June, 28 2021, 11:03am EDT

More Than 85 Advocacy Groups Endorse the People's Response Act; Urge Congress to Pass Key Legislation
Newly introduced legislation brings a new focus on public safety as a public health issue, allocates critical resources toward community safety to fill gaps in the current system.
WASHINGTON
Today, more than 85 advocacy groups announced collective support for the People's Response Act, which was introduced today by Congresswoman Cori Bush. The newly introduced legislation would fund community-based, health-centered, non-carceral investments in public safety to fill critical gaps in the public safety system which has failed to protect Black people.
The People's Response Act brings a new focus on public safety as a public health issue and would provide grants at the state and local levels for organizations to develop and support pilot community-based programs. This bill builds on the efforts of Black, Latinx, and working class communities to redefine public safety through community-led, holistic models that have centered care over cages. In defining public safety as a public health issue, this bill allows those efforts to be brought to scale. The People's Response Act emphasizes a health-centered approach to public safety by empowering the Department of Health and Human Services and promoting interagency collaboration--because communities and experts agree that public safety is not a matter for the Department of Justice alone.The full text of the legislation is available at the peoplesresponseact.com.
"We are thrilled to see the introduction of the People's Response Act, a bill that centers the critical work Black communities have done to ensure that their communities and their families are safe. We know that despite the said purpose of law enforcement, a carceral model of public safety has been anything but safe for our communities. Instead, and like this bill would do, we must invest in community-based, community-led models that puts people first. Public safety is a public health issue and we must finally invest in the services that truly make us safe. We urge Congress to join Congresswoman Bush, support this bill, and work to create true safety in our communities," said Scott Roberts, Senior Director of Criminal Justice Campaign, Color Of Change.
"This bill is a continuation of the work that the people of St. Louis and people all across our country have been deeply engaged in since the police murder of 18-year-old Michael Brown Jr. As an activist who stood on the frontlines of the Ferguson uprising in 2014 and through the summer of protests for George Floyd and Breonna Taylor last year--I believe that our legislation should be responsive to the demands of those of us who risked our lives in pursuit of justice. That demand has always been clear: thriving communities, homes, clean air, and the chance to live a life unencumbered by trauma and senseless violence. This Act brings together a broad coalition of health professionals, advocates, teachers, mental health professionals, peers, counselors, social workers, and movement leaders to build an agency that is rooted in a holistic approach to public safety," said U.S. Representative Cori Bush (D-MO).
"Punitive tactics such as policing and imprisonment uniquely harm Black women. Police have harmed and killed us and our loved ones, mass incarceration policy has ravaged our communities, and courts have driven us to financial ruin. Despite more resources than it has ever had at its disposal, the criminal justice system fails to protect Black women each step of the way. The People's Response Act is a sensible approach that would create pathways to harm prevention and violence interruption that are more effective than policing in keeping communities safe. Congresswoman Cori Bush has answered the cry from gender justice, racial justice, and mental health advocates who know that community-led, health-based investments are the only just public safety solution," said Gina Clayton-Johnson, Founder & Executive Director, Essie Justice Group
"The People's Response Act is transformative legislation that puts us on the path toward achieving our full vision of safety for all Black people. It moves us toward a shared vision of what truly keeps Black people safe: dramatic investments in communities that have suffered from generations of systemic racism and economic exploitation, incentives for local governments to adopt critical non-carceral practices, and the creation of a federal community safety agency to make the critical link between public safety and public health. We demand legislators hold a hearing for the People's Response Act and move the bill towards passage. We know what it takes to keep our communities safe, that is why we will organize to support Rep. Bush and the bill's co-sponsors to make this approach real for Black people," said Kayla Reed, Executive Director of Action St. Louis and leader of the Movement for Black Lives' Electoral Justice Project
The grants provided by the People's Response Act would allow organizations to scale-up public services and programs including vouchers for supportive housing, community-based employment programs, violence interruption, harm reduction counseling services, school mediation, and treatment for mental health and substance abuse.
The People's Response Act has garnered support from civic and advocacy groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Greenpeace, Black Live Matter, Movement for Black Lives, Essie Justice Group, Dignity and Power Now, Center for Popular Democracy, Human Rights Watch, Sunrise Movement, Latino Justice, National Employment Law Project, Promise of Justice Initiative, Drug Policy Alliance, Bend the Arc: Jewish Action, Common Justice, Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, Showing Up for Racial Justice, Civil Rights Corps, Southern Poverty Law Center Action Fund, Real Justice Network, Equal Justice Under Law, Public Justice Center, Louisiana Survivors for Reform, National Immigration Project (NIPNLG), and Parents Organized for Public Education.
"Rep. Bush's excellent legislation helps create a sustainable federal infrastructure for community safety alternatives to violent policing. If passed, it has the potential to drastically reduce harm and violence in Black and brown communities, and ultimately, transform how we imagine public safety. This is a long overdue move forward, and we applaud Rep. Bush for hearing the calls of the millions of people who've been organizing against police violence over the last year," said Arvin Alaigh, Campaign Manager, MoveOn.
"Los Angeles County is home to the largest jail system in the nation, but through the tireless work of our community, we are now leading the nation in the development of a Care First vision that prioritizes community-based systems of care over incarceration and policing," said Ivette Ivette Ale, Senior Policy Lead, Dignity and Power Now. "From the passing of Measure R and Measure J, to the creation of the Alternatives to Incarceration roadmap, we are taking critical steps to transform our county. Federal funding that supports these efforts and invests in our most vulnerable communities will propel this work forward and create the blue-print for national transformation."
"An actionable, visionary change to the way we approach safety is long overdue. Communities need policies that root safety not in punishment, but in health, education, housing, and the other things that people truly need to thrive. The People's Response Act is a key step in this direction, and we are thrilled that Rep. Bush is leading this charge," said Thea Sebastian, Director of Policy, Civil Rights Corps.
"We applaud Representative Bush for proposing solutions that rethink public safety. Far too many people with psychiatric disabilities, and particularly those who are people of color, have died or experienced needless incarceration due to avoidable contacts with law enforcement. Law enforcement should not be the default response to mental health emergencies," said Jennifer Mathis, Director of Policy and Legal Advocacy, Bazelon Center.
"LiveFree California believes gun violence in this country is at epidemic proportions and it's impact disproportionately felt in marginalized communities and only through focused and intense strategies supported by sufficient funding and effective programs can this be addressed," said Tim Kornegay, Coalition Director of LivFree California.
"As a national public health organization, we enthusiastically support building community-led, non-punitive public safety systems. We have seen time and again the ways that policing and incarceration threatens community health, especially among Black, Indigenous, immigrant, poor, and unhoused people. This bold legislation is a crucial step to advancing health equity and racial justice," said Amber Akemi Piatt, Health Instead of Punishment Program Director, Human Impact Partners.
"We cannot expect an institution rooted in the history of American chattel slavery to keep our communities safe. There is no such policy or technology that can reform policing - we need to completely divest from this racist punishment system and seriously tackle the issue of violence. This requires investing in the resources that address the root causes of violence in order to create healthy and safe communities. But it also means investing in the resources that allows us to respond to crises in a principled and dignified way. Our communities have had the courage to envision a world beyond the brutality of our current carceral system and it's time for our leaders to do the same," said Myaisha Hayes, Campaign Strategies Director at MediaJustice.
"The Bail Project applauds The People's Response Act for modeling public safety as a public health issue. Investments in people and not incarceration is how we achieve public safety. Through our Community Release with Support model, we have seen time again that housing, employment, mental health care, and other voluntary services can help return a person to court pretrial or keep them out of the system altogether. We look forward to building upon the foundation that this legislation will set in fostering more non-carceral and community-based models to public safety," said Kanya Bennett, Senior Policy Counsel & Legislative Coalition Manager, The Bail Project.
"Sunrise Movement stands with Rep. Bush in our shared vision of safety that invests in community, care and a non-carceral system," said Lauren Maunus, Advocacy Director for Sunrise Movement. "Billions of our tax dollars are used to train cops to kill. It's time to defund the police and invest in our communities through legislation like the People's Response Act- doing so would bring us one step closer towards the Green New Deal," said Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement Advocacy Director
Specifically, the People's Response Act would:
Create a public safety agency within the Department of Health and Human Services to fund and coordinate research, technical assistance, and grant programs related to non-carceral, health-centered investments in public safety.
Establish a First Responders Hiring Grant to award competitive grants through HHS and direct resources to community-based organizations and state, local, and tribal governments to hire emergency first responders, such as licensed social workers, mental health counselors, substance use counselors, and peer counselors, in an effort to improve crisis response and increase non-carceral, health-based approaches to public safety.
Fund several grant programs to implement and invest in community-led, health-based investments in public safety.
Fund grassroots, community-based organizations to implement non-carceral investments in public safety, including a dedicated grant for violence prevention.
Fund and incentivize states and local governments to shrink their criminal-legal systems and invest in community-led, non-carceral, and non-punitive investments in public safety.
Color Of Change is the nation's largest online racial justice organization. We help people respond effectively to injustice in the world around us. As a national online force driven by over one million members, we move decision-makers in corporations and government to create a more human and less hostile world for Black people in America.
LATEST NEWS
Trump DOJ's Use of Subpoenas Against Journalists Is 'Straight Out of the Dictator's Playbook': Press Freedom Group
"The potential of the government intruding into the newsgathering process is even greater when you are in the grand jury than it is for a subpoena for documents," said one press freedom advocate.
Jun 23, 2026
The US Department of Justice's attempt to compel journalists to testify before a grand jury is drawing blowback from a top press freedom group, which is accusing President Donald Trump's administration of behaving like an authoritarian regime.
According to a Tuesday report in The New York Times, the DOJ earlier this month issued subpoenas for national security reporters at The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal related to national security leaks.
Subpoenas against both news organizations were withdrawn after they issued legal challenges in sealed filings.
"The Justice Department had sought information from three reporters at The Journal about an article detailing how top officials warned... Trump of the risks of a major military campaign against Iran," reported the Times. "It also sought information from a reporter at The Post, Ellen Nakashima, about reporting related to US military action in Venezuela."
As the Times noted, it is highly uncommon for government investigators to subpoena journalists when they are probing national security leaks, as such actions are generally seen as having a chilling effect on reporters' ability to gather information.
After the details of the subpoenas and news of their withdrawal broke, Reporters Without Borders slammed the Trump DOJ for hitting a "new low" in its attempt to "suppress information from the American people."
"Subpoenaing journalists to appear before a grand jury under the guise of ‘national security’ is straight out of the dictator's playbook," the group said. "Fortunately, in the United States, newsrooms are fighting back and winning."
A Tuesday CNN report claimed that Trump had personally pushed acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to subpoena the journalists, going so far as to hand Blanche "a sticky note—with the word 'Treason' written in Sharpie—placed atop a stack of printed articles."
CNN also reported that both the Post and the Journal "remain on guard against the possibility that the subpoenas will be reissued in the future."
A spokesperson for the Post ripped the Trump DOJ for issuing "an unwarranted subpoena of our reporter," which the newspaper described as "a clear violation of constitutionally guaranteed press freedom."
"We will continue to stand fully behind the journalism of The Washington Post," the spokesperson added, "and fight all efforts by any administration that violate our First Amendment rights."
Gabe Rottman, vice president of policy at Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in an interview with the Post that issuing grand jury subpoenas to reporters puts core First Amendment rights at risk because "once you are up in front of the grand jury, the testimony can go in many different ways and can inquire into stories that are unrelated to the underlying investigation."
"The potential of the government intruding into the newsgathering process is even greater when you are in the grand jury than it is for a subpoena for documents," Rottman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Undeterred by Threats, Khanna Tells Musk to 'Testify, Under Oath, About What He Did' to USAID
"Someone confident he did nothing wrong shows up and clears his name," Khanna said. "Elon Musk is doing the opposite because he genuinely believes the law does not apply to him."
Jun 23, 2026
In the face of lawsuit threats from the richest man in the world, Rep. Ro Khanna on Monday renewed his call for Elon Musk to testify before Congress and defend his dramatic cuts to foreign aid against the claim that they are killing millions of children.
Earlier this week, Musk threatened to sue Khanna (D-Calif.) for defamation and said he “should be in prison” after the congressman said that the trillionaire’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had “possibly sentenced” 4.5 million children “to death” through its dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) last year at the start of the second Trump administration.
Khanna's assertion was based on the findings of a July 2025 Lancet study, which found that DOGE's cancellation of roughly 83% of the programs run by USAID—including 88% cuts to child health aid, 87% cuts to epidemic and disease surveillance, and 94% cuts to family planning assistance—could result in the deaths of 14 million people by 2030, including 4.5 million children under five.
"That number is not mine," Khanna explained in a Substack post on Monday. "It comes straight from the first comprehensive analysis of its kind into what American foreign aid actually does. Over the past two decades, The Lancet found USAID-funded programs helped prevent more than 91 million deaths, 30 million of them children."
While at the time Musk boasted that he was "feeding USAID into the wood chipper," he claimed on Tuesday that all DOGE actually did was "require... contact information of the recipients to confirm that funding was not fraudulent. No validated medical funding was stopped."
He added that "anything that appeared to be legitimate lifesaving funding continued and is now administered by the State Department."
This is broadly not true. While some funds were restored, according to an April 2025 analysis by KFF, about 80% of USAID identifiable global health awards—including ones for polio vaccination, HIV treatment, malaria, and tuberculosis prevention—were still listed as terminated after the review.
In another video posted Tuesday, Musk claimed that when organizations requested that their lifesaving aid be restored, he rebuffed them because they refused to let him personally speak with the children whom they serve. This, he claimed, was evidence of an "enormous amount of fraud and graft."
Khanna said on Monday that if Musk's actions were truly harmless as he claims, he "should sit before the House Oversight Committee," of which the congressman is a member, and "testify, under oath, about what he did."
He said Musk's belligerent response to being called to testify was damning.
"He could have shown up and made his case. He could have argued the study was wrong. Instead, he called me 'an evil liar.'" Khanna said. "When that did not work, he reached for something uglier. He announced he would sue me. He called for my arrest. He said I belong in prison."
"The richest man in human history answered a request to testify by trying to put the person who asked behind bars. Someone confident he did nothing wrong shows up and clears his name," Khanna continued. "Elon Musk is doing the opposite because he genuinely believes the law does not apply to him."
The congressman accused Musk of attempting to use his wealth, and the threat of "years of litigation, paid for by the deepest pockets on the planet," to scare him "into silence."
"It won’t," Khanna said.
"Here is my answer to Elon Musk. I have already challenged him to a televised debate on the rule of law," he said. "Come testify before the Oversight Committee and answer under oath, the way every other person who has held this kind of power has had to."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'No Immunity for Big Oil': Dem Leaders Urged to Block GOP Gift to Fossil Fuel Industry
"If we do not also protect Americans’ right to hold bad actors accountable in court, we will be handing Big Oil a get-out-of-jail-free card," said a coalition of over 190 civil society groups.
Jun 23, 2026
Nearly 200 civil society groups on Tuesday urged congressional Democrats to reject any legislation granting fossil fuel companies immunity from climate lawsuits, warning that such protections would block communities from pursuing accountability and compensation for climate-related damages.
"As communities across the country are taking Big Oil companies to court for lying to the public about the climate harms of their products, we are alarmed by reports that the fossil fuel industry is trying to secure a legal liability waiver that would block communities from attempts to hold them accountable," the No Immunity for Big Oil coalition wrote in a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), and Democratic lawmakers in both chambers.
"The American Petroleum Institute—the largest oil and gas trade association in the country and a defendant in several climate accountability lawsuits—has announced that stopping 'abusive state climate lawsuits' against fossil fuel companies is a top priority for the industry this year," the letter continues.
"We’re urging you to protect our right to hold Big Oil accountable and reject any proposal that would shield fossil fuel companies from the legal and legislative efforts communities across the country are advancing to make polluters pay for the damage their climate lies and pollution [have] caused," added the groups, which include the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Greenpeace USA, Union of Concerned Scientists, Center for Biological Diversity, and Amnesty International USA.
In April, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-Wyo.) introduced companion versions of the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act of 2026, which would “prohibit liability against those engaged in the mining, extraction, production, refinement, transportation, distribution, marketing, manufacture, or sale of energy for damages or injunctive or other relief from the use of their products, and for other purposes.”
Hageman's office explained at the time that the legislation aims “to protect American energy from leftist legal crusades punishing lawful activity."
At the state level, there has been a coordinated push by Republican-controlled legislatures to shield fossil fuel companies from climate-related lawsuits. Earlier this year, Utah became the first state to pass a law "all but shutting down communities’ ability to hold gas-emitting polluters responsible for harms caused by their bad actions," according to law professor and critic Wes Henricksen.
Numerous Republican-controlled state legislatures are following suit, with similar legislation in various stages of advancement.
An investigation published in April by ProPublica's Abrahm Lustgarten found that "most of these bills are part of a coordinated effort, orchestrated by a constellation of groups that share staff or have funding ties to the prominent conservative activist Leonard Leo, who is credited with placing conservative justices on the US Supreme Court."
"These groups have drafted state legislation, planned its dissemination, and engaged a well-connected lobbying firm to get them signed into law," Lustgarten wrote. "The effort is unfolding as courts are weighing more than 30 significant lawsuits by states, counties, and municipalities accusing fossil fuel companies of misrepresenting the risks their products posed to consumers and seeking to recoup the costs of disasters and other climate impacts like wildfire losses or coastal flooding that their products helped cause."
"A goal of the legislation is to block these cases from going forward and prevent new ones from being filed," he added.
Responding to an effort to establish a state program that could collect as much as $50 billion from fossil fuel companies responsible for climate-wrecking greenhouse gas emissions, New Jersey state Rep. Dawn Fantasia (R-24) asked Tuesday on social media, "Since when do we get to retroactively tax oil companies for decades of lawful, heavily-regulated activity?"
But that's precisely what the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement did, forcing tobacco companies pay states more than $200 billion to compensate for past public health and medical costs caused by smoking-related harms. Like Big Tobacco before it, the fossil fuel industry has been accused of downplaying and obscuring evidence of climate and health harms from its products while working to stymie regulation and skirt legal and financial accountability.
Sixteen Republican state attorneys general are also pushing a liability shield for Big Oil modeled on the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, legislation signed by former President George W. Bush that grants gun manufacturers and dealers legal immunity from civil litigation.
As the No Immunity for Big Oil letter notes:
The mounting threat of climate change is being felt first-hand by our communities as worsening floods, storms, and other extreme weather events leave destruction in their wake, saddling everyday Americans and local governments with skyrocketing costs to recover, respond, and adapt to the growing crisis. The record-breaking extreme weather events walloping our communities with increasing frequency and intensity are a result of fossil fuel pollution enabled for decades by Big Oil companies and their coordinated campaign of climate deception. Oil and gas companies have known for decades that their products posed “potentially catastrophic” risk to the climate—but instead of disclosing this knowledge, they chose to run a historic and ongoing campaign to deceive the public, protect their profits, and delay our transition to cleaner and cheaper energy.
"There are many ongoing fights to protect justice, democracy, and fundamental rights that demand your attention—and we thank you for fighting to keep our communities’ rights intact," the letter concludes. "If we do not also protect Americans’ right to hold bad actors accountable in court, we will be handing Big Oil a get-out-of-jail-free card."
The No Immunity for Big Oil coalition's letter comes as 10 Democratic state governors are also calling on congressional leaders to "reject federal legislation that would grant sweeping legal protections to fossil fuel companies and limit the authority of states and local governments to enforce their own laws."
“No industry should receive a blanket exemption from accountability under the law,” said Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. “States have the right to protect their residents, enforce their laws, and seek justice when communities are harmed."
"This proposal before Congress would undermine those principles and set a dangerous precedent by allowing one industry to avoid legal scrutiny," Pritzker added, referring to the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act. "I urge Congress to reject this proposal and stand with states, taxpayers, and the rule of law—not special protections for powerful corporations.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


