SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Dylan Penner, Media Officer, Council of Canadians, 613-795-8685, dpenner@canadians.org.
Three motions (below) by Conservative MP Gerald Keddy to stop hearing
from witnesses and rush through clause-by-clause consideration of the
Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement must be rejected during an
in-camera meeting of the international trade committee on Thursday ,
says the Council of Canadians.
"The Conservatives and Liberals are clearly uncomfortable hearing
witness after witness state that Canada should not sign a free trade
agreement with Colombia without first ordering an independent assessment
of the deal on human rights," says Stuart Trew, trade campaigner with
the Council of Canadians. "It's an inconvenient truth about this deal
that it will likely make a bad situation worse in Colombia and do little
for the Canadian economy. Voting for Keddy's motions on Thursday would
be a transparent attempt to sweep that truth under the rug."
Mr. Keddy does a further injustice to democracy by proposing that MPs
only get five seconds to consider each clause in the Colombia agreement,
and the decision to move Thursday's meeting in-camera is also
surprising, and a sign perhaps that the Conservatives are feeling the
public pressure. The Council of Canadians has organized "Tweet-Ins" in
English and most recently in Spanish during the last three trade
committee meetings to give real-time updates on committee proceedings
and MP comments to people who cannot be there in person. The first
Tweet-In on May 11 reached tens of thousands of people and made the
Canada-Colombia free trade agreement the second most popular topic of
discussion on Twitter.
There is near unanimous support among Canadian labour, development,
ecumenical and social justice organizations that the Colombia free trade
deal should wait until a human rights impact assessment can be carried
out. A Liberal proposal from trade critic Scott Brison, which resulted
in an as yet unspecific amendment to the agreement requiring some form
of annual human rights reports post-ratification, is seen with
skepticism because of comments from Colombian trade officials that the
Colombian government would perform its own assessments.
"When the Liberals voted in the House of Commons last month to end
second reading debate on the Canada-Colombia free trade agreement,
sending it to committee, it was on the explicit condition that a
'comprehensive' and 'in depth' study be carried out of the agreement's
human rights implications," says Trew. "The only choice of all
opposition parties on Thursday is to reject Keddy's motions and to hear
from all remaining witnesses."
--
MOTIONS FOR VOTE ON THURSDAY, MAY 27
Notice of Motions - Gerald Keddy, MP
Date: May 25, 2010
Motion #1
That the Committee hear no more testimonies regarding its study of Bill
C-2 and that it conclude clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill on
Tuesday, June 1 2010; and that by no later than 5:30 p.m. of June 1st,
all remaining questions in relation to the clause-by-clause
consideration of the Bill be put to a vote without further debate.
Motion #2
That regarding the Committee's clause-by-clause consideration of Bill
C-2 each member will take no longer than 5 seconds to vote on each
clause and amendment; and if the 5 seconds limit is exceeded the member
will be deemed to have abstained.
Motion #3
That all proposed amendments to the bill must be tabled with the clerk
of the committee 24 hours in advance of the meeting in which the
proposed amendments will be moved; and that the chair of the committee,
at his discretion, be allowed to group similar amendments to be
considered at the same time.
Notice of Motion - Peter Julian, MP
2010-05-25
That the Committee provide sufficient time during the committee's
scheduled meetings of May 27, June 1rst, June 3rd , June 8th and June
10th , to hear the testimony of the organizations and persons who have
written to the Committee to date, requesting to appear as witnesses at
the Bill C-2 hearings, which include, AFRODES (Charo Mina Rojas),
Justicia y Paz (Danilo Rueda), Dr. Penelope Simons (University of
Ottawa), National Union of Public and General Employees (James Clancy),
CLC (Sheila Katz), AFL-CIO (Jeff Vogt), National Indigenous Organization
of Colombia (ONIC - Luis Fernando Arias Secretary General), OPSEU
(Smokey Thomas & Yhony Munoz), Mingas-FTA (Natalia Fajardo), la
Chiva Collective (Manual Rozental), Gary Leech (Independent Journalist,
NS), NOMADESC (Berenice Celeyta), Union of the Ombudsman's office (Maria
Eva Villate, President, Human Rights Lawyer), Congressman Mike Michaud,
Escuela Nacional Sindical (ENS), National Indigenous Organization of
Colombia (ONIC),
Central Unitaria De Trahabadores de Colombia, CODHES (Jorge Rohas,
President) and that the committee close off hearings on Bill C-2 and
proceed to clause by clause review after having
heard
these
witnesses.
Founded in 1985, the Council of Canadians is Canada's leading social action organization, mobilizing a network of 60 chapters across the country.
Office: (613) 233-4487, ext. 249"Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over," said one organizer.
Campaigners who last month celebrated the success of their effort to place an abortion rights referendum on November ballots in Missouri faced uncertainty about the ballot initiative Friday night, after a judge ruled that organizers had made an error on their petitions that rendered the measure invalid.
Judge Christopher Limbaugh of Cole County Circuit Court sided with pro-forced pregnancy lawmakers and activists who had argued that Missourians for Constitutional Freedom had not sufficiently explained the ramifications of the Right to Reproductive Freedom initiative, or Amendment 3, which would overturn the state's near-total abortion ban.
The state constitution has a requirement that initiative petitions include "an enacting clause and the full text of the measure," and clarify the laws or sections of the constitution that would be repealed if the amendment were passed.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom included the full text of the measure on their petitions, which were signed by more than 380,000 residents—more than twice the number of signatures needed to place the question on ballots.
Opponents claimed, though, that organizers did not explain to signatories the meaning of "a person's fundamental right to reproductive freedom."
Limbaugh accused the group of a "blatant violation" of the constitution.
Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for the group, said it "remains unwavering in [its] mission to ensure Missourians have the right to vote on reproductive freedom on November 5."
"The court's decision to block Amendment 3 from appearing on the ballot is a profound injustice to the initiative petition process and undermines the rights of the... 380,000 Missourians who signed our petition," said Sweet. "Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over."
Limbaugh said he would wait until Tuesday, when the state is set to print ballots, to formally issue an injunction instructing the secretary of state to remove the question.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom said it plans to appeal to a higher court, but if the court declines to act, the question would be struck from ballots.
As the case plays out in the coming days, said Missouri state Rep. Eric Woods (D-18), "it's a good time for a reminder that Missouri's current extreme abortion ban has ZERO exceptions for rape or incest. And Missouri Republicans are hell bent on keeping it that way."
The ruling came weeks after the Arkansas Supreme Court disqualified an abortion rights amendment from appearing on November ballots, saying organizers had failed to correctly submit paperwork verifying that paid canvassers had been properly trained.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Thousands of people gathered at London's Picadilly Circus Saturday for the city's latest march against Israel's bombardment of Gaza and the United Kingdom's continued support for the Israel Defense Forces, following what organizers called "a major victory in defense of the democratic right to protest."
The Metropolitan Police on Friday dropped its restrictions on the march, which was the first pro-Palestinian protest since last October to proceed to the Israeli embassy in London.
The police had attempted to stop campaigners from gathering before 2:30 pm, conflicting with plans to begin the rally preceding the march at noon.
"They never provided any convincing explanation or evidence for this delay, and it has caused enormous, unnecessary difficulty to the organization of a large-scale demonstration," Ben Jamal, who leads the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, one of the groups organizing the march, toldMiddle East Eye on Friday.
"It has unfortunately been part of a pattern of obstruction, delay, and lack of communication on the part of the Met which we will press them to review and reflect on for future demonstrations," he added. "For tomorrow, we call on our supporters to turn out in their hundreds of thousands to show we will not be deterred from seeking an end to Israel's genocide and justice for Palestine!"
Jamal said the police "saw sense and abandoned their unjustified and impractical attempt to delay the start of the march by two hours on Saturday," allowing the march to begin at 1:30 pm.
During previous marches in which hundreds of thousands of people have demonstrated in solidarity with Palestinians since last October, police have blocked off the area surrounding the Israeli embassy in Kensington, threatening anyone who protested in the vicinity with arrest.
Marching to the embassy, demonstrators made a "renewed call to end the ongoing genocide in Gaza" and demanded an "immediate and full cessation of arms supplies to Israel."
Earlier this week, the U.K. government announced it was suspending approximately 30 of its 350 arms export licenses for Israel, saying that "there does exist a clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law."
Human rights advocates, medical professionals working in Gaza, and legal experts have for months demanded that Israel's top international funders, including the U.S. and U.K., stop providing military aid as Israel has blocked humanitarian aid from reaching Gaza and waged attacks on civilian infrastructure, killing more than 40,000 people.
The country has also been accused of carrying out genocide in a case led by South Africa at the International Court of Justice; the court has ordered Israel to end its blockade on humanitarian aid and to prevent genocide in Gaza.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
As Londoners marched on Saturday, the Gaza Health Ministry announced that at least 61 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli forces in the last two days. Four people were killed in a strike on Halimah al-Saadiyah school in Jabaliya, where displaced Palestinians have been sheltering, and three were killed in a bombing at Amr Ibn al-As school in Gaza City.
Media outlets in Palestine reported that a baby named Yaqeen al-Astal had become the 37th child in Gaza to die of malnutrition since Israel began its near-total aid blockade.
International outrage also grew on Saturday regarding the killing of a Turkish American activist, Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, in the West Bank on Friday. Local media and eyewitnesses said Eygi had been deliberately shot in the head by Israeli forces at a protest over the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements.
The U.S. called on Israel to investigate the killing on Friday, but Eygi's family said in a statement that such a probe would not be "adequate."
"We call on President [Joe] Biden, Vice President [Kamala] Harris, and Secretary of State [Antony] Blinken to order an independent investigation into the unlawful killing of a U.S. citizen and to ensure full accountability for the guilty parties," said the family.
Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for the United Nations, called for "a full investigation of the circumstances" and said that "people should be held accountable. And again, civilians must be protected at all times."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," said Democratic leaders, "the odds of a shutdown go way up."
Leading U.S. Senate Democrats on Friday accused House Republicans of "wasting precious time catering to the hard MAGA right" as House Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled a stopgap funding bill tied to a proposal that would require proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
The proposal—the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act—has been pushed by Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump and was passed by the House in July, with five Democrats joining the GOP in supporting the bill.
Non-citizens are already barred from voting in federal elections. With about 21.3 million eligible voters reporting in a recent survey that they would not be able to quickly access their birth certificate, passport, naturalization certificate, or certificate of citizenship in order to prove their status, critics say the proposal is a clear attempt to stop people of color and young Americans from taking part in elections.
Johnson proposed including the legislation in a stopgap bill, or a continuing resolution, that would keep the government running roughly at current spending levels through March 28—a move that would postpone major spending negotiations until after the next president takes office.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said that "avoiding a government shutdown requires bipartisanship, not a bill drawn up by one party," and alluded to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) attempt last September to ram a spending bill through with immigration and border policy changes in order to avert a government shutdown.
"Speaker Johnson is making the same mistake as former Speaker McCarthy did a year ago," said Schumer and Murray in a statement. "The House Republican funding proposal is an ominous case of déjà vu."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," they added, "the odds of a shutdown go way up, and Americans will know that the responsibility of a shutdown will be on the House Republicans' hands."
Johnson is expected to bring the bill to the House floor on Wednesday after lawmakers return from summer recess. Congress has a September 30 deadline to make changes to the spending bill in order to avoid a partial government shutdown on October 1.
The House speaker called the proposal "a critically important step" toward funding the government and ensuring "that only American citizens can decide American elections"—prompting one critic to accuse Johnson of pushing a "manufactured" issue.
"Anyone who reads the SAVE Act understands it is a bad bill," said attorney Heath Hixson, "a poorly worded unfunded mandate that'll lead to voter suppression and racist outcomes."