

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Capping off a week that saw him nominate a known climate skeptic to head the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and put forth a fossil fuel CEO as potential secretary of state, President-elect Donald Trump said in a Sunday interview that "nobody really knows" if climate change is real.
When asked by "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace where he stands on the issue, Trump responded: "I'm still open-minded. Nobody really knows. Look, I'm somebody that gets it, and nobody really knows. It's not something that's so hard and fast."
He also claimed to be "studying" the Paris Agreement and whether to withdraw, saying, "I don't want that agreement to put us at a competitive disadvantage with other countries."
The comments came days after reports that Trump's Energy Department transition team has been asking for the names of civil servants that worked on environmental policies under President Barack Obama, sparking fears of a coming "climate purge" by the incoming administration.
Indeed, the Trump administration's energy agenda, recently revealed by PRWatch, "collectively amounts to a fossil fuel industry wish list...which would be devastating for attempts to slow climate change."
And the Guardian writes:
Trump has assembled a transition team in which at least nine senior members deny basic scientific understanding that the planet is warming due to the burning of carbon and other human activity. These include the transition heads of all the key agencies responsible for either monitoring or dealing with climate change. None of these transition heads have any background in climate science.
Meanwhile, his likely selection of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson for secretary of state is stirring the ire of environmentalists who describe the Big Oil magnate as "no friend of the planet."
In a statement this weekend, Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter declared Tillerson's likely nomination to be "a frightful prospect for our planet."
"If confirmed," Hauter said, "Tillerson would have an unprecedented platform to promote drilling and fracking for oil and gas around the world at the expense of clean energy and our climate."
Given past statements by Tillerson and Exxon's top leadership, Hauter added: "We must presume that aggressive opposition to renewables--and environmental protection at large--would become official policy in a Trump-Tillerson State Department."
Drawing a comparison between Trump's cabinet appointments thus far and the counsel of his daughter, Ivanka--who "appears to be establishing a role as the one person who might prevent the Trump administration from undoing all of the progress made by the Obama administration in cutting US carbon pollution"--Guardian blogger Dana Nuccitelli writes Monday:
On the issue of climate change, Trump resembles a character with an angel on one shoulder and a devil on the other. Except in this case, the devil also has a horde of demons beside him. Trump has filled every position of power with fossil fuel industry allies who have years of experience in undermining government efforts to slow human-caused global warming.
Trump certainly listens to and trusts his daughter Ivanka, who in Gore and DiCaprio, has wisely invited the counsel of high-profile individuals that are well-informed about the subject of climate change. However, it's difficult to imagine that Ivanka's influence on the president can outweigh the direct actions of the climate foes who he has appointed to powerful government positions, especially since she's new to government and policy debates. Obviously her counsel to date hasn't stopped Trump from continuing to make these nightmarish appointments.
"The winner of this battle will determine whether the Trump name forever becomes synonymous with climate heroism or villainy," Nuccitelli concludes. "So far, the villains are winning bigly."
Trump and his "demons" appear to be at least partially out of step with members of their own party. While a recent Pew poll showed fewer than a quarter of Republican respondents believe climate change to be the result of human activity, the same survey found widespread, bipartisan report for expansion of wind and solar industries. It also found that most Republicans (69 percent among moderate or liberal Republicans and 48 percent of conservative Republicans) say climate scientists should have a major role in policy decisions related to the climate.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Capping off a week that saw him nominate a known climate skeptic to head the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and put forth a fossil fuel CEO as potential secretary of state, President-elect Donald Trump said in a Sunday interview that "nobody really knows" if climate change is real.
When asked by "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace where he stands on the issue, Trump responded: "I'm still open-minded. Nobody really knows. Look, I'm somebody that gets it, and nobody really knows. It's not something that's so hard and fast."
He also claimed to be "studying" the Paris Agreement and whether to withdraw, saying, "I don't want that agreement to put us at a competitive disadvantage with other countries."
The comments came days after reports that Trump's Energy Department transition team has been asking for the names of civil servants that worked on environmental policies under President Barack Obama, sparking fears of a coming "climate purge" by the incoming administration.
Indeed, the Trump administration's energy agenda, recently revealed by PRWatch, "collectively amounts to a fossil fuel industry wish list...which would be devastating for attempts to slow climate change."
And the Guardian writes:
Trump has assembled a transition team in which at least nine senior members deny basic scientific understanding that the planet is warming due to the burning of carbon and other human activity. These include the transition heads of all the key agencies responsible for either monitoring or dealing with climate change. None of these transition heads have any background in climate science.
Meanwhile, his likely selection of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson for secretary of state is stirring the ire of environmentalists who describe the Big Oil magnate as "no friend of the planet."
In a statement this weekend, Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter declared Tillerson's likely nomination to be "a frightful prospect for our planet."
"If confirmed," Hauter said, "Tillerson would have an unprecedented platform to promote drilling and fracking for oil and gas around the world at the expense of clean energy and our climate."
Given past statements by Tillerson and Exxon's top leadership, Hauter added: "We must presume that aggressive opposition to renewables--and environmental protection at large--would become official policy in a Trump-Tillerson State Department."
Drawing a comparison between Trump's cabinet appointments thus far and the counsel of his daughter, Ivanka--who "appears to be establishing a role as the one person who might prevent the Trump administration from undoing all of the progress made by the Obama administration in cutting US carbon pollution"--Guardian blogger Dana Nuccitelli writes Monday:
On the issue of climate change, Trump resembles a character with an angel on one shoulder and a devil on the other. Except in this case, the devil also has a horde of demons beside him. Trump has filled every position of power with fossil fuel industry allies who have years of experience in undermining government efforts to slow human-caused global warming.
Trump certainly listens to and trusts his daughter Ivanka, who in Gore and DiCaprio, has wisely invited the counsel of high-profile individuals that are well-informed about the subject of climate change. However, it's difficult to imagine that Ivanka's influence on the president can outweigh the direct actions of the climate foes who he has appointed to powerful government positions, especially since she's new to government and policy debates. Obviously her counsel to date hasn't stopped Trump from continuing to make these nightmarish appointments.
"The winner of this battle will determine whether the Trump name forever becomes synonymous with climate heroism or villainy," Nuccitelli concludes. "So far, the villains are winning bigly."
Trump and his "demons" appear to be at least partially out of step with members of their own party. While a recent Pew poll showed fewer than a quarter of Republican respondents believe climate change to be the result of human activity, the same survey found widespread, bipartisan report for expansion of wind and solar industries. It also found that most Republicans (69 percent among moderate or liberal Republicans and 48 percent of conservative Republicans) say climate scientists should have a major role in policy decisions related to the climate.
Capping off a week that saw him nominate a known climate skeptic to head the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and put forth a fossil fuel CEO as potential secretary of state, President-elect Donald Trump said in a Sunday interview that "nobody really knows" if climate change is real.
When asked by "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace where he stands on the issue, Trump responded: "I'm still open-minded. Nobody really knows. Look, I'm somebody that gets it, and nobody really knows. It's not something that's so hard and fast."
He also claimed to be "studying" the Paris Agreement and whether to withdraw, saying, "I don't want that agreement to put us at a competitive disadvantage with other countries."
The comments came days after reports that Trump's Energy Department transition team has been asking for the names of civil servants that worked on environmental policies under President Barack Obama, sparking fears of a coming "climate purge" by the incoming administration.
Indeed, the Trump administration's energy agenda, recently revealed by PRWatch, "collectively amounts to a fossil fuel industry wish list...which would be devastating for attempts to slow climate change."
And the Guardian writes:
Trump has assembled a transition team in which at least nine senior members deny basic scientific understanding that the planet is warming due to the burning of carbon and other human activity. These include the transition heads of all the key agencies responsible for either monitoring or dealing with climate change. None of these transition heads have any background in climate science.
Meanwhile, his likely selection of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson for secretary of state is stirring the ire of environmentalists who describe the Big Oil magnate as "no friend of the planet."
In a statement this weekend, Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter declared Tillerson's likely nomination to be "a frightful prospect for our planet."
"If confirmed," Hauter said, "Tillerson would have an unprecedented platform to promote drilling and fracking for oil and gas around the world at the expense of clean energy and our climate."
Given past statements by Tillerson and Exxon's top leadership, Hauter added: "We must presume that aggressive opposition to renewables--and environmental protection at large--would become official policy in a Trump-Tillerson State Department."
Drawing a comparison between Trump's cabinet appointments thus far and the counsel of his daughter, Ivanka--who "appears to be establishing a role as the one person who might prevent the Trump administration from undoing all of the progress made by the Obama administration in cutting US carbon pollution"--Guardian blogger Dana Nuccitelli writes Monday:
On the issue of climate change, Trump resembles a character with an angel on one shoulder and a devil on the other. Except in this case, the devil also has a horde of demons beside him. Trump has filled every position of power with fossil fuel industry allies who have years of experience in undermining government efforts to slow human-caused global warming.
Trump certainly listens to and trusts his daughter Ivanka, who in Gore and DiCaprio, has wisely invited the counsel of high-profile individuals that are well-informed about the subject of climate change. However, it's difficult to imagine that Ivanka's influence on the president can outweigh the direct actions of the climate foes who he has appointed to powerful government positions, especially since she's new to government and policy debates. Obviously her counsel to date hasn't stopped Trump from continuing to make these nightmarish appointments.
"The winner of this battle will determine whether the Trump name forever becomes synonymous with climate heroism or villainy," Nuccitelli concludes. "So far, the villains are winning bigly."
Trump and his "demons" appear to be at least partially out of step with members of their own party. While a recent Pew poll showed fewer than a quarter of Republican respondents believe climate change to be the result of human activity, the same survey found widespread, bipartisan report for expansion of wind and solar industries. It also found that most Republicans (69 percent among moderate or liberal Republicans and 48 percent of conservative Republicans) say climate scientists should have a major role in policy decisions related to the climate.