September, 13 2010, 04:09pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Paul Towers, Pesticide Watch
paul@pesticidewatch.org
Tracey Brieger, Californians for Pesticide Reform
tracey@pesticidereform.org
Evidence from Florida Indicates Strawberry Pesticide May Contaminate Groundwater
Study shows chemical levels in water pose threats for children
SAN FRANCISCO
Confirming concerns that the
controversial toxic strawberry pesticide methyl iodide could contaminate
groundwater if used in agricultural fields, new evidence from Florida shows one
of the pesticide's breakdown products present in groundwater at levels
that pose threats to children. Air monitoring demonstrated the presence of the
parent methyl iodide at levels far exceeding those that many scientists deem
even marginally safe. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR)
is currently considering whether or not to approve the strawberry pesticide for
widespread use in California in the coming weeks.
As a condition for registering the pesticide in Florida,
Arysta LifeScience--methyl iodide manufacturer and the largest privately
held pesticide company in the world--was obligated to conduct air and
groundwater monitoring after field applications in the state. Consultants hired
by Arysta to conduct monitoring recently revealed in their report that iodide,
a breakdown product of the pesticide, was found in Florida groundwater near a
field fumigated in 2008 and 2009 at levels that ranged from 0.12 to 0.15 mg/L,
substantially above typical levels of iodide in fresh water or sea water. The
results cast serious doubt on growers' ability to use methyl iodide
without contaminating groundwater.
The levels of iodide found in Florida groundwater exceeded
levels considered safe for children. Children drinking water with this level of
iodide contamination could receive 1.2 times the tolerable upper limit of
iodide exposure defined by the Centers for Disease Control and the National
Academy of Sciences of 0.20 mg/day. Excess iodide exposure is associated with
pre- and post-natal developmental toxicity and autoimmune thyroid disease, and
possibly impairment of childhood cognition and postpartum depression. Healthy
children with no iodine deficiency are assumed to be getting the recommended
daily intake (RDI) amount in their diets on a daily basis. Any added iodide
from contaminated groundwater would be on top of normal dietary iodide and
would result in exceeding the 0.20 mg/day standard.
The findings affirm a California
Regional Water Resources Control Board - Central Coast Region letter
written earlier this year, citing concerns of proposed groundwater
contamination:
We are opposed to registering
Methyl Iodide as a fumigant given it is a known carcinogen, neurotoxin, and
thyroid disruptor, has ability to cause spontaneous abortion late in pregnancy,
and its use as a fumigant poses risk of groundwater contamination because of
its properties and the way it will be used--widespread applications to
strawberry fields.
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. It
would be foolish to knowingly poison our groundwater, create enormous clean-up
bills and risk our children's health for generations to come," said
Paul Towers, State Director of Pesticide Watch Education Fund. "The study
supports what scientists have been telling officials all along: methyl iodide
cannot be controlled once released into the environment. Combined with the
chemical's high toxicity, it should be a no-brainer for DPR to refuse its
use in California."
The report also indicates that the air near fumigated fields
contains methyl iodide at levels posing health risks to community residents and
farmworkers in nearby fields. Air monitoring results from Florida showed an
average air concentration of methyl iodide at a 30-foot buffer boundary during
the first 24 hours after application to be 9 parts per billion (ppb), or 30
times higher than the 0.3 ppb concentration deemed to be marginally acceptable
by the Scientific Review Committee, a peer-review committee of
independent scientists who reviewed DPR's risk assessment of methyl
iodide. The maximum air concentration measured between 4 and 8 hours after
application was 37.5 ppb, or 125 times the 0.3ppb level that these scientists
recommend as a maximum exposure limit to prevent fetal death.
"These methyl iodide air levels were found even though
the field was covered with the special type of tarp (called Virtually
Impermeable Film ) that DPR is counting on to control exposures ," said
Anne Katten, Pesticide and Work Safety Specialist at California Rural Legal
Assistance Foundation. "While larger buffers would be required in
California, the Florida monitoring also found levels over 2 ppb (about
8-fold higher than the 0.3 ppb level scientists deemed marginally safe) after
buffer zones would have expired."
The Arysta-funded air and water monitoring report from
Florida can be downloaded at https://dl.dropbox.com/u/491851/IR1_MIDAS_004-11437-00.pdf.
Methyl iodide would be used
primarily on California's strawberry fields. Despite the claims that it
would not be possible to grow strawberries without methyl iodide, organic
growers across the state do so successfully every year.
A Washington State University
study released earlier this month showed that organic farms produced more
flavorful and nutritious strawberries while leaving the soil healthier and more
genetically diverse than conventional strawberry farms (https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-09/wsu-sfc082510.php).
Recently, Washington state refused to register methyl iodide as a soil fumigant
based on findings in California's review of methyl iodide toxicity.
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America) works to replace pesticide use with ecologically sound and socially just alternatives. As one of five autonomous PAN Regional Centers worldwide, we link local and international consumer, labor, health, environment and agriculture groups into an international citizens' action network. This network challenges the global proliferation of pesticides, defends basic rights to health and environmental quality, and works to ensure the transition to a just and viable society.
LATEST NEWS
Anthropic CEO 'Cannot in Good Conscience Accede' to Pentagon's AI Demand
"Anthropic and Dario deserve credit for standing up for two very basic and obvious principles: no mass surveillance and no autonomous killer robots," said one progressive commentator.
Feb 26, 2026
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic until Friday evening to agree to let the Pentagon use the company's artificial intelligence technology however it wants, or else. Roughly 24 hours ahead of the deadline, CEO Dario Amodei announced that "we cannot in good conscience accede to their request," and reiterated opposition to enabling autonomous weapons or surveillance of US citizens.
Anthropic's Claude was the first AI model allowed to handle classified US military data. While the Department of Defense (DOD) has now signed an agreement with Elon Musk's xAI and "is getting close to making a deal with Google," as the New York Times reported Monday, Hegseth demanded "unfettered" access to Claude during a Tuesday meeting with Amodei.
Hegseth threatened to declare the Anthropic a "supply chain risk," effectively blacklisting it for military use and ending its current contract, or invoke the Defense Production Act, which would force Anthropic to tailor the product to the DOD’s needs, if Amodei refused to drop the company's guardrails.
The CEO responded publicly with a Thursday blog post. Using President Donald Trump's preferred name for the Pentagon, he wrote that "Anthropic understands that the Department of War, not private companies, makes military decisions. We have never raised objections to particular military operations nor attempted to limit use of our technology in an ad hoc manner."
"However, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values. Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today's technology can safely and reliably do," Amodei continued. He explained the company's position that "using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values."
"AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI," he wrote. "For example, under current law, the government can purchase detailed records of Americans' movements, web browsing, and associations from public sources without obtaining a warrant, a practice the Intelligence Community has acknowledged raises privacy concerns, and that has generated bipartisan opposition in Congress. Powerful AI makes it possible to assemble this scattered, individually innocuous data into a comprehensive picture of any person's life—automatically and at massive scale."
The CEO also argued that "frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America's warfighters and civilians at risk." He noted that Anthropic offered to work directly with the department on research and development to "improve the reliability of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer."
Amodei concluded by expressing hope that the Pentagon revises its position, writing that "our strong preference is to continue to serve the department and our warfighters—with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions."
Amodei's blog post followed CBS News reporting earlier Thursday that "Pentagon officials on Wednesday night sent Anthropic their best and final offer in negotiations for use of the company's artificial intelligence technology."
It also came just hours after Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell responded to a related post from a Google scientist on Musk's social media platform X. The DOD official claimed that "the Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement. This narrative is fake and being peddled by leftists in the media."
"Here's what we're asking: Allow the Pentagon to use Anthropic's model for all lawful purposes. This is a simple, commonsense request that will prevent Anthropic from jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk. We will not let ANY company dictate the terms regarding how we make operational decisions," Parnell added, noting the Friday deadline and the threat to "terminate our partnership with Anthropic and deem them a supply chain risk."
While Amodei and observers await the Pentagon's next move, several Anthropic employees, other tech experts, and critics of the Trump administration praised the CEO for "standing on principle" and choosing "war with the Department of War."
"Anthropic and Dario deserve credit for standing up for two very basic and obvious principles: no mass surveillance and no autonomous killer robots," said progressive commentator Krystal Ball. "Perhaps this is a low bar but it isn’t clear any of the other leading AI companies would put principle above profits in ANY scenario. The Pentagon is sure to make Anthropic pay for daring to defy them."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump's Revived Anti-Worker Rules Condemned as 'Outright Grift'
"Every day, little by little, the Trump administration is rigging the system to benefit giant corporations and shortchange workers," said one senator.
Feb 26, 2026
President Donald Trump's "barrage of attacks on workers" continued on Thursday with announcements about two key labor rules.
The US Department of Labor (DOL) proposed an independent contractor rule that the National Employment Law Project (NELP) called "yet another example of the administration siding with major corporations and stacking the deck against working people" by "effectively allowing employers to strip workers of federal minimum wage and overtime protections."
The DOL's Wage and Hour Division proposal would replace the Biden administration's widely celebrated 2024 policy for when employers can treat workers as independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act with business-friendly guidance that resembles a rule adopted just before the end of Trump's first term.
"This rule will have profound real-world consequences for working people," warned NELP. "Misclassification is common in many labor-intensive, poorly paid jobs—jobs like home healthcare, janitorial work, landscaping, personal services, and increasingly, app-dispatched ride-hail and delivery—where people of color and immigrants are overrepresented, and workers lack the bargaining power to negotiate higher wages and better working conditions."
NELP pointed to research showing that low-paid independent contractors "lag behind their employee counterparts," and some "do not even earn the federal minimum wage." The organization stressed that "this rule threatens to enshrine a two-tiered labor system where similarly situated workers receive vastly different rights and protections based on the classification chosen by the business employing them."
The new rule—which now faces a 60-day public comment period—focuses on two "core factors" to determine an employee's classification: the nature and degree of control over the work, and the worker's opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative or investment.
NELP argued that "by elevating two factors above other equally important factors, the Trump administration's test fails to account for the economic realities of many working relationships. Many workers labeled as independent contractors are not really in business for themselves because they are integrated into the operations of a larger business structure that sets most of the terms of the work."
"In app-dispatched ride-hail and delivery jobs, for example, corporations like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Amazon use apps and algorithms to offer shifts or assignments to so-called independent contractors doing the core work of the business, set the wages these workers receive, surveil and assess their performance, and determine if they are offered future assignments or get 'deactivated,'" the group noted. "App-based ride-hail and delivery workers perform difficult and dangerous work without basic employment protections like the right to minimum wage and overtime, workers' compensation, and unemployment insurance."
As NELP and other critics sounded the alarm over the DOL proposal on Thursday, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) also revived an effort from Trump's first term, reinstating that administration's 2020 rule on joint employers.
During Trump's initial administration, the NLRB required joint employers to "possess and exercise substantial direct and immediate control" over at least one aspect of the workers' employment. In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, the board decided that two or more entities could be considered joint employers if they had an employment relationship with the workers and helped to determine their terms and conditions of employment. However, the latter was blocked by a Trump-appointed judge the next year.
Unlike the DOL proposal, the board's rule is final. The NLRB—which has two Trump appointees, one Biden appointee, and two vacancies—said in the Federal Register that "the 2023 rule was vacated by the district court, and the action the board takes today merely implements the court's decision. Our action is ministerial and therefore will have no separate economic effect."
US Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, declared in a Thursday statement that "every day, little by little, the Trump administration is rigging the system to benefit giant corporations and shortchange workers—it's an outright grift and working people should be furious."
"The joint employer rule is nothing more than a return to Trump's anti-worker policies that let giant corporations skirt their basic obligations to employees—Trump is giving the biggest corporations cover to deny workers their ability to band together for better wages and working conditions and leaving millions of workers in the lurch, vulnerable to egregious violations of their rights," she said.
"At the same time, today, the Trump administration announced they're working to rescind the independent contractor rule," Murray continued. "Trump wants to let giant corporations classify workers as contractors so that they don't have to pay them minimum wage and overtime—these workers deserve fair pay."
The senator then took aim at the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act that congressional Republicans passed and the president signed last summer, saying that "under the Trump administration, giant corporations get giant tax breaks paid for by cutting Medicaid—the healthcare that the poorest workers are forced to rely on."
"Now, Trump wants those same corporations off the hook for every benefit, protection, and dollar they'd otherwise owe to millions of workers—it's a shakedown," she asserted. "Republicans are proving time and again, they don't care about workers—they don't want to even let workers have crumbs, but billionaires can get trillions in tax breaks that will blow up our national debt."
Murray isn't up for reelection in November's closely watched midterms, but could lead the Senate Appropriations Committee if Democrats reclaim the chamber. On Thursday, she vowed that "I am going to keep fighting for laws on the books that protect workers and build an economy that grows the middle-class, not just profit margins for the largest corporations on Earth."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israel Responsible for Two-Thirds of Journalist Deaths in 2025: Press Freedom Group
The number of journalists killed by Israel is remarkably high even when compared to the number of journalists killed in other conflict zones.
Feb 26, 2026
A new report from a major press freedom group has found that a record 129 journalists were killed in 2025, and that Israel was responsible for two-thirds of the worldwide total.
The Tuesday report from the Committee to Protect Journalists says that the Israeli military has cumulatively killed more journalists than any other government since CPJ started tracking reporter deaths in 1992, with the vast majority being Palestinian media workers in Gaza.
The report also finds an increase in the use of drones to attack journalists, with Israel accounting for more than 70% of the 39 documented instances of reporters killed by drone strikes.
The number of journalists killed by Israel is remarkably high even when compared to the number of journalists killed in other conflict zones.
Only nine journalists were killed in Sudan, for example, while just four journalists were killed in Ukraine, despite both countries being in the midst of brutal conflicts that have collectively killed hundreds of thousands of people.
A report issued in December by Reporters Without Borders similarly found that Israel was responsible for the most journalists deaths in 2025, the third consecutive year that the country had held that distinction.
The CPJ report also points the finger at governments for not taking their responsibilities to protect journalists seriously.
"The rising number of journalist deaths globally is fueled by a persistent culture of impunity," the report states. "Very few transparent investigations have been conducted into the 47 cases of targeted killings (classified as 'murder' in CPJ’s longstanding methodology) documented by CPJ in 2025—the highest number of journalists deliberately killed for their work in the past decade—and no one has been held accountable in any of the cases."
CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg said that attacks on the media are "a leading indicator of attacks on other freedoms, and much more needs to be done to prevent these killings and punish the perpetrators," adding that "we are all at risk when journalists are killed for reporting the news.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


