SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Judge Strikes Down Wisconsin's 'Discriminatory' Voter ID Law
'This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote'
Apr 30, 2014
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Tuesday struck down the state's controversial voter ID law on the grounds that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
Issued by Judge Lynn Adelman of Federal District Court in Milwaukee, the ruling came in response to an American Civil Liberties Union challenge of the law, which was passed in 2011 and imposes the often prohibitive requirement that voters show ID.
In a 90-page decision, Adelman rejected arguments made by the law's proponents that ID is necessary to prevent voter fraud, stating that there is a dearth of evidence that voter fraud is a problem in the state. "[I]t's is absolutely clear that Act 23 will prevent more legitimate votes from being cast than fraudulent votes," writes Adelman.
"This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote."
-- Dale Ho, ACLU"A disproportionate share of the Black and Latino populations must shoulder an additional burden in order to exercise the right to vote," Adelman continues. This is because "they are disproportionately likely to live in poverty, which in turn is traceable to the effects of discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and housing."
According to Adelman, 9 percent of registered voters in Wisconsin do not have the required ID -- amounting to more than two times the margin of victory in the most recent gubernatorial election.
The ACLU had argued the law discriminates against minorities, the elderly, people with disabilities, and low-income and homeless people.
According to an ACLU statement,
Among the plaintiffs is Shirley Brown, an African-American woman in her 70s who was born at home in Louisiana and never had a birth certificate. Brown, who had voted in Wisconsin for decades, was denied an ID because she did not have a birth certificate. DMV rejected a statement from her elementary school attesting to her birth, even though Medicare accepted the statement. Another voter, Eddie Lee Holloway Jr., was unable to get ID because his birth certificate read "Eddie Junior Holloway" instead of "Eddie Lee Holloway Junior." The court recognized that these and many other voters would be harmed by the law.
This was the first time a federal court has invoked what's left of the Voting Rights Act after it was gutted this summer to overturn a state's voter ID law, potentially clearing the way for similar challenges across the country.
A New York Times op-ed states, "The Wisconsin ruling is important in part because it shows the power of the testimony of real, everyday people whose right to vote is demonstrably burdened by these laws."
"This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. "This decision put them on notice that they can't tamper with citizens' fundamental right to cast a ballot. The people, and our democracy, deserve and demand better."
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Tuesday struck down the state's controversial voter ID law on the grounds that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
Issued by Judge Lynn Adelman of Federal District Court in Milwaukee, the ruling came in response to an American Civil Liberties Union challenge of the law, which was passed in 2011 and imposes the often prohibitive requirement that voters show ID.
In a 90-page decision, Adelman rejected arguments made by the law's proponents that ID is necessary to prevent voter fraud, stating that there is a dearth of evidence that voter fraud is a problem in the state. "[I]t's is absolutely clear that Act 23 will prevent more legitimate votes from being cast than fraudulent votes," writes Adelman.
"This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote."
-- Dale Ho, ACLU"A disproportionate share of the Black and Latino populations must shoulder an additional burden in order to exercise the right to vote," Adelman continues. This is because "they are disproportionately likely to live in poverty, which in turn is traceable to the effects of discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and housing."
According to Adelman, 9 percent of registered voters in Wisconsin do not have the required ID -- amounting to more than two times the margin of victory in the most recent gubernatorial election.
The ACLU had argued the law discriminates against minorities, the elderly, people with disabilities, and low-income and homeless people.
According to an ACLU statement,
Among the plaintiffs is Shirley Brown, an African-American woman in her 70s who was born at home in Louisiana and never had a birth certificate. Brown, who had voted in Wisconsin for decades, was denied an ID because she did not have a birth certificate. DMV rejected a statement from her elementary school attesting to her birth, even though Medicare accepted the statement. Another voter, Eddie Lee Holloway Jr., was unable to get ID because his birth certificate read "Eddie Junior Holloway" instead of "Eddie Lee Holloway Junior." The court recognized that these and many other voters would be harmed by the law.
This was the first time a federal court has invoked what's left of the Voting Rights Act after it was gutted this summer to overturn a state's voter ID law, potentially clearing the way for similar challenges across the country.
A New York Times op-ed states, "The Wisconsin ruling is important in part because it shows the power of the testimony of real, everyday people whose right to vote is demonstrably burdened by these laws."
"This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. "This decision put them on notice that they can't tamper with citizens' fundamental right to cast a ballot. The people, and our democracy, deserve and demand better."
_____________________
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Tuesday struck down the state's controversial voter ID law on the grounds that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
Issued by Judge Lynn Adelman of Federal District Court in Milwaukee, the ruling came in response to an American Civil Liberties Union challenge of the law, which was passed in 2011 and imposes the often prohibitive requirement that voters show ID.
In a 90-page decision, Adelman rejected arguments made by the law's proponents that ID is necessary to prevent voter fraud, stating that there is a dearth of evidence that voter fraud is a problem in the state. "[I]t's is absolutely clear that Act 23 will prevent more legitimate votes from being cast than fraudulent votes," writes Adelman.
"This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote."
-- Dale Ho, ACLU"A disproportionate share of the Black and Latino populations must shoulder an additional burden in order to exercise the right to vote," Adelman continues. This is because "they are disproportionately likely to live in poverty, which in turn is traceable to the effects of discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and housing."
According to Adelman, 9 percent of registered voters in Wisconsin do not have the required ID -- amounting to more than two times the margin of victory in the most recent gubernatorial election.
The ACLU had argued the law discriminates against minorities, the elderly, people with disabilities, and low-income and homeless people.
According to an ACLU statement,
Among the plaintiffs is Shirley Brown, an African-American woman in her 70s who was born at home in Louisiana and never had a birth certificate. Brown, who had voted in Wisconsin for decades, was denied an ID because she did not have a birth certificate. DMV rejected a statement from her elementary school attesting to her birth, even though Medicare accepted the statement. Another voter, Eddie Lee Holloway Jr., was unable to get ID because his birth certificate read "Eddie Junior Holloway" instead of "Eddie Lee Holloway Junior." The court recognized that these and many other voters would be harmed by the law.
This was the first time a federal court has invoked what's left of the Voting Rights Act after it was gutted this summer to overturn a state's voter ID law, potentially clearing the way for similar challenges across the country.
A New York Times op-ed states, "The Wisconsin ruling is important in part because it shows the power of the testimony of real, everyday people whose right to vote is demonstrably burdened by these laws."
"This is a warning to other states that are trying to make it harder for citizens to vote," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. "This decision put them on notice that they can't tamper with citizens' fundamental right to cast a ballot. The people, and our democracy, deserve and demand better."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy