stops in Minnesota Neighborhoods

    We cover the issues the corporate media never will.
    Please support our journalism.

    Fearing Midterm Loss, Trump Once Again Says 'We Shouldn't Even Have an Election'

    "Take Trump at his word here," said one Minnesota attorney. "But know his word isn’t law."