

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Today, Congressman Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D. (NY-16) unveiled the Emergency Price Stabilization Act, which will launch a whole-of-government effort to address America's cost-of-living crisis.
Today, Congressman Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D. (NY-16) unveiled the Emergency Price Stabilization Act, which will launch a whole-of-government effort to address America's cost-of-living crisis.
"In my district and across the country, people simply cannot afford to live," said Congressman Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D (NY-16). "From impossible rents and utility bills to soaring costs for food, health care, and other necessities of life, people in America are being crushed by the burden of high prices and wages that can't keep pace. While our government is taking several important steps in response, we must move with greater speed and agility to protect our constituents from price shocks and corporate profiteering. The Emergency Price Stabilization Act will do exactly that - first, by getting to the bottom of what is driving price increases in key sectors, and second, by designing targeted controls and regulations to rein in those prices. At every step of the way, we will mobilize and engage the public in the process. We cannot simply step back and allow the Federal Reserve, which hiked interest rates again last week, to address inflation on the backs of everyday people. That approach means throwing people out of work and risking a recession. Here is the question we must ask: do we have the resources and skills to reach our full productive capacity, make sure everyone in this country has a good job, and manage our economy in the interests of all people? I believe the answer is yes. But we'll need a new economic playbook to get there, and passing my Emergency Price Stabilization Act would be a major step in the right direction."
The Emergency Price Stabilization Act will expand the existing White House Supply Chains Disruption Task Force, creating a new Sub-Task Force that is empowered to:
Click here to read statements in support of the Emergency Price Stabilization Act from a range of individual economists and experts, including James K. Galbraith, Robert Reich, Isabella Weber, and Mark Paul.
"Though Wall Street tycoons would have us believe otherwise, retail prices for essential goods like food and energy are not set by simple supply and demand. They are egregiously manipulated by corporate giants that have achieved monopoly-level dominance over their markets," said Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter. "Setting reasonable maximum prices for everyday needs would reduce out-of-pocket costs to consumers while curbing excessive profiteering by opportunistic corporations. This common-sense legislation is needed more than ever."
"Corporations are reaping record profits while working people's wages are falling behind inflation," said AFL-CIO Government Affairs Director William Samuel. "This bill will ensure that we have every tool available to help working people cope with rising prices."
"Even before the pandemic, millions of America's lowest-income and most marginalized households were struggling to keep roofs over their heads, always just one financial shock away from falling behind on rent and being threatened with eviction, and in the worst cases, homelessness," stated Diane Yentel, president and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition. "Today, these same households are facing new threats with historic levels of inflation and skyrocketing rents. Just as some states have in place laws to prevent price or rent gouging after natural disasters, Congress should consider similar protections like those included in the Emergency Price Stabilization Act for renters coming out of a global pandemic."
"The rent is too damn high, and it is past time for the federal government to regulate the private rental market by setting price controls," said Tara Raghuveer, Homes Guarantee Campaign Director, People's Action. "Rent inflation is a national emergency, both a crisis for millions of tenants who can't afford their home, and a threat to our economic security as rent drives core inflation. Corporate landlords are using inflation as an excuse to raise rents, and they are raising rents beyond inflation; they are rent gouging. Congress and the President must act immediately to regulate rents, to curb inflation and to correct the imbalance of power between tenants and their landlords. This bill is a critical step in the right direction."
"It's time to take emergency pricing power out of the hands of corporate profiteers and put it in the hands of publicly accountable officials," said Matt Kent, Competition Policy Advocate at Public Citizen. "The Emergency Price Stabilization Act gives the federal government the tools necessary to step in on behalf of consumers when prices soar due to C-suite profit seeking during successive global emergencies. Crucially, the bill provides a targeted policy path for combating inflation without hiking interest rates, putting people out of work and tilting the economy into recession. "
"Rising costs are squeezing working people across the country, and politicians and policy makers keep insisting that the only way to stop it is to cut jobs and take money out of people's pockets by raising interest rates," said Natalia Salgado, Working Families Party Director of Federal Affairs. "Rep. Bowman's bill would give our government more and better options for fighting inflation by going directly at the prices set by firms with concentrated economic power. Working families need the government on our side and this is one important way to put it there."
Original co-sponsors of the legislation include: Reps. Cori Bush (D-MO), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Danny K. Davis (D-IL), Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (D-IL), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Hank Johnson (D-GA), Mondaire Jones (D-NY), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Donald M. Payne, Jr. (D-NJ), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Mark Takano (D-CA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), and Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.)
Organizations endorsing include: AFL-CIO, SEIU, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, National Nurses United, Food & Water Watch, Public Citizen, Indivisible, MoveOn, 1199 SEIU, Jobs with Justice, United for Respect, Community Change Action, Homes Guarantee Campaign, National Low Income Housing Coalition, National Housing Law Project, Housing Justice for All, Action Center on Race & the Economy (ACRE), NY PIRG, New York Communities for Change, Working Families Party, Fight Corporate Monopolies, Center for Popular Democracy Action, People's Action, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth US, Sunrise Movement, Social Security Works, Campaign for NY Health, Unrig our Economy NYC, National Employment Law Project, Labor Network for Sustainability, Taproot Earth, Democracy Collaborative, Sane Energy Project, Climate and Community Project, and New York Lawyers for the Public Interest.
Click here to read a summary of the bill.
Click here to read the full text of the bill.
Jamaal Anthony Bowman is an American politician and educator serving as the U.S. representative for New York's 16th congressional district since 2021.
(202) 225-2464"Under the guise of caring about Iranian people, the US is suffocating Iran to justify bombings and regime change," said one peace group.
The White House on Monday ramped up threats to attack Iran while President Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs on countries doing business with the Islamic Republic, where the death toll from two weeks of protests against economic hardship exacerbated by US sanctions and government repression rose to at least 599 people.
While Trump acknowledged that Iranian leaders want to negotiate with the United States to avoid renewed US attacks on the country like last summer's airstrikes targeting nuclear facilities and scientists, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday that the president reserves all options, including military force, amid Tehran's deadly crackdown on protesters.
"Airstrikes would be one of the many, many options that are on the table for the commander-in-chief," Leavitt said. "Diplomacy is always the first option for the president."
In an ominous development, the virtual US Embassy for Iran on Monday advised all Americans to "leave Iran now" and “have a plan for departing Iran that does not rely on US government help.”
In a Monday post on his Truth Social network, Trump said: "Effective immediately, any Country doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran will pay a Tariff of 25% on any and all business being done with the United States of America. This Order is final and conclusive."
Trump’s escalation of sanctions will make life even harder for millions of Iranians.Under the guise of caring about Iranian people, the US is suffocatating Iran to justify bombings & regime change.
[image or embed]
— CODEPINK (@codepink.bsky.social) January 12, 2026 at 2:38 PM
This followed Friday's threat by Trump that the US is "locked and loaded" for attacks on Iran if the country's security forces keep killing protesters. At least 599 people have been killed during the demonstrations, even as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed Monday that “the situation has come under total control."
The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) said in a statement Monday that "as Iranian Americans, we are horrified by the images and reports emerging from Iran showing brutal state violence inflicted on civilians to suppress their protests and demands."
"We condemn the Iranian government’s crackdown on peaceful protestors in the strongest possible terms and urge for accountability for what, according to the information we are receiving, appears to have been a massacre," NIAC continued.
“We continue to reject the prospect of the US answering the Iranian government’s brutality with bombing," the group stressed. "Military interventions have not brought democracy, human rights, or prosperity to the targets of prior interventions, including Iraq, Libya, Palestine, and Afghanistan."
"Iran’s long history is riddled with examples of external interventions and military actions that have only robbed Iranians of their agency to decide their future," NIAC added. "The future of Iran must be shaped by Iranians, not by repression, foreign militarism, or those seeking to exploit suffering to justify war. There is no credible case that US military intervention would protect Iranian lives."
"The unlawful deployment of thousands of armed, masked, and poorly trained federal agents is hurting Minnesota," said that state's attorney general.
Illinois and Minnesota, along with targeted cities in both states, filed a pair of federal lawsuits on Monday in hopes of ending deadly operations by President Donald Trump administration's intended to hunt down and deport immigrants.
Trump has sent thousands of US Department of Homeland Security agents—including from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—to the Twin Cities in recent days for an operation that resulted in the death of Renee Good, a US citizen and mother fatally shot by a federal officer in Minneapolis.
Amid the mounting violence by federal agents in Minnesota and the Trump administration's related propaganda—which have fueled protests across the country—the state's Democratic attorney general, Keith Ellison, plus the cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, took aim at DHS, CBP, ICE, and various agency leaders in a US district court.
"Defendants claim this unprecedented surge of immigration agents is necessary to fight fraud," says the complaint, filed in the District of Minnesota. "In reality, the massive deployment of armed agents to Minnesota bears no connection to that stated objective and instead reflects an alarming escalation of the Trump administration's retaliatory actions towards the state."
In a Monday statement, Ellison stressed that "the unlawful deployment of thousands of armed, masked, and poorly trained federal agents is hurting Minnesota."
"People are being racially profiled, harassed, terrorized, and assaulted," he noted. "Schools have gone into lockdown. Businesses have been forced to close. Minnesota police are spending countless hours dealing with the chaos ICE is causing. This federal invasion of the Twin Cities has to stop, so today I am suing DHS to bring it to an end."
As footage of an ICE officer shooting Good began to circulate online last week, Democratic Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey publicly told the agency to "get the fuck out" of his city. On Monday, he added that "when federal actions undermine public safety, harm our neighbors, and violate constitutional rights, we have a responsibility to act. That's exactly what we’re doing today."
St Paul Mayor Kaohly Her: "I wasn't born here. I'm carrying my ID and passport card all the time because I don't know when I'm going to be detained, when I'm going to be approached."
[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) January 12, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Trump's "Operation Metro Surge" in Minnesota this year followed the September launch of "Operation Midway Blitz" in Illinois, which targeted Chicago and its suburbs—where immigration agents have also shot multiple people in recent months, including one fatally.
"Border Patrol agents and ICE officers have acted as occupiers rather than officers of the law," Democratic Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul declared Monday. "They randomly, and often violently, question residents. Without warrants or probable cause, they brutally detain citizens and noncitizens alike."
"They use tear gas and other chemical weapons against bystanders, injuring dozens, including children, the elderly, and local police officers," he continued. "I filed this lawsuit to stand up for the safety of the people of Illinois and the sovereignty of our state."
The 103-page suit, filed in the Northern District of Illinois, followed another from the state and city of Chicago that blocked Trump's attempt to deploy the National Guard in the area, as he had done in Los Angeles, California and Washington, DC. At the end of last month, the president announced troops would leave Chicago, LA, and Portland, Oregon, but also said that "we will come back."
Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker—a frequent critic of the president—said Monday that "Illinois is once again taking Donald Trump to court to hold his administration accountable for their unlawful tactics, unnecessary escalations, and flagrant abuses of power."
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson emphasized that "these actions weren't just unlawful; they were cruel, needlessly inflicting fear and harm on our communities."
"My administration will forcefully protect our residents' rights and hold anyone accountable who abuses their power," Johnson pledged. "Nobody is above the law. This lawsuit is about ensuring there is accountability for the lawless actions of the Trump administration and justice for the Chicagoans who have been wronged."
Today, my office has taken significant action to put an end to federal agents’ lawlessness in the state of Illinois. Along with the @chicago-city.bsky.social, I have filed a lawsuit against DHS, ICE, and CBP: vimeo.com/1153715406?s...
[image or embed]
— Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul (@ilattygeneral.bsky.social) January 12, 2026 at 3:25 PM
In statements to multiple media outlets, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin made clear that the Trump administration plans to fight back against both states' moves. She called the Illinois filing "a baseless lawsuit," and said of the Minnesota case, "We have the Constitution on our side on this, and we look forward to proving that in court."
Meanwhile, critics of the Trump administration, and particularly its immigration operations, welcomed the new suits.
Congresswoman Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), a daughter of immigrants, wrote in a social media post about the suit in her state that "DHS's terror force is the greatest threat to our safety. Their militarized invasion of our cities puts us all at risk. They need to be defunded. They need to be held accountable. In the streets, in Congress, and in courts, we will fight to protect our communities, and we will win."
"This policy will cause more deaths of vulnerable Americans, like infants and the elderly," said one critic. "Also, it appears to be a violation of the Clean Air Act."
The Trump administration plans to stop calculating the monetary value of the public health benefits from reducing air pollution and instead focus exclusively on the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, the New York Times reported Monday.
Intragency emails and other documents reviewed by the Times revealed that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to stop tallying the financial value of health benefits caused by limiting fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone when regulating polluting industries.
Research published in 2023 showed that PM2.5 pollution from coal-fired power plants alone killed approximately 460,000 people in the US from 1999 to 2020.
"This policy will cause more deaths of vulnerable Americans, like infants and the elderly," American University School of Public Affairs professor Claudia Persico said on X Monday. "Also, it appears to be a violation of the Clean Air Act. This is incredibly foolish."
The EPA proposal would mark a stark reversal of decades of policy under which the agency cited the estimated cost of avoided asthma attacks and premature deaths to support stronger clean air rules. The change is likely to make it easier to roll back limits on PM2.5 and ozone from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills, and other polluting facilities.
“The idea that EPA would not consider the public health benefits of its regulations is anathema to the very mission of EPA,” Richard Revesz, faculty director at the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, told the Times.
“If you’re only considering the costs to industry and you’re ignoring the benefits, then you can’t justify any regulations that protect public health, which is the very reason that EPA was set up,” Revesz added.
The Environmental Protection Network (EPN), an advocacy group, said in a statement Monday that "EPA’s reported decision to ignore prevented deaths is part of a pattern of ignoring or downplaying health effects in the rulemaking process, including in its rulemaking on effluent guidelines for coal-fired power plants and its recent Waters of the United States rulemaking."
Critics of President Donald Trump's policies accuse his administration of repeatedly putting polluters—who contributed hundreds of millions of dollars toward reelecting the president and supporting other Republicans—over people.
"EPA should strengthen how it values human life and health, not pretend it doesn’t matter," Katie Tracy, senior regulatory policy advocate at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said Monday. "By refusing to monetize the benefits of cleaner air, the agency is effectively saying that preventing asthma attacks, heart disease, and early deaths have no dollar value at all."
"This unconscionable decision by the EPA should be called out for what it really is—a favor to corporate interests at the expense of the environment and public health," Tracy added. "EPA’s decision is not only shocking—it’s illegal and violates the Supreme Court’s instruction that the government cannot stack the deck to benefit polluters. Accordingly, if this disturbing policy leads to regulatory repeals or weak standards, it will certainly be challenged in court.”
During Trump's second term, the EPA has moved to repeal or replace the stronger carbon emission limits on fossil-fueled power plants put in place by the Biden administration, rescinded Biden-era fuel efficiency and emissions standards for cars and light trucks, revoked California's ability to enact stricter vehicle emissions rules, and signaled plans to overturn the agency's finding that greenhouse gases are a public health hazard.
The EPA has also weakened water and wetland protections, rolled back regulations limiting so-called "forever chemicals" in drinking water, dramatically cut or eliminated environmental justice programs, reduced enforcement of environmental violations, dismantled long-standing advisory and scientific panels, removed all mentions of human-caused climate change from its website, and more.
According to a 2024 EPN analysis, Trump's rollbacks could cause the deaths of nearly 200,000 people in the United States by 2050.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin—a former Republican congressman from New York with an abysmal 14% lifetime rating from the League of Conservation Voters—has also boasted about canceling around $20 billion worth of Biden-era green grants.
"EPA’s current leadership has abandoned EPA’s mission to protect human health and safety," EPN senior adviser Jeremy Symons said Monday. "Human lives don’t count. Childhood asthma doesn’t count. It is a shameful abdication of EPA’s responsibility to protect Americans from harm. Under this administration, the Environmental Protection Agency is now the Environmental Pollution Agency, helping polluters at the expense of human health."