March, 31 2011, 02:36pm EDT
Jim and Sarah Brady Urge Congress to Continue Progress on Life-Saving Legacy Begun by the Brady Law
On 30th Anniversary of Reagan Assassination Attempt, Bradys Express Strong Support for "Assault Clips" Restrictions and Stronger Background Checks
WASHINGTON
President Bill Clinton once summed up the public service of Jim and Sarah Brady this way: "If it hadn't been for them, we would not have passed the Brady Law, and then the ban on assault weapons, and on cop-killer bullets...How many people are alive today because of Jim and Sarah Brady?" the President asked, and then answered, "Countless."
The Bradys' life-saving legacy, however, has its roots in the terror-laden seconds 30 years ago today when a mentally-ill man armed with a .22-caliber handgun shot President Ronald Reagan, a Secret Service agent, a police officer and Jim Brady. Just 69 days earlier, Jim had achieved his long-held dream of becoming White House Press Secretary. Of the four wounded, Jim's injury was the most severe -- a gunshot to the head that left him partially paralyzed for life.
Today the Bradys have come to our nation's capitol to mark that tragic event with a petition to the world's most powerful leaders. In a news conference at the Russell Senate Building, Room 485, the Bradys were joined by Brady Campaign President Paul Helmke, Senators Frank Lautenberg and Dianne Feinstein, and Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy, as they pressed members of Congress to work for the passage of sensible new gun laws that will continue and enhance the life-saving tradition of the Brady Law.
Since its enactment in1994, the Brady law has blocked an estimated 2 million prohibited gun purchases, including more than 800,000 felons. After the law was adopted, murders dropped 30 percent. Nearly three-quarters of the drop in murders was accounted for by the sharp decline in gun murders. This historic drop in murders has been sustained, with murders in the most recent year available (2009), at their lowest level since 1970.
"Jim and Sarah Brady know a lot about challenges," said Brady President Paul Helmke. "But where others see obstacles, the Bradys, with their indomitable spirits, see opportunities. After all of these years, it is an honor to be a part of their legacy and to see them still fighting to protect the American people from the dangers of guns. We need more public servants like the Bradys."
The Bradys called, particularly, on Republicans, most of whom have been silent about the need for new laws to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous and irresponsible people, to do what is in the nation's best interest.
"We've come to Washington and Capitol Hill at a time when the tragedy in Tucson is still fresh in American minds," said Sarah Brady, wife of Jim and Chair of the Brady Campaign. "We've come at a time when a record number of police officers have been shot and killed, and we've come when there are sensible proposals in Congress that could limit this bloodshed and save more lives."
Specifically, Sarah and Jim Brady, called for support of the passage of House Bill 308 and Senate Bill 32, introduced respectively by Rep. McCarthy and Sen. Lautenberg, which would ban large-capacity assault clips, like the one used by the Tucson shooter to kill six people and wound 13, including Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, on January 8. The Bradys also stressed the need to strengthen the Brady Law by requiring background checks on all gun sales, not just those by federally licensed dealers.
The Brady bill received a tremendous amount of bi-partisan support on Capitol Hill and it was backed strongly by former President Ronald Reagan. Fifty-six Republicans in the House voted to pass the Brady Bill in 1993. Eight of them remain. Fifteen Senate Republicans voted for the Brady Bill. Three are in the Senate today.
"Presidents Reagan and Clinton understood that the problem of gun violence is an American problem and that it deserves bi-partisan American solutions," said Jim Brady. "They were not cowardly lions when it came to what needed to be done to protect Americans from dangerous people."
Senator Lautenberg agreed more of his colleagues in Congress need to join in support of new laws.
"Thirty years ago today, we saw that no one in our country is safe from gun violence, not even the President and his staff," Sen. Lautenberg said. "Jim and Sarah Brady have made our country safer, but we still have more work to do. We have to bring back the ban on oversized ammunition magazines that turn handguns into weapons of mass destruction and require background checks for every gun sale. These are common-sense reforms that can protect Americans from needless violence and make our communities safer."
Said Congresswoman McCarthy: "Jim and Sarah Brady are living proof that gun violence can strike anywhere anytime, and efforts to reduce it are not limited to Democrats and law enforcement. The Bradys' support for banning high-capacity magazines and strengthening background checks are the most poignant reminder yet that we must do everything we can to reduce injuries and save lives in our nation."
The eight Republicans who voted for the Brady Law and are still serving in the House of Representatives are: Gus Bilirakis (FL-9), Elton Gallegly (CA-24), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL-16), Chris Smith (NJ-4), Cliff Stearns (FL-6), Fred Upton (MI-6), Frank Wolf (VA-10), and Bill Young (FL-10) The Senate Republicans who voted for the Brady Law and are serving in the Senate today are: Kay Bailey Hutchinson (TX), Dan Coats (IN), and Richard Lugar (IN).
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular