SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A survey of candidatesfor the upcoming French presidential election, which both candidates still in the race completed, reveals differences in approach on some significant international and domestic human rights topics, Human Rights Watch said today. The survey's purpose was to establish the position of each candidate on pressing human rights issues that the new president will have to tackle. The runoff between President Nicolas Sarkozy and Francois Hollande, the Socialist challenger, will be on May 6, 2012.
Sarkozy and Hollande, along with six other candidates in the first round, answered questions on a variety of issues including events in and relationships with Syria, Russia, China, Afghanistan, and the US. They were also asked to state their position on accountability, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) rights, and some specific issues related to France, such as violence against women, the rights of the Roma people, and abusive police identity checks.
"The two candidates' replies to our survey, each in their own way, tell us a lot about their respective approaches to some key international and domestic human rights issues," said Jean-Marie Fardeau, France director at Human Rights Watch. "We hope that these answers will help voters make an informed choice."
The two candidates' main answers are summarized below, and are posted in their entirety.
Human Rights Watch sought the candidates' point of view on three human rights issues of particular relevance to France: abusive police identity checks, a European convention on violence against women, and the rights of the Roma community.
Abusive Identity Checks
In a report published in January, Human Rights Watch documented discriminatory and humiliating identity checks by the police of minority youth and recommended that police officers conducting identity checks systematically provide each person stopped with a written explanation of the legal basis for the identity check. When asked whether the candidate would implement such a recommendation, Sarkozy did not answer the question. Hollande said he will "ensure that France is a model of respect for individual freedoms as set forth in the Constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union." A separate letter from his office affirmed his commitment to fight racial profiling ("delit de facies") in identity checks "through a procedure respectful of all citizens."
Violence Against Women
France has signed the Council of Europe convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, but has yet to ratify it. When asked if they would ratify the convention, Sarkozy said that he supported ratification, and Hollande indicated his intention to establish a "dedicated body in charge of specific monitoring of violence against women, supporting the victims of violence, training professionals, organizing research on violence against women, and making recommendations to guide public action" to consider ratification.
Roma Rights
In August 2010, an administrative circular from the Interior Ministry ordered prefects to take "systematic action to dismantle illegal camps, priority given to those of Roma" and associated these measures with the "immediate expulsion of irregular foreigners." In the wake of criticism, France adopted a new circular in September 2010 that removed the discriminatory reference to Roma, who are European Union citizens and have the same rights to freedom of movement and non-discrimination as any other EU citizen. However, as Human Rights Watch has documented, discrimination against Romapersists in France. Asked about their approach on this specific topic, Hollande called for "discriminatory measures against Roma populations ... to be abolished," while Sarkozy said that "the same rules apply" to Roma as to "all other citizens," adding that their freedom of movement "is the same as for nomadic persons in our country," specifying that they also have "the same "obligations to meet."
Human Rights Violations in Syria
Concerning continuing rights abuses in Syria, Sarkozy defended his record, saying that, "France has played a leading role in the negotiations within the Security Council for reaching a resolution on Syria." He said he "has personally very firmly denounced the human rights violations committed by the Syrian authorities." Moreover, he said that "the negotiations within the UN framework must be continued with the aim of ... an effective end to all violence" and said that, "In order to bring the Security Council to the French and European position on this issue, we must continue the work that has been started, so that China and Russia withdraw their support for Bashar Al-Assad."
Hollande said that under his presidency, "France will be on the side of those who oppose and denounce the crimes committed against peoples ... and our country will use all its weight so that dissuasive measures are taken to put an end to such situations."
Dialogue with Russia and China on Rights Issues
Sarkozy emphasized a need to establish a "constructive dialogue" with both Russiaand China, saying that, "This dialogue has never prevented us from reasserting how important respect for human rights is for us." He also indicated that public statements about such issues should be made at the European level instead of the national level, and said he had pushed for France to "take the initiative in the European declarations calling for the liberation of Liu Xiaobo." Hollande focused on political prisoners in both countries and asserted that if he is elected, "France ... will request the freeing of or the end to legal proceedings against people harassed because of their opinion, and will support the civil society organizations that campaign for the respect of fundamental rights."
Promoting the Rule of Law in Afghanistan
Human Rights Watch asked the candidates to describe the strategy they would put in place to promote the respect of rule of law and women's rights in Afghanistan. Hollande said that if he is elected, "France will put its diplomacy at the service of the rule of law and equal respect due to each person." Sarkozy said that, "Educating the future generations seems to us to be the surest way to promote the cause of women and the rule of law."
Accountability for Rights Abuses
Two questions in the survey referred to the issue of accountability, one specifically about three African states - Cote d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Guinea- and one about the United Statesin the context of allegations of abuses against Guantanamo Bay detainees. Both candidates stressed their commitment to the fight against impunity. Sarkozy said that, "Whatever their nationality, those responsible for crimes involving serious violations of human rights must be prosecuted, tried and sentenced." He said he is "prepared to intervene so that France's partners respect, effectively, the individual rights guaranteed by French and international law." Hollande said France "will support the strengthening of international criminal justice."
LGBT Rights Around the World
Regarding the rights of LGBT people, Sarkozy described persecutions based on sexual orientation and gender identity as "shocking and unacceptable" and said he wants "France to be able to take a clear stand, especially within the UN Human Rights Committee, against states planning to penalize homosexuality with the death penalty." Hollande said French diplomacy will support the "equal respect due to each person, whatever his or her gender or sexual orientation."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
Highlighting how the Pentagon is "replete with waste and fraud," one critic called it "a disgraceful and unconscionable misuse of taxpayer money."
Nearly all Republicans and 17 Democrats in the US House of Representatives voted Wednesday evening for a military bill that would push the figure for defense spending approved this year beyond $1 trillion.
The final vote for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2026 was 231-196, with just four Republicans opposing the bill, which will still need to be reconciled with the Senate's version.
Robert Weissman, co-president of the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen, highlighted after the vote that the House's NDAA authorizes about $883 billion for defense spending—including over $848 billion for the Pentagon, which has never passed an audit—on top of the $150 billion in the GOP budget reconciliation package that President Donald Trump signed in July.
"Throwing a trillion dollars at the Pentagon—an agency replete with waste and fraud—at the same time the Republican Congress and the Trump regime are slashing spending on healthcare, education, housing, food assistance, and foreign aid is a disgraceful and unconscionable misuse of taxpayer money," Weissman said, referring to other provisions in the earlier package.
"On top of the age-old dangerous and wasteful spending, the bill pours billions into new boondoggles like Trump's 'Golden Dome' space interceptor vanity project and supercharges the dangerous development of killer robots for the battlefield," he noted. "Making it still worse is the administration's in-your-face, authoritarian misuse of Pentagon dollars—from the deployment of the National Guard on the streets of Washington, DC, to the illegal and murderous attack on a Venezuelan boat."
Weissman added that "the bill includes some modest, positive requirements to report waste, fraud, and price gouging to Congress and establishes financial penalties if the Pentagon fails its audit. But these small measures do not begin to offset the damage done by the dangerous and wasteful overall package."
House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Adam Smith (D-Wash.), who voted against the NDAA's final passage, told Politico that "we didn't get any of the amendments and the debates that we wanted; not a single solitary one."
"Meanwhile, all manner of different issues that are pure culture war partisan issues were allowed in," he continued. "I fear that many of those are going to pass."
In a statement after the vote, the Congressional Equality Caucus condemned "six Republican-sponsored anti-LGBTQI+ amendments," including bans on medically necessary healthcare for transgender service members and dependents.
"The National Defense Authorization Act has traditionally received strong bipartisan support, yet for the second Congress in a row House Republicans have tainted a bill aimed at improving the lives of servicemembers with poison-pill riders that threaten our troops' rights, their families' stability, and our efforts to retain top talent," said the caucus chair, Rep. Mark Takano (D-Cailf.).
"Republicans' sacrifice of a strong bipartisan vote for a politicized NDAA to appease the Trump administration and a small slice of their base cannot undo the sacrifice of the transgender service members, cadets, or military dependents that will be hurt by this bill," he added. "Congress should be fighting for those who fight for us—but it's clear the GOP has other priorities. I will keep fighting to prevent the harmful provisions in this bill from becoming law."
"Unconscionable acts of violence should have no place in our country," said Congresswoman Ilhan Omar—whom Kirk wanted to denaturalize and deport. "Let's pray for no more lives being lost to gun violence."
Tuesday's assassination of far-right firebrand Charlie Kirk in Utah drew widespread condemnation from many of the same progressive figures who have previously decried his rampant bigotry, dismissal of gun deaths, and promotion of conspiracy theories including the "stolen" 2020 election.
"Political violence has no place in this country. We must condemn this horrifying attack," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said on the social media site X. "My thoughts are with Charlie Kirk and his family."
Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) said on X that she was sending "sincere condolences to Charlie Kirk's family."
"Violence is unacceptable, always," she added. "Though I disagree with nearly everything he said publicly, I never lose sight of others' humanity. He was someone's son. He was someone's husband. He was a father to two young children. Praying for the [Utah Valley University] community impacted by this horrific act of gun violence."
Today’s act of political violence in Utah against Charlie Kirk is absolutely disgusting and unacceptable. We don’t have to agree on everything, but we should all agree on this: political violence is wrong, and has no place in our democracy
— Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (@crockett.house.gov) September 10, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Another "Squad" member, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)—whom Kirk wanted to strip of her US citizenship and deport to Somalia—posted that "political violence is absolutely unacceptable and indefensible."
"Unconscionable acts of violence should have no place in our country," she added. "Let's pray for no more lives being lost to gun violence."
Kirk, the 31-year-old CEO and co-founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point USA, was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University. The assassin's identity is still not known; The Washington Post reported that "a person of interest is in custody and being interviewed by officials."
Kirk's last words were a characteristically racist attempt to deflect an audience member's question about US mass shootings—one of which occurred at a Colorado high school on the same day as his assassination.
The irony of Kirk's murder was not lost on numerous observers, some of whom posted video of him saying in 2023 that "I think it's worth to have a cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment."
Still, even staunch critics of Kirk and his politics in the United States and abroad condemned his murder.
"There is never any place for violence in our politics," ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. "The only way to work out differences in a democracy is to work them out together—peacefully through our political system."
"The ACLU condemns this horrific act and extends its sympathies to the family of Charlie Kirk," Romero added.
Scottish lawmaker and former First Minister of Scotland Humza Yousaf said on social media that "I couldn't have disagreed more with Charlie Kirk on virtually every political issue he debated."
"But that is the point, he debated," Yousaf added. "In any society, let alone a democracy, violence can never be justified. I hope God eases the suffering of his wife, children, family, and friends."
I'm horrified by the shooting of Charlie Kirk at a college event in Utah.Political violence has no place in our country.
— Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@zohrankmamdani.bsky.social) September 10, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Political violence must be condemned. Always.I’m praying for Charlie Kirk and his family.
— Nina Turner (@ninaturner.bsky.social) September 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Civil rights attorney and transgender rights activist Alejandra Caraballo was among those who expressed deep concern over the direction in which the nation is heading.
"We are in a 'years of lead' scenario where political violence has become normalized," she wrote on the social media site Bluesky. "This is not good for anyone and is deeply dangerous. This level of political violence is not compatible with a functioning society."
"I'm honestly terrified of what the right will use this as justification for," she said of Kirk's assassination. "They're itching to engage in violence against their enemies and this will give them the excuse to do so. This is why political violence is never acceptable. It just descends into uncontrollable chaos and more violence."
"What does it say about us that the news of a conservative political activist getting assassinated may need to compete for coverage with yet another school shooting?" said one podcaster.
As condemnation of the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk continued to pour in on Wednesday, details emerged about another shooting, at Evergreen High School in Colorado, that left at least three teenagers in critical condition.
"What does it say about us that the news of a conservative political activist getting assassinated may need to compete for coverage with yet another school shooting?" writer and podcaster Manny Fidel asked on social media.
Kirk, the 31-year-old CEO and co-founder of the right-wing youth organization Turning Point USA, was shot during an event at Utah Valley University. Kirk's spokesperson, Andrew Kolvet, and US President Donald Trump confirmed his death. There is no suspect in custody.
Footage shared on social media shows that just before Kirk was shot in the neck, a member of the crowd asked him, "Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?" Kirk responded, "Counting or not counting gang violence?"
March for Our Lives, which launched in the wake of the February 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, was among the organizations and public figures who weighed in on Kirk's apparent assassination.
"Gun violence spares no one," the group said. "The shooting of Charlie Kirk makes clear that this crisis doesn't care about ideology or politics—it endangers us all. We know the solutions: stronger background checks, extreme risk protection orders, accountability for the gun industry, and more. What stands in the way is not a lack of answers, but political obstruction. Every day of inaction costs lives. It's long past time for leaders of every party to choose people over politics and act."
March for Our Lives also called out the Trump administration for various actions it has taken since the president returned to power:
Moms Demand Action founder Shannon Watts said, "The problem with allowing guns everywhere is that no one is safe anywhere."
Everytown for Gun Safety ranks Utah 36th in the country for "gun law strength." The Utah Valley University website says in part that it "complies with state law with regard to weapons" and "allows concealed firearm permit holders to possess their concealed firearm on campus."
Watts and March for Our Lives were among those who highlighted that the Kirk shooting coincided with the one in Colorado. The gun violence prevention organization said, "Another group of kids left to live with fear and trauma, because our so-called leaders would rather protect the gun lobby than protect the people they serve."
As The Denver Post reported on the shooting in Evergreen, Colorado:
Hundreds of police and law enforcement officers responded to the high school at 29300 Buffalo Park Road for an active shooting, which county officials first reported on social media at 12:40 pm.
Three people from the high school were being treated at CommonSpirit St. Anthony Hospital in Lakewood on Wednesday afternoon and were in critical condition, spokesperson Lindsay Radford said.
The Jefferson County Sheriff's Office later confirmed on social media that "one of the three students transported is the suspect," and the school, which over 900 children attend, has been cleared by law enforcement.
Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said that "I am closely monitoring the situation at Evergreen High School, and am getting live updates. State troopers are supporting local law enforcement in responding to this situation. Students should be able to attend school safely and without fear across our state and nation. We are all praying for the victims and the entire community."
Polis separately addressed Kirk's shooting, saying that "political violence is never acceptable, and I condemn the brutal and inexcusable attack on Charlie Kirk in Utah. This is a challenging time for so many in our country, but any divisions we face will never be solved by trying to hurt each other. I am sending hope and love to his friends and his family in this dark hour. I encourage everyone to be stronger and disagree better and peacefully."
Like the governor, Fred Guttenberg, who became an activist against gun violence after his 14-year-old daughter, Jaime, was murdered in Parkland, took note of both shootings. He declared that "it is time for Republicans and Democrats to find a way to work together to reduce gun violence."
Also acknowledging both shootings, Congresswoman Summer Lee (D-Pa.) said: "Gun violence and political violence cannot continue to devastate our communities. We need gun reform now."