SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Can't Touch This: To Stave Off Climate Disaster, Arctic Oil Must Stay in Ground
'There is no reasonable scenario in which Arctic oil drilling and a safe climate future co-exist,' says Oil Change International in new report
Aug 13, 2015
Just days after Royal Dutch Shell commenced drilling at the bottom of the Chukchi Sea, two major environmental groups released a new report confirming what many activists and scientists have already warned--to avert the looming climate crisis, U.S. Arctic offshore oil should be considered "untouchable."
"There is no reasonable scenario in which Arctic oil drilling and a safe climate future co-exist," said report author Hannah McKinnon, senior campaigner with Oil Change International (OCI), which issued the study along with Greenpeace. "Drilling in the Arctic is a climate disaster, plain and simple."
"The President can't continue to leave the fate of the Arctic--and his climate legacy--up to a disastrous corporation like Shell."
--Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace
Untouchable: The Climate Case Against Drilling (pdf) reiterates the warning that, according to the best available science, at least three-quarters of existing fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground to limit global warming to 2deg Celsius. "Projects that expand or break open new reserves and generate more greenhouse gas emissions fail a test of what is safe for the global climate," the report states.
The authors charge that Shell Oil's mishap-plagued hunt for oil in the Arctic is a prime example of such a project, given that "the only scenarios published in defense of Arctic oil exploration are consistent with at least 5 degrees Celsius of global warming—a level widely considered to be disastrous."
Not only is Arctic drilling bad for frontline communities and the environment, but it's also expensive, with Shell depending on sustained high oil prices if it wants to make a profit, the report explains. From an investor perspective, U.S. Arctic oil is an asset that has a high risk of becoming stranded as billions are poured into exploration for a resource that experts say ultimately cannot be burned safely.
Still, the report declares, the oil industry--and the government actors who have supported its bids for seemingly unlimited resource exploration and extraction--continue to employ "fossil fuel fatalism," perpetuating the idea that oil, gas, and coal will continue to dominate the energy supply for decades to come.
"To tackle climate change, one step must be to liberate our imaginations--and our policies--from the grip of this fatalism," the report states.
After all, "what happens in the Arctic matters to all of us," said Tim Donaghy, senior research specialist at Greenpeace. "America is living with the floods, storms, and heatwaves caused by global warming, and this report makes clear that Arctic drilling will only make it worse."
Donaghy laid the fate of this vast and pristine region at the feet of President Barack Obama, whose decision to green-light Shell's Arctic drilling plan earlier this summer was seen as a betrayal by climate activists.
"The message is clear: the melting Arctic is a dire warning, not an invitation."
--Hannah McKinnon, Oil Change International
"The President can't continue to leave the fate of the Arctic--and his climate legacy--up to a disastrous corporation like Shell," Donaghy said. "It's not too late to rescind the lease and make the Arctic permanently off-limits to catastrophic oil drilling."
The White House announced Thursday that later this month, Obama will become the first sitting president to visit the Alaskan Arctic. In a video released from his vacation home on Martha's Vineyard, Obama said he's going to Alaska because it is on the "front lines of one of the greatest challenges we face this century."
"You see, climate change once seemed like a problem for future generations, but for most Americans, it's already a reality," he said.
However, it's difficult for some to reconcile Obama's climate rhetoric with his industry-friendly actions.
"By allowing Shell to drill in the U.S. offshore Arctic Ocean, the Obama Administration is ignoring the world's best scientists, as well as millions of concerned citizens in North America and beyond," McKinnon wrote on Thursday. "The message is clear: the melting Arctic is a dire warning, not an invitation."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
alaskaarcticarctic drillingbarack obamabig oilclimate changeclimate crisisenvironmentfossil fuelsglobal warminggreenhouse gas emissionsgreenpeaceoceansoil change internationalshell
Just days after Royal Dutch Shell commenced drilling at the bottom of the Chukchi Sea, two major environmental groups released a new report confirming what many activists and scientists have already warned--to avert the looming climate crisis, U.S. Arctic offshore oil should be considered "untouchable."
"There is no reasonable scenario in which Arctic oil drilling and a safe climate future co-exist," said report author Hannah McKinnon, senior campaigner with Oil Change International (OCI), which issued the study along with Greenpeace. "Drilling in the Arctic is a climate disaster, plain and simple."
"The President can't continue to leave the fate of the Arctic--and his climate legacy--up to a disastrous corporation like Shell."
--Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace
Untouchable: The Climate Case Against Drilling (pdf) reiterates the warning that, according to the best available science, at least three-quarters of existing fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground to limit global warming to 2deg Celsius. "Projects that expand or break open new reserves and generate more greenhouse gas emissions fail a test of what is safe for the global climate," the report states.
The authors charge that Shell Oil's mishap-plagued hunt for oil in the Arctic is a prime example of such a project, given that "the only scenarios published in defense of Arctic oil exploration are consistent with at least 5 degrees Celsius of global warming—a level widely considered to be disastrous."
Not only is Arctic drilling bad for frontline communities and the environment, but it's also expensive, with Shell depending on sustained high oil prices if it wants to make a profit, the report explains. From an investor perspective, U.S. Arctic oil is an asset that has a high risk of becoming stranded as billions are poured into exploration for a resource that experts say ultimately cannot be burned safely.
Still, the report declares, the oil industry--and the government actors who have supported its bids for seemingly unlimited resource exploration and extraction--continue to employ "fossil fuel fatalism," perpetuating the idea that oil, gas, and coal will continue to dominate the energy supply for decades to come.
"To tackle climate change, one step must be to liberate our imaginations--and our policies--from the grip of this fatalism," the report states.
After all, "what happens in the Arctic matters to all of us," said Tim Donaghy, senior research specialist at Greenpeace. "America is living with the floods, storms, and heatwaves caused by global warming, and this report makes clear that Arctic drilling will only make it worse."
Donaghy laid the fate of this vast and pristine region at the feet of President Barack Obama, whose decision to green-light Shell's Arctic drilling plan earlier this summer was seen as a betrayal by climate activists.
"The message is clear: the melting Arctic is a dire warning, not an invitation."
--Hannah McKinnon, Oil Change International
"The President can't continue to leave the fate of the Arctic--and his climate legacy--up to a disastrous corporation like Shell," Donaghy said. "It's not too late to rescind the lease and make the Arctic permanently off-limits to catastrophic oil drilling."
The White House announced Thursday that later this month, Obama will become the first sitting president to visit the Alaskan Arctic. In a video released from his vacation home on Martha's Vineyard, Obama said he's going to Alaska because it is on the "front lines of one of the greatest challenges we face this century."
"You see, climate change once seemed like a problem for future generations, but for most Americans, it's already a reality," he said.
However, it's difficult for some to reconcile Obama's climate rhetoric with his industry-friendly actions.
"By allowing Shell to drill in the U.S. offshore Arctic Ocean, the Obama Administration is ignoring the world's best scientists, as well as millions of concerned citizens in North America and beyond," McKinnon wrote on Thursday. "The message is clear: the melting Arctic is a dire warning, not an invitation."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Just days after Royal Dutch Shell commenced drilling at the bottom of the Chukchi Sea, two major environmental groups released a new report confirming what many activists and scientists have already warned--to avert the looming climate crisis, U.S. Arctic offshore oil should be considered "untouchable."
"There is no reasonable scenario in which Arctic oil drilling and a safe climate future co-exist," said report author Hannah McKinnon, senior campaigner with Oil Change International (OCI), which issued the study along with Greenpeace. "Drilling in the Arctic is a climate disaster, plain and simple."
"The President can't continue to leave the fate of the Arctic--and his climate legacy--up to a disastrous corporation like Shell."
--Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace
Untouchable: The Climate Case Against Drilling (pdf) reiterates the warning that, according to the best available science, at least three-quarters of existing fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground to limit global warming to 2deg Celsius. "Projects that expand or break open new reserves and generate more greenhouse gas emissions fail a test of what is safe for the global climate," the report states.
The authors charge that Shell Oil's mishap-plagued hunt for oil in the Arctic is a prime example of such a project, given that "the only scenarios published in defense of Arctic oil exploration are consistent with at least 5 degrees Celsius of global warming—a level widely considered to be disastrous."
Not only is Arctic drilling bad for frontline communities and the environment, but it's also expensive, with Shell depending on sustained high oil prices if it wants to make a profit, the report explains. From an investor perspective, U.S. Arctic oil is an asset that has a high risk of becoming stranded as billions are poured into exploration for a resource that experts say ultimately cannot be burned safely.
Still, the report declares, the oil industry--and the government actors who have supported its bids for seemingly unlimited resource exploration and extraction--continue to employ "fossil fuel fatalism," perpetuating the idea that oil, gas, and coal will continue to dominate the energy supply for decades to come.
"To tackle climate change, one step must be to liberate our imaginations--and our policies--from the grip of this fatalism," the report states.
After all, "what happens in the Arctic matters to all of us," said Tim Donaghy, senior research specialist at Greenpeace. "America is living with the floods, storms, and heatwaves caused by global warming, and this report makes clear that Arctic drilling will only make it worse."
Donaghy laid the fate of this vast and pristine region at the feet of President Barack Obama, whose decision to green-light Shell's Arctic drilling plan earlier this summer was seen as a betrayal by climate activists.
"The message is clear: the melting Arctic is a dire warning, not an invitation."
--Hannah McKinnon, Oil Change International
"The President can't continue to leave the fate of the Arctic--and his climate legacy--up to a disastrous corporation like Shell," Donaghy said. "It's not too late to rescind the lease and make the Arctic permanently off-limits to catastrophic oil drilling."
The White House announced Thursday that later this month, Obama will become the first sitting president to visit the Alaskan Arctic. In a video released from his vacation home on Martha's Vineyard, Obama said he's going to Alaska because it is on the "front lines of one of the greatest challenges we face this century."
"You see, climate change once seemed like a problem for future generations, but for most Americans, it's already a reality," he said.
However, it's difficult for some to reconcile Obama's climate rhetoric with his industry-friendly actions.
"By allowing Shell to drill in the U.S. offshore Arctic Ocean, the Obama Administration is ignoring the world's best scientists, as well as millions of concerned citizens in North America and beyond," McKinnon wrote on Thursday. "The message is clear: the melting Arctic is a dire warning, not an invitation."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.