March, 18 2020, 12:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Email:,press@lawyerscommittee.org
Election Protection Overview of Barriers Faced by Voters in Illinois, Florida and Arizona Primary Elections
On March 17, voters in Arizona, Florida, and Illinois cast ballots in their respective state's presidential preference primaries. The primary election in Ohio did not go forward after state officials moved to postpone the election.
WASHINGTON
On March 17, voters in Arizona, Florida, and Illinois cast ballots in their respective state's presidential preference primaries. The primary election in Ohio did not go forward after state officials moved to postpone the election. The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law leads Election Protection, the nation's largest and longest-running nonpartisan voter protection program operating in its 19th year. Election Protection has been and continues to work with coalition partners to safeguard voting rights across the country. During today's primary elections, Election Protection provided support for voters through several non-partisan hotlines and through the work of coalition partners in the primary states. The non-partisan hotlines 866-OUR-VOTE (866-687-8683), 888-VE-Y-VOTA (888-839-8682), 888-API-VOTE (888-273-8683), and 844-YALLA-US (844- 925-5287) provided multilingual support to voters.
"The existing barriers and challenges faced by voters have grown exponentially in the wake of the current public health crisis," said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. "The coronavirus crisis has had a cascading effect during the first few weeks of this election cycle and presented growing challenges for voters. Those states that have not yet conducted primaries should move to adopt reforms now to address the burdens faced by voters this election season."
Clarke continued, "expanding early voting opportunities, lifting restrictions on absentee voting, easing registration deadlines, instituting Same Day Registration, providing full and fair notice regarding electoral changes, and expanding poll worker recruitment efforts are among steps that officials can take to better respond to the crisis. Taking decisive action as early as possible can help to avoid the kind of chaos that ensued in Ohio on the heels of their 11th hour decision to postpone the election. Moreover, states can help instill confidence in the electorate by providing safe and clean environments for voting that comply with social distancing guidelines."
The spread of COVID-19 altered the state of election administration and Election Protection during this week's primaries. Election Protection responded to the public health advisories regarding COVID-19 and related social distancing recommendations by bringing many aspects of its program online and using more than a hundred staff and volunteers to respond to calls and complaints from voters in Arizona, Florida, Illinois, and Ohio.
Election officials need to do more to prepare for elections, particularly given the unprecedented challenges. As in recent elections, voters continued to experience barriers to the ballot box due to restrictive voter requirements, delays caused by long lines, and poorly trained poll workers in today's primaries. However, the spread of COVID-19 has presented new, unique challenges that have exacerbated the barriers faced by some voters:
- Long Lines: Long lines discourage voter turnout and present a unique risk given the current viral pandemic. While turnout was largely down in today's primaries, the closure of many polling places, especially those in close proximity to one another, created acute delays in voting at some polling places. Long lines were observed in places such as the Thurgood Marshall Library in Chicago, Illinois.
- Poll Workers: Many pollworkers refused to show for assigned shifts as the pandemic has gripped the country. Voters in several Illinois counties were unable to cast ballots today either because their polling place failed to open on time or voting equipment was not properly set up.
- Self-Isolating or Sick Voters: Voters from Florida contacted the Election Protection and indicated that they were not able to turn out to vote because they were quarantined or were self-isolating. Many of these voters were not able to vote under the state's laws. Voters in Illinois and Arizona also reported barriers to the polls because they were unable to leave their homes to access the polls given the public health crisis.
- Barriers Faced by Student Voters: Many students who have relocated from their colleges as a result of COVID-19 are no longer present in the area where they are registered to vote. Student voters in Arizona and Florida who were evacuated outside their counties or their states called the hotline to inquire about voting options. The COVID-19 has resulted in unanticipated barriers for student voters who were not able to access absentee or emergency ballots.
- Polling Place Sanitation: Many voters who turned out to vote contacted Election Protection hotline to report that their polling place lacked proper sanitation including gloves for poll workers and hand sanitizer or wipes for frequently used voting equipment, particularly in Illinois. Election officials must do more to ensure clean and safe environments for voters.
Separately, many Ohio voters faced confusion about the status of the primary election or did not receive information about the changing status of the election at all. The Election Protection hotline received a steady stream of calls throughout the day from Ohio voters unsure about whether the primary election had been cancelled. These calls represented about 15% of all hotline calls received. Uncertainty remains about when the postponed election will be held. While the state's Governor and Secretary of State have announced that the election has been rescheduled for June 2, it is unclear whether they have the authority to make such a change unilaterally. The late postponement of Ohio's primary proved challenging for voters across the state and left officials with little time to communicate the postponement to voters.
Throughout the 2020 election cycle, Election Protection will be working with national, state, and local partners to protect voting rights through the suite of Election Protection hotlines, non-partisan poll monitoring, and voting rights litigation.
The Lawyers' Committee is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, formed in 1963 at the request of President John F. Kennedy to enlist the private bar's leadership and resources in combating racial discrimination and the resulting inequality of opportunity - work that continues to be vital today.
(202) 662-8600LATEST NEWS
Asked If He Must Uphold the US Constitution, Trump Says: 'I Don't Know'
"I'm not a lawyer," the president said in a newly aired interview.
May 04, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump refused in an interview released Sunday to affirm that the nation's Constitution affords due process to citizens and noncitizens alike and that he, as president, must uphold that fundamental right.
"I don't know, I'm not a lawyer," Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker, who asked if the president agrees with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that everyone on U.S. soil is entitled to due process.
When Welker pointed to the Fifth Amendment—which states that "no person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"—Trump again replied that he's unsure and suggested granting due process to the undocumented immigrants he wants to deport would be too burdensome.
"We'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," Trump said, echoing a sentiment that his vice president expressed last month.
Asked whether he needs to "uphold the Constitution of the United States as president," Trump replied, "I don't know."
Watch:
WELKER: The 5th Amendment says everyone deserves due process
TRUMP: It might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or two million or three million trials pic.twitter.com/FMZQ7O9mTP
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 4, 2025
Trump, who similarly deferred to "the lawyers" when asked recently about his refusal to bring home wrongly deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, has unlawfully cited the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly remove undocumented immigrants from the U.S. without due process. Federal agents have also arrested and detained students, academics, and a current and former judge in recent weeks, heightening alarm over the administration's authoritarian tactics.
CNNreported Friday that the administration has "been examining whether it can label some suspected cartel and gang members inside the U.S. as 'enemy combatants' as a possible way to detain them more easily and limit their ability to challenge their imprisonment."
"Trump has expressed extreme frustration with federal courts halting many of those migrants' deportations, amid legal challenges questioning whether they were being afforded due process," the outlet added. "By labeling the migrants as enemy combatants, they would have fewer rights, the thinking goes."
Some top administration officials have publicly expressed disdain for the constitutional right to due process. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote in a social media post last month that "the judicial process is for Americans" and "immediate deportation" is for undocumented immigrants.
The New Republic's Greg Sargent wrote in a column Saturday that "Miller appears to want Trump to have the power to declare undocumented immigrants to be terrorists and gang members by fiat; to have the power to absurdly decree them members of a hostile nation's invading army, again by fiat; and then to have quasi-unlimited power to remove them, unconstrained by any court."
"The more transparency we have gained into the rot of corruption and bad faith at the core of this whole saga, the worse it has come to look," Sargent continued. "Trump himself is exposing it all for what it truly is: the stuff of Mad Kings."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Republicans Set to Give Self-Described 'DOGE Person' Keys to Social Security Agency
"A vote for Trump's Social Security Commissioner is a vote to destroy Social Security," warned one advocacy group.
May 04, 2025
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday is set to hold a confirmation vote for President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Social Security Administration—an ultra-rich former Wall Street executive who has aligned himself with the Elon Musk-led slash-and-burn effort at agencies across the federal government.
"I am fundamentally a DOGE person," Frank Bisignano told CNBC in March, amplifying concerns that he would take his experience in the financial technology industry—where he was notorious for inflicting mass layoffs while raking in a huge compensation package—to SSA, which is already facing large-scale staffing cuts that threaten the delivery of benefits for millions of Americans.
In an email on Saturday, the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works warned that Bisignano "is not the cure to the DOGE-manufactured chaos at the Social Security Administration."
"In fact, he is part of it, and, if confirmed, would make it even worse," the group added. "We're not going down without a fight. Republicans may have a majority in the Senate, but we're going to rally to send a message: A vote for Trump's Social Security Commissioner is a vote to destroy Social Security!"
"If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he's even in place as commissioner, who knows what else he'll be able to get away with once he's in office."
Bisignano, the CEO of payment processing giant Fiserv, has been accused during his confirmation process of lying under oath about his ties to DOGE, which has worked to seize control of Social Security data as part of a purported effort to root out "fraud" that advocates say is virtually nonexistent.
As The Washington Post reported in March, Bisignano testified to the Senate Finance Committee that "he has had no contact" with DOGE.
"But Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the claim is 'not true,' citing an account the senator said he received from a senior Social Security official who recently left the agency," the Post noted. "The former official... described 'numerous contacts Mr. Bisignano made with the agency since his nomination,' including 'frequent' conversations with senior executives."
Wyden pointed again to the former SSA official's statement in a floor speech Thursday in opposition to Bisignano, saying that "according to the whistleblower, Mr. Bisignano personally appointed his Wall Street buddy, Michael Russo, to be the leader of DOGE's team at Social Security."
The Oregon Democrat said Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee refused his request for a bipartisan meeting with the whistleblower to evaluate their accusations unless "we agreed to hand over any information received from the whistleblower directly to the nominee and the Trump administration."
"All Americans should be concerned that a nominee for a position of public trust like commissioner of Social Security is accused of lying about his actions at the agency and that efforts to bring this important information to light are being thwarted," Wyden said Thursday. "If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he's even in place as commissioner, who knows what else he'll be able to get away with once he's in office."
"He could lie by denying any American who paid their Social Security taxes the benefits they've earned, claiming some phony pretense," the senator warned. "He could lie about how sensitive personal information is being mishandled—or worse, exploited for commercial use."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Chilling Attempt to Normalize Fascism': Groups Decry Trump Official's Arrest Threats
"We must not allow intimidation and authoritarian tactics to take root in our political system."
May 04, 2025
A coalition of advocacy organizations on Saturday expressed support for Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers and warned that the Trump border czar's threat against the Democratic leader marks a "dangerous escalation" of the administration's assault on the rule of law across the United States.
The groups—including All Voting Is Local and the ACLU of Wisconsin—said in a joint statement that Evers' guidance to state officials on how to handle being confronted by federal agents was "a prudent measure aimed at ensuring compliance with state and federal laws while protecting the rights of state employees."
The suggestion by Tom Homan, a leader of President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign, that Evers could be arrested for issuing such guidance undermines "the foundational principles of our democracy, including the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the right of state governments to operate without undue federal interference," the groups said Saturday.
"To threaten our governor over his legal directive is gross overreach by our federal government, and it is not occurring in a vacuum," they continued, warning that the administration's rhetoric and actions represent a "chilling attempt to normalize fascism."
"Similar occurrences are happening across the nation, including within our academic systems," the groups added. "If we do not reject these actions now, states and other institutions will only lose more and more of their autonomy and power. This is exactly why we underscore Gov. Evers' claim that this event is 'chilling.'"
The threats against Gov. Evers in Wisconsin undermine the foundational principles of our democracy: the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the right of state governments to operate without undue federal interference. We must reject this overreach. allvotingislocal.org/statements/w...
[image or embed]
— All Voting is Local (@allvotingislocal.bsky.social) May 3, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Trump administration officials and the president himself have repeatedly threatened state and local officials as the White House rushes ahead with its lawless mass deportation campaign, which has ensnared tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants and at least over a dozen U.S. citizens—including children.
In an executive order signed late last month, Trump accused "some state and local officials" of engaging in a "lawless insurrection" against the federal government by refusing to cooperate with the administration's deportation efforts.
But as Temple University law professor Jennifer Lee recently noted, localities "can legally decide not to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement."
"Cities, like states, have constitutional protections against being forced to administer or enforce federal programs," Lee wrote. "The Trump administration cannot force any state or local official to assist in enforcing federal immigration law."
Administration officials have also leveled threats against members of Congress, with Homan suggesting earlier this year that he would refer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to the U.S. Justice Department for holding a webinar informing constituents of their rights.
During a town hall on Friday, Ocasio-Cortez dared Homan to do so.
"To that I say: Come for me," she said to cheers from the audience. "We need to challenge them. So don't let them intimidate you."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular