

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Public Citizen and seven other prominent public interest groups took
to the streets in the nation's capital today to express the public's
outrage at BP's continued mismanagement of the ever-spreading
environmental disaster it caused in the Gulf of Mexico.
Joined by Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Energy Action Coalition,
350.org, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, the Center for Biological
Diversity and Hip Hop Caucus, Public Citizen articulated the deep
frustration of average Americans by making a mock citizen's arrest of
BP's CEO Tony Hayward at the oil giant's Washington, D.C., office.
At the base of a 13-foot tall inflatable oil barrel, participating
group leaders read from a list of charges against the corporation,
culminating in a finding of criminal negligence and the presentation of a
prison jumpsuit fitted for Hayward, who is ultimately accountable for
the ecological nightmare unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico.
"BP has a long history of violating environmental and worker safety
laws, as well as manipulating markets," said Robert Weissman, president
of Public Citizen. "BP was ill-prepared for dealing with a deepwater
spill and still cannot contain this gusher. Eleven workers are dead,
coastlines in three states are being devastated, the Gulf is incurring
untold damage and livelihoods are threatened. People are outraged, and
we are here to let BP know it."
Added Phil Radford, president of Greenpeace, "The oil destroying
our wetlands and the Gulf of Mexico is a tragic reminder of what we get
when we let corporate polluters write our energy policy. BP must be held
accountable for their crimes, and our government must stop listening to
polluter lobbyists."
Protesters rallied and waved signs streaming with "crude" in front of
BP's government affairs office at 1101 New York Ave. NW. The charges
against BP that were read aloud by protesters included disregard for
worker safety, price-gouging consumers and taxpayers, and violations of
environmental laws.
BP has the worst safety and environmental record of any oil company
operating in the U.S. In the past few years, BP has paid more than $730
million in fines and settlements to the federal and state governments,
and in civil lawsuit judgments for environmental crimes, violating
worker safety rules and manipulating energy markets:
* Worker safety - $215 million in total penalties and settlements.
* Environmental violations - $153 million in penalties and settlements,
plus a guilty plea to an environmental felony and a criminal
misdemeanor.
* Price-gouging consumers and taxpayers - $363 million in penalties and
settlements.
(Go here for links to related
documents.)
Public Citizen research shows that since the beginning of 2009, BP
has spent more than $19.5 million to hire 49 of the highest-powered D.C.
lobbyists, including 35 former employees of Congress and the executive
branch. (Go here
for more details.) The investment appears to have paid off:
Regulators who are supposed to oversee offshore drilling procedures have
been lax - letting BP run its operation however it wanted - and
lawmakers have worked to bolster offshore drilling.
" Big Oil has been polluting the political process for too long," said
Ethan Nuss, co-field director of the Energy Action Coalition. "This
fall, young people are organizing to kick dirty energy out of politics
by flooding the midterm elections with support for real clean energy
solutions. Big Oil may be able to outspend us, but we're the voters and
that's what counts."
The protest also was designed to highlight the need for the nation to
move away from inherently dangerous and dirty fuel and instead pursue
clean energy sources. In addition, the groups called for all offshore
drilling to be suspended and liability caps lifted so oil companies feel
the full financial force of responsibility for the damage they cause.
"We don't just need to end offshore drilling, we need to enact smart
policies to get ourselves off of oil entirely," said Erich Pica,
president of Friends of the Earth. "Three out of every five barrels of
oil used in the U.S. go towards transportation. Fortunately, there are
ways we can truly move beyond petroleum, including electrification of
rail, stronger clean-car standards, and walkable, bikeable, public
transit-based development. We have the solutions. We just need the
political courage to stand up to the oil lobby and enact them."
Added the Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr., president of the Hip Hop Caucus,
"All of God's children must hold BP accountable for the rape and plunder
of our planet. We must hold BP accountable especially here in
Washington, D.C., the nation's capital, in order to stop the corporate
meddling in the political process, which has led to a blatant disregard
for the regulatory process. It is time to strip BP of its corporate
charter and ensure that its assets pay the victims, clean up the Gulf
and try to restore the devastated wildlife."
The groups also identified the disparity in the fact that charges
have been brought against peaceful climate change activists, while not a
single BP executive has been charged for the devastation caused. Seven
Greenpeace activists are facing felony charges for a peaceful protest in
Louisiana on May 24 to call on the Obama administration to stop the
next oil drilling disaster in the Arctic, and a local Chesapeake Climate
Action Network employee faces potential jail time for hanging a banner
in a Senate office building last fall to urge the Senate to move toward
clean energy.
"In the wake of the Gulf disaster, no one from BP has been arrested
and sent to jail. Meanwhile, I am facing up to three years behind bars
for peacefully hanging a banner urging the Senate to get to work on
securing a desperately needed clean energy economy," said Ted Glick,
policy director for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. "It's time we
got our priorities straight and went after those who really are
criminally negligent: Oil companies who have repeatedly demonstrated
disregard for workers' lives and our wounded environment."
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances," vowed the Senate Minority Leader.
The extremes to which the Republican Party will go to sway the 2026 elections in their favor was highlighted again on Sunday after US President Donald Trump said he will sign no other legislation into law this year until the SAVE Act—a bill that would deeply erode voting rights and threatens ballot access for tens of millions of Americans—is passed by Congress.
"It must be done immediately," Trump declared in a characteristically unhinged social media post on Sunday, referring to the SAVE Act, versions of which have passed the Republican-controlled House but so far stalled in the Senate.
"It supersedes everything else. MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE," Trump continued in an all-caps tantrum. "I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION - GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY - ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL: NO MEN IN WOMEN’S SPORTS: NO TRANSGENDER MUTILIZATION FOR CHILDREN! DO NOT FAIL!!!"
Voting rights experts and Democratic lawmakers have denounced the SAVE Act as a dangerous threat to millions of eligible voters, calling it a clear effort by the GOP to tip the scales in their favor by depressing voter turnout in 2026 and beyond.
"In every form, the SAVE Act would require American citizens to show documents like a passport or birth certificate to register to vote. Our research shows that more than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents," warned Eliza Sweren-Becker and Owen Bacskai of the Brennan Center for Justice, which advocates for robust voting rights, in a blog post last week.
"Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport," Sweren-Becker and Bacskai continued. "Millions lack access to a paper copy of their birth certificate. The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but younger voters and voters of color would suffer disproportionately. Likewise, millions of women whose married names aren’t on their birth certificates or passports would face extra steps just to make their voices heard."
In response to Trump's threat on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) characterized the SAVE Act as "Jim Crow 2.0" as he condemned the president and his GOP allies.
"If Trump is saying he won’t sign any bills until the SAVE Act is passed, then so be it: there will be total gridlock in the Senate," said Schumer. "Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances."
Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, said Sunday that the SAVE Act—which Trump said last week must be passed "at the expense of everything else"—is not a voter ID bill, but rather "voter suppression" legislation bill masquerading as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
"If it was a voter ID bill, it would provide people with the proper IDs to vote, with no barriers — but it doesn’t," noted D'Arrigo. "The voter fraud rate is .0001%, and this bill would potentially prevent up to 69 million women, 40 million who don’t have access to their birth certificate, and 140 million without a passport, from voting."
"The American people don't want this war," said Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut. "Virtually nothing good happened from sending thousands of Americans to die in Iraq in the 2000s and if we don't learn that lesson then shame on every single one of us."
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut offered immediate push back on Sunday when CNN anchorJake Tapper said a vote against an expected $50 billion request by President Donald Trump to fund his attack on Iran would be seen as "voting against the troops."
"Oh come on," said Murphy, incredulous. "I mean, the American people don't want this war. They don't want this war—they have seen what happens when American troops go into places like Iraq, places like Afghanistan. Ultimately we get a lot of people killed, we waste a lot of dollars. The one thing the people of the American people have been clear about is that they don't want the United States dragged into another long-term war in the Middle East."
Polling has shown that Murphy is correct, with only one out of four people—a mere 25%—in a Reuters/Ipsos poll released last week showing any kind of support for Trump's war of choice against Iran.
"If you support the troops," said Murphy, "then you should vote against this war so that we get our troops out of harm's way. Virtually nothing good happened from sending thousands of Americans to die in Iraq in the 2000s and if we don't learn that lesson then shame on every single one of us."
TAPPER: "You have said you're a 'hell no' on funding the war. We have seen this movie before. We know that vote will be cast as - especially if you run for higher office - you voting against the troops."
MURPHY: "Oh come on I mean, the American people don't want this war." pic.twitter.com/lTB5isM8I7
— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) March 8, 2026
Trump has yet to make the formal request for the $50 billion in funding, but estimates for just one week of fighting have put the cost of the military operations thus far at something close to $1billion per day.
Murphy has said he is a "hell no" on any additional funding and other members of the Democratic caucus have echoed that message.
"Trump is already spending $1 BILLION PER DAY on his illegal regime change war of choice in Iran," said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) on Thursday. "Now, he's going to ask Congress to give him up to $50 BILLION MORE. My vote: hell NO."
"We could be lowering the cost of health care, but instead Trump is spending BILLIONS on his reckless war with Iran," said Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) on Thursday. "Trump is blowing YOUR taxpayer dollars on war and causing gas prices to spike while he's at it."
Senator Susan Collins, said Platner outside the Republican senator's office in Portland, Maine, is more interested in the profits of weapons contractors "than the shame that we bring upon ourselves when we kill children."
Graham Platner, the Democratic hopeful running for the US Senate in Maine to unseat Republican Sen. Susan Collins, delivered a sharp rebuke Saturday to the war of choice launched against Iran last week by President Donald Trump—the kind of messaging, say anti-war progressives, that every lawmaker or politician seeking office should be giving in the face of a military campaign that a majority of Americans, across the political spectrum, adamantly oppose.
"We can all see what is happening right now," said Platner outside Collins' offices in downtown Portland, Maine on Saturday. "At least with the war in Iraq, they had the decency to try to trick us for months. At least they made Colin Powell go sully his name in front of the UN to try to trick us into thinking WMDs were real. At least then they tried to convince us that it was necessary. This time around, they're just doing it."
And the Trump administration is doing it, he continued, "because we have a system that does not hold people accountable. We have a Congress that for decades has abdicate its constitutional role in war making. It never should have been an option that a president can just start a huge regional conflict because he's afraid we're going to find out he might be a pedophile."
In a vote in the Senate on Wednesday, Collins sided against a War Powers Resolution that would have curbed Trump's ability to wage the war that has already killed more than 1,300 civilians, a large portion of them children. While the joint US-Israeli operation has unleashed chaos across the Middle East and been denounced as a criminal war of aggression by experts, Collins argued that passing the resolution "would send the wrong message to Iran and our troops."
"At least with the war in Iraq, they had the decency to try to trick us for months... This time around, they're just doing it."
Platner, who served multiple tours of combat duty in Afghanistan and Iraq as both a Marine and Army infantry soldier, expressed outrage at how willing politicians like Collins are to send young Americans off to kill and die for wars that bring such horror and carnage abroad while costing US taxpayers billions at home.
"Susan Collins is more interested in protecting the wealthy and the powerful. She is more interested in protecting the profits of the defense industry. She's more interested in protecting the interests of her AIPAC donors," Platner told the crowd, ripping Collins for her vote against the resolution. "She is more interested in all of that, than in protecting the sacred resource that is the lives of young American men and women who are willing to put their lives on the line for this country. She is more interested in their profits than the shame that we bring upon ourselves when we kill children."
On the first day of US bombing last week, a school in the southeastern town of Minab was struck, killing an estimated 165 civilians, most of them young students.
"She [Susan Collins] is more interested in their profits [AIPAC donors and the defense industry] than the shame that we bring upon ourselves when we kill children."
Watch Maine Democratic U.S. Senate candidate @grahamformaine confront Republican Senator Susan Collins. pic.twitter.com/9uaKqBcKix
— Zeteo (@zeteo_news) March 7, 2026
Norman Solomon, national director of the progressive advocacy group RootsAction, said "the content and location" of Platner’s remarks made them "doubly vital" and that other lawmakers and politicians would be wise to follow his lead and that others in the US should replicate such rallies where they live.
Across the country, Solomon told Common Dreams, "members of Congress who’ve voted for more high-tech slaughter in Iran are smugly going on with routine business in their offices, insulated from the murderous effects of their political positions. They do not deserve insulation, they deserve nonviolent and militant confrontation."
Showing up at local district offices of their members of Congress, "to protest with clear moral messaging" like those in Maine over the weekend, said added Solomon, "is long overdue and should become widespread. Most of us don’t live far from such offices. Why should politicians who enable mass murder from the skies be able to run their offices every day as though nothing is amiss?"
"Antiwar speeches and picket lines with moral clarity should become standard aspects of the political environment at the decentralized congressional offices," he said, "that for far too long have been aloof from the carnage and human anguish that craven elected officials continue to inflict."
Platner has emerged as potent anti-war voice in the week since Trump launched the US assault on Iran, repeatedly invoking the trauma he suffered and the horrors of war he witnessed as a soldier as a way to condemn repeating history, especially by lawmaker like Collins who appeared to have learned no lessons from the experience of the disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Talking to reporters after Saturday's rally, Platner referred to both Trump and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth as "morons" with no plan to get out of the mess they've created.
"I don't think these people have any idea what they're doing," Planter said. "And the problem with that is that that incompetent leadership is going to result in dead Americans—and it already has—and it's going to result in a region thrust into chaos and bloodshed."
If lawmakers won't stand up to stop Trump's war, Platner told News Center Maine in an interview that it will ultimately be up to the American people to organize and force an end to the conflict.
"The people who are going to send their sons and daughters off to fight, the people who are going to see their friends and families maimed and killed in combat, the people who are going to have to pay for all of this instead of getting health care," said Platner, "we need to stand together and show the political class in this country that we are not going to stand another foreign war."
In a separate post on Saturday, Platner reached out to Trump voters who may be disappointed or disillusioned after the warmongering of a president who told voters he would act to end wars in his second term, not start them.
"To all of those who voted for Trump," said Platner, "hoping for an end to stupid foreign wars: We may not agree on everything, but I promise to never waste your hard-earned money on a pointless quagmire in the Middle East."