

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
GOP House Speaker Paul Ryan (Wis.) swears the widely disparaged American Healthcare Act (AHCA) will pass the U.S. House of Representatives, but opposition from many corners--including from right-wing conservatives and healthcare companies--is making political observers dubious.
On top of energetic resistance from progressives and Democrats who say the plan is a recipe for "massive health insecurity for the American people," the AHCA has been met with skepticism and flat-out hostility from those who say it isn't cruel or profit-driven enough.
Is there a chance the proposal could be sunk entirely?
As of Wednesday morning, The Hill's whip list had three far-right Republicans on-record as planning to vote against the repeal-and-replace legislation: Justin Amash of Michigan; David Brat of Virginia; and Jim Jordan of Ohio. The positions of another 12 GOP representatives were described as "unclear or uncertain."
Right-wing Freedom Caucus member Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), one of those listed as on-the-fence, went as far as to say Tuesday evening: "Right now the Speaker of the House does not have the votes to pass this bill unless he's got substantial Democratic support."
The bill "faces perhaps an even steeper climb in the Senate," The Hill reported, where "at least eight Republican senators have voiced concerns with aspects of the legislation."
"[T]he margin for error is slim," the outlet noted. "Assuming all Democrats vote against the legislation, GOP leaders cannot afford more than 21 defections in the House and two in the Senate."
Meanwhile, two House committees are taking up the bill on Wednesday morning--though they still do not have a "score" on the legislation from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), making it impossible for lawmakers (or the public) to know its human or financial costs.
That's a big problem, and not just for Democrats like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), who on Tuesday demanded of Ryan that no votes be held--in committees or on the House floor--until that score is released. Politico reports that Senate Republicans have similarly said that until they have a CBO score, "it's unlikely many lawmakers will sign on. Privately, some Republicans fear the CBO score will show that millions of Americans will lose coverage. The CBO is expected to weigh in later this week."
Still, without many hardcore conservatives on the House Ways and Means or Energy and Commerce committees, it's likely the mark-ups will proceed apace. (Though Democrats do plan to "make some Republicans take some really tough votes" that are "revealing" about GOP's priorities on healthcare, according to CNN, which cited a Democratic aide.)
"The House floor is the problem," journalist David Dayen wrote on Twitter. He later noted that Breitbart's opposition to the legislation was a signal that "it's over" for "Ryancare."
At Vox, reporter Andrew Prokop outlined the three groups that could potentially "scuttle" the AHCA when it goes before the full chamber:
- The far right of the Republican Party. Within the GOP, staunch conservative politicians and groups have objected most vocally to the bill so far, because they're upset that it doesn't do enough to roll back Obamacare. Heritage Action, the Club for Growth, Freedomworks, Americans for Prosperity, and Freedom Partners have already declared their opposition to the current draft. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), and several members of the House Freedom Caucus, have joined them.
- Mainstream members who listen to lobbyists.Many of the more moderate Republicans in the House and Senate are receptive to lobbying from important interest groups. So if associations representing doctors, hospitals, or insurers say the bill has problems, the House could well slam the brakes. (And lo and behold, on Tuesday afternoon, the American Hospital Association wrote that it "cannot support the American Health Care Act in its current form.")
- Vulnerable members. Swing district representatives are already blanching at the prospect of a tough reelection fight. These are the members who really have their careers on the line, and several of them expressed misgivings about repeal and replace in leaked audio from a congressional retreat in January.
And that's not to mention the power of constituents who showed up in droves during the congressional recess to voice their opposition to Republican healthcare schemes--who are now more outraged than ever.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
GOP House Speaker Paul Ryan (Wis.) swears the widely disparaged American Healthcare Act (AHCA) will pass the U.S. House of Representatives, but opposition from many corners--including from right-wing conservatives and healthcare companies--is making political observers dubious.
On top of energetic resistance from progressives and Democrats who say the plan is a recipe for "massive health insecurity for the American people," the AHCA has been met with skepticism and flat-out hostility from those who say it isn't cruel or profit-driven enough.
Is there a chance the proposal could be sunk entirely?
As of Wednesday morning, The Hill's whip list had three far-right Republicans on-record as planning to vote against the repeal-and-replace legislation: Justin Amash of Michigan; David Brat of Virginia; and Jim Jordan of Ohio. The positions of another 12 GOP representatives were described as "unclear or uncertain."
Right-wing Freedom Caucus member Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), one of those listed as on-the-fence, went as far as to say Tuesday evening: "Right now the Speaker of the House does not have the votes to pass this bill unless he's got substantial Democratic support."
The bill "faces perhaps an even steeper climb in the Senate," The Hill reported, where "at least eight Republican senators have voiced concerns with aspects of the legislation."
"[T]he margin for error is slim," the outlet noted. "Assuming all Democrats vote against the legislation, GOP leaders cannot afford more than 21 defections in the House and two in the Senate."
Meanwhile, two House committees are taking up the bill on Wednesday morning--though they still do not have a "score" on the legislation from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), making it impossible for lawmakers (or the public) to know its human or financial costs.
That's a big problem, and not just for Democrats like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), who on Tuesday demanded of Ryan that no votes be held--in committees or on the House floor--until that score is released. Politico reports that Senate Republicans have similarly said that until they have a CBO score, "it's unlikely many lawmakers will sign on. Privately, some Republicans fear the CBO score will show that millions of Americans will lose coverage. The CBO is expected to weigh in later this week."
Still, without many hardcore conservatives on the House Ways and Means or Energy and Commerce committees, it's likely the mark-ups will proceed apace. (Though Democrats do plan to "make some Republicans take some really tough votes" that are "revealing" about GOP's priorities on healthcare, according to CNN, which cited a Democratic aide.)
"The House floor is the problem," journalist David Dayen wrote on Twitter. He later noted that Breitbart's opposition to the legislation was a signal that "it's over" for "Ryancare."
At Vox, reporter Andrew Prokop outlined the three groups that could potentially "scuttle" the AHCA when it goes before the full chamber:
- The far right of the Republican Party. Within the GOP, staunch conservative politicians and groups have objected most vocally to the bill so far, because they're upset that it doesn't do enough to roll back Obamacare. Heritage Action, the Club for Growth, Freedomworks, Americans for Prosperity, and Freedom Partners have already declared their opposition to the current draft. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), and several members of the House Freedom Caucus, have joined them.
- Mainstream members who listen to lobbyists.Many of the more moderate Republicans in the House and Senate are receptive to lobbying from important interest groups. So if associations representing doctors, hospitals, or insurers say the bill has problems, the House could well slam the brakes. (And lo and behold, on Tuesday afternoon, the American Hospital Association wrote that it "cannot support the American Health Care Act in its current form.")
- Vulnerable members. Swing district representatives are already blanching at the prospect of a tough reelection fight. These are the members who really have their careers on the line, and several of them expressed misgivings about repeal and replace in leaked audio from a congressional retreat in January.
And that's not to mention the power of constituents who showed up in droves during the congressional recess to voice their opposition to Republican healthcare schemes--who are now more outraged than ever.
GOP House Speaker Paul Ryan (Wis.) swears the widely disparaged American Healthcare Act (AHCA) will pass the U.S. House of Representatives, but opposition from many corners--including from right-wing conservatives and healthcare companies--is making political observers dubious.
On top of energetic resistance from progressives and Democrats who say the plan is a recipe for "massive health insecurity for the American people," the AHCA has been met with skepticism and flat-out hostility from those who say it isn't cruel or profit-driven enough.
Is there a chance the proposal could be sunk entirely?
As of Wednesday morning, The Hill's whip list had three far-right Republicans on-record as planning to vote against the repeal-and-replace legislation: Justin Amash of Michigan; David Brat of Virginia; and Jim Jordan of Ohio. The positions of another 12 GOP representatives were described as "unclear or uncertain."
Right-wing Freedom Caucus member Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), one of those listed as on-the-fence, went as far as to say Tuesday evening: "Right now the Speaker of the House does not have the votes to pass this bill unless he's got substantial Democratic support."
The bill "faces perhaps an even steeper climb in the Senate," The Hill reported, where "at least eight Republican senators have voiced concerns with aspects of the legislation."
"[T]he margin for error is slim," the outlet noted. "Assuming all Democrats vote against the legislation, GOP leaders cannot afford more than 21 defections in the House and two in the Senate."
Meanwhile, two House committees are taking up the bill on Wednesday morning--though they still do not have a "score" on the legislation from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), making it impossible for lawmakers (or the public) to know its human or financial costs.
That's a big problem, and not just for Democrats like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), who on Tuesday demanded of Ryan that no votes be held--in committees or on the House floor--until that score is released. Politico reports that Senate Republicans have similarly said that until they have a CBO score, "it's unlikely many lawmakers will sign on. Privately, some Republicans fear the CBO score will show that millions of Americans will lose coverage. The CBO is expected to weigh in later this week."
Still, without many hardcore conservatives on the House Ways and Means or Energy and Commerce committees, it's likely the mark-ups will proceed apace. (Though Democrats do plan to "make some Republicans take some really tough votes" that are "revealing" about GOP's priorities on healthcare, according to CNN, which cited a Democratic aide.)
"The House floor is the problem," journalist David Dayen wrote on Twitter. He later noted that Breitbart's opposition to the legislation was a signal that "it's over" for "Ryancare."
At Vox, reporter Andrew Prokop outlined the three groups that could potentially "scuttle" the AHCA when it goes before the full chamber:
- The far right of the Republican Party. Within the GOP, staunch conservative politicians and groups have objected most vocally to the bill so far, because they're upset that it doesn't do enough to roll back Obamacare. Heritage Action, the Club for Growth, Freedomworks, Americans for Prosperity, and Freedom Partners have already declared their opposition to the current draft. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), and several members of the House Freedom Caucus, have joined them.
- Mainstream members who listen to lobbyists.Many of the more moderate Republicans in the House and Senate are receptive to lobbying from important interest groups. So if associations representing doctors, hospitals, or insurers say the bill has problems, the House could well slam the brakes. (And lo and behold, on Tuesday afternoon, the American Hospital Association wrote that it "cannot support the American Health Care Act in its current form.")
- Vulnerable members. Swing district representatives are already blanching at the prospect of a tough reelection fight. These are the members who really have their careers on the line, and several of them expressed misgivings about repeal and replace in leaked audio from a congressional retreat in January.
And that's not to mention the power of constituents who showed up in droves during the congressional recess to voice their opposition to Republican healthcare schemes--who are now more outraged than ever.