For Immediate Release
Sean Vitka, email@example.com
Rep. Lofgren Calls on Barr to Disclose Basis of Surveillance of Protesters
During Attorney General William Barr's hearing before the House Judiciary Committee today, Representative Lofgren called for answers to roiling questions about the government's deployment of advanced surveillance techniques against protesters across the country. Citing the potential deployment of cell-site simulators, face recognition, and dragnet surveillance of internet activity, Representative Lofgren demanded the Attorney General explain the legal basis on which this warrantless surveillance is based. The exchange begins approximately 2 hours and 10 minutes into the hearing, available here.
Attorney General Barr said in part that he "cannot speak to those instances if in fact they occurred," and added that "most of our cyber activities are conducted by the FBI under their law enforcement powers to detect and prevent crime."
"This is about the privacy of all Americans, and it's all being violated," Representative Lofgren responded.
The following statement can be attributed to Sean Vitka, senior policy counsel at Demand Progress:
The Attorney General has personally authorized lawless, mass surveillance in this country before, and did so by relying on radically aggressive interpretations of executive power, by secretly abusing statutory authority, and by hiding it under the DEA. Representative Lofgren is asking critically important questions. It is frighteningly plausible that Attorney General Barr has told the Trump administration it may conduct domestic mass surveillance with effectively no limits, potentially even in the absence of Congressional authorization. The consequences would be staggering and the chilling of free speech is already being felt.
The planes are in the air. We need these answers now."
QUESTION 8: Does the government collect web browsing and internet search history pursuant to Section 215? If so, what are or should be any limitations on such collection or the dissemination and use of such information? Does the government collect webbrowsing or internet search history pursuant to FISA Pen Register/Trap and Trace authorities?
ANSWER: I believe it is important for the IC to use its authorities appropriately against valid intelligence targets. The amendments to Title V of FISA made by Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act expired on March 15, 2020 and, to date, have not been reauthorized.
Demand Progress Education Fund and the FreedomWorks Foundation have published many resources about Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act at www.Section215.org. In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed that the government was secretly using Section 215 to collect all calling records of all customers of major telephone providers, which is only one of the ways this authority has been abused over the past two decades.
Demand Progress amplifies the voice of the people — and wields it to make government accountable and contest concentrated corporate power. Our mission is to protect the democratic character of the internet — and wield it to contest concentrated corporate power and hold government accountable.