

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday urged Senate Republicans to "go nuclear" and take away Democrats' ability to block his Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, as members of his party suggest that is the very path they're willing to take.
That rule change, as The Hill explains, "would allow [Gorsuch's] nomination to move forward with a 51-vote majority, rather than the 60 needed if Gorsuch is filibustered." Republicans hold 52 seats in the Senate. CNN notes that "Republicans and Democrats have long resisted [invoking the rule change] as it would change the confirmation process for Supreme Court nominees in the future as well."
Speaking at the White House, Trump said that in the face of congressional gridlock over the nomination, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) should impose it anyway, saying, "I would say, if you can, Mitch, go nuclear because that would be an absolute shame if a man of this quality was caught up in the web. So I would say [...] go for it."
Watch his comments below:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has said that his party is prepared to filibuster, saying in a statement Tuesday that "Gorsuch has repeatedly sided with corporations over working people, demonstrated a hostility toward women's rights, and most troubling, hewed to an ideological approach to jurisprudence that makes me skeptical that he can be a strong, independent justice on the court."
According to McConnell, however, "regardless of all this procedural talk about filibusters, no filibusters, we're going to get this judge confirmed,"
Reporting from Capitol Hill on Wednesday, MSNBC political correspondent Kasie Hunt featured interviews with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), both of whom employed the same phrase when they said that "one way or another" Gorsuch would be confirmed.
Though neither would answer specific questions about what that meant in terms of procedure, Hunt said it was "clear" to her that the message has been spread among Republicans that the "nuclear option" was indeed on the table.
And Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) told MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle that Republicans "simply may have to" go nuclear.
Gorsuch would fill the seat left vacant for nearly a year since the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, as Republicans blocked the nomination of former President Barack Obama's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, Merrick Garland. According to SCOTUSblog, "some of the parallels [between Scalia and Gorsuch] can be downright eerie."
Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron on Tuesday called Gorsuch "a disastrous choice for the U.S. Supreme Court--especially now, given the president's repeated demonstrations of contempt for our democratic institutions. This shows us how vital the federal courts are as a check against unconstitutional and erratic acts by the other branches."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Donald Trump on Wednesday urged Senate Republicans to "go nuclear" and take away Democrats' ability to block his Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, as members of his party suggest that is the very path they're willing to take.
That rule change, as The Hill explains, "would allow [Gorsuch's] nomination to move forward with a 51-vote majority, rather than the 60 needed if Gorsuch is filibustered." Republicans hold 52 seats in the Senate. CNN notes that "Republicans and Democrats have long resisted [invoking the rule change] as it would change the confirmation process for Supreme Court nominees in the future as well."
Speaking at the White House, Trump said that in the face of congressional gridlock over the nomination, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) should impose it anyway, saying, "I would say, if you can, Mitch, go nuclear because that would be an absolute shame if a man of this quality was caught up in the web. So I would say [...] go for it."
Watch his comments below:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has said that his party is prepared to filibuster, saying in a statement Tuesday that "Gorsuch has repeatedly sided with corporations over working people, demonstrated a hostility toward women's rights, and most troubling, hewed to an ideological approach to jurisprudence that makes me skeptical that he can be a strong, independent justice on the court."
According to McConnell, however, "regardless of all this procedural talk about filibusters, no filibusters, we're going to get this judge confirmed,"
Reporting from Capitol Hill on Wednesday, MSNBC political correspondent Kasie Hunt featured interviews with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), both of whom employed the same phrase when they said that "one way or another" Gorsuch would be confirmed.
Though neither would answer specific questions about what that meant in terms of procedure, Hunt said it was "clear" to her that the message has been spread among Republicans that the "nuclear option" was indeed on the table.
And Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) told MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle that Republicans "simply may have to" go nuclear.
Gorsuch would fill the seat left vacant for nearly a year since the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, as Republicans blocked the nomination of former President Barack Obama's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, Merrick Garland. According to SCOTUSblog, "some of the parallels [between Scalia and Gorsuch] can be downright eerie."
Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron on Tuesday called Gorsuch "a disastrous choice for the U.S. Supreme Court--especially now, given the president's repeated demonstrations of contempt for our democratic institutions. This shows us how vital the federal courts are as a check against unconstitutional and erratic acts by the other branches."
President Donald Trump on Wednesday urged Senate Republicans to "go nuclear" and take away Democrats' ability to block his Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, as members of his party suggest that is the very path they're willing to take.
That rule change, as The Hill explains, "would allow [Gorsuch's] nomination to move forward with a 51-vote majority, rather than the 60 needed if Gorsuch is filibustered." Republicans hold 52 seats in the Senate. CNN notes that "Republicans and Democrats have long resisted [invoking the rule change] as it would change the confirmation process for Supreme Court nominees in the future as well."
Speaking at the White House, Trump said that in the face of congressional gridlock over the nomination, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) should impose it anyway, saying, "I would say, if you can, Mitch, go nuclear because that would be an absolute shame if a man of this quality was caught up in the web. So I would say [...] go for it."
Watch his comments below:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has said that his party is prepared to filibuster, saying in a statement Tuesday that "Gorsuch has repeatedly sided with corporations over working people, demonstrated a hostility toward women's rights, and most troubling, hewed to an ideological approach to jurisprudence that makes me skeptical that he can be a strong, independent justice on the court."
According to McConnell, however, "regardless of all this procedural talk about filibusters, no filibusters, we're going to get this judge confirmed,"
Reporting from Capitol Hill on Wednesday, MSNBC political correspondent Kasie Hunt featured interviews with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), both of whom employed the same phrase when they said that "one way or another" Gorsuch would be confirmed.
Though neither would answer specific questions about what that meant in terms of procedure, Hunt said it was "clear" to her that the message has been spread among Republicans that the "nuclear option" was indeed on the table.
And Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) told MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle that Republicans "simply may have to" go nuclear.
Gorsuch would fill the seat left vacant for nearly a year since the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, as Republicans blocked the nomination of former President Barack Obama's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, Merrick Garland. According to SCOTUSblog, "some of the parallels [between Scalia and Gorsuch] can be downright eerie."
Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron on Tuesday called Gorsuch "a disastrous choice for the U.S. Supreme Court--especially now, given the president's repeated demonstrations of contempt for our democratic institutions. This shows us how vital the federal courts are as a check against unconstitutional and erratic acts by the other branches."