University of Nebraska-Lincoln Disinvites William Ayers After Death Threats, Financial Pressure
William Ayers can't catch a break.
After the McCain campaign has dragged his name through the mud and
tried to attach it to Obama's, Ayers is finding himself shunned even on
a university campus.
Ayers, a professor of education at the University of Illinois at
Chicago, was invited to deliver the keynote speech at an education
conference at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln on November 15.
His address was billed as: "We Are Each Other's Keepers: Research to Change the World."
William Ayers can't catch a break.
After the McCain campaign has dragged his name through the mud and
tried to attach it to Obama's, Ayers is finding himself shunned even on
a university campus.
Ayers, a professor of education at the University of Illinois at
Chicago, was invited to deliver the keynote speech at an education
conference at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln on November 15.
His address was billed as: "We Are Each Other's Keepers: Research to Change the World."
But on October 17, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln canceled the speech.
"The university's threat assessment group monitored e-mails and
other information UNL received regarding Ayers's scheduled Nov. 15
visit, and identified safety concerns which resulted in the university
canceling the event," the administration said in a press release.
On October 23, the university released further details about these threats.
Mario Scalora, associate professor of psychology, was on the
school's threat assessment team. In an e-mail to the chancellor on the
morning of October 17, he cited "substantial security concerns," though
he added, "We do not have any active death threats as yet."
But a further analysis that he provided did contain thinly veiled death threats.
"Give me a sniper rifle and a good firing position, and I shall move
Bill Ayers' gray matter," wrote one blogger who identified himself as
"Lee Harvey Cornhusker."
Another blogger wrote, "I wonder what flag he wants on his coffin."
One caller was described as "very upset" and said there will be "hell to pay" if Ayers is not disinvited within 24 hours.
"Several subjects," Scalora noted, were "making multiple contacts escalating in their rhetoric and emotion."
There was other pressure, as well.
"Some donors threatened to withhold financial support to the university unless Ayers was disinvited," the Lincoln Journal Star reported, including a foundation that has provided millions.
Many e-mails poured into the paper from people saying they would
stop contributing. Kim Morsett wrote: 'I say to all ALUMS NO MORE
$$$$$$$$$ if he speaks."
Another one said: "This is absolutely disgusting! Whoever made this
decision should be removed from their position at UNL. No more
contributions from me!!!!!!!!"
Someone named John wrote: "Every year for the past few years, I have
donated $5,000 to the University of Nebraska. If Ayers is allowed to
set foot on campus, that will end. Not a threat. A promise."
State politicians also weighed in.
"This is an embarrassment to the University of Nebraska and the
State of Nebraska," Governor Dave Heineman told the paper. "Bill Ayers
is a well-known radical who should never have been invited to the
University of Nebraska."
Nebraska's Democratic Senator, Ben Nelson, urged the university to reconsider its invitation.
"I join many Nebraskans in disappointment that Bill Ayers has been
invited to the University of Nebraska at Lincoln," Nelson said. "His
past involvement in a violent protest group and incendiary comments are
not consistent with the agenda of unity that we need in America today."
The chancellor of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Harvey
Perlman, sent out an e-mail to the faculty and staff on October 20
defending the initial invitation to Ayers and bemoaning the fact that
the threats of violence impelled him to rescind that invitation.
"Most alarming," he wrote,
"were some responses that were threatening to the security of the
campus. . . . The tone and tenor of the e-mails, the phone calls, and
the blogs, suggested that the reaction to any Ayers' visit would
represent a significant threat to the safety of the campus. . . . I
find it difficult to accept that the actions of a few individuals can
deprive this university of its right to select speakers who can
contribute to the education of our students. Nonetheless I take
seriously the responsibility I have for the safety of members of this
community, particularly the students. It seemed cancellation was the
most responsible action. This university has always been able to invite
and to host controversial speakers from all walks of life and all
matters of persuasion. It is unnerving that the apparent escalating
passion and violence of recent years makes the exercise of our
traditional values more difficult."
Some faculty members sharply criticized this decision.
It is a "chilling blow to academic freedom on our campus," said one,
"and there is a lot of frustration and anger from faculty, including
some threats to leave."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
William Ayers can't catch a break.
After the McCain campaign has dragged his name through the mud and
tried to attach it to Obama's, Ayers is finding himself shunned even on
a university campus.
Ayers, a professor of education at the University of Illinois at
Chicago, was invited to deliver the keynote speech at an education
conference at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln on November 15.
His address was billed as: "We Are Each Other's Keepers: Research to Change the World."
But on October 17, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln canceled the speech.
"The university's threat assessment group monitored e-mails and
other information UNL received regarding Ayers's scheduled Nov. 15
visit, and identified safety concerns which resulted in the university
canceling the event," the administration said in a press release.
On October 23, the university released further details about these threats.
Mario Scalora, associate professor of psychology, was on the
school's threat assessment team. In an e-mail to the chancellor on the
morning of October 17, he cited "substantial security concerns," though
he added, "We do not have any active death threats as yet."
But a further analysis that he provided did contain thinly veiled death threats.
"Give me a sniper rifle and a good firing position, and I shall move
Bill Ayers' gray matter," wrote one blogger who identified himself as
"Lee Harvey Cornhusker."
Another blogger wrote, "I wonder what flag he wants on his coffin."
One caller was described as "very upset" and said there will be "hell to pay" if Ayers is not disinvited within 24 hours.
"Several subjects," Scalora noted, were "making multiple contacts escalating in their rhetoric and emotion."
There was other pressure, as well.
"Some donors threatened to withhold financial support to the university unless Ayers was disinvited," the Lincoln Journal Star reported, including a foundation that has provided millions.
Many e-mails poured into the paper from people saying they would
stop contributing. Kim Morsett wrote: 'I say to all ALUMS NO MORE
$$$$$$$$$ if he speaks."
Another one said: "This is absolutely disgusting! Whoever made this
decision should be removed from their position at UNL. No more
contributions from me!!!!!!!!"
Someone named John wrote: "Every year for the past few years, I have
donated $5,000 to the University of Nebraska. If Ayers is allowed to
set foot on campus, that will end. Not a threat. A promise."
State politicians also weighed in.
"This is an embarrassment to the University of Nebraska and the
State of Nebraska," Governor Dave Heineman told the paper. "Bill Ayers
is a well-known radical who should never have been invited to the
University of Nebraska."
Nebraska's Democratic Senator, Ben Nelson, urged the university to reconsider its invitation.
"I join many Nebraskans in disappointment that Bill Ayers has been
invited to the University of Nebraska at Lincoln," Nelson said. "His
past involvement in a violent protest group and incendiary comments are
not consistent with the agenda of unity that we need in America today."
The chancellor of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Harvey
Perlman, sent out an e-mail to the faculty and staff on October 20
defending the initial invitation to Ayers and bemoaning the fact that
the threats of violence impelled him to rescind that invitation.
"Most alarming," he wrote,
"were some responses that were threatening to the security of the
campus. . . . The tone and tenor of the e-mails, the phone calls, and
the blogs, suggested that the reaction to any Ayers' visit would
represent a significant threat to the safety of the campus. . . . I
find it difficult to accept that the actions of a few individuals can
deprive this university of its right to select speakers who can
contribute to the education of our students. Nonetheless I take
seriously the responsibility I have for the safety of members of this
community, particularly the students. It seemed cancellation was the
most responsible action. This university has always been able to invite
and to host controversial speakers from all walks of life and all
matters of persuasion. It is unnerving that the apparent escalating
passion and violence of recent years makes the exercise of our
traditional values more difficult."
Some faculty members sharply criticized this decision.
It is a "chilling blow to academic freedom on our campus," said one,
"and there is a lot of frustration and anger from faculty, including
some threats to leave."
William Ayers can't catch a break.
After the McCain campaign has dragged his name through the mud and
tried to attach it to Obama's, Ayers is finding himself shunned even on
a university campus.
Ayers, a professor of education at the University of Illinois at
Chicago, was invited to deliver the keynote speech at an education
conference at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln on November 15.
His address was billed as: "We Are Each Other's Keepers: Research to Change the World."
But on October 17, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln canceled the speech.
"The university's threat assessment group monitored e-mails and
other information UNL received regarding Ayers's scheduled Nov. 15
visit, and identified safety concerns which resulted in the university
canceling the event," the administration said in a press release.
On October 23, the university released further details about these threats.
Mario Scalora, associate professor of psychology, was on the
school's threat assessment team. In an e-mail to the chancellor on the
morning of October 17, he cited "substantial security concerns," though
he added, "We do not have any active death threats as yet."
But a further analysis that he provided did contain thinly veiled death threats.
"Give me a sniper rifle and a good firing position, and I shall move
Bill Ayers' gray matter," wrote one blogger who identified himself as
"Lee Harvey Cornhusker."
Another blogger wrote, "I wonder what flag he wants on his coffin."
One caller was described as "very upset" and said there will be "hell to pay" if Ayers is not disinvited within 24 hours.
"Several subjects," Scalora noted, were "making multiple contacts escalating in their rhetoric and emotion."
There was other pressure, as well.
"Some donors threatened to withhold financial support to the university unless Ayers was disinvited," the Lincoln Journal Star reported, including a foundation that has provided millions.
Many e-mails poured into the paper from people saying they would
stop contributing. Kim Morsett wrote: 'I say to all ALUMS NO MORE
$$$$$$$$$ if he speaks."
Another one said: "This is absolutely disgusting! Whoever made this
decision should be removed from their position at UNL. No more
contributions from me!!!!!!!!"
Someone named John wrote: "Every year for the past few years, I have
donated $5,000 to the University of Nebraska. If Ayers is allowed to
set foot on campus, that will end. Not a threat. A promise."
State politicians also weighed in.
"This is an embarrassment to the University of Nebraska and the
State of Nebraska," Governor Dave Heineman told the paper. "Bill Ayers
is a well-known radical who should never have been invited to the
University of Nebraska."
Nebraska's Democratic Senator, Ben Nelson, urged the university to reconsider its invitation.
"I join many Nebraskans in disappointment that Bill Ayers has been
invited to the University of Nebraska at Lincoln," Nelson said. "His
past involvement in a violent protest group and incendiary comments are
not consistent with the agenda of unity that we need in America today."
The chancellor of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Harvey
Perlman, sent out an e-mail to the faculty and staff on October 20
defending the initial invitation to Ayers and bemoaning the fact that
the threats of violence impelled him to rescind that invitation.
"Most alarming," he wrote,
"were some responses that were threatening to the security of the
campus. . . . The tone and tenor of the e-mails, the phone calls, and
the blogs, suggested that the reaction to any Ayers' visit would
represent a significant threat to the safety of the campus. . . . I
find it difficult to accept that the actions of a few individuals can
deprive this university of its right to select speakers who can
contribute to the education of our students. Nonetheless I take
seriously the responsibility I have for the safety of members of this
community, particularly the students. It seemed cancellation was the
most responsible action. This university has always been able to invite
and to host controversial speakers from all walks of life and all
matters of persuasion. It is unnerving that the apparent escalating
passion and violence of recent years makes the exercise of our
traditional values more difficult."
Some faculty members sharply criticized this decision.
It is a "chilling blow to academic freedom on our campus," said one,
"and there is a lot of frustration and anger from faculty, including
some threats to leave."