SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Abortion rights activists march in Austin Texas after the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the US Supreme Court on June 24, 2022. (Photo: Suzanne Cordeiro/AFP via Getty Images)
Texas Supreme Court Allows Century-Old Abortion Ban to Take Effect
"Extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
Jul 02, 2022
The conservative-dominated Texas Supreme Court late Friday allowed a nearly century-old abortion ban to take effect, blocking a lower court order that had temporarily allowed the state's clinics to continue offering the procedure without the threat of legal retribution and financial penalties.
As the Texas Tribune reports, the 1925 law "made performing an abortion, by any method, punishable by two to 10 years in prison." The Texas Supreme Court's order Friday, which rolled back an injunction secured just days earlier by the ACLU, only allows for civil enforcement of the law as litigation continues. A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 12.
"This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
"The Texas Supreme Court blocked our injunction, allowing a total abortion ban originally passed in 1925 to be enforced," the ACLU said late Friday. "This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
In an advisory released after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade late last month, Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton noted that the 1925 law was never reversed by the state's legislature, even after the 1973 Roe decision rendered it unconstitutional.
"Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions," wrote Paxton, who appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to revoke the Harris County judge's order that blocked the 1925 law.
On Twitter, Paxton celebrated the Texas Supreme Court's move Friday and declared that "our state's pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law."
The 1925 ban is just one of several anti-abortion laws on the books in Texas.
In September, a law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it took effect. And in the coming weeks, the state's "trigger ban"--which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization--is set to become active thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"These laws are confusing, unnecessary, and cruel," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Texas' trigger ban is not scheduled to take effect for another two months, if not longer. This law from nearly one hundred years ago is banning essential healthcare prematurely, despite clearly being long repealed."
Julia Kaye, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, warned Friday that "extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
"We won't stop fighting to ensure that as many people as possible, for as long as possible, can access the essential reproductive healthcare they need," said Kaye.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling unleashed a flurry of legal activity as Republican-led states--often haphazardly--rushed to implement trigger bans and other dormant anti-abortion laws.
The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights are among the organizations working through the courts to delay the enforcement of or completely block state-level abortion bans, which could have devastating health and economic impacts on pregnant people across the country.
Thus far, the groups have succeeded in temporarily halting abortion bans in several states, including Utah, Kentucky, and Louisiana. More than half of all U.S. states are expected to pursue total abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.
"The effect of last week's ruling has been swift and severe, with abortion services stopping immediately in many states," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We are seeing the start of a public health crisis that will engulf the nation. But we knew this outcome was possible, and we have been preparing for this moment."
"Our immediate priority is to preserve access in every state for as long as we can," Northup added. "Every day and hour that a clinic can stay open is a victory for the patients in the waiting room. We have already seen abortion services restored in four states as a result of our collective legal efforts, and there will be more cases filed in the days to come. The clinics we represent are working non-stop to help as many patients as possible for as long as they can."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The conservative-dominated Texas Supreme Court late Friday allowed a nearly century-old abortion ban to take effect, blocking a lower court order that had temporarily allowed the state's clinics to continue offering the procedure without the threat of legal retribution and financial penalties.
As the Texas Tribune reports, the 1925 law "made performing an abortion, by any method, punishable by two to 10 years in prison." The Texas Supreme Court's order Friday, which rolled back an injunction secured just days earlier by the ACLU, only allows for civil enforcement of the law as litigation continues. A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 12.
"This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
"The Texas Supreme Court blocked our injunction, allowing a total abortion ban originally passed in 1925 to be enforced," the ACLU said late Friday. "This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
In an advisory released after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade late last month, Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton noted that the 1925 law was never reversed by the state's legislature, even after the 1973 Roe decision rendered it unconstitutional.
"Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions," wrote Paxton, who appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to revoke the Harris County judge's order that blocked the 1925 law.
On Twitter, Paxton celebrated the Texas Supreme Court's move Friday and declared that "our state's pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law."
The 1925 ban is just one of several anti-abortion laws on the books in Texas.
In September, a law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it took effect. And in the coming weeks, the state's "trigger ban"--which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization--is set to become active thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"These laws are confusing, unnecessary, and cruel," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Texas' trigger ban is not scheduled to take effect for another two months, if not longer. This law from nearly one hundred years ago is banning essential healthcare prematurely, despite clearly being long repealed."
Julia Kaye, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, warned Friday that "extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
"We won't stop fighting to ensure that as many people as possible, for as long as possible, can access the essential reproductive healthcare they need," said Kaye.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling unleashed a flurry of legal activity as Republican-led states--often haphazardly--rushed to implement trigger bans and other dormant anti-abortion laws.
The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights are among the organizations working through the courts to delay the enforcement of or completely block state-level abortion bans, which could have devastating health and economic impacts on pregnant people across the country.
Thus far, the groups have succeeded in temporarily halting abortion bans in several states, including Utah, Kentucky, and Louisiana. More than half of all U.S. states are expected to pursue total abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.
"The effect of last week's ruling has been swift and severe, with abortion services stopping immediately in many states," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We are seeing the start of a public health crisis that will engulf the nation. But we knew this outcome was possible, and we have been preparing for this moment."
"Our immediate priority is to preserve access in every state for as long as we can," Northup added. "Every day and hour that a clinic can stay open is a victory for the patients in the waiting room. We have already seen abortion services restored in four states as a result of our collective legal efforts, and there will be more cases filed in the days to come. The clinics we represent are working non-stop to help as many patients as possible for as long as they can."
The conservative-dominated Texas Supreme Court late Friday allowed a nearly century-old abortion ban to take effect, blocking a lower court order that had temporarily allowed the state's clinics to continue offering the procedure without the threat of legal retribution and financial penalties.
As the Texas Tribune reports, the 1925 law "made performing an abortion, by any method, punishable by two to 10 years in prison." The Texas Supreme Court's order Friday, which rolled back an injunction secured just days earlier by the ACLU, only allows for civil enforcement of the law as litigation continues. A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 12.
"This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
"The Texas Supreme Court blocked our injunction, allowing a total abortion ban originally passed in 1925 to be enforced," the ACLU said late Friday. "This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
In an advisory released after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade late last month, Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton noted that the 1925 law was never reversed by the state's legislature, even after the 1973 Roe decision rendered it unconstitutional.
"Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions," wrote Paxton, who appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to revoke the Harris County judge's order that blocked the 1925 law.
On Twitter, Paxton celebrated the Texas Supreme Court's move Friday and declared that "our state's pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law."
The 1925 ban is just one of several anti-abortion laws on the books in Texas.
In September, a law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it took effect. And in the coming weeks, the state's "trigger ban"--which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization--is set to become active thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"These laws are confusing, unnecessary, and cruel," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Texas' trigger ban is not scheduled to take effect for another two months, if not longer. This law from nearly one hundred years ago is banning essential healthcare prematurely, despite clearly being long repealed."
Julia Kaye, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, warned Friday that "extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
"We won't stop fighting to ensure that as many people as possible, for as long as possible, can access the essential reproductive healthcare they need," said Kaye.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling unleashed a flurry of legal activity as Republican-led states--often haphazardly--rushed to implement trigger bans and other dormant anti-abortion laws.
The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights are among the organizations working through the courts to delay the enforcement of or completely block state-level abortion bans, which could have devastating health and economic impacts on pregnant people across the country.
Thus far, the groups have succeeded in temporarily halting abortion bans in several states, including Utah, Kentucky, and Louisiana. More than half of all U.S. states are expected to pursue total abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.
"The effect of last week's ruling has been swift and severe, with abortion services stopping immediately in many states," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We are seeing the start of a public health crisis that will engulf the nation. But we knew this outcome was possible, and we have been preparing for this moment."
"Our immediate priority is to preserve access in every state for as long as we can," Northup added. "Every day and hour that a clinic can stay open is a victory for the patients in the waiting room. We have already seen abortion services restored in four states as a result of our collective legal efforts, and there will be more cases filed in the days to come. The clinics we represent are working non-stop to help as many patients as possible for as long as they can."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.