January, 11 2011, 11:59am EDT

Rights Groups Mark Beginning of a Decade of Wrongful Detentions at Guantanamo and Demand Obama Close Island Prison with Justice
Rally in Front of White House to Close Guantánamo Bay Followed by Procession to DOJ
WASHINGTON
As the prison at Guantanamo enters its 10th year, Amnesty
International USA, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Witness Against
Torture, September 11 Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, the Center for
Justice and International Law (CEJIL) and other human rights
groups called on President Obama to close the U.S. detention center at
Guantanamo Bay with justice at a rally in front of the White House. They
closed the rally by reading a message from Omar Deghayes, a man who was
arbitrarily detained at Guantanamo without charge for 6 years before
being allowed to return to his home in England. Mr. Deghayes' statement
is viewable on CCR's website here. After the rally, activists
representing the 173 men still at Guantanamo marched in orange jumpsuits
to the U.S. Department of Justice, where they held a vigil.
The groups are calling on President Obama to end indefinite arbitrary
detention and unfair military commissions trials at Guantanamo Bay, and
to either charge and fairly try or release the detained men. The rights
groups demanded the president re-commit to rapidly closing Guantanamo,
lift the blanket ban on all repatriations to Yemen, and continue to make
diligent efforts to resettle the many men who cannot return to their
home countries for fear of torture and persecution.
CCR, AI-USA, WAT and the Center for Justice and International Law
(CEJIL) released a "Close Guantanamo with Justice" statement that is
gathering support from prominent human rights organizations, activists,
scholars, artists, writers, and torture survivors from all around the
world--including the United States, Latin America, the Middle East,
Europe, Australia, and Africa. The statement includes a plea to the
international community to offer homes to the men at Guantanamo who have
been cleared for release or won their habeas cases, but cannot leave
until third countries make humanitarian gestures to offer them
resettlement. The statement and list of signatories is available on the
CCR website here.
Said Pardiss Kebriaei, Center for Constitutional Rights staff attorney representing
men detained at Guantanamo, "Approximately 30 men could be released
from Guantanamo tomorrow but for a fear of torture or persecution in
their home countries. These men appeal to the international community
for help in offering them safe havens and a chance to rebuild their
lives. People of conscience in the world cannot let yet another
anniversary of Guantanamo pass without doing something to help close
it. Offering resettlement is a key part of the solution."
Said Valerie Lucznikowska, September 11 Families for Peaceful Tomorrows,
"Our politicians must stop exploiting our grief and our concern for our
safety for political ends. The rule of law, the essence of a democratic
society, demands Constitutional federal trials of those who continue to
be detained in Guantanamo. We cannot continue to deny human beings
their freedom without legal charges and fair trials. Those who have been
cleared must not continue to be held simply because of their
nationality or the U.S. government's indecisiveness. Guantanamo has made
us less safe. Close it."
Said Tom Parker, Amnesty International USA's advocacy and policy director of terrorism, counterterrorism and human rights, "For
nine years Guantanamo has been a global symbol for injustice and abuse.
The idea that you can't hold people indefinitely without trial has been
around since the Middle Ages. It is a basic human right. President
Obama continues to promise change, but what this administration has
actually delivered is continuity for one of the darkest chapters in
America's recent history."
Said Matthew W. Daloisio, organizer with Witness Against Torture. "The
Obama administration's failure to close Guantanamo and undo Bush-era
policies is a disaster for the rule of law, the best American ideals,
and the security of people everywhere who want to live in peace. This is
not about the politics of Left and Right; it's about what's right and
wrong. Guantanamo, abusive treatment, and indefinite detention are
wrong, and must once again be decisively rejected."
Said Andy Worthington, British author and Guantanamo expert,
"One year after President Obama promised to have closed Guantanamo 173
men are still there, the majority of whom should never have been held in
the first place. Without concerted action from the American people it's
very possible the majority will never be released."
Said Viviana Krsticevic, Executive Director of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), "Indefinite
detention at Guantanamo will not end unless the international community
offers safe homes for the men who cannot return to their countries of
nationality for fear of torture or persecution. As co-counsel with the
Center for Constitutional Rights before the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights, representing Djamel Ameziane--an Algerian man now entering
his tenth year of arbitrary detention at Guantanamo, who will remain
indefinitely imprisoned until a third country offers him resettlement--we
call on President Obama to initiate dialogue with the Organization of
American States so that countries in the Americas wishing to be involved
in the resettlement process as a humanitarian gesture may do so."
To read the sign-in statement click here.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464LATEST NEWS
Hegseth Says Pentagon Project Will Put Artificial Intelligence 'Into the Hands of Every American Warrior'
The new website, GenAI.mil, describes the "end state" of the project as "a Joint Force where generative AI is fully integrated as a native capability into every aspect of operations."
Dec 09, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, currently under fire for treating a deadly ongoing US military operation against alleged drug traffickers in the Caribbean "like it's a video game," as one columnist said this week, announced on Tuesday that the Pentagon is launching an artificial intelligence platform for service members to use on the proverbial battlefield.
"We are unleashing GenAI.mil," said Hegseth in a video address on the Department of Defense's (DOD) embrace of AI. "This platform puts the world's most powerful frontier AI models, starting with Google Gemini, directly into the hands of every American warrior."
Hegseth, who has claimed the DOD is now called the Department of War, said that "at the click of a button," service members can "conduct deep research, format documents, and even analyze video or imagery at unprecedented speed."
"We will continue to aggressively field the world's best technology to make our fighting force more lethal than ever before," added Hegseth.
Pete Hegseth: "The future of American warfare is here, and it's spelled AI."
He says the military has launched a new platform that "puts the world's most powerful frontier AI models, starting with Google Gemini, directly into the hands of every American warrior." pic.twitter.com/phva2cnIc9
— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) December 9, 2025
Jessica Burbank and Drop Site News reported that the custom-made Google AI tool, Gemini, is now available to all military personnel, civilians, and contractors, and includes extensions to tools including ChatGPT, AI assistant Claude, and Grok.
The Trump administration awarded Google a $200 million contract in July to develop AI at the DOD.
"Victory belongs to those who embrace real innovation," Hegseth wrote in a memo obtained by Burbank. "GenAI.mil is part of this monumental transformation... I expect every member of the department to log in, learn it, and incorporate it into your workflows immediately. AI should be in your battle rhythm every single day."
DOD employees have been given a "Do and Don't" list, according to Burbank.
A Pentagon source told Burbank that an “example of 'don’t' was, 'Don’t use GenAI for decisions involving attribution, targeting, or threat evaluation without human validation.'"
"I read that as someone can read what the AI said and be like, 'Yep it’s good to go shoot that missile,'" added the source. “They are legit going full force into AI."
GenAI.mil also describes the "end state" that the Pentagon is working toward as "a Joint Force where generative AI is fully integrated as a native capability into every aspect of operations."
"Our warriors and leaders will leverage AI to achieve unparalleled situational awareness, accelerate planning cycles, and execute operations with a speed and precision that yields information dominance and mission success," reads the platform.
The launch of Google Gemini comes after Emil Michael, the defense undersecretary for research and engineering, took control of the Defense Innovation Unit, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO), and other offices in an effort to accelerate the expansion of AI use in the military.
Between Russia and Ukraine, Michael said, "You have a robot-on-robot frontline now, which we've never seen before."
“The explosion of capabilities has been enormous, and we're just catching up to that,” he added. “Now we can take CDAO and actually try to use it to push the capability into the department for actual use cases.”
Drop Site co-founder Ryan Grim commented that Tuesday's announcement points to "Hegseth ushering in the apocalypse."
The launch of GenAI.mil comes as the Trump administration continues to escalate tensions with Venezuela, with President Donald Trump signaling that the US could soon launch land strikes in the South American country and elsewhere in Latin America.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Attack on Independent Science': Trump EPA Removes All Mention of Human-Caused Climate Crisis From Public Webpages
Climate scientist Daniel Swain called it "a deliberate effort to misinform."
Dec 09, 2025
The Trump administration has removed all references to human-caused climate change from Environmental Protection Agency webpages, as well as large amounts of data showing the dramatic warming of the climate over recent decades and the resulting risks.
According to a Tuesday report from the Washington Post, one page on the "Causes of Climate Change" stated as recently as October that "it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land," a statement that reflects the overwhelming consensus in peer-reviewed literature on climate.
That statement is now nowhere to be found, with those that remain only mentioning "natural" causes of planetary warming like volcanic activity and variations in solar activity.
"The new, near-exclusive emphasis on natural causes of climate change on the EPA's website is now completely out of sync with all available evidence demonstrating overwhelming human influence on contemporary warming trends," explained Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, who posted about the changes on social media.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which examines tens of thousands of studies from around the globe, found that virtually all warming since the dawn of the industrial era can be attributed to human carbon emissions.
This can be confirmed using the Wayback Machine's last snapshot (from Oct 8, 2025). At some point between Oct 8 & Dec 8, major changes were made to this and other EPA climate change content. Information has either been removed completely or "adjusted" to emphasize natural causes.
[image or embed]
— Daniel Swain (@weatherwest.bsky.social) December 8, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Pages about the catastrophic results of climate change have also been scrubbed: One of them allowed users to view several climate change indicators, like the historic decline of Arctic sea ice and glaciers and the increased rates of coastal flooding due to rising sea levels. That page has been deleted entirely.
Another page, which answered frequently asked questions about climate change, now no longer includes questions like, "Is there scientific consensus that human activities are causing today’s climate change?” "How can people reduce the risks of climate change?" and "Who is most at risk from the impacts of climate change?" The page provides no indication that climate change is a human-caused phenomenon, instead only discussing natural factors.
That page links to another that has since been deleted. It once provided extensive information about the risks climate change poses to human health, "from increasing the risk of extreme heat events and heavy storms to increasing the risk of asthma attacks and changing the spread of certain diseases carried by ticks and mosquitoes." Another deleted page discussed the impacts of climate change on children's health and low-income populations.
“This is, I think, one of the more dramatic scrubbings we’ve seen so far in the climate space,” said Swain. "This website is now completely incorrect regarding the changes in climate that we’re seeing today and their causes... It’s clearly a deliberate effort to misinform.”
During his 2024 campaign for reelection, President Donald Trump and his affiliated super political action committees received more than $96 million in direct contributions from oil and gas industry donors, according to a January report from Climate Power. Since retaking office, he has moved to dramatically expand the extraction and use of planet-heating fossil fuels while eliminating investment in clean energy and electric vehicles.
Rachel Cleetus, senior policy director for the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said, "Deleting and distorting this scientific information only serves to give a free pass to fossil fuel polluters who are raking in profits even as communities reel from extreme heatwaves, record-breaking floods, intensified storms, and catastrophic wildfires."
Cleetus said that the purging of climate information from EPA sites was a prelude to "the likely overturning of the endangerment finding, a legal and scientific foundation for standards to limit the heat-trapping emissions driving climate change and threatening human health."
In July, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled a proposal to rescind the 2009 finding, which determined that climate change endangers human life and serves as the legal basis for greenhouse gas regulations under the Clean Air Act.
Undermining climate science is core to that effort, which Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M, said at the time, "could unravel virtually every US climate regulation on the books, from car emissions standards to power plant rules.”
Shortly after Zeldin announced the rule change, the Department of Energy cobbled together a “Climate Working Group” comprising five authors handpicked by Secretary Chris Wright to produce a climate report that disputes the IPCC's findings and the scientific consensus on climate change.
The report did not undergo peer review and omitted around 99% of the scientific literature the IPCC relied on for its comprehensive findings. A group of climate scientists that independently reviewed the paper found that it “exhibits pervasive problems with misrepresentation and selective citation of the scientific literature, cherry-picking of data, and faulty or absent statistics.”
Cleetus said Tuesday that “EPA is trying to bury the evidence on human-caused climate change, but it cannot change the reality of climate science or the harsh toll climate impacts are taking on people’s lives... This isn’t just about data on a website; it’s an attack on independent science and scientific integrity.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Kushner Role in Paramount Scheme Shows US 'Devolving Into Caricature of Crony Capitalism'
"The Warner Bros. merger was already suspect, but now Trump’s family is getting in on the act," said one Democratic senator.
Dec 09, 2025
The revelation that Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump's son-in-law, is playing a key role in Paramount Skydance's hostile bid for Warner Bros. Discovery underscores the extent to which the current administration's open corruption "is fundamentally distorting economic and governmental policymaking at the direct expense of the interests of the American people," a watchdog group said Tuesday.
Kushner's private equity firm, Affinity Partner, is listed in a regulatory filing as one of the organizations financing Paramount's $108 billion bid for Warner Bros., which owns CNN. Ethics experts say Kushner's involvement represents another glaring conflict of interest on top of preexisting concerns about the bid, stemming from Trump's relationship with Paramount CEO David Ellison and his billionaire father, GOP megadonor Larry Ellison.
"America is devolving into a caricature of crony capitalism," Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, said in a statement Tuesday. "Factions aiming to shrink media competition are fighting over who can show the greatest fealty to Donald Trump. Paramount seems to have won the prize, bringing in presidential son-in-law Jared Kushner—whose investment vehicle is flush with Saudi funds, deposited only because of his personal relationship with Donald Trump—as a partner."
"A working antitrust policy would block the merger of Warner Bros. Discovery with one of the existing media goliaths. It would never be influenced by personal connections to the president," Weissman added. "This case underscores that the corruption pervading the Trump administration isn’t just about making Trump and his family and hangers-on ever richer. That corruption is fundamentally distorting economic and governmental policy making, at the direct expense of the interests of the American people.”
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said that "the Warner Bros. merger was already suspect, but now Trump’s family is getting in on the act."
"Paramount already had deep ties to the White House," he added, "now Trump's family will directly profit if they win."
Asked Monday about Kushner's financing role, Trump said he has "never spoken to him about it."
Paramount, which the Trump administration reportedly favored to take over Warner Bros., announced its bid for the company days after the streaming behemoth Netflix and Warner Bros. leadership reached an $83 billion acquisition deal. The president immediately criticized the Netflix agreement and pledged to intervene in the federal review process.
"The blurred line between running the government and the family's business interests is expanding each day," Scott Amey, general counsel with the Project On Government Oversight, told Reuters.
Antitrust experts and advocates have argued that both of the proposed mergers are likely illegal and should be blocked.
Matt Stoller, research director at the American Economic Liberties Project, said Monday that either merger "would further deepen the media consolidation crisis that is eroding our creative economy and freedom of expression."
"Paramount specifically would be well-positioned to manipulate the news to please the president, which David Ellison made clear it intends to do in an interview earlier today," said Stoller. "There is a reason that policymakers and workers in Hollywood have come out against each iteration of this deal. Rather than allowing further consolidation in the industry, policymakers must reregulate the market with prohibitions on vertical integration.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


