U.S. tanks appear during a May 2016 military training exercise in Vaziani, Republic of Georgia. (Photo: Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Dec 15, 2021
As a bill authorizing $778 billion in military spending breezed through the U.S. Senate Wednesday amid darkening prospects for the Build Back Better social and climate investment package, peace and civil society groups decried what they called the misplaced priorities that place the military-industrial complex and corporate greed above dire human and planetary needs.
"Where is all the hand-wringing over the $778 billion military bill that we've seen over Build Back Better, which costs less than a quarter as much annually?"
After passing the House of Representatives last week by a vote of 363-70--51 Democrats and 19 Republicans voted against it--88 senators voted to approve the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2022, a policy measure that provides $25 billion more in Pentagon funding than requested by President Joe Biden and nearly $38 billion more than the last NDAA of former President Donald Trump's tenure.
Only 11 senators voted against the measure: New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker--who in an unusual move changed his vote from "yes" to "no"--Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
"Where is all the hand-wringing over the $778 billion military bill that we've seen over Build Back Better, which costs less than a quarter as much annually? Congress has completely abdicated their responsibility for the Pentagon budget," Lindsay Koshgarian, program director of the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "They may as well hand over a blank check."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 BREAKING: The Senate just voted to pass the astronomical $778 billion Pentagon budget (89-10) DESPITE the fact that millions of families will be pushed back into poverty if the Senate fails to pass Build Back Better before the end of the year. #CutThePentagon\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1639591705
The bipartisan ease with which the NDAA passed stood in stark contrast with the increasingly dim prospects for the Build Back Better Act, which passed the House without a single Republican vote last month but was on the verge of collapse Wednesday as Sen. Joe Manchin (W-Va.)--who voted "yes" on the NDAA--seeks to eliminate the boosted child tax credit, a move experts say would impoverish millions of children.
"Families will stop receiving child tax credit checks next month unless Congress finally passes the Build Back Better Act, but the flow of dollars to stockholders for Pentagon contractors will go on, uninterrupted," lamented Koshgarian.
Carley Towne, national co-director of the peace group CodePink, called the NDAA "a slap in the face to working people across this country."
"Over the past few months, Congress has been gridlocked over the possibility of spending $350 billion annually on healthcare, education, and green jobs," she told Common Dreams. "All of a sudden, when it comes to money for war, Congress once again shows that they are ready and willing to prioritize war profiteers over human needs."
\u201cWe ended the longest war in US history, yet Congress just passed a $768 BILLION defense budget \u2014 more than the military budgets of the next 11 countries combined.\n\nDon't tell me we can't afford to fight poverty, cancel student debt, pass paid leave, and defeat the climate crisis.\u201d— Pramila Jayapal (@Pramila Jayapal) 1639593901
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said that "as the national debate centers around how much is 'too much' to be spending on the true needs of the American people, it is unconscionable to approve three-quarters of a trillion dollars for war-making, a sum that is $25 billion more than the president even requested."
"Why is there more money for the military-industrial complex--providing no additional protection for our national security and arguably diminishing it--at the same time the U.S. is refusing to spend the $25 billion needed to make enough additional vaccines to vaccinate the world?" he asked.
Even the right-wing National Taxpayers Union called the NDAA's $778 billion topline spending figure "unsustainable."
\u201cOne of the many disgusting things about the bloated $778 billion defense budget is next year anything less than that will be labeled "a cut to military spending" and the bi-partisan war hawks will end up increasing it again & again. Enough is never enough for the death merchants.\u201d— Warren Gunnels (@Warren Gunnels) 1639503483
"The Pentagon budget can't go on growing forever," Koshgarian stressed. "We need more members of Congress to step up, as some principled members have done, and say no to bigger and bigger Pentagon budgets."
"We've seen powerful progressive movements achieve a lot over the last couple of years," she added, "and we can move the needle on Pentagon spending, too."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
corporate powerinstitute for policy studiesmilitarismpublic citizenstudent debtus congressus houseus senate
As a bill authorizing $778 billion in military spending breezed through the U.S. Senate Wednesday amid darkening prospects for the Build Back Better social and climate investment package, peace and civil society groups decried what they called the misplaced priorities that place the military-industrial complex and corporate greed above dire human and planetary needs.
"Where is all the hand-wringing over the $778 billion military bill that we've seen over Build Back Better, which costs less than a quarter as much annually?"
After passing the House of Representatives last week by a vote of 363-70--51 Democrats and 19 Republicans voted against it--88 senators voted to approve the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2022, a policy measure that provides $25 billion more in Pentagon funding than requested by President Joe Biden and nearly $38 billion more than the last NDAA of former President Donald Trump's tenure.
Only 11 senators voted against the measure: New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker--who in an unusual move changed his vote from "yes" to "no"--Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
"Where is all the hand-wringing over the $778 billion military bill that we've seen over Build Back Better, which costs less than a quarter as much annually? Congress has completely abdicated their responsibility for the Pentagon budget," Lindsay Koshgarian, program director of the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "They may as well hand over a blank check."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 BREAKING: The Senate just voted to pass the astronomical $778 billion Pentagon budget (89-10) DESPITE the fact that millions of families will be pushed back into poverty if the Senate fails to pass Build Back Better before the end of the year. #CutThePentagon\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1639591705
The bipartisan ease with which the NDAA passed stood in stark contrast with the increasingly dim prospects for the Build Back Better Act, which passed the House without a single Republican vote last month but was on the verge of collapse Wednesday as Sen. Joe Manchin (W-Va.)--who voted "yes" on the NDAA--seeks to eliminate the boosted child tax credit, a move experts say would impoverish millions of children.
"Families will stop receiving child tax credit checks next month unless Congress finally passes the Build Back Better Act, but the flow of dollars to stockholders for Pentagon contractors will go on, uninterrupted," lamented Koshgarian.
Carley Towne, national co-director of the peace group CodePink, called the NDAA "a slap in the face to working people across this country."
"Over the past few months, Congress has been gridlocked over the possibility of spending $350 billion annually on healthcare, education, and green jobs," she told Common Dreams. "All of a sudden, when it comes to money for war, Congress once again shows that they are ready and willing to prioritize war profiteers over human needs."
\u201cWe ended the longest war in US history, yet Congress just passed a $768 BILLION defense budget \u2014 more than the military budgets of the next 11 countries combined.\n\nDon't tell me we can't afford to fight poverty, cancel student debt, pass paid leave, and defeat the climate crisis.\u201d— Pramila Jayapal (@Pramila Jayapal) 1639593901
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said that "as the national debate centers around how much is 'too much' to be spending on the true needs of the American people, it is unconscionable to approve three-quarters of a trillion dollars for war-making, a sum that is $25 billion more than the president even requested."
"Why is there more money for the military-industrial complex--providing no additional protection for our national security and arguably diminishing it--at the same time the U.S. is refusing to spend the $25 billion needed to make enough additional vaccines to vaccinate the world?" he asked.
Even the right-wing National Taxpayers Union called the NDAA's $778 billion topline spending figure "unsustainable."
\u201cOne of the many disgusting things about the bloated $778 billion defense budget is next year anything less than that will be labeled "a cut to military spending" and the bi-partisan war hawks will end up increasing it again & again. Enough is never enough for the death merchants.\u201d— Warren Gunnels (@Warren Gunnels) 1639503483
"The Pentagon budget can't go on growing forever," Koshgarian stressed. "We need more members of Congress to step up, as some principled members have done, and say no to bigger and bigger Pentagon budgets."
"We've seen powerful progressive movements achieve a lot over the last couple of years," she added, "and we can move the needle on Pentagon spending, too."
As a bill authorizing $778 billion in military spending breezed through the U.S. Senate Wednesday amid darkening prospects for the Build Back Better social and climate investment package, peace and civil society groups decried what they called the misplaced priorities that place the military-industrial complex and corporate greed above dire human and planetary needs.
"Where is all the hand-wringing over the $778 billion military bill that we've seen over Build Back Better, which costs less than a quarter as much annually?"
After passing the House of Representatives last week by a vote of 363-70--51 Democrats and 19 Republicans voted against it--88 senators voted to approve the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2022, a policy measure that provides $25 billion more in Pentagon funding than requested by President Joe Biden and nearly $38 billion more than the last NDAA of former President Donald Trump's tenure.
Only 11 senators voted against the measure: New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker--who in an unusual move changed his vote from "yes" to "no"--Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
"Where is all the hand-wringing over the $778 billion military bill that we've seen over Build Back Better, which costs less than a quarter as much annually? Congress has completely abdicated their responsibility for the Pentagon budget," Lindsay Koshgarian, program director of the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "They may as well hand over a blank check."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 BREAKING: The Senate just voted to pass the astronomical $778 billion Pentagon budget (89-10) DESPITE the fact that millions of families will be pushed back into poverty if the Senate fails to pass Build Back Better before the end of the year. #CutThePentagon\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1639591705
The bipartisan ease with which the NDAA passed stood in stark contrast with the increasingly dim prospects for the Build Back Better Act, which passed the House without a single Republican vote last month but was on the verge of collapse Wednesday as Sen. Joe Manchin (W-Va.)--who voted "yes" on the NDAA--seeks to eliminate the boosted child tax credit, a move experts say would impoverish millions of children.
"Families will stop receiving child tax credit checks next month unless Congress finally passes the Build Back Better Act, but the flow of dollars to stockholders for Pentagon contractors will go on, uninterrupted," lamented Koshgarian.
Carley Towne, national co-director of the peace group CodePink, called the NDAA "a slap in the face to working people across this country."
"Over the past few months, Congress has been gridlocked over the possibility of spending $350 billion annually on healthcare, education, and green jobs," she told Common Dreams. "All of a sudden, when it comes to money for war, Congress once again shows that they are ready and willing to prioritize war profiteers over human needs."
\u201cWe ended the longest war in US history, yet Congress just passed a $768 BILLION defense budget \u2014 more than the military budgets of the next 11 countries combined.\n\nDon't tell me we can't afford to fight poverty, cancel student debt, pass paid leave, and defeat the climate crisis.\u201d— Pramila Jayapal (@Pramila Jayapal) 1639593901
Robert Weissman, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said that "as the national debate centers around how much is 'too much' to be spending on the true needs of the American people, it is unconscionable to approve three-quarters of a trillion dollars for war-making, a sum that is $25 billion more than the president even requested."
"Why is there more money for the military-industrial complex--providing no additional protection for our national security and arguably diminishing it--at the same time the U.S. is refusing to spend the $25 billion needed to make enough additional vaccines to vaccinate the world?" he asked.
Even the right-wing National Taxpayers Union called the NDAA's $778 billion topline spending figure "unsustainable."
\u201cOne of the many disgusting things about the bloated $778 billion defense budget is next year anything less than that will be labeled "a cut to military spending" and the bi-partisan war hawks will end up increasing it again & again. Enough is never enough for the death merchants.\u201d— Warren Gunnels (@Warren Gunnels) 1639503483
"The Pentagon budget can't go on growing forever," Koshgarian stressed. "We need more members of Congress to step up, as some principled members have done, and say no to bigger and bigger Pentagon budgets."
"We've seen powerful progressive movements achieve a lot over the last couple of years," she added, "and we can move the needle on Pentagon spending, too."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.