SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
February, 10 2013, 07:00am EDT
Contact:
Anna-Lisa Castle, KyotoNOW!, Resolution Sponsor,(312.330.7998,),Julie Fiore, KyotoNOW!, Media Coordinator,(845.240.8288,)
Cornell Student Assembly Passes Resolution to Divest from Fossil Fuels In Landslide Vote
Who:KyotoNOW!, Cornell's student climate justice organiztion; Cornell Student Assembly; Resolution co-sponsors Sarah Balik (Student Assembly), Anna-Lisa Castle (KyotoNOW!), and Becca Macies (KyotoNOW!)
Ithaca, NY
Who:KyotoNOW!, Cornell's student climate justice organiztion; Cornell Student Assembly; Resolution co-sponsors Sarah Balik (Student Assembly), Anna-Lisa Castle (KyotoNOW!), and Becca Macies (KyotoNOW!)
What: The Student Assembly passed Resolution 32: Toward a Responsible Endowment in a landslide "sense of the body" vote of 22 to 2. This resolution calls for full divestment of Cornell's $5+ billion endowment from the fossil fuel industry by 2020 and for 30% of those divested funds to be reinvested in sustainable options by 2030. A "sense of the body" vote is an official endorsement from the student body, and not legislative. The final decision to divest is left to administration and the Board of Trustees. However, now that this resolution has passed, President Skorton must respond within 30 days.
In response to concerns that divestment would put the endowment at risk, resolution co-sponsor and former KyotoNOW! president, Anna-Lisa Castle defended the resolution, "We are not asking the university to divest tomorrow. Rather, we are asking the trustees to begin a responsible transition away from fossil fuels. It's a step toward aligning our investment practices with our ideals as an institution. This is also pragmatic in the long-term, given that international commitments to mitigate carbon emissions will deliver a major blow to the fossil fuel industry."
Fossil fuel divestment is a national movement with over 200 active campaigns across the country. Students have cited this as the moral imperative of their generation. Sterling College, Unity College, and Hampshire College have already committed to fossil fuel divestment.
When: This vote took place on Thursday evening, February 6th, 2013
Quotes:
"In the long term, everyone, including the University will have to transition away from fossil fuels as we discover new ways to power the planet, and I personally think it's great that students and the SA are fighting for a way to put us on the right side of history. Although they have to understand that we might not be able to act immediately, I'm happy to see them proposing guidelines for the investment office in order to make us take actions that are both good for Cornell and the entirety of humanity in the long run."
-Alex Bores, Student Trustee
"I'm really excited that this resolution passed, not necessarily because I think that Cornell administrators are going to be really willing to accept our suggestions right away, but because I think that as students we have the opportunity to influence our university and in this case, we need to do just that. This might not happen tomorrow, but maybe 5 years from now we'll come back as alumni and smile knowing that we've had an impact. I also think that divestment is a powerful statement and through doing this we might be able to influence other universities and institutions to do the same."
-Sarah Balik, Student Assembly Representative, Chair of the Environmental Committee
"It's a really strong statement from the Student Assembly and the student body that they want to see the University invest in companies that have more sustainable practices and they don't want to see their alma mater investing in an industry that could have harmful effects on the earth for years to come."
-Adam Gitlin, Student Assembly President
"It would be hypocritical for the University to claim a commitment to carbon neutrality without taking our investment decisions into account. With $400 billion collectively in university endowments, students have an incredible opportunity to grow the green economy and hasten a shift away from fossil fuels. As primary stakeholders, we have the right and responsibility to advocate for a just and sustainable future."
-Julia Fiore, KyotoNOW! member
KyotoNOW! is a Cornell student organization formed in response to the US rejection of the Kyoto Protocol in 2001. Our student-run campaigns work to promote a sustainable, just future and advance policy on climate change on the university, local and national levels.
LATEST NEWS
As Mike Johnson Floats Social Security Cuts, Trustees Report Shows Harm of Trump Policies
“MAGA Mike Johnson won’t show the American people his secret plan to eliminate Social Security because he knows Republican policies are wildly unpopular."
Jun 09, 2026
Social Security's trustees said in their annual report released Tuesday that the New Deal program will be unable to pay out full benefits by the end of 2032—a quarter earlier than projected last year—in the absence of congressional action, a finding that advocates said underscores the destructive impact of President Donald Trump's policy agenda and the need to make the rich finally pay their fair share into the system.
“This is the first Social Security trustees report that begins to take Donald Trump’s second term policies into account: A tax bill that largely benefited the wealthy, economy-wrecking tariffs, a needless war with Iran, and hostility to immigrants," said Nancy Altman, the president of Social Security Works. "All of these have reduced the amount of money going into Social Security, weakening the system’s finances."
The trustees report was released a day after House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) declared in a radio show appearance that "entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and things like Social Security" need to be "adjusted and fixed," which critics say is euphemistic language for benefit cuts, given past GOP proposals such as raising the retirement age.
Johnson said the GOP intends to release a new Social Security plan "next year," without providing any details.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), House Democrats' campaign arm, immediately pressed Johnson, suggesting he's delaying Republican plans for Social Security and Medicare until after the 2026 midterms to avoid consequences at the ballot box.
“MAGA Mike Johnson won’t show the American people his secret plan to eliminate Social Security because he knows Republican policies are wildly unpopular and will be resoundingly rejected by the American people in November," said Justin Chermol, a DCCC spokesperson.
The new trustees report projects that Social Security's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance will be able to pay out full benefits "until the fourth quarter of 2032, one quarter earlier than projected last year."
"At that time, the fund’s reserves will become depleted and continuing program income will be sufficient to pay 78% of total scheduled benefits," the trustees said.
Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM), stressed that the new projection "does not mean that Social Security is going ‘bankrupt’ or ‘broke.’"
"Nor does the trustees report mean that benefits must be cut to maintain the program’s fiscal health," said Richtman. "It would be grossly unfair to ask beneficiaries on fixed incomes to bear the cost of strengthening Social Security. While conservatives favor benefit cuts (such as raising the retirement age, means testing, or reduced COLAs), we advocate for revenue-side solutions where the wealthy pay their fair share."
Specifically, NCPSSM and other progressive advocacy groups and lawmakers have called for raising the Social Security's payroll tax cap, which currently exempts annual income above $184,500 from the program's dedicated payroll levy.
Richtman said that lifting the payroll tax cap and "subjecting some of high earners’ investment income to Social Security taxes" would keep the program solvent "well beyond the 2030s." He noted that Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation to shore up Social Security's finances by taxing the rich, but the bills have gone nowhere in the Republican-controlled Congress.
In a joint statement issued in response to the trustees report, Reps. John Larson (D-Conn.), Richard Neal (D-Mass.), and Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) said that "instead of joining Democrats to protect and enhance" Medicare and Social Security, "Donald Trump and Republicans are busy sabotaging them."
"After DOGE took a wrecking ball to the Social Security Administration under false pretenses, all Americans got were slashed customer service and their most personal data put at risk—without a penny saved," the Democrats said. "Combined with their sole legislative achievement pricing millions out of coverage and putting Medicare on the chopping block, there is no greater threat to Americans’ wellbeing than Republican governance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fears of Escalation After Trump Says US Must ‘Respond’ to Iran Downing Apache Helicopter
"We... worry deeply that US retaliatory strikes will trigger another destabilizing military exchange that has no winners," said the National Iranian American Committee.
Jun 09, 2026
President Donald Trump said the US military would "respond" after Iran reportedly took down an Army Apache helicopter on Tuesday, raising fears of yet more escalation amid collapsing ceasefire talks.
"I have just been informed by our Great Military that last night the Iranians shot down one of our highly sophisticated Apache Helicopters while patrolling over the Strait of Hormuz," the president wrote on Truth Social. "There were two pilots involved, both are safe and uninjured. Nevertheless, the United States must, of necessity, respond to this attack."
The Iranian state-owned outlet PressTV acknowledged that the aircraft had gone down, describing it as coming amid "Iran's decisive retaliation against Washington's incessant violations of a ceasefire with the Islamic Republic," though it did not clarify whether it had been shot down or had gone down for a different reason.
US Central Command said on Tuesday morning that "the cause of the incident is under investigation."
It is the first known instance in which an Apache, one of the most powerful aircraft in the US arsenal, was downed since the US and Israel attacked Iran in late February. Two US officials told CNN that it was brought down by an Iranian drone.
The US has deployed Apache and other aircraft as part of its effort to escort vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has blocked most maritime traffic in retaliation for the US launching the war, dramatically spiking global oil and gas prices. The US has also enacted its own naval blockade of Iranian ports.
The downing of the aircraft comes amid Israel's escalating attacks on Lebanon, which Iran has described as a red line for ceasefire negotiations.
After trading fire over the weekend, Israel and Iran agreed to pause their attacks against one another after Trump begged them to "stop shooting." But Iran warned that if Israel continues its devastating attacks on Lebanon, in violation of a recent ceasefire, it would continue firing.
On Tuesday, Israel issued yet another forced evacuation order for all the residents of Tyre, Lebanon's fourth largest city before pummeling it with strikes, killing at least eight people and injuring another 32, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry.
Israel claimed last week that militants from the Iranian-backed militia Hezbollah were hiding out there, but according to Reuters, it did so "without providing evidence."
Doctors Without Borders (MSF), which was forced to suspend its operations in the city and nearby areas due to the attacks, denounced Israel's "forced displacement practices," which have left more than 1 million residents of Lebanon displaced from their homes.
The National Iranian American Council warned of further escalation on Tuesday after the downing of the American helicopter, saying it jeopardized the prospects for peace.
"Military escalation amid the ceasefire became normalized via Israel’s military operations in Lebanon and the US imposition of a blockade," the group said in a statement posted to social media on Tuesday. "Now, the tempo of stresses to the ceasefire is increasing at an alarming rate."
"We are thankful that the helicopter pilots survived last night’s military exchange that unfolded in the Strait of Hormuz, yet worry deeply that US retaliatory strikes will trigger another destabilizing military exchange that has no winners," the group continued. "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. We must choose peace or be condemned to more disastrous war."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Makes Clear That He and Trump Have Different Ideas When It Comes to AI
"Do I have great confidence that Trump will do that right thing? No, I don't."
Jun 09, 2026
With President Donald Trump seemingly open to the idea of having the federal government take a stake in major artificial intelligence firms, Sen. Bernie Sanders emphasized on Monday that he and the president have two very different visions when it comes to regulating AI.
During an interview at the National Press Club, CBS News' Robert Costa asked Sanders (I-Vt.) to comment on Trump last week showing interest in the government partially owning Big Tech firms whose AI models could potentially disrupt American society in the coming years.
Sanders credited Trump with having sharp political instincts on the matter, theorizing that he understands the deep unease and anxiety that people feel about AI, particularly the fear that it could put millions of Americans out of work while benefiting Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.
"So as a politician, I think that's where he's coming from," Sanders said. "Do I have great confidence that Trump will do the right thing? No."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders): "Trump is many things, but he is a good politician." pic.twitter.com/2iGu0kXZBa
— CSPAN (@cspan) June 9, 2026
Trump so far has only hinted at plans for a public stake in AI firms and hasn't released any concrete plans.
In contrast, Sanders earlier this month wrote an editorial for The New York Times in which he proposed creating an AI-based sovereign wealth fund that would impose a one-time, 50% tax on OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI behemoths, paid in the form of stock.
Sanders argued that the wealth fund was necessary to "give the public a direct role in determining the future of this technology” and “guarantee that the trillions of dollars potentially generated by AI are used to improve the lives of all of us—not simply to make the richest people in the world even richer."
Noting that AI companies' large language models (LLMs) were only made possible with the inputs of centuries' worth of human knowledge and writing, Sanders said that it's only reasonable that the public have a strong degree of control over how such technology is used.
"When a public resource generates wealth, the public should share in that wealth," Sanders wrote. "The future of AI and the fate of humanity must not be decided behind closed doors in Silicon Valley. It must not be dictated by billionaires seeking to maximize their power and profit."
Progressive economist Dean Baker on Tuesday pushed back on Sanders' idea for an AI sovereign wealth fund, in particular arguing that it may be unwise for the government to create a wealth fund based on what might be a wildly overvalued asset.
"Most likely the AI sector is in a massive bubble," cautioned Baker. "An AI sovereign wealth fund is likely to end up being a mechanism to shovel yet more money to Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and the rest of the right-wing billionaire gang. We have already given this crew enough money."
Instead, Baker proposed handling the potential negative consequences of AI disruption through a mix of higher corporate income taxes, stricter antitrust enforcement, and shorter average work weeks.
"We have all the tools needed deal with an AI productivity boom; we just lack the political will to use them," Baker concluded. "The sovereign wealth fund idea is a massive leap in the wrong direction."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular