For Immediate Release
Facebook Fails to Address Privacy Concerns in Proposed Class-Action Lawsuit Settlement
Facebook and Lawyers Will Benefit But Not Social Network’s Users
WASHINGTON - Facebook’s solution to complaints that it violated the privacy
rights of potentially millions of its users is no solution at all,
Public Citizen said today in opposing the settlement of a class-action
lawsuit that was filed against the social networking giant.
The central piece of the proposed settlement is the creation of a
nonprofit foundation that would largely be controlled by Facebook. The
foundation would be charged with funding projects and initiatives that
“promote the cause of online privacy, safety, and security,” which
Public Citizen attorney Greg Beck likens to putting the fox in charge
of the henhouse.
Under the proposed settlement, Facebook would pay $9.5 million into
a settlement fund, with as much as a third of that money going to pay
the class-action attorneys. The remaining money would go toward the
creation of the new privacy foundation. Facebook would choose one of
the foundation’s three directors and have an equal say in the selection
of a second. Facebook has already selected its own chief lobbyist to
sit on the foundation’s board.
At the heart of the class action lawsuit is Facebook’s Beacon
marketing program. Facebook users complained that online purchases
they made from merchandisers participating in the Beacon program were
published on Facebook without their permission. Although under the
settlement Facebook would terminate Beacon, Facebook had already
essentially ended the program before the lawsuit was filed in response
to widespread negative publicity.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Never Miss a Beat.
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
“Facebook and the lawyers in this case will benefit from this
proposed settlement, but it is virtually worthless to Facebook users
who are part of this class action,” said Beck, who, along with D.C.
lawyer Philip Friedman and Mark Chavez of Chavez & Gertler in San
Francisco, represents D.C. resident Ginger McCall in her objection to
the proposed settlement. McCall was shocked when she learned that
Facebook had published on her profile the titles of movies she rented
from Blockbuster’s Web site in 2007 and 2008..
There is no need for an online privacy foundation when several
nonprofit organizations dedicated to the issue already exist, Beck
said. It’s also troubling that Facebook, a site whose very mission is
to make private details of its users readily available to the world at
large, would be involved in managing such a foundation, he said.
Additionally, closing the essentially defunct Beacon program is a token
gesture of no value to class members, Beck said.
Public Citizen is asking the court to reject the proposed settlement.
To view Public Citizen’s objections, go to http://www.citizen.org/litigation/forms/cases/CaseDetails.cfm?cID=597.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization founded in 1971 to represent consumer interests in Congress, the executive branch and the courts.