

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

DENMARK: Rikke Rasmussen, Friends of the Earth Denmark press officer: email rikrassen@gmail.com
BELGIUM: Francesca Gater, Friends of the Earth Europe communications officer, email francesca.gater@foeeurope.org
UNITED STATES: Nick Berning, Friends of the Earth US media director, Tel: +1 202 222 0748 (US office number) or email NBerning@foe.org
UNITED KINGDOM: Henry Rummins, Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland communications and media officer, Tel: +44 776 16 01 666 or email henry.rummins@foe.co.uk
More than two million
supporters of Friends of the Earth International worldwide want the
United Nations (UN) climate talks talking place from 7 to 18 December to
become a milestone towards 'Climate Justice', but the chances of
achieving a just and effective UN agreement in Copenhagen are extremely
slim. [1]
"Rich countries are responsible for the vast majority of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere today and must immediately commit to steep and
legally binding reductions of their emissions. These reductions must
take place without offsetting and without other false solutions such as
agrofuels, nuclear energy or so-called 'clean coal'," said Friends of
the Earth International chair Nnimmo Bassey from Nigeria.
Negotiators at the Copenhagen talks are expected to agree to binding
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions under the second phase of the UN
Kyoto Protocol, which starts in 2013. This Protocol is the only treaty
that enforces emissions reductions on industrialized, developed countries.
Greenhouse gas emissions are the main cause of climate change and
impoverished people and communities -who have contributed least to these
emissions- are the most affected by climate change, according to the UN.
Meena Raman from Friends of the Earth Malaysia said:
"The divide-and-rule tactics of rich countries have cast a dark shadow
over the run-up to Copenhagen, which has led to legitimate and strong
opposition by developing countries. If Copenhagen is to be any different
developed countries must change their mindsets or potentially face more
delays, walk-outs or a collapse of the talks."
"Climate justice will be achieved when the countries that have the most
historical responsibility for causing climate change do the most to
prevent further damage, and substantially reduce their own emissions at
home," added Meena Raman.
To demonstrate their desire for climate justice, thousands of people are
expected to 'flood' the streets of Copenhagen in the morning of December
12 in a march organized by FoEI to demand climate justice and an end to
carbon offsetting, which is a false solution to climate change. [2]
"Carbon offsetting - when developed countries buy carbon credits from
developing countries to avoid cutting emissions themselves - has no part
to play in a just international agreement to fight climate change.
Developed countries must tackle climate change by making immediate and
real change at home," said Ricardo Navarro from Friends of the Earth El
Salvador.
During the Copenhagen talks Friends of the Earth International
campaigners will lobby negotiators and deliver a petition signed by more
than 30,000 people urging world leaders to do the right thing in
Copenhagen by effectively protecting our climate and people all over the
world. [3]
Campaigners will also strengthen the climate justice movement through
mobilizations, debates and activities at the alternative civil society
summit known as 'Klimaforum' [4] with allied organisations such as La
Via Campesina and the World March of Women. Thousands of voices
demanding climate justice will also be presented in a 'climate capsule'
exhibition at the Klimaforum and Bella Center.
Friends of the Earth International believes that:
- Rich, developed countries should cut their greenhouse gas emissions by
at least 40% in comparison with 1990 levels by 2020. These cuts should
be made at home - with no offsetting. Offsetting, including through the
'Clean Development Mechanism', is a false solution and should be rejected.
- Rich, developed countries owe to developing countries a climate debt
that is the result of decades of pollution. This debt must be recognised
and repayed, for example through massive emission reductions and through
the provision of sufficient public funds democratically through the UN
to fight climate change.
- The World Bank and its climate funds must be rejected as they are set
to increase developing country debt and promote dirty energy such as
"clean" coal.
- Major corporations and polluters are lobbying to undermine a just
climate agreement and are advancing their own economic interests at the
expense of people and the planet.
- Including forests in 'carbon offsetting initiatives' does not help to
combat climate change. Instead, it diverts attention from the real
solutions to climate change and deforestation. Plantations are not
forests. Monoculture tree plantations must be excluded from the UN
climate negotiations.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT :
Nnimmo Bassey, Friends of the Earth International, Tel: +234 80 37 27 43
95 (Nigerian mobile number) or email nnimmo@eraction.org
Meena Raman, Friends of the Earth Malaysia, Tel: + 60 12 43 00 042
(Malaysian mobile number) or email meenaco@pd.jaring.my
Ricardo Navarro, Friends of the Earth El Salvador, Tel: + 503 78 88 75
67 (El Salvador mobile number) or email foeelsalvador@hotmail.com
For more spokespeople contact details in Copenhagen (from December 7)
please send a request for our 'spokespeople contact sheet' to
media@foei.org.
Friends of the Earth International media line: +31-6-51 00 56 30 (Dutch
mobile number)
NOTES TO EDITORS
[1] For more information about the Copenhagen UN talks please send a
request for our Copenhagen media briefing to media@foei.org
[2] For more information about the Copenhagen Flood please send a
request for our 'Flood briefing' to media@foei.org.
[3] For more information about the petition signed by more than 30,000
people see https://www.demandclimatejustice.org/
[4] For more information about the Klimaforum see www.Klimaforum09.org
Friends of the Earth International is the world's largest grassroots environmental network, uniting 74 national member groups and some 5,000 local activist groups on every continent. With over 2 million members and supporters around the world, FOEI campaigns on today's most urgent environmental and social issues.
"Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food," one lawyer said.
As the Trump administration continued its illegal freeze on food assistance, the US Department of Agriculture sent a warning to grocery stores not to provide discounts to the more than 42 million Americans affected.
Several grocery chains and food delivery apps have announced in recent days that they would provide substantial discounts to those whose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits have been delayed. More than 1 in 8 Americans rely on the program, and 39% of them are children.
But on Sunday, Catherine Rampell, a reporter at the Washington Post published an email from the USDA that was sent to grocery stores around the country, telling them they were prohibited from offering special discounts to those at greater risk of food insecurity due to the cuts.
"You must offer eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions to SNAP-EBT customers as other customers, except that sales tax cannot be charged on SNAP purchases," the email said. "You cannot treat SNAP-EBT customers differently from any other customer. Offering discounts or services only to SNAP-eligible customers is a SNAP violation unless you have a SNAP equal treatment waiver."
The email referred to SNAP's "Equal Treatment Rule," which prohibits stores from discriminating against SNAP recipients by charging them higher prices or treating them more favorably than other customers by offering them specialized sales or incentives.
Rampell said she was "aware of at least two stores that had offered struggling customers a discount, then withdrew it after receiving this email."
She added that it was "understandable why grocery stores might be scared off" because "a store caught violating the prohibition could be denied the ability to accept SNAP benefits in the future. In low-income areas where the SNAP shutdown will have the biggest impact, getting thrown off SNAP could mean a store is no longer financially viable."
While the rule prohibits special treatment in either direction, legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold argues that it was a "perverted interpretation of a rule that stops grocers from price gouging SNAP recipients... charging them more when they use food stamps."
The government also notably allows retailers to request waivers for programs that incentivize SNAP recipients to purchase healthy food.
Others pointed out that SNAP is currently not paying out to Americans because President Donald Trump is defying multiple federal court rulings issued Friday, requiring him to tap a $6 billion contingency fund to ensure benefit payments go out. Both courts, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, have said his administration's refusal to pay out benefits is against the law.
One labor movement lawyer summed up the administration's position on social media: "Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food."
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy.
After failing to use the government's might to bully Jimmy Kimmel off the air earlier this fall, President Donald Trump is once again threatening to bring the force of law down on comedians for the egregious crime of making fun of him.
This time, his target was NBC late-night host Seth Meyers, whom the president said, in a Truth Social post Saturday, "may be the least talented person to 'perform' live in the history of television."
On Thursday, the comedian hosted a segment mocking Trump's bizarre distaste for the electromagnetic catapults aboard Navy ships, which the president said he may sign an executive order to replace with older (and less efficient) steam-powered ones.
Trump did not take kindly to Meyers' barbs: "On and on he went, a truly deranged lunatic. Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this??? - NO TALENT, NO RATINGS, 100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL!!!"
It is, of course, not "illegal" for a late-night comedian, or any other news reporter or commentator, for that matter, to be "anti-Trump." But it's not the first time the president has made such a suggestion. Amid the backlash against Kimmel's firing in September, Trump asserted that networks that give him "bad publicity or press" should have their licenses taken away.
"I read someplace that the networks were 97% against me... I mean, they’re getting a license, I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. "All they do is hit Trump. They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.”
His FCC director, Brendan Carr, used a similar logic to justify his pressure campaign to get Kimmel booted by ABC, which he said could be punished for airing what he determined was "distorted” content.
Before Kimmel, Carr suggested in April that Comcast may be violating its broadcast licenses after MSNBC declined to air a White House press briefing in which the administration defended its wrongful deportation of Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media following Trump's tirade against Meyers. "Why? Because Trump believes he—not the people—decides the law. This is why we are in the middle of, not on the verge of, a totalitarian takeover."
"An ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien," said the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Immigration agents are using facial recognition software as "definitive" evidence to determine immigration status and is collecting data from US citizens without their consent. In some cases, agents may detain US citizens, including ones who can provide their birth certificates, if the app says they are in the country illegally.
These are a few of the findings from a series of articles published this past week by 404 Media, which has obtained documents and video evidence showing that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents are using a smartphone app in the field during immigration stops, scanning the faces of people on the street to verify their citizenship.
The report found that agents frequently conduct stops that "seem to have little justification beyond the color of someone’s skin... then look up more information on that person, including their identity and potentially their immigration status."
While it is not clear what application the agencies are using, 404 previously reported that ICE is using an app called Mobile Fortify that allows ICE to simply point a camera at a person on the street. The photos are then compared with a bank of more than 200 million images and dozens of government databases to determine info about the person, including their name, date of birth, nationality, and information about their immigration status.
On Friday, 404 published an internal document from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which stated that "ICE does not provide the opportunity for individuals to decline or consent to the collection and use of biometric data/photograph collection." The document also states that the image of any face that agents scan, including those of US citizens, will be stored for 15 years.
The outlet identified several videos that have been posted to social media of immigration officials using the technology.
In one, taken in Chicago, armed agents in sunglasses and face coverings are shown accosting a pair of Hispanic teenagers on bicycles, asking where they are from. The 16-year-old boy who filmed the encounter said he is "from here"—an American citizen—but that he only has a school ID on him. The officer tells the boy he'll be allowed to leave if he'll "do a facial." The other officer then snaps a photo of him with a phone camera and asks his name.
In another video, also in Chicago, agents are shown surrounding a driver, who declines to show his ID. Without asking, one officer points his phone at the man. "I’m an American citizen, so leave me alone,” the driver says. "Alright, we just got to verify that,” the officer responds.
Even if the people approached in these videos had produced identification proving their citizenship, there's no guarantee that agents would have accepted it, especially if the app gave them information to the contrary.
On Wednesday, ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), told 404 that ICE agents will even trust the app's results over a person's government documents.
“ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien,” he said.
This is despite the fact that, as Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told 404, “face recognition technology is notoriously unreliable, frequently generating false matches and resulting in a number of known wrongful arrests across the country."
Thompson said: "ICE using a mobile biometrics app in ways its developers at CBP never intended or tested is a frightening, repugnant, and unconstitutional attack on Americans’ rights and freedoms.”
According to an investigation published in October by ProPublica, more than 170 US citizens have been detained by immigration agents, often in squalid conditions, since President Donald Trump returned to office in January. In many of these cases, these individuals have been detained because agents wrongly claimed the documents proving their citizenship are false.
During a press conference this week, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem denied this reality, stating that "no American citizens have been arrested or detained" as part of Trump's "mass deportation" crusade.
"We focus on those who are here illegally," she said.
But as DHS's internal document explains, facial recognition software is necessary in the first place because "ICE agents do not know an individual's citizenship at the time of the initial encounter."
David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, explains that the use of such technology suggests that ICE's operations are not "highly targeted raids," as it likes to portray, but instead "random fishing expeditions."