Supporters of the initiative "Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co." dance during an election party on September 26, 2021 in Berlin. (Photo: Monika Skolimowska/picture alliance via Getty Images)
'Fantastic!': Berlin Votes to Expropriate 240K Apartments From Corporate Landlords
"Which cities will follow its lead?" asked one advocate, after 56% of voters told Berlin's municipal government to transfer thousands of homes to public ownership.
Housing justice advocates are celebrating after residents in Berlin, Germany--fed up with skyrocketing rents driven in part by speculative investments in real estate markets--voted on Sunday to socialize roughly 240,000 homes by expropriating apartments controlled by the city's biggest corporate landlords and transferring them to public ownership.
By a margin of 56% to 39%, Berliners approved a referendum that instructs the municipal government to purchase housing from mega-landlords, or private real estate companies that own more than 3,000 units. If implemented, the move would bring approximately 240,000 homes, or about 15% of the city's stock, into public ownership.
The referendum was secured by the Deutsche Wohnen & Co. Enteignen (Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.) campaign, which gathered 343,000 petition signatures to ensure the measure made its way onto the ballot for Sunday's elections in Germany. Deutsche Wohnen--the largest residential property owner in Berlin, with a portfolio of more than 113,000 units--is one of several profit-maximizing mega-landlords that organizers expect to be covered by the decision.
"For years, Berlin's rental market has been going berserk," the campaign noted, adding that over the past decade, rents have risen to a far greater extent than wages. "That is why more and more people are affected by displacement... We seek to end the rental insanity."
Progressives worldwide applauded Sunday night's result--made possible by years of organizing by anti-gentrification activists and housing-for-all campaigners in Berlin, where over 84% of the population are tenants and "rents have doubled in the last 10 to 15 years," according to Jonas Becker, a spokesperson for Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.
"Fantastic!" tweeted journalist and author Paris Marx. "Now which cities will follow its lead?"
Progressive International characterized the development as a chance to "return" hundreds of thousands of homes to the public. That's because, as journalist Molly Shah wrote last week for The Real News Network, "Berlin used to have much more publicly owned housing, but since reunification of East and West Germany in 1990 more than 200,000 units have been sold to private equity and hedge funds."
Notwithstanding the significance of Sunday night's victory, the referendum to transform corporate landlords' units into public housing is non-binding, meaning that fierce opposition is expected and organizers will likely need to put sustained pressure on Berlin's elected officials in order to ensure the city passes a law that turns the plan into reality.
Euronews reported:
The newly elected parliament has yet to form a coalition, but will likely be comprised of the outgoing constellation of center-left SPD, Greens, and the Left Party. Of those, only the Left Party openly supports expropriation, while the SPD is against it.
Incoming SPD mayor Franziska Giffey has recently categorically ruled out expropriation. Given that more than one million Berliners voted for it, compared to the roughly 400,000 that voted for her, Giffey's hand may be forced by the initiative's popularity.
Joanna Kusiak, an activist for Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co., warned the city government that "more people voted for our initiative than any single party in Berlin. We got support from every part of Berlin, and across the political spectrum."
Kalle Kunkel, another organizer behind the initiative, said that Mayor-elect Giffey "can't just be indifferent to a democratic decision."
"We have over 1,000 activists around the city and they're not going to be robbed of this victory."
--Kalle Kunkel, Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.
"Sure, she'll try to use all the legal and formal tricks at her disposal to delay or circumvent its implementation," Kunkel acknowledged, "but we have over 1,000 activists around the city and they're not going to be robbed of this victory."
Seven independent legal experts have confirmed that the proposal is constitutional, according to Kusiak. The campaign invokes Article 15 of the German constitution, a previously unused eminent domain clause that, according to Euronews, "expressly allows socialization for the public good."
While Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co. estimates that the initiative would cost roughly $9.3 billion, the projections of Berlin's municipal government are closer to $35.1 billion. "The deciding factor," Euronews noted, "will be if the city has to pay the market price for the apartments."
Earlier this month, Berlin's government announced that it would buy nearly 15,000 apartments from two corporate landlords for $2.9 billion, a move that housing campaigners attributed to the potential success of the referendum.
Some progressives say that Berlin's movement to decommodify thousands of homes in one fell swoop provides important lessons, given that moving units from the private market--where shelter is increasingly treated as a financial asset--to the public domain instantly increases the supply of housing that should, in theory, be permanently affordable.
Based on her conversations with housing organizers in Berlin, Shah wrote that "the reason so many of the city's establishment have come out against the law is because of its possible effectiveness in solving the housing crisis--not only in Berlin, but as an example to cities all over the world."
Kim Meyer of the Berlin Alliance against Displacement and Rent Madness told Shah that a successful referendum to decommodify housing in Germany's capital city "might inspire people to question the current sellout of their land and cities to global investors and to [investigate] compulsory purchases of necessities by their administrations, like housing, water wells, power plants, et cetera, and to fight for their human right to housing."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Housing justice advocates are celebrating after residents in Berlin, Germany--fed up with skyrocketing rents driven in part by speculative investments in real estate markets--voted on Sunday to socialize roughly 240,000 homes by expropriating apartments controlled by the city's biggest corporate landlords and transferring them to public ownership.
By a margin of 56% to 39%, Berliners approved a referendum that instructs the municipal government to purchase housing from mega-landlords, or private real estate companies that own more than 3,000 units. If implemented, the move would bring approximately 240,000 homes, or about 15% of the city's stock, into public ownership.
The referendum was secured by the Deutsche Wohnen & Co. Enteignen (Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.) campaign, which gathered 343,000 petition signatures to ensure the measure made its way onto the ballot for Sunday's elections in Germany. Deutsche Wohnen--the largest residential property owner in Berlin, with a portfolio of more than 113,000 units--is one of several profit-maximizing mega-landlords that organizers expect to be covered by the decision.
"For years, Berlin's rental market has been going berserk," the campaign noted, adding that over the past decade, rents have risen to a far greater extent than wages. "That is why more and more people are affected by displacement... We seek to end the rental insanity."
Progressives worldwide applauded Sunday night's result--made possible by years of organizing by anti-gentrification activists and housing-for-all campaigners in Berlin, where over 84% of the population are tenants and "rents have doubled in the last 10 to 15 years," according to Jonas Becker, a spokesperson for Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.
"Fantastic!" tweeted journalist and author Paris Marx. "Now which cities will follow its lead?"
Progressive International characterized the development as a chance to "return" hundreds of thousands of homes to the public. That's because, as journalist Molly Shah wrote last week for The Real News Network, "Berlin used to have much more publicly owned housing, but since reunification of East and West Germany in 1990 more than 200,000 units have been sold to private equity and hedge funds."
Notwithstanding the significance of Sunday night's victory, the referendum to transform corporate landlords' units into public housing is non-binding, meaning that fierce opposition is expected and organizers will likely need to put sustained pressure on Berlin's elected officials in order to ensure the city passes a law that turns the plan into reality.
Euronews reported:
The newly elected parliament has yet to form a coalition, but will likely be comprised of the outgoing constellation of center-left SPD, Greens, and the Left Party. Of those, only the Left Party openly supports expropriation, while the SPD is against it.
Incoming SPD mayor Franziska Giffey has recently categorically ruled out expropriation. Given that more than one million Berliners voted for it, compared to the roughly 400,000 that voted for her, Giffey's hand may be forced by the initiative's popularity.
Joanna Kusiak, an activist for Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co., warned the city government that "more people voted for our initiative than any single party in Berlin. We got support from every part of Berlin, and across the political spectrum."
Kalle Kunkel, another organizer behind the initiative, said that Mayor-elect Giffey "can't just be indifferent to a democratic decision."
"We have over 1,000 activists around the city and they're not going to be robbed of this victory."
--Kalle Kunkel, Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.
"Sure, she'll try to use all the legal and formal tricks at her disposal to delay or circumvent its implementation," Kunkel acknowledged, "but we have over 1,000 activists around the city and they're not going to be robbed of this victory."
Seven independent legal experts have confirmed that the proposal is constitutional, according to Kusiak. The campaign invokes Article 15 of the German constitution, a previously unused eminent domain clause that, according to Euronews, "expressly allows socialization for the public good."
While Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co. estimates that the initiative would cost roughly $9.3 billion, the projections of Berlin's municipal government are closer to $35.1 billion. "The deciding factor," Euronews noted, "will be if the city has to pay the market price for the apartments."
Earlier this month, Berlin's government announced that it would buy nearly 15,000 apartments from two corporate landlords for $2.9 billion, a move that housing campaigners attributed to the potential success of the referendum.
Some progressives say that Berlin's movement to decommodify thousands of homes in one fell swoop provides important lessons, given that moving units from the private market--where shelter is increasingly treated as a financial asset--to the public domain instantly increases the supply of housing that should, in theory, be permanently affordable.
Based on her conversations with housing organizers in Berlin, Shah wrote that "the reason so many of the city's establishment have come out against the law is because of its possible effectiveness in solving the housing crisis--not only in Berlin, but as an example to cities all over the world."
Kim Meyer of the Berlin Alliance against Displacement and Rent Madness told Shah that a successful referendum to decommodify housing in Germany's capital city "might inspire people to question the current sellout of their land and cities to global investors and to [investigate] compulsory purchases of necessities by their administrations, like housing, water wells, power plants, et cetera, and to fight for their human right to housing."
Housing justice advocates are celebrating after residents in Berlin, Germany--fed up with skyrocketing rents driven in part by speculative investments in real estate markets--voted on Sunday to socialize roughly 240,000 homes by expropriating apartments controlled by the city's biggest corporate landlords and transferring them to public ownership.
By a margin of 56% to 39%, Berliners approved a referendum that instructs the municipal government to purchase housing from mega-landlords, or private real estate companies that own more than 3,000 units. If implemented, the move would bring approximately 240,000 homes, or about 15% of the city's stock, into public ownership.
The referendum was secured by the Deutsche Wohnen & Co. Enteignen (Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.) campaign, which gathered 343,000 petition signatures to ensure the measure made its way onto the ballot for Sunday's elections in Germany. Deutsche Wohnen--the largest residential property owner in Berlin, with a portfolio of more than 113,000 units--is one of several profit-maximizing mega-landlords that organizers expect to be covered by the decision.
"For years, Berlin's rental market has been going berserk," the campaign noted, adding that over the past decade, rents have risen to a far greater extent than wages. "That is why more and more people are affected by displacement... We seek to end the rental insanity."
Progressives worldwide applauded Sunday night's result--made possible by years of organizing by anti-gentrification activists and housing-for-all campaigners in Berlin, where over 84% of the population are tenants and "rents have doubled in the last 10 to 15 years," according to Jonas Becker, a spokesperson for Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.
"Fantastic!" tweeted journalist and author Paris Marx. "Now which cities will follow its lead?"
Progressive International characterized the development as a chance to "return" hundreds of thousands of homes to the public. That's because, as journalist Molly Shah wrote last week for The Real News Network, "Berlin used to have much more publicly owned housing, but since reunification of East and West Germany in 1990 more than 200,000 units have been sold to private equity and hedge funds."
Notwithstanding the significance of Sunday night's victory, the referendum to transform corporate landlords' units into public housing is non-binding, meaning that fierce opposition is expected and organizers will likely need to put sustained pressure on Berlin's elected officials in order to ensure the city passes a law that turns the plan into reality.
Euronews reported:
The newly elected parliament has yet to form a coalition, but will likely be comprised of the outgoing constellation of center-left SPD, Greens, and the Left Party. Of those, only the Left Party openly supports expropriation, while the SPD is against it.
Incoming SPD mayor Franziska Giffey has recently categorically ruled out expropriation. Given that more than one million Berliners voted for it, compared to the roughly 400,000 that voted for her, Giffey's hand may be forced by the initiative's popularity.
Joanna Kusiak, an activist for Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co., warned the city government that "more people voted for our initiative than any single party in Berlin. We got support from every part of Berlin, and across the political spectrum."
Kalle Kunkel, another organizer behind the initiative, said that Mayor-elect Giffey "can't just be indifferent to a democratic decision."
"We have over 1,000 activists around the city and they're not going to be robbed of this victory."
--Kalle Kunkel, Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co.
"Sure, she'll try to use all the legal and formal tricks at her disposal to delay or circumvent its implementation," Kunkel acknowledged, "but we have over 1,000 activists around the city and they're not going to be robbed of this victory."
Seven independent legal experts have confirmed that the proposal is constitutional, according to Kusiak. The campaign invokes Article 15 of the German constitution, a previously unused eminent domain clause that, according to Euronews, "expressly allows socialization for the public good."
While Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co. estimates that the initiative would cost roughly $9.3 billion, the projections of Berlin's municipal government are closer to $35.1 billion. "The deciding factor," Euronews noted, "will be if the city has to pay the market price for the apartments."
Earlier this month, Berlin's government announced that it would buy nearly 15,000 apartments from two corporate landlords for $2.9 billion, a move that housing campaigners attributed to the potential success of the referendum.
Some progressives say that Berlin's movement to decommodify thousands of homes in one fell swoop provides important lessons, given that moving units from the private market--where shelter is increasingly treated as a financial asset--to the public domain instantly increases the supply of housing that should, in theory, be permanently affordable.
Based on her conversations with housing organizers in Berlin, Shah wrote that "the reason so many of the city's establishment have come out against the law is because of its possible effectiveness in solving the housing crisis--not only in Berlin, but as an example to cities all over the world."
Kim Meyer of the Berlin Alliance against Displacement and Rent Madness told Shah that a successful referendum to decommodify housing in Germany's capital city "might inspire people to question the current sellout of their land and cities to global investors and to [investigate] compulsory purchases of necessities by their administrations, like housing, water wells, power plants, et cetera, and to fight for their human right to housing."