"Coal isn't coming back, nor should it. From start to finish, it's one of the most destructive energy sources. Extracting it often requires blasting away entire mountaintops, polluting air, water, and soil." (Photo: Appalachian Voices/flickr/cc)
Jul 25, 2020
During and after his 2016 campaign, the current U.S. president promised to make coal great again. He also claimed climate change was a hoax, so it's no surprise that he'd promote a cheap, outdated, polluting, climate-altering fuel even as cleaner alternatives continued to become more efficient and cost-effective.
Since then, U.S. coal companies have seen share prices plummet and many have gone bankrupt. A decade ago, more than half of U.S. electricity was generated by coal. Now that number is down to one-fifth and dropping steadily, in part because of a shift to natural gas, but also to renewable energy. Wind power is now the country's fastest-growing electricity source.
Coal isn't coming back, nor should it. From start to finish, it's one of the most destructive energy sources. Extracting it often requires blasting away entire mountaintops, polluting air, water, and soil. Burning it creates enormous amounts of deadly pollution, along with CO2 and methane emissions that drive global heating.
The climate emergency demands that we use less energy and that we get what we need from cleaner sources. We shouldn't be using 19th century fuels in the 21st.
But the U.S. president isn't alone in wanting to double down on archaic, deadly coal in the face of a climate crisis. Alberta, not content to drive global heating to catastrophic levels with its dirty bitumen, is now moving to expand its coal industry--with little or no environmental oversight.
Even though Canada is moving to phase out coal-fired electricity, we're happy to export it to other countries.
Even though Canada is moving to phase out coal-fired electricity, we're happy to export it to other countries. It's like a drug dealer who knows the harms of addiction, and so quits a personal habit but continues to sell to others.
The proposed Vista mine expansion near Hinton, Alberta, will increase thermal coal production from about seven million tonnes a year to between 10 and 15 million tonnes. Even though it will destroy ecosystems and put endangered species at greater risk, the project isn't required to undergo a federal environmental assessment--in part because the company revised its estimate of the "project area" to fall below the threshold that requires review for any "increase in the area of mining operations of 50 per cent or more."
A metallurgical coal mine in B.C.'s Elk Valley, Teck's Castle Mountain, is also attempting to avoid federal review by claiming the project is an expansion rather than a new mine.
Alberta is even overturning regulations enacted by its Conservative government in 1976 to protect ecologically sensitive areas--substantially increasing locations for open-pit mines. The Alberta government's relationship with the coal industry is almost as cosy as with the oil industry. The province's former environment minister is now president of the Coal Association of Canada.
It's always the same story from those who lack the imagination, wisdom, and foresight to learn and change with the times, who prioritize the human-created economy over the air, water, land, and biodiversity that we need to survive, and over human health and well-being.
Economic costs and benefits should never be the only factors in considering industrial policy and regulation.
Economic costs and benefits should never be the only factors in considering industrial policy and regulation. But coal fails even on that front. Although electricity from existing coal power plants is often less expensive than wind or solar, many plants worldwide are nearing their end. Building new coal power plants would make the costs far higher--while prices for renewables are dropping rapidly as the technologies improve. Of course, the costs to human lives and health, wildlife, habitat, and the climate are immeasurable.
It seems strange to write about the push for coal well into the 21st century. Those who would go on destroying the environment and fuelling the climate crisis all for the sake of short-term profits and a few jobs--when so many better options exist--are demonstrating their short-sightedness and illustrating the flaws in our current economic systems.
Even within the current paradigm, more and better jobs could be created by facilitating clean tech and renewable energy industries rather than relying on outdated, destructive energy sources that the world has agreed must be phased out if we are to survive.
The pandemic crisis hasn't slowed the climate and extinction crises, but it's shown that rapid action can have positive results. It's time to do better. Coal is over.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 David Suzuki Foundation
David Suzuki
David Suzuki , an award-winning geneticist and broadcaster, co-founded the David Suzuki Foundation in 1990. He was a faculty member at the University of British Columbia, and is currently professor emeritus. Suzuki is widely recognized as a world leader in sustainable ecology and has received numerous awards for his work, including a UNESCO prize for science and a United Nations Environment Program medal.
Ian Hanington
Ian Hanington is a senior editor at the David Suzuki Foundation.
During and after his 2016 campaign, the current U.S. president promised to make coal great again. He also claimed climate change was a hoax, so it's no surprise that he'd promote a cheap, outdated, polluting, climate-altering fuel even as cleaner alternatives continued to become more efficient and cost-effective.
Since then, U.S. coal companies have seen share prices plummet and many have gone bankrupt. A decade ago, more than half of U.S. electricity was generated by coal. Now that number is down to one-fifth and dropping steadily, in part because of a shift to natural gas, but also to renewable energy. Wind power is now the country's fastest-growing electricity source.
Coal isn't coming back, nor should it. From start to finish, it's one of the most destructive energy sources. Extracting it often requires blasting away entire mountaintops, polluting air, water, and soil. Burning it creates enormous amounts of deadly pollution, along with CO2 and methane emissions that drive global heating.
The climate emergency demands that we use less energy and that we get what we need from cleaner sources. We shouldn't be using 19th century fuels in the 21st.
But the U.S. president isn't alone in wanting to double down on archaic, deadly coal in the face of a climate crisis. Alberta, not content to drive global heating to catastrophic levels with its dirty bitumen, is now moving to expand its coal industry--with little or no environmental oversight.
Even though Canada is moving to phase out coal-fired electricity, we're happy to export it to other countries.
Even though Canada is moving to phase out coal-fired electricity, we're happy to export it to other countries. It's like a drug dealer who knows the harms of addiction, and so quits a personal habit but continues to sell to others.
The proposed Vista mine expansion near Hinton, Alberta, will increase thermal coal production from about seven million tonnes a year to between 10 and 15 million tonnes. Even though it will destroy ecosystems and put endangered species at greater risk, the project isn't required to undergo a federal environmental assessment--in part because the company revised its estimate of the "project area" to fall below the threshold that requires review for any "increase in the area of mining operations of 50 per cent or more."
A metallurgical coal mine in B.C.'s Elk Valley, Teck's Castle Mountain, is also attempting to avoid federal review by claiming the project is an expansion rather than a new mine.
Alberta is even overturning regulations enacted by its Conservative government in 1976 to protect ecologically sensitive areas--substantially increasing locations for open-pit mines. The Alberta government's relationship with the coal industry is almost as cosy as with the oil industry. The province's former environment minister is now president of the Coal Association of Canada.
It's always the same story from those who lack the imagination, wisdom, and foresight to learn and change with the times, who prioritize the human-created economy over the air, water, land, and biodiversity that we need to survive, and over human health and well-being.
Economic costs and benefits should never be the only factors in considering industrial policy and regulation.
Economic costs and benefits should never be the only factors in considering industrial policy and regulation. But coal fails even on that front. Although electricity from existing coal power plants is often less expensive than wind or solar, many plants worldwide are nearing their end. Building new coal power plants would make the costs far higher--while prices for renewables are dropping rapidly as the technologies improve. Of course, the costs to human lives and health, wildlife, habitat, and the climate are immeasurable.
It seems strange to write about the push for coal well into the 21st century. Those who would go on destroying the environment and fuelling the climate crisis all for the sake of short-term profits and a few jobs--when so many better options exist--are demonstrating their short-sightedness and illustrating the flaws in our current economic systems.
Even within the current paradigm, more and better jobs could be created by facilitating clean tech and renewable energy industries rather than relying on outdated, destructive energy sources that the world has agreed must be phased out if we are to survive.
The pandemic crisis hasn't slowed the climate and extinction crises, but it's shown that rapid action can have positive results. It's time to do better. Coal is over.
David Suzuki
David Suzuki , an award-winning geneticist and broadcaster, co-founded the David Suzuki Foundation in 1990. He was a faculty member at the University of British Columbia, and is currently professor emeritus. Suzuki is widely recognized as a world leader in sustainable ecology and has received numerous awards for his work, including a UNESCO prize for science and a United Nations Environment Program medal.
Ian Hanington
Ian Hanington is a senior editor at the David Suzuki Foundation.
During and after his 2016 campaign, the current U.S. president promised to make coal great again. He also claimed climate change was a hoax, so it's no surprise that he'd promote a cheap, outdated, polluting, climate-altering fuel even as cleaner alternatives continued to become more efficient and cost-effective.
Since then, U.S. coal companies have seen share prices plummet and many have gone bankrupt. A decade ago, more than half of U.S. electricity was generated by coal. Now that number is down to one-fifth and dropping steadily, in part because of a shift to natural gas, but also to renewable energy. Wind power is now the country's fastest-growing electricity source.
Coal isn't coming back, nor should it. From start to finish, it's one of the most destructive energy sources. Extracting it often requires blasting away entire mountaintops, polluting air, water, and soil. Burning it creates enormous amounts of deadly pollution, along with CO2 and methane emissions that drive global heating.
The climate emergency demands that we use less energy and that we get what we need from cleaner sources. We shouldn't be using 19th century fuels in the 21st.
But the U.S. president isn't alone in wanting to double down on archaic, deadly coal in the face of a climate crisis. Alberta, not content to drive global heating to catastrophic levels with its dirty bitumen, is now moving to expand its coal industry--with little or no environmental oversight.
Even though Canada is moving to phase out coal-fired electricity, we're happy to export it to other countries.
Even though Canada is moving to phase out coal-fired electricity, we're happy to export it to other countries. It's like a drug dealer who knows the harms of addiction, and so quits a personal habit but continues to sell to others.
The proposed Vista mine expansion near Hinton, Alberta, will increase thermal coal production from about seven million tonnes a year to between 10 and 15 million tonnes. Even though it will destroy ecosystems and put endangered species at greater risk, the project isn't required to undergo a federal environmental assessment--in part because the company revised its estimate of the "project area" to fall below the threshold that requires review for any "increase in the area of mining operations of 50 per cent or more."
A metallurgical coal mine in B.C.'s Elk Valley, Teck's Castle Mountain, is also attempting to avoid federal review by claiming the project is an expansion rather than a new mine.
Alberta is even overturning regulations enacted by its Conservative government in 1976 to protect ecologically sensitive areas--substantially increasing locations for open-pit mines. The Alberta government's relationship with the coal industry is almost as cosy as with the oil industry. The province's former environment minister is now president of the Coal Association of Canada.
It's always the same story from those who lack the imagination, wisdom, and foresight to learn and change with the times, who prioritize the human-created economy over the air, water, land, and biodiversity that we need to survive, and over human health and well-being.
Economic costs and benefits should never be the only factors in considering industrial policy and regulation.
Economic costs and benefits should never be the only factors in considering industrial policy and regulation. But coal fails even on that front. Although electricity from existing coal power plants is often less expensive than wind or solar, many plants worldwide are nearing their end. Building new coal power plants would make the costs far higher--while prices for renewables are dropping rapidly as the technologies improve. Of course, the costs to human lives and health, wildlife, habitat, and the climate are immeasurable.
It seems strange to write about the push for coal well into the 21st century. Those who would go on destroying the environment and fuelling the climate crisis all for the sake of short-term profits and a few jobs--when so many better options exist--are demonstrating their short-sightedness and illustrating the flaws in our current economic systems.
Even within the current paradigm, more and better jobs could be created by facilitating clean tech and renewable energy industries rather than relying on outdated, destructive energy sources that the world has agreed must be phased out if we are to survive.
The pandemic crisis hasn't slowed the climate and extinction crises, but it's shown that rapid action can have positive results. It's time to do better. Coal is over.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.