

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Abortion rights activists march in Austin Texas after the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the US Supreme Court on June 24, 2022. (Photo: Suzanne Cordeiro/AFP via Getty Images)
The conservative-dominated Texas Supreme Court late Friday allowed a nearly century-old abortion ban to take effect, blocking a lower court order that had temporarily allowed the state's clinics to continue offering the procedure without the threat of legal retribution and financial penalties.
As the Texas Tribune reports, the 1925 law "made performing an abortion, by any method, punishable by two to 10 years in prison." The Texas Supreme Court's order Friday, which rolled back an injunction secured just days earlier by the ACLU, only allows for civil enforcement of the law as litigation continues. A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 12.
"This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
"The Texas Supreme Court blocked our injunction, allowing a total abortion ban originally passed in 1925 to be enforced," the ACLU said late Friday. "This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
In an advisory released after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade late last month, Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton noted that the 1925 law was never reversed by the state's legislature, even after the 1973 Roe decision rendered it unconstitutional.
"Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions," wrote Paxton, who appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to revoke the Harris County judge's order that blocked the 1925 law.
On Twitter, Paxton celebrated the Texas Supreme Court's move Friday and declared that "our state's pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law."
The 1925 ban is just one of several anti-abortion laws on the books in Texas.
In September, a law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it took effect. And in the coming weeks, the state's "trigger ban"--which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization--is set to become active thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"These laws are confusing, unnecessary, and cruel," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Texas' trigger ban is not scheduled to take effect for another two months, if not longer. This law from nearly one hundred years ago is banning essential healthcare prematurely, despite clearly being long repealed."
Julia Kaye, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, warned Friday that "extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
"We won't stop fighting to ensure that as many people as possible, for as long as possible, can access the essential reproductive healthcare they need," said Kaye.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling unleashed a flurry of legal activity as Republican-led states--often haphazardly--rushed to implement trigger bans and other dormant anti-abortion laws.
The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights are among the organizations working through the courts to delay the enforcement of or completely block state-level abortion bans, which could have devastating health and economic impacts on pregnant people across the country.
Thus far, the groups have succeeded in temporarily halting abortion bans in several states, including Utah, Kentucky, and Louisiana. More than half of all U.S. states are expected to pursue total abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.
"The effect of last week's ruling has been swift and severe, with abortion services stopping immediately in many states," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We are seeing the start of a public health crisis that will engulf the nation. But we knew this outcome was possible, and we have been preparing for this moment."
"Our immediate priority is to preserve access in every state for as long as we can," Northup added. "Every day and hour that a clinic can stay open is a victory for the patients in the waiting room. We have already seen abortion services restored in four states as a result of our collective legal efforts, and there will be more cases filed in the days to come. The clinics we represent are working non-stop to help as many patients as possible for as long as they can."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The conservative-dominated Texas Supreme Court late Friday allowed a nearly century-old abortion ban to take effect, blocking a lower court order that had temporarily allowed the state's clinics to continue offering the procedure without the threat of legal retribution and financial penalties.
As the Texas Tribune reports, the 1925 law "made performing an abortion, by any method, punishable by two to 10 years in prison." The Texas Supreme Court's order Friday, which rolled back an injunction secured just days earlier by the ACLU, only allows for civil enforcement of the law as litigation continues. A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 12.
"This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
"The Texas Supreme Court blocked our injunction, allowing a total abortion ban originally passed in 1925 to be enforced," the ACLU said late Friday. "This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
In an advisory released after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade late last month, Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton noted that the 1925 law was never reversed by the state's legislature, even after the 1973 Roe decision rendered it unconstitutional.
"Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions," wrote Paxton, who appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to revoke the Harris County judge's order that blocked the 1925 law.
On Twitter, Paxton celebrated the Texas Supreme Court's move Friday and declared that "our state's pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law."
The 1925 ban is just one of several anti-abortion laws on the books in Texas.
In September, a law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it took effect. And in the coming weeks, the state's "trigger ban"--which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization--is set to become active thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"These laws are confusing, unnecessary, and cruel," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Texas' trigger ban is not scheduled to take effect for another two months, if not longer. This law from nearly one hundred years ago is banning essential healthcare prematurely, despite clearly being long repealed."
Julia Kaye, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, warned Friday that "extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
"We won't stop fighting to ensure that as many people as possible, for as long as possible, can access the essential reproductive healthcare they need," said Kaye.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling unleashed a flurry of legal activity as Republican-led states--often haphazardly--rushed to implement trigger bans and other dormant anti-abortion laws.
The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights are among the organizations working through the courts to delay the enforcement of or completely block state-level abortion bans, which could have devastating health and economic impacts on pregnant people across the country.
Thus far, the groups have succeeded in temporarily halting abortion bans in several states, including Utah, Kentucky, and Louisiana. More than half of all U.S. states are expected to pursue total abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.
"The effect of last week's ruling has been swift and severe, with abortion services stopping immediately in many states," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We are seeing the start of a public health crisis that will engulf the nation. But we knew this outcome was possible, and we have been preparing for this moment."
"Our immediate priority is to preserve access in every state for as long as we can," Northup added. "Every day and hour that a clinic can stay open is a victory for the patients in the waiting room. We have already seen abortion services restored in four states as a result of our collective legal efforts, and there will be more cases filed in the days to come. The clinics we represent are working non-stop to help as many patients as possible for as long as they can."
The conservative-dominated Texas Supreme Court late Friday allowed a nearly century-old abortion ban to take effect, blocking a lower court order that had temporarily allowed the state's clinics to continue offering the procedure without the threat of legal retribution and financial penalties.
As the Texas Tribune reports, the 1925 law "made performing an abortion, by any method, punishable by two to 10 years in prison." The Texas Supreme Court's order Friday, which rolled back an injunction secured just days earlier by the ACLU, only allows for civil enforcement of the law as litigation continues. A hearing in the case is scheduled for July 12.
"This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
"The Texas Supreme Court blocked our injunction, allowing a total abortion ban originally passed in 1925 to be enforced," the ACLU said late Friday. "This law has already forced countless people to carry pregnancies against their will. Abortion is our right--no matter what the courts say."
In an advisory released after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade late last month, Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton noted that the 1925 law was never reversed by the state's legislature, even after the 1973 Roe decision rendered it unconstitutional.
"Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions," wrote Paxton, who appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to revoke the Harris County judge's order that blocked the 1925 law.
On Twitter, Paxton celebrated the Texas Supreme Court's move Friday and declared that "our state's pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law."
The 1925 ban is just one of several anti-abortion laws on the books in Texas.
In September, a law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it took effect. And in the coming weeks, the state's "trigger ban"--which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization--is set to become active thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"These laws are confusing, unnecessary, and cruel," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Texas' trigger ban is not scheduled to take effect for another two months, if not longer. This law from nearly one hundred years ago is banning essential healthcare prematurely, despite clearly being long repealed."
Julia Kaye, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, warned Friday that "extremist politicians are on a crusade to force Texans into pregnancy and childbirth against their will, no matter how devastating the consequences."
"We won't stop fighting to ensure that as many people as possible, for as long as possible, can access the essential reproductive healthcare they need," said Kaye.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling unleashed a flurry of legal activity as Republican-led states--often haphazardly--rushed to implement trigger bans and other dormant anti-abortion laws.
The ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights are among the organizations working through the courts to delay the enforcement of or completely block state-level abortion bans, which could have devastating health and economic impacts on pregnant people across the country.
Thus far, the groups have succeeded in temporarily halting abortion bans in several states, including Utah, Kentucky, and Louisiana. More than half of all U.S. states are expected to pursue total abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision.
"The effect of last week's ruling has been swift and severe, with abortion services stopping immediately in many states," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We are seeing the start of a public health crisis that will engulf the nation. But we knew this outcome was possible, and we have been preparing for this moment."
"Our immediate priority is to preserve access in every state for as long as we can," Northup added. "Every day and hour that a clinic can stay open is a victory for the patients in the waiting room. We have already seen abortion services restored in four states as a result of our collective legal efforts, and there will be more cases filed in the days to come. The clinics we represent are working non-stop to help as many patients as possible for as long as they can."