

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Trump shouldn't have Greenland. Greenland is Greenland," said Denmark's foreign minister.
Greenlanders have spoken: An overwhelming majority of them do not want to leave the Kingdom of Denmark to instead become a part of the United States.
Denmark's Berlingske and Greenland's Sermitsiaq reported Tuesday that a poll conducted for the newspapers by the research firm Verian found that a whopping 85% of Greenlanders are opposed to joining the U.S., an idea that U.S. President Donald has aggressively pushed in recent weeks.
Trump has also claimed that the people of Greenland want to be a part of the U.S. "I think the people want to be with us," Trump said last week, according to the BBC.
Only 6% of Greenlanders said they want to leave the Danish Realm in favor of the U.S., and 9% are undecided, according to Berlingske. The poll, which recorded the responses of 497 Greenlandic citizens aged 18 and over, found that 45% of Greenlanders said they perceive Trump's interest in Greenland as a threat.
"Trump shouldn't have Greenland. Greenland is Greenland," said Lars Løkke Rasmussen, Denmark's foreign minister, on Tuesday, according to the Financial Times.
Since taking back the White House in November, Trump has publicly mused about not only seizing Greenland, but also retaking the Panama Canal and making Canada the 51st state.
In early January, he refused to rule out using military force to take over the canal and Greenland. "It might be that you'll have to do something. The Panama Canal is vital to our country," Trump said at a press conference. "We need Greenland for national security purposes."
Speaking on Fox News a day later, Trump's appointee for national security adviser, former Rep. Mike Waltz (R-Fla.), said that Trump's ambitions over Greenland have to do with geopolitical competition and natural resources. Greenland, the largest noncontinental island and a territory of Denmark, is mineral rich. The Arctic island is increasingly an arena of competition between China, the U.S., and Russia as ice melts and opens up new trade routes, according to the Financial Times.
During his first term, Trump directed his aides to examine whether the United States could purchase Greenland, which is home to the U.S. Space Force's Pituffik Space Base.
Last week, the Financial Times also reported on a phone call between Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Trump, during which Trump insisted that he's serious about taking over Greenland.
"He was very firm. It was a cold shower. Before, it was hard to take it seriously. But I do think it is serious, and potentially very dangerous," said one European official who was briefed on the call and quoted anonymously by the Financial Times.
Even before the findings of the poll were reported on, Greenlanders had shown little enthusiasm for Trump's plan. "Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom," the leftist Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte Egede said in December.
Egede has said that he wants independence from Denmark for Greenland.
Wealthy nations are responsible for most of the consumption of natural resources, according to a new United Nations report.
The world could be extracting 60% more natural resources by 2060 if current trends continue, a new United Nations report finds.
The extraction of natural resources is having calamitous effects on the climate and the environment, the report states, and demand for such resources is only rising. These natural resources range from fossil fuels to the minerals and metals used in renewable energy.
"Extraction and processing of material resources... account for over 55% of greenhouse gas emissions and 40% of particulate matter health-related impacts," says the report by the U.N. Environment Program's International Resource Panel (IRP).
The report focuses on the large amounts of resources consumed by the world's richest and largest nations, and it recommends these nations reduce their projected consumption by a third. This would reduce projected greenhouse gas emissions by 80%, benefit the environment, and improve human health.
.@UNEPIRP Global Resources Outlook launched at #UNEA6 shows rich countries use 6x more resources & have 10x the climate impact than low-income ones.
Resource extraction tripled in 50 years, set to increase 60% by 2060, challenging environmental goals.https://t.co/R3fTjcosGJ pic.twitter.com/BfO0LO2sQo
— UN Environment Programme (@UNEP) March 1, 2024
Accomplishing this goal would require making significant changes in transportation, infrastructure, food consumption, and more. That may seem lofty, but the report states this can be accomplished without sacrificing economic growth. The economy simply needs to be grown in a more sustainable fashion.
"Weak, partial, fragmented, or slow policies will not work. This can only be possible with far-reaching and truly systemic shifts in energy, food, mobility, and the built environment implemented at an unprecedented scale and speed," the report says.
The U.N. has been warning about the overconsumption of natural resources for years, and it seems the situation has only gotten more dire over time. While many wealthy nations have made progress in terms of increasing renewable energy use, less attention has been paid to the sustainable use of natural resources.
"We should not accept that meeting human needs must be resource-intensive, and we must stop stimulating extraction-based economic success. With decisive action by politicians and the private sector, a decent life for all is possible without costing the earth," said Janez Potočnik, co-chair of the IRP.
More than 50 humanitarian and environmental groups from around the world called on Friday for an independent international investigation into the assassination of Honduran Indigenous rights activist Berta Caceres, who was murdered in her sleep at 1 am on Thursday by two unknown assailants.
"Mrs. Caceres' case is the most high-profile killing within a growing trend in the murder, violence, and intimidation of people defending their indigenous land rights in Honduras," wrote the groups in their letter to the Honduran president.
"We know that in Honduras, it is very easy to pay people to commit murders," Zuniga Caceres said of her mother's death to teleSUR. "But we know that those behind this are other powerful people with money and a whole apparatus that allows them to commit these crimes."
The Guardian reported that Caceres was a prominent leader in the Indigenous movement in Honduras against one of Central America's most significant hydropower projects, four enormous dams known as "Agua Zarca" in the Gualcarque river basin. The Indigenous group Caceres founded, the Civil Council for Popular and Indigenous Organizations of Honduras (COPINH), has successfully prevented the project from moving forward.
Caceres was awarded the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize last year for her activism.
"Berta Caceres devoted her life to protecting natural resources, public spaces, land rights, rivers from the privatization process that's underway and that gained speed after the 2009 military coup," said Karen Spring, the Honduras-based coordinator of the social justice network Honduras Solidarity Group, in an interview with Free Speech Radio News on Thursday. "She spent her life defending land and supporting communities, mostly indigenous communities all over the country."
As a result of her activism, Caceres had received death threats and feared for her life, the Los Angeles Times reported, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), a prominent human rights organization, had last year formally called on the Honduran government to put protections in place for Caceres, according to the Guardian. The UN has condemned the Honduran government for failing to protect her, and activists have accused the government of having a hand in her death.

In its most recent report (pdf) released in December, IACHR warned of the violence and threats to their lives that activists such as Caceres suffer under in Honduras. The group blamed "the increased presence of organized crime and drug traffickers, the recruitment of children and adolescents, and an inadequate judicial response that fuels impunity, corruption, and high levels of poverty and inequality. In addition, according to the information received, part of that insecurity comes from the National Police, the Military Police, and the Army, through their illegitimate use of force, in some cases in complicity with organized crime."
Student protesters took to the streets in Tegucigalpa on Thursday to mourn the widely beloved environmentalist's death, the Guardian reported, and the Honduran government, in power since a U.S.-backed coup in 2009, responded with riot police.
The Honduran government confirmed that one suspect had been arrested in a statement to teleSUR on Friday. There were reportedly two assassins involved in Caceres' death. But the Caceres family is demanding "an independent, international investigation [into her death] not led by the Honduran government," teleSUR reported.
"Honduras has the world's highest murder rate," noted School of the Americas Watch, a group that seeks to close the infamous U.S. Army School of the Americas, in a statement on Thursday. "Honduran human rights organizations report there have been over 10,000 human rights violations by state security forces, and impunity is the norm--most murders go unpunished. The Associated Press has repeatedly exposed ties between the Honduran police and death squads, while U.S. military training and aid for the Honduran security forces continues."
The environmental group International Rivers demanded Thursday that "the U.S government, in particular, end its support for the Honduran military through loans and training at the School of the Americas," drawing attention to the United States' significant responsibility for the oppressive regime in Honduras today, in order "to honor Berta Caceres' lifelong struggle and her ultimate sacrifice for rivers and rights."
Democracy Now! remembered Caceres in the following segment on Thursday: