

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A survey of candidatesfor the upcoming French presidential election, which both candidates still in the race completed, reveals differences in approach on some significant international and domestic human rights topics, Human Rights Watch said today. The survey's purpose was to establish the position of each candidate on pressing human rights issues that the new president will have to tackle. The runoff between President Nicolas Sarkozy and Francois Hollande, the Socialist challenger, will be on May 6, 2012.
Sarkozy and Hollande, along with six other candidates in the first round, answered questions on a variety of issues including events in and relationships with Syria, Russia, China, Afghanistan, and the US. They were also asked to state their position on accountability, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) rights, and some specific issues related to France, such as violence against women, the rights of the Roma people, and abusive police identity checks.
"The two candidates' replies to our survey, each in their own way, tell us a lot about their respective approaches to some key international and domestic human rights issues," said Jean-Marie Fardeau, France director at Human Rights Watch. "We hope that these answers will help voters make an informed choice."
The two candidates' main answers are summarized below, and are posted in their entirety.
Human Rights Watch sought the candidates' point of view on three human rights issues of particular relevance to France: abusive police identity checks, a European convention on violence against women, and the rights of the Roma community.
Abusive Identity Checks
In a report published in January, Human Rights Watch documented discriminatory and humiliating identity checks by the police of minority youth and recommended that police officers conducting identity checks systematically provide each person stopped with a written explanation of the legal basis for the identity check. When asked whether the candidate would implement such a recommendation, Sarkozy did not answer the question. Hollande said he will "ensure that France is a model of respect for individual freedoms as set forth in the Constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union." A separate letter from his office affirmed his commitment to fight racial profiling ("delit de facies") in identity checks "through a procedure respectful of all citizens."
Violence Against Women
France has signed the Council of Europe convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, but has yet to ratify it. When asked if they would ratify the convention, Sarkozy said that he supported ratification, and Hollande indicated his intention to establish a "dedicated body in charge of specific monitoring of violence against women, supporting the victims of violence, training professionals, organizing research on violence against women, and making recommendations to guide public action" to consider ratification.
Roma Rights
In August 2010, an administrative circular from the Interior Ministry ordered prefects to take "systematic action to dismantle illegal camps, priority given to those of Roma" and associated these measures with the "immediate expulsion of irregular foreigners." In the wake of criticism, France adopted a new circular in September 2010 that removed the discriminatory reference to Roma, who are European Union citizens and have the same rights to freedom of movement and non-discrimination as any other EU citizen. However, as Human Rights Watch has documented, discrimination against Romapersists in France. Asked about their approach on this specific topic, Hollande called for "discriminatory measures against Roma populations ... to be abolished," while Sarkozy said that "the same rules apply" to Roma as to "all other citizens," adding that their freedom of movement "is the same as for nomadic persons in our country," specifying that they also have "the same "obligations to meet."
Human Rights Violations in Syria
Concerning continuing rights abuses in Syria, Sarkozy defended his record, saying that, "France has played a leading role in the negotiations within the Security Council for reaching a resolution on Syria." He said he "has personally very firmly denounced the human rights violations committed by the Syrian authorities." Moreover, he said that "the negotiations within the UN framework must be continued with the aim of ... an effective end to all violence" and said that, "In order to bring the Security Council to the French and European position on this issue, we must continue the work that has been started, so that China and Russia withdraw their support for Bashar Al-Assad."
Hollande said that under his presidency, "France will be on the side of those who oppose and denounce the crimes committed against peoples ... and our country will use all its weight so that dissuasive measures are taken to put an end to such situations."
Dialogue with Russia and China on Rights Issues
Sarkozy emphasized a need to establish a "constructive dialogue" with both Russiaand China, saying that, "This dialogue has never prevented us from reasserting how important respect for human rights is for us." He also indicated that public statements about such issues should be made at the European level instead of the national level, and said he had pushed for France to "take the initiative in the European declarations calling for the liberation of Liu Xiaobo." Hollande focused on political prisoners in both countries and asserted that if he is elected, "France ... will request the freeing of or the end to legal proceedings against people harassed because of their opinion, and will support the civil society organizations that campaign for the respect of fundamental rights."
Promoting the Rule of Law in Afghanistan
Human Rights Watch asked the candidates to describe the strategy they would put in place to promote the respect of rule of law and women's rights in Afghanistan. Hollande said that if he is elected, "France will put its diplomacy at the service of the rule of law and equal respect due to each person." Sarkozy said that, "Educating the future generations seems to us to be the surest way to promote the cause of women and the rule of law."
Accountability for Rights Abuses
Two questions in the survey referred to the issue of accountability, one specifically about three African states - Cote d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Guinea- and one about the United Statesin the context of allegations of abuses against Guantanamo Bay detainees. Both candidates stressed their commitment to the fight against impunity. Sarkozy said that, "Whatever their nationality, those responsible for crimes involving serious violations of human rights must be prosecuted, tried and sentenced." He said he is "prepared to intervene so that France's partners respect, effectively, the individual rights guaranteed by French and international law." Hollande said France "will support the strengthening of international criminal justice."
LGBT Rights Around the World
Regarding the rights of LGBT people, Sarkozy described persecutions based on sexual orientation and gender identity as "shocking and unacceptable" and said he wants "France to be able to take a clear stand, especially within the UN Human Rights Committee, against states planning to penalize homosexuality with the death penalty." Hollande said French diplomacy will support the "equal respect due to each person, whatever his or her gender or sexual orientation."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
"This reward to Big Tech is a disgraceful invitation to reckless behavior by the world’s largest corporations," said one watchdog group.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order aimed at preventing state-level regulation of the burgeoning artificial intelligence industry, a gift to tech corporations that bankrolled his inauguration and are currently funding his White House ballroom project.
Trump's order instructs the US Justice Department to establish an AI Litigation Task Force with a single mandate: sue states that enact AI laws that the administration deems "onerous and excessive." The order also threatens to withhold federal funding from states that implement AI regulations.
Public Citizen, a watchdog group that has tracked increasingly aggressive AI influence-peddling in Congress and the administration, said Trump's order "grants his greedy Big Tech buddies’ Christmas wish."
"This reward to Big Tech is a disgraceful invitation to reckless behavior by the world’s largest corporations and a complete override of the federalist principles that Trump and MAGA claim to venerate," said Robert Weissman, Public Citizen's co-president. "Everyone should understand why this is happening: During and since the last election cycle, Big Tech has spent at least $1.1 billion on campaign contributions and lobby expenditures. Big Tech corporations poured money into Trump’s inaugural committee and to pay for his garish White House ballroom. A major Big Tech and AI investor is serving as Trump’s 'AI czar' and driving administration policy."
"While Trump has ensured the federal government is doing almost nothing to address the harms that AI is already causing, states are moving forward with sensible AI regulation," Weissman added. "These include efforts to address political deepfakes, nonconsensual intimate deepfakes, algorithmic pricing manipulation, consumer protection measures, excessive data center electricity and water demand, and much more. Big Tech is whining about these modest measures, but there is zero evidence that these rules are impeding innovation; in fact, they are directing innovation in more positive directions."
Jenna Sherman, a campaign director focused on tech and gender at Ultraviolet Action, said Trump's order "only has one group of winners: his wealthy donors in the tech sector."
"Every other person loses from this wildly unpopular move. And not just in theory, as stripping away state AI regulations puts many—namely, women and children—at risk of real harm," said Sherman. "These harms of AI—which the Trump and the tech sector are clearly happy to ignore—are already here: non-consensual deepfake porn sexualizing women and girls, children being led to suicidal ideation by AI chatbots, and AI-powered scams and crimes targeting older Americans, especially women, to name but a few."
The US Chamber of Commerce and other corporate lobbying organizations representing tech giants such as Microsoft and Google celebrated the order, predictably characterizing it as a win for "small businesses."
The leaders of California and other states that have proposed and finalized AI regulations were defiant in the face of Trump's threats of legal action and funding cuts."
"President Trump and Davis Sacks aren’t making policy—they’re running a con," said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, referring to the scandal-plagued White House AI czar. "Every day, they push the limits to see how far they can take it. California is working on behalf of Americans by building the strongest innovation economy in the nation while implementing commonsense safeguards and leading the way forward."
Trump signed the order after the Republican-controlled Congress repeatedly rejected efforts to tuck a ban on state AI regulations into broader legislation.
"After months of failed lobbying and two defeats in Congress, Big Tech has finally received the return on its ample investment in Donald Trump," Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said in a statement Thursday. "With this executive order, Trump is delivering exactly what his billionaire benefactors demanded—all at the expense of our kids, our communities, our workers, and our planet."
"A broad, bipartisan coalition in Congress has rejected the AI moratorium again and again," he added, "and I intend to keep that streak going. I will use every tool available to challenge this indefensible and irresponsible power grab. We will defeat it again."
"President Trump betrayed workers," said the head of the AFL-CIO. "Working people delivered a rare bipartisan majority to stop the administration's unprecedented attacks on our freedoms."
US labor leaders on Thursday celebrated the House of Representatives' bipartisan vote in favor of a bill that would reverse President Donald Trump's attack on the collective bargaining rights of 1 million federal workers.
Trump's sweeping assault on federal workers has included March and August executive orders targeting their rights under the guise of protecting national security. In response, Congressmen Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) spearheaded the fight for the Protect America’s Workforce Act. They recently collected enough signatures to force the 231-195 vote, in which 20 Republicans joined all Democrats present to send the bill to the Senate.
"The right to be heard in one's workplace may appear basic, but it carries great weight—it ensures that the people who serve our nation have a seat at the table when decisions shape their work and their mission," Fitzpatrick said after the vote.
"This bill moves us closer to restoring that fundamental protection for nearly 1 million federal employees, many of them veterans," he added. "I will always fight for our workers, and I call on the Senate to help ensure these protections are fully reinstated."
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) president Liz Shuler joined union leaders in applauding the lower chamber on Thursday and calling on the Senate to follow suit. She said in a statement that "President Trump betrayed workers when he tried to rip away our collective bargaining rights. In these increasingly polarized times, working people delivered a rare bipartisan majority to stop the administration's unprecedented attacks on our freedoms."
"We commend the Republicans and Democrats who stood with workers and voted to reverse the single-largest act of union busting in American history," she continued. "Americans trust unions more than either political party. As we turn to the Senate—where the bill already has bipartisan support—working people are calling on the politicians we elected to stand with us, even if it means standing up to the union-busting boss in the White House."
Everett Kelley, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal workers union, similarly praised the members of Congress who "demonstrated their support for the nonpartisan civil service, for the dedicated employees who serve our country with honor and distinction, and for the critical role that collective bargaining has in fostering a safe, protective, and collaborative workplace."
"This vote marks an historic achievement for the House's bipartisan pro-labor majority, courageously led by Reps. Jared Golden of Maine and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania," he said. "We need to build on this seismic victory in the House and get immediate action in the Senate—and also ensure that any future budget bills similarly protect collective bargaining rights for the largely unseen civil servants who keep our government running."
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees president Lee Saunders also applauded the House's passage of "a bill that strengthens federal workers' freedoms on the job so they can continue to keep our nation safe, healthy, and strong."
"This bill not only provides workers' critical protections from an administration that has spent the past year relentlessly attacking them," he noted, "but it also ensures that our communities are served by the most qualified public service workers—not just those with the best political connections."
Randy Erwin, the head of the National Federation of Federal Employees, declared that "this is an incredible testament to the strength of federal employees and the longstanding support for their fundamental right to organize and join a union."
"The president cannot unilaterally strip working people of their constitutional freedom of association. In bipartisan fashion, Congress has asserted their authority to hold the president accountable for the biggest attack on workers that this country has ever seen," he added, thanking the House supporters and pledging to work with "senators from both parties to ensure this bill is signed into law."
"For someone who claims to care about hostages, going to bat for a leader who sacrificed them for his own political survival... is the height of cynicism," said one Israeli critic.
US Sen. John Fetterman recently asked Israel's president to pardon Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who is on trial in his country for alleged bribery, fraud, and breach of trust—Talking Points Memo revealed on Thursday.
In a previously unreported December 2 letter sent to Israeli President Isaac Herzog and obtained by TPM, Fetterman (D-Pa.) asserted, “In a world this dangerous, I question whether any democracy can afford to have its head of government spending valuable hours, day after day, in a courtroom rather than the situation room."
“I believe there is a strong case to be made for a pardon—not to erase the past, but to secure the future," Fetterman added.
Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump have also asked Herzog to pardon the beleaguered Israeli prime minister, who in addition to facing domestic criminal charges is also a fugitive from the International Criminal Court, which last year issued a warrant for his arrest for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza.
Scoop, w the incomparable @kateriga.bsky.social: John Fetterman asked Israel's President to pardon Netanyahu in a previously unreported letter talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fetterm...
[image or embed]
— Josh Kovensky (@joshkovensky.bsky.social) December 11, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Fetterman has taken more than $370,000 in campaign contributions from the pro-Israel lobby, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, according to AIPAC Tracker. He has been an ardent supporter of Israel's US-backed genocidal war on Gaza, which has left more than 250,000 Palestinians dead, wounded, or missing and 2 million others forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened.
In addition to repeatedly opposing calls by progressive members of his own party for an arms embargo on Israel, Fetterman has amplified Israeli claims regarding the war, and even giddily accepted a silver-plated beeper gifted by Netanyahu following the September 2024 pager bombings that killed at least 20 people in Lebanon, including children.
Asked Thursday about his letter to Herzog, Fetterman said, "I fully support it" and called the TPM's reporting "a pointless distraction."
“I know you guys use things like leaks, but I don’t know who did that," he told TPM reporters Kate Riga and Josh Kovensky, who broke news of the letter.
Responding to theTPM article, Israeli journalist Etan Nechin said on social media that "for someone who claims to care about hostages, going to bat for a leader who sacrificed them for his own political survival... is the height of cynicism"—a reference to allegations that Netanyahu prolonged the war, and thus the release of the more than 250 Israelis and others abducted by Hamas during the October 7, 2023 attack, in order to delay his corruption trial.