WASHINGTON - Of the top five outside international appointments made by embattled World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz during his nearly two-year tenure, three were senior political appointees of right-wing governments that provided strong backing for U.S. policy in Iraq.The latest appointment came just last month when former Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister Marwan Muasher was named senior vice president for external affairs.\r\n\r\nMuasher served as King Abdullah\u0026#039;s ambassador here in Washington in the run-up to the Iraq war in 2002 and reportedly played a key role in ensuring Amman\u0026#039;s co-operation in the March 2003 invasion.\r\n\r\nDuring and after the invasion, when he served first as foreign minister and then as deputy prime minister, he was considered among Washington\u0026#039;s staunchest supporters in an increasingly hostile Arab world.\r\n\r\nMuasher\u0026#039;s appointment came nine months after Wolfowitz named former Spanish foreign minister Ana Palacio as the Bank\u0026#039;s senior vice president and general counsel. As foreign minister, she was an outspoken proponent of the U.S.-led Iraq invasion, to which her government, led by former Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, contributed 1,500 troops.\r\n\r\nAlso in June 2006, Wolfowitz named former Salvadoran Finance Minister Juan Jose Daboub as one of the Bank\u0026#039;s two managing directors. In addition to his financial post, Daboub served as chief of staff to former President Francisco Flores when, as a charter member of the U.S.-led \u0022Coalition of the Willing\u0022, he sent nearly 400 Salvadoran combat troops to Iraq, more than any other developing country.\r\n\r\nWolfowitz is currently fending off growing calls, particularly from Bank staff, non-government organisations and a number of former senior Bank officials, for his resignation over charges that he improperly negotiated a promotion and compensation package for his romantic partner, career Bank staffer Shaha Riza, who was subsequently seconded to the U.S. State Department.\r\n\r\nWolfowitz, who became the Bank\u0026#039;s president in June 2005, has long insisted that his own role as deputy defence secretary under U.S. President George W. Bush, in which he was a key architect of the Iraq war, would never influence his decisions at the Bank.\r\n\r\nAs recently as Thursday, as finance and development ministers began gathering here for the annual Spring Meetings of the Bank and its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Wolfowitz again denied that his connection to the Iraq war has played any role in his work at the Bank and suggested that the calls by staff for him resign were motivated at least in part by anti-war sentiment.\r\n\r\n\u0022For people who disagree with things they associate with me in my previous job,\u0022 he said, \u0022I am not in my previous job.\u0022\r\n\r\nBut persistent efforts by Wolfowitz to recruit a new country manager for Iraq despite concerns over staff security there -- as well as the Bank\u0026#039;s attempts last month to suppress reports about an incident in which a Bank employee was injured in Baghdad, apparently to avoid derailing his recruitment efforts -- have lent credence to critics\u0026#039; charges that he has been more than eager to line up the institution and its resources behind U.S. policy there.\r\n\r\nThe fact that Wolfowitz also took with him to the Bank several key right-wing Republican aides -- none with any development experience -- who had worked closely with him on Iraq-related issues while he was at the Pentagon also bolstered that impression.\r\n\r\nThere have been reports of elaborate off-the-record efforts on Wolfowitz\u0026#039;s part, during his tenure at the Bank, to persuade prominent journalists that the administration\u0026#039;s pre-war allegations of an operational link between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda were indeed true.\r\n\r\nIt is in that context that Wolfowitz\u0026#039;s appointments of non-U.S. individuals who were not already working for the Bank to top posts appear significant.\r\n\r\n\u0022I believe that Paul Wolfowitz has used his tenure in part to reward those governments and individuals who were particularly helpful to the U.S. in the Iraq War,\u0022 said Steven Clemens, director of the American Strategy Programme of the New America Foundation, who has closely followed Wolfowitz\u0026#039;s career on his much-read blog, www.thewashingtonnote.com.\r\n\r\n\u0022To me, that\u0026#039;s a completely irresponsible approach to managing one of the world\u0026#039;s most important economic development institutions,\u0022 he added.\r\n\r\nSince taking the reins, Wolfowitz has made five senior non-U.S. outside appointments at the Bank. In addition to Muasher, Palacio, and Daboub, they include Vincenzo La Via, a former Italian finance ministry official who serves as the Bank\u0026#039;s chief financial officer, and Lars Thunell, a Swede who serves as executive vice president of the Bank\u0026#039;s International Finance Corporation, a post for which the Bank president traditionally defers to the choice of the Bank\u0026#039;s major European donors.\r\n\r\nIn contrast to the last two, Muasher, Palacio and Daboub were all political appointees in governments that strongly backed the Bush administration on Iraq and on other issues, as well.\r\n\r\nDaboub was a senior member of the ruling right-wing ARENA party in El Salvador and effectively ran the country\u0026#039;s economic policy from 1999 to 2004.\r\n\r\n\u0022He really was [then president Francisco] Flores\u0026#039; right-hand man,\u0022 said Roberto Rubio, president of the Fundacion Nacional para Desarrollo in San Salvador, \u0022 and, as such, pursued the most orthodox economic policy in the country\u0026#039;s history, closely tied to U.S. policies.\u0022\r\n\r\nAccording to Rubio, he was also a frequent visitor to Washington, where he founded the Instituto America Libre to advocate free market policies. At a conference here in 2005, he called on Washington to \u0022act more aggressively on the problem of security that South American populists represent to the United States and to other Latin American countries that have not fallen into leftist hands yet.\u0022\r\n\r\nPalacio, an outspoken supporter of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, lost her position as foreign minister after the 2004 defeat of Aznar\u0026#039;s Partido Popular in 2004. Before her appointment to the Bank, she repeatedly denounced the decision of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero to withdraw Spanish forces from Iraq and praised the persistence of both Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair.\r\n\r\nIn an interview with the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute\u0026#039;s magazine, American Enterprise, in late 2005, she accused Zapatero of \u0022plung(ing) Spain into Third World politics\u0022 by allying it more closely with France and Germany than with Britain and the U.S.\r\n\r\nAs Jordan\u0026#039;s ambassador here before the Gulf War and later as foreign minister, Muasher met with then-deputy defence secretary Wolfowitz on at least several occasions, according to the Pentagon\u0026#039;s website.\r\n\r\nDespite King Abdullah II\u0026#039;s public criticism of the war, Washington found a \u0022willing\u0022 -- if behind-the-scenes -- ally in Muasher. While Jordan, like other Arab countries, did not send troops to Iraq, it quietly provided intelligence and other critical support for the U.S. before and during the war. It has also helped train thousands of Iraqi security personnel and tightened control of its borders to prevent the infiltration of Sunni fighters after the war.\r\n\r\nAs deputy prime minister, Muashar was charged with implementing the country\u0026#039;s \u0022reform\u0022 agenda, a portfolio that required frequent contact with U.S. officials, including former deputy assistant secretary of state for Near East and South Asian Affairs Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney with whom Wolfowitz was closely allied during Bush\u0026#039;s first term.\r\n\r\nWashington increased its aid to Jordan by some 300 million dollars in 2003 to a total of 450 million dollars. In 2006, it received 500 million dollars split between economic and military assistance.\r\n\r\nJordan\u0026#039;s benefits from the war included oil subsidies from Gulf States, substantial new U.S. aid, a booming real estate sector, and a growing Iraq-related trade and transport account -- and, apparently, the appointment of Muasher to the World Bank\u0026#039;s vice presidency.\r\n\r\n\u0022It\u0026#039;s not at all surprising given Wolfowitz\u0026#039; actions so far within the Bank and the Bush administration\u0026#039;s propensity to reward allies and cronies,\u0022 said Doug Hellinger, co-director of the Development GAP and a veteran Bank observer.\r\nCopyright \u0026copy; 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.