

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
At first glance, a poll released this week by USA Today and Rock the Vote, done by Ipsos, seems to confound our narrative that a majority of millennials identify more with progressives than conservatives. In fact, when asked that question point-blank when it comes to economic policy, 38 percent of respondents in the poll identified as conservative to some degree, while 34 percent identified as liberal.
But there are several signs in the poll that a progressive policy agenda would win much broader support among millennials than what would be indicated by how they identified themselves ideologically. (See our Populist Majority website for how other polls have measured national support for progressive policies.)
When the poll asked specific policy questions, a majority of the respondents - a sample of more than 1,100 adults between the ages of 18 and 34 - sided most of the time with positions that at least lean toward positions in our Populism 2015 Platform for People and the Planet.
Eighty percent, for example, agreed with the statement that "American should transition to mostly clean or renewable energy by 2030." Almost that same percentage supported regulation to protect air and water (which would be a no-brainer position if it were not for leading Republican presidential candidates campaigning on either abolishing or severely weakening the Environmental Protection Agency and the laws it enforces). Almost 60 percent support the idea of government investing more heavily in buses and rail.
The poll also ranks millennials as conservative on security and foreign policy issues, but they part from the Republican presidential candidates on their willingness to see the U.S. accept refugees from Syria and other conflict sites (53 percent agree) and whether the U.S, should focus on alleviating poverty as part of its strategy to combat terrorism (52 percent agree).
Poll respondents solidly agreed with the stances taken by Black Lives Matter activists and their supporters on basic questions of police violence, accountability and sentencing reform for nonviolent offenders. But the question that received the most agreement was on whether there would be a background check for all gun purchases in the United States, with 82 percent saying yes. (Fifty-eight percent agreed that "stricter gun laws would help prevent gun violence.")
It is no wonder, then, that when self-identified Democrats and independents in this group was asked by pollsters who they would vote for as president, 46 percent said they would vote for Bernie Sanders, 35 percent said Hillary Clinton and 5 percent said Martin O'Malley. For Republicans and independents, 26 percent said they would vote for Donald Trump and 11 percent said Ben Carson. Ted Cruz, now running first or second in most other Republican polls, came in fifth with 8 percent in this millennial poll, behind Ben Carson, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush.
Another clue that millennials may not be as conservative as they might lead pollsters to believe is in what they chose as "the most important issues for the next President of the United States." A suite of economic issues related to jobs, wages and family leave ranked first at 35 percent; ranking third below foreign policy and security was "education, college affordability and student debt" at 28 percent.
This poll did not probe further on whether respondents agreed with Republican presidential candidates who oppose an increase in the minimum wage - or who believe, as Donald Trump infamously stated, "our wages are too high" - or who are against federal efforts to make college affordable to everyone. But it is clear that there is not a large audience among millennials for the Republican candidate preoccupations with immigration, the budget deficit or tax cuts. And it's doubtful that their rating of jobs and wages, and college affordability, as top issues reflects support for how Republican candidates have positioned themselves on those issues.
It is worth stating the obvious: Millennials are not monolithic. It is true, as USA Today wrote in its coverage, that many consider themselves "more pragmatic than ideological." A significant share of this group is waiting to be persuaded - and is open to being persuaded - that their vote will make a difference, and that their vote for progressive candidates and policies will make their lives better. But that is a challenge that progressives are well equipped to successfully take on.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
At first glance, a poll released this week by USA Today and Rock the Vote, done by Ipsos, seems to confound our narrative that a majority of millennials identify more with progressives than conservatives. In fact, when asked that question point-blank when it comes to economic policy, 38 percent of respondents in the poll identified as conservative to some degree, while 34 percent identified as liberal.
But there are several signs in the poll that a progressive policy agenda would win much broader support among millennials than what would be indicated by how they identified themselves ideologically. (See our Populist Majority website for how other polls have measured national support for progressive policies.)
When the poll asked specific policy questions, a majority of the respondents - a sample of more than 1,100 adults between the ages of 18 and 34 - sided most of the time with positions that at least lean toward positions in our Populism 2015 Platform for People and the Planet.
Eighty percent, for example, agreed with the statement that "American should transition to mostly clean or renewable energy by 2030." Almost that same percentage supported regulation to protect air and water (which would be a no-brainer position if it were not for leading Republican presidential candidates campaigning on either abolishing or severely weakening the Environmental Protection Agency and the laws it enforces). Almost 60 percent support the idea of government investing more heavily in buses and rail.
The poll also ranks millennials as conservative on security and foreign policy issues, but they part from the Republican presidential candidates on their willingness to see the U.S. accept refugees from Syria and other conflict sites (53 percent agree) and whether the U.S, should focus on alleviating poverty as part of its strategy to combat terrorism (52 percent agree).
Poll respondents solidly agreed with the stances taken by Black Lives Matter activists and their supporters on basic questions of police violence, accountability and sentencing reform for nonviolent offenders. But the question that received the most agreement was on whether there would be a background check for all gun purchases in the United States, with 82 percent saying yes. (Fifty-eight percent agreed that "stricter gun laws would help prevent gun violence.")
It is no wonder, then, that when self-identified Democrats and independents in this group was asked by pollsters who they would vote for as president, 46 percent said they would vote for Bernie Sanders, 35 percent said Hillary Clinton and 5 percent said Martin O'Malley. For Republicans and independents, 26 percent said they would vote for Donald Trump and 11 percent said Ben Carson. Ted Cruz, now running first or second in most other Republican polls, came in fifth with 8 percent in this millennial poll, behind Ben Carson, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush.
Another clue that millennials may not be as conservative as they might lead pollsters to believe is in what they chose as "the most important issues for the next President of the United States." A suite of economic issues related to jobs, wages and family leave ranked first at 35 percent; ranking third below foreign policy and security was "education, college affordability and student debt" at 28 percent.
This poll did not probe further on whether respondents agreed with Republican presidential candidates who oppose an increase in the minimum wage - or who believe, as Donald Trump infamously stated, "our wages are too high" - or who are against federal efforts to make college affordable to everyone. But it is clear that there is not a large audience among millennials for the Republican candidate preoccupations with immigration, the budget deficit or tax cuts. And it's doubtful that their rating of jobs and wages, and college affordability, as top issues reflects support for how Republican candidates have positioned themselves on those issues.
It is worth stating the obvious: Millennials are not monolithic. It is true, as USA Today wrote in its coverage, that many consider themselves "more pragmatic than ideological." A significant share of this group is waiting to be persuaded - and is open to being persuaded - that their vote will make a difference, and that their vote for progressive candidates and policies will make their lives better. But that is a challenge that progressives are well equipped to successfully take on.
At first glance, a poll released this week by USA Today and Rock the Vote, done by Ipsos, seems to confound our narrative that a majority of millennials identify more with progressives than conservatives. In fact, when asked that question point-blank when it comes to economic policy, 38 percent of respondents in the poll identified as conservative to some degree, while 34 percent identified as liberal.
But there are several signs in the poll that a progressive policy agenda would win much broader support among millennials than what would be indicated by how they identified themselves ideologically. (See our Populist Majority website for how other polls have measured national support for progressive policies.)
When the poll asked specific policy questions, a majority of the respondents - a sample of more than 1,100 adults between the ages of 18 and 34 - sided most of the time with positions that at least lean toward positions in our Populism 2015 Platform for People and the Planet.
Eighty percent, for example, agreed with the statement that "American should transition to mostly clean or renewable energy by 2030." Almost that same percentage supported regulation to protect air and water (which would be a no-brainer position if it were not for leading Republican presidential candidates campaigning on either abolishing or severely weakening the Environmental Protection Agency and the laws it enforces). Almost 60 percent support the idea of government investing more heavily in buses and rail.
The poll also ranks millennials as conservative on security and foreign policy issues, but they part from the Republican presidential candidates on their willingness to see the U.S. accept refugees from Syria and other conflict sites (53 percent agree) and whether the U.S, should focus on alleviating poverty as part of its strategy to combat terrorism (52 percent agree).
Poll respondents solidly agreed with the stances taken by Black Lives Matter activists and their supporters on basic questions of police violence, accountability and sentencing reform for nonviolent offenders. But the question that received the most agreement was on whether there would be a background check for all gun purchases in the United States, with 82 percent saying yes. (Fifty-eight percent agreed that "stricter gun laws would help prevent gun violence.")
It is no wonder, then, that when self-identified Democrats and independents in this group was asked by pollsters who they would vote for as president, 46 percent said they would vote for Bernie Sanders, 35 percent said Hillary Clinton and 5 percent said Martin O'Malley. For Republicans and independents, 26 percent said they would vote for Donald Trump and 11 percent said Ben Carson. Ted Cruz, now running first or second in most other Republican polls, came in fifth with 8 percent in this millennial poll, behind Ben Carson, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush.
Another clue that millennials may not be as conservative as they might lead pollsters to believe is in what they chose as "the most important issues for the next President of the United States." A suite of economic issues related to jobs, wages and family leave ranked first at 35 percent; ranking third below foreign policy and security was "education, college affordability and student debt" at 28 percent.
This poll did not probe further on whether respondents agreed with Republican presidential candidates who oppose an increase in the minimum wage - or who believe, as Donald Trump infamously stated, "our wages are too high" - or who are against federal efforts to make college affordable to everyone. But it is clear that there is not a large audience among millennials for the Republican candidate preoccupations with immigration, the budget deficit or tax cuts. And it's doubtful that their rating of jobs and wages, and college affordability, as top issues reflects support for how Republican candidates have positioned themselves on those issues.
It is worth stating the obvious: Millennials are not monolithic. It is true, as USA Today wrote in its coverage, that many consider themselves "more pragmatic than ideological." A significant share of this group is waiting to be persuaded - and is open to being persuaded - that their vote will make a difference, and that their vote for progressive candidates and policies will make their lives better. But that is a challenge that progressives are well equipped to successfully take on.