June, 04 2010, 11:06am EDT
Public Citizen and Allies Stage Protest at BP's Washington, D.C., Headquarters, Conduct Mock Citizen's Arrest of CEO
Environmental Advocates, Other Activists Read Charges, Deem Tony Hayward Guilty
WASHINGTON
Public Citizen and seven other prominent public interest groups took
to the streets in the nation's capital today to express the public's
outrage at BP's continued mismanagement of the ever-spreading
environmental disaster it caused in the Gulf of Mexico.
Joined by Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Energy Action Coalition,
350.org, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, the Center for Biological
Diversity and Hip Hop Caucus, Public Citizen articulated the deep
frustration of average Americans by making a mock citizen's arrest of
BP's CEO Tony Hayward at the oil giant's Washington, D.C., office.
At the base of a 13-foot tall inflatable oil barrel, participating
group leaders read from a list of charges against the corporation,
culminating in a finding of criminal negligence and the presentation of a
prison jumpsuit fitted for Hayward, who is ultimately accountable for
the ecological nightmare unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico.
"BP has a long history of violating environmental and worker safety
laws, as well as manipulating markets," said Robert Weissman, president
of Public Citizen. "BP was ill-prepared for dealing with a deepwater
spill and still cannot contain this gusher. Eleven workers are dead,
coastlines in three states are being devastated, the Gulf is incurring
untold damage and livelihoods are threatened. People are outraged, and
we are here to let BP know it."
Added Phil Radford, president of Greenpeace, "The oil destroying
our wetlands and the Gulf of Mexico is a tragic reminder of what we get
when we let corporate polluters write our energy policy. BP must be held
accountable for their crimes, and our government must stop listening to
polluter lobbyists."
Protesters rallied and waved signs streaming with "crude" in front of
BP's government affairs office at 1101 New York Ave. NW. The charges
against BP that were read aloud by protesters included disregard for
worker safety, price-gouging consumers and taxpayers, and violations of
environmental laws.
BP has the worst safety and environmental record of any oil company
operating in the U.S. In the past few years, BP has paid more than $730
million in fines and settlements to the federal and state governments,
and in civil lawsuit judgments for environmental crimes, violating
worker safety rules and manipulating energy markets:
* Worker safety - $215 million in total penalties and settlements.
* Environmental violations - $153 million in penalties and settlements,
plus a guilty plea to an environmental felony and a criminal
misdemeanor.
* Price-gouging consumers and taxpayers - $363 million in penalties and
settlements.
(Go here for links to related
documents.)
Public Citizen research shows that since the beginning of 2009, BP
has spent more than $19.5 million to hire 49 of the highest-powered D.C.
lobbyists, including 35 former employees of Congress and the executive
branch. (Go here
for more details.) The investment appears to have paid off:
Regulators who are supposed to oversee offshore drilling procedures have
been lax - letting BP run its operation however it wanted - and
lawmakers have worked to bolster offshore drilling.
"Big Oil has been polluting the political process for too long," said
Ethan Nuss, co-field director of the Energy Action Coalition. "This
fall, young people are organizing to kick dirty energy out of politics
by flooding the midterm elections with support for real clean energy
solutions. Big Oil may be able to outspend us, but we're the voters and
that's what counts."
The protest also was designed to highlight the need for the nation to
move away from inherently dangerous and dirty fuel and instead pursue
clean energy sources. In addition, the groups called for all offshore
drilling to be suspended and liability caps lifted so oil companies feel
the full financial force of responsibility for the damage they cause.
"We don't just need to end offshore drilling, we need to enact smart
policies to get ourselves off of oil entirely," said Erich Pica,
president of Friends of the Earth. "Three out of every five barrels of
oil used in the U.S. go towards transportation. Fortunately, there are
ways we can truly move beyond petroleum, including electrification of
rail, stronger clean-car standards, and walkable, bikeable, public
transit-based development. We have the solutions. We just need the
political courage to stand up to the oil lobby and enact them."
Added the Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr., president of the Hip Hop Caucus,
"All of God's children must hold BP accountable for the rape and plunder
of our planet. We must hold BP accountable especially here in
Washington, D.C., the nation's capital, in order to stop the corporate
meddling in the political process, which has led to a blatant disregard
for the regulatory process. It is time to strip BP of its corporate
charter and ensure that its assets pay the victims, clean up the Gulf
and try to restore the devastated wildlife."
The groups also identified the disparity in the fact that charges
have been brought against peaceful climate change activists, while not a
single BP executive has been charged for the devastation caused. Seven
Greenpeace activists are facing felony charges for a peaceful protest in
Louisiana on May 24 to call on the Obama administration to stop the
next oil drilling disaster in the Arctic, and a local Chesapeake Climate
Action Network employee faces potential jail time for hanging a banner
in a Senate office building last fall to urge the Senate to move toward
clean energy.
"In the wake of the Gulf disaster, no one from BP has been arrested
and sent to jail. Meanwhile, I am facing up to three years behind bars
for peacefully hanging a banner urging the Senate to get to work on
securing a desperately needed clean energy economy," said Ted Glick,
policy director for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. "It's time we
got our priorities straight and went after those who really are
criminally negligent: Oil companies who have repeatedly demonstrated
disregard for workers' lives and our wounded environment."
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000LATEST NEWS
Cori Bush Demands Repeal of 'Zombie Statute' Weaponized by Anti-Abortion Zealots
"The Comstock Act must be repealed," said the Missouri Democrat.
Mar 27, 2024
Rep. Cori Bush on Tuesday called for the repeal of a long-obsolete law that anti-abortion activists, lawmakers, and judges have worked to revive as part of their nationwide assault on reproductive rights.
"The Comstock Act must be repealed," Bush (D-Mo.) wrote in a social media post on Tuesday as the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by a group of anti-abortion doctors aiming to curtail access to mifepristone—a medication used in more than 60% of U.S. abortions.
"Enacted in 1873, it is a zombie statute, a dead law that the far-right is trying to reanimate," Bush warned. "The anti-abortion movement wants to weaponize the Comstock Act as a quick route to a nationwide medication abortion ban. Not on our watch."
Bush's office said she was the first member of Congress to demand the law's repeal since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in the summer of 2022.
The Comstock Act, which hasn't been applied in a century and was repeatedly narrowed following its enactment, prohibits the mailing of any "instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing" that "may, or can, be used or applied for producing abortion." Legal experts have described the dormant law as the "most significant national threat to reproductive rights."
Given that "virtually everything used for an abortion—from abortion pills, to the instruments for abortion procedures, to clinic supplies—gets mailed to providers in some form," a trio of experts wrote earlier this year, the anti-abortion movement's "interpretation of the Comstock Act could mean a nationwide ban on all abortions, even in states where it remains legal."
"Enforcing a Victorian-era law would be deeply unpopular and Democrats have a chance to sound the alarm, take action in both chambers, and run on it."
The Biden Justice Department has argued that the Comstock Act "does not prohibit the mailing of certain drugs that can be used to perform abortions where the sender lacks the intent that the recipient of the drugs will use them unlawfully."
But the law has nevertheless been cited with growing frequency by far-right advocacy groups and judges following the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
In 2023, a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas, Matthew Kacsmaryk, invoked the Comstock Act in a decision suspending the Food and Drug Administration's 2000 approval of mifepristone. In 2021, the FDA said it would allow patients to receive abortion medication by mail—which Kacsmaryk claimed the Comstock Act "plainly forecloses."
That case, which has massive implications for abortion rights nationwide, is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.
During oral arguments on Tuesday, Justices Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas "repeatedly invoked the Comstock Act," The Washington Postreported, "pressing lawyers about whether the 1873 federal law should apply to abortion drugs sent through the mail today."
The justices' comments raised concerns that they could try to resurrect the Comstock Act in their coming ruling in the mifepristone case.
"While the Biden administration has issued guidance saying that the federal government
will not enforce the laws," the Post noted, "a future administration seeking to restrict abortion could choose to do so."
Donald Trump, the former president and presumptive 2024 Republican nominee, has expressed support for a national abortion ban.
Jezebel's Susan Rinkunas wrote Tuesday that "enforcing a Victorian-era law would be deeply unpopular and Democrats have a chance to sound the alarm, take action in both chambers, and run on it."
"We definitively have one lawmaker on board," Rinkunas added, referring to Bush. "Who's next?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Container Ship That Destroyed Baltimore Bridge Has Troubled History
The Maersk-chartered MV Dali—which lost propulsion just before the collision—not only was involved in a previous crash, but was also briefly detained last year over problems with its propulsion system.
Mar 26, 2024
The mega-container ship that lost propulsion before toppling Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge in a Tuesday morning collision was involved in a previous crash, and was cited last year for propulsion-related problems.
Newsweekreported that the Maersk Line Limited-chartered MV Dali—which crashed into the Interstate 695 Patapsco River crossing just before 1:30 am, causing the span to collapse and sending a construction crew into the water—collided with a wall in the harbor at Antwerp, Belgium in 2016. The accident, which was reported by Vessel Finder and other outlets at the time, was attributed to errors made by the ship's master and pilot.
The 9-year-old Dali was also detained by port officials in San Antonio, Chile last June after inspectors discovered a problem related to the vessel's "propulsion and auxiliary machinery," according toThe Washington Post, which cited records from the intergovernmental shipping regulator Tokyo MOU.
The ship's owner, Grace Ocean Private Ltd., and operator, Synergy Marine, "have been sued at least four times in U.S. federal court on allegations of negligence and other claims tied to worker injuries on other ships owned and operated by the Singapore-based companies," according toThe Associated Press.
Maersk was also sanctioned last year by the U.S. Labor Department for allegedly stopping employees from reporting safety concerns, documents published by The Lever revealed.
According to a July 14, 2023 Labor Department letter to Maersk regarding an Occupational Safety and Health Administration investigation, the Danish company "suspended and then terminated" a worker "in retaliation for reporting unsafe conditions and contacting the U.S. Coast Guard."
The fired employee "engaged in numerous protected activities" including reporting a leak and the need for repairs to a ship's cargo hold bilge system, alcohol use aboard the vessel by crew members, and inoperable equipment including an emergency fire pump and lifeboat block and releasing gear.
The search for six construction workers who were on the bridge when it collapsed into the river was suspended until Wednesday, according toThe Associated Press. The workers are presumed dead by their employer, Brawner Builders. Local media reported that multiple vehicles plunged into the river and that two workers—one of whom was briefly hospitalized—were rescued from the water.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Pentagon Urged to Just Say No to AI-Powered Killer Robots
"The Department of Defense should declare its opposition to the development and deployment of autonomous weapons."
Mar 26, 2024
The watchdog group Public Citizen on Tuesday led a letter urging Pentagon leaders "to clarify that the Replicator Initiative will not involve the development and deployment of autonomous weapons systems," also known as "killer robots."
Last September, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks "asserted that the development of all-domain, attributable autonomy systems (ADA2) is an essential way for the Pentagon to maintain its comparative cutting-edge and keep up with the technological advancements of other states," notes the letter, which was addressed to her and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
"However, those comments failed to specify whether or not supporting autonomous weapons systems is one of the key focuses of this initiative," the letter stresses. "When addressing whether or not 'ADA2 means weapons systems,' Secretary Hicks stated: 'That's a serious question to be sure. They are not synonymous. There are many applications for ADA2 systems beyond delivering weapons effects.'"
"Autonomous weapons are inherently dehumanizing and unethical, no matter whether a human is 'ultimately' responsible for the use of force or not."
Public Citizen and the 13 other organizations argued that "this is no place for strategic ambiguity. Autonomous weapons are inherently dehumanizing and unethical, no matter whether a human is 'ultimately' responsible for the use of force or not."
Deploying lethal weapons that rely on artificial intelligence (AI) "in battlefield conditions necessarily means inserting them into novel conditions for which they have not been programmed, an invitation for disastrous outcomes," the groups warned. "'Swarms' of the sort envisioned by Replicator pose even heightened risks, because of the unpredictability of how autonomous systems will function in a network. And the mere ambiguity of the U.S. position on autonomous weapons risks spurring a catastrophic arms race."
"We believe the Department of Defense should declare its opposition to the development and deployment of autonomous weapons," the coalition concluded. "However, even if you are not prepared to make that declaration, we strongly urge you to clarify that the Replicator Initiative will not employ autonomous weapons."
In addition to Public Citizen, the coalition included the American Friends Service Committee, Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network, Backbone Campaign, Demand Progress Education Fund, Fight for the Future, Future of Life, National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, RootsAction.org, United Church of Christ, the Value Alliance, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom U.S., Win Without War, and World Beyond War.
The letter comes on the heels of Public Citizen releasing a report about the rise of killer robots, AI Joe: The Dangers of Artificial Intelligence and the Military.
The February report addresses the Pentagon's AI policy, the dangers of killer robots, the need to ensure decisions about nuclear weapons aren't made by automated systems, how artificial intelligence can increase not diminish the use of violence, risks of using deepfakes on the battlefield, and how AI startups are seeking government contracts.
The publication concludes with recommendations that Public Citizen president Robert Weissman echoed in a statement Tuesday.
"The United States should state plainly that it will not create or deploy killer robots and should work to advance global treaty negotiations to ban such weapons," Weissman said. "At minimum, the United States should commit that the Replicator Initiative will not involve the use of autonomous weapons."
"Ambiguity about the Replicator program essentially ensures a catastrophic arms race over autonomous weapons," he added. "That's a race in which all of humanity is the loser."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular