May, 17 2010, 01:11pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Maria Archuleta, ACLU, (212) 519-7808 or
549-2666; media@aclu.org
Alessandra Soler Meetze, ACLU of
Arizona, (602) 773-6006 or 418-5499
Laura Rodriguez, MALDEF, (310)
956-2425; lrodriguez@maldef.org
Adela de la Torre, NILC, (213)
674-2832; delatorre@nilc.org
Karin Wang, APALC, (213) 241-0234 or
999-5640; kwang@apalc.orgÂ
Leila McDowell, NAACP, (202) 463-2940
ext. 1021
ACLU and Civil Rights Groups File Legal Challenge to Arizona Racial Profiling Law
PHOENIX
The American Civil Liberties Union and a
coalition of civil rights groups filed a class action lawsuit today in
the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona challenging
Arizona's new law requiring police to demand "papers" from people they
stop who they suspect are not authorized to be in the U.S. The extreme
law, the coalition charged, invites the racial profiling of people of
color, violates the First Amendment and interferes with federal law.
The coalition filing the lawsuit
includes the ACLU, MALDEF, National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), ACLU
of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the
Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) - a member of the Asian
American Center for Advancing Justice.
"Arizona's law is quintessentially
un-American: we are not a 'show me your papers' country, nor one that
believes in subjecting people to harassment, investigation and arrest
simply because others may perceive them as foreign," said Omar Jadwat, a
staff attorney with the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "This law
violates the Constitution and interferes with federal law, and we are
confident that we will prevent it from ever taking effect."
The lawsuit charges that the Arizona
law unlawfully interferes with federal power and authority over
immigration matters in violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S.
Constitution; invites racial profiling against people of color by law
enforcement in violation of the equal protection guarantee and
prohibition on unreasonable seizures under the 14th and Fourth
Amendments; and infringes on the free speech rights of day laborers and
others in Arizona.
"This discriminatory law pushes
Arizona into a spiral of fear, increased crime and costly litigation,"
said Victor Viramontes, MALDEF Senior National Counsel. "We expect that
this misguided law will be enjoined before it takes effect."
One of the individuals the coalition
is representing in the case, Jim Shee, is a U.S.-born 70-year-old
American citizen of Spanish and Chinese descent. Shee asserts that he
will be vulnerable to racial profiling under the law, and that, although
the law has not yet gone into effect, he has already been stopped twice
by local law enforcement officers in Arizona and asked to produce his
"papers."
Another plaintiff, Jesus Cuauhtemoc
Villa, is a resident of the state of New Mexico who is currently
attending Arizona State University. The state of New Mexico does not
require proof of U.S. citizenship or immigration status to obtain a
driver's license. Villa does not have a U.S. passport and does not want
to risk losing his birth certificate by carrying it with him. He worries
about traveling in Arizona without a valid form of identification that
would prove his citizenship to police if he is pulled over. If he cannot
supply proof upon demand, Arizona law enforcement is required to arrest
and detain him.
Several prominent law enforcement
groups, including the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, oppose
the law because it diverts limited resources from law enforcement's
primary responsibility of providing protection and promoting public
safety in the community and undermines trust and cooperation between
local police and immigrant communities.
"This ill-conceived law sends a clear
message to communities of color that the authorities are not to be
trusted, making them less likely to come forward as victims of or
witnesses to crime," said Linton Joaquin, General Counsel of NILC.
"Arizona's authorities should not allow public safety to take a back
seat to racial profiling."
"African-Americans know all too well
the insidious effects of racial profiling," said Benjamin Todd Jealous,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the NAACP. "The government
should be preventing police from investigating and detaining people
based on color and accent, not mandating it. Laws that encourage
discrimination have no place in this country anywhere for anyone."
"This extreme law puts Arizona
completely out of step with American values of fairness and equality,"
said Julie Su, Litigation Director of the APALC. "In a state where U.S.
citizens of Japanese descent were interned during World War II, it is
deeply troubling that a law that would mandate lower-class treatment of
people of color, immigrants and others seen to be outsiders would pass
in 2010."
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of
labor, domestic violence, day laborer, human services and social justice
organizations, including Friendly House, Service Employees
International Union (SEIU), SEIU Local 5, United Food and Commercial
Workers International (UFCW), Arizona South Asians for Safe Families
(ASAFSF), Southside Presbyterian Church, Arizona Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce, Asian Chamber of Commerce of Arizona, Border Action Network,
Tonatierra Community Development Institute, Muslim American Society,
Japanese American Citizens League, Valle del Sol, Inc., Coalicion De
Derechos Humanos, and individual named plaintiffs who will be subject to
harassment or arrest under the law and a class of similarly situated
persons.
"Day laborers have repeatedly
defended their First Amendment rights in federal courts and successfully
established their undeniable right to seek work in public areas," said
Pablo Alvarado, Executive Director of NDLON. "Arizona's effort to
criminalize day laborers and migrants is an affront to the Constitution
and threatens to disrupt national unity, and we are confident that
federal courts will intervene to ensure the protection of our bedrock
civil rights."
Even prior to the passage of the
statute, local enforcement of federal immigration law has already caused
rampant racial profiling of Latinos in Arizona, most notably in
Maricopa County. The ACLU, MALDEF and other members of the coalition
have several pending lawsuits against government officials in Arizona
because of civil rights abuses of U.S. citizens and immigrants.
Organizations and attorneys on the
case, Friendly House et al. v. Whiting
et al., include:
- ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project: Jadwat, Lucas Guttentag,
Cecillia Wang, Tanaz Moghadam and Harini P. Raghupathi; - MALDEF: Viramontes, Tom Saenz, Cynthia Valenzuela Dixon,
Nina Perales, Ivan Espinoza-Madrigal, Gladys Limon and Nicholas
Espiritu; - NILC: Joaquin, Karen C. Tumlin, Nora A. Preciado, Melissa
S. Keaney, Vivek Mittal and Ghazal Tajmiri; - ACLU Foundation of Arizona: Dan Pochoda and Annie Lai;
- APALC: Su, Ronald Lee, Yungsuhn Park, Connie Choi and
Carmina Ocampo; - NDLON: Chris Newman and Lisa Kung;
- NAACP: Laura Blackburne;
- Munger Tolles & Olson LLP: Bradley S. Phillips, Paul
J. Watford, Elizabeth J. Neubauer,Joseph J. Ybarra, Susan T. Boyd and
Yuval Miller; and - Roush, Mccracken, Guerrero,
Miller & Ortega: Daniel R. Ortega, Jr.
The complaint can be found at: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights-racial-justice/friendly-house-et-al-v-whiting-complaint
More information about the Arizona
law, including an ACLU video and slide show, can be found at: www.aclu.org/what-happens-arizona-stops-arizona
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
ICJ Issues New Order in Genocide Case as Another Gaza Child Starves to Death
The World Court cited "exceptionally grave" developments, especially the "spread of famine and starvation," in once again ordering Israel to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza.
Mar 28, 2024
Citing "the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular the spread of famine and starvation," the International Court of Justice on Thursday ordered Israel to allow desperately needed humanitarian aid into the embattled enclave and reiterated an earlier directive to prevent genocidal acts.
The ICJ's new provisional order—which passed by a vote of 15-1, with Israeli Ad-Hoc Judge Aharon Barak dissenting—states that Israel must take "all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza."
This includes "food, water, electricity, fuel, shelter, clothing, hygiene, and sanitation requirements, as well as medical supplies and medical care."
The Hague-based court also ordered Israel to ensure "with immediate effect that its military does not commit acts which constitute a violation of any of the rights of the Palestinians in Gaza as a protected group" under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The court's directive is a response to a March 6 request by South Africa, which filed the genocide case against Israel last December. On January 26, the tribunal issued a provisional ruling that found Israel was plausibly committing genocide in Gaza and ordering the country to prevent genocidal acts.
A final ruling in the case could take years. ICJ rules permit the court to "revoke or modify any decision concerning provisional measures if, in its opinion, some change in the situation justifies such revocation or modification."
Critics accuse Israel of ignoring the January 26 order. South Africa said its March 6 request for modification was prompted by "horrific deaths from starvation of Palestinian children, including babies, brought about by Israel's deliberate acts and omissions" including "concerted attempts" since January 26 to ensure the defunding of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) "and Israel's attacks on starving Palestinians seeking to access what extremely limited humanitarian assistance Israel permits into Northern Gaza."
The new ICJ order notes that "Israel rejects 'in the strongest terms' South Africa's claims that incidents of starvation in Gaza are a direct result of its deliberate acts and omissions."
However, the court found that "exceptionally grave" recent developments, including "at least 31 people, including 27 children, having already died of malnutrition and dehydration... constitute a change in the situation."
Underscoring the severity of the crisis, a 5-year-old boy,
identified by Al Jazeera as Mohammed Naeem al-Najar, died of malnutrition Thursday at Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza.
This, as Israel is blocking UNRWA aid convoys from entering the northern part of the besieged strip.
The U.N. Human Rights Council on Monday published a draft report that found "reasonable grounds to believe" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a move that came on the same day as the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire in the ongoing war, a move enabled by a U.S. abstention.
More than 30 nations, as well as the the Arab League, African Union, and other international organizations, have joined South Africa's ICJ suit. On Wednesday, Ireland said it would intervene in the case after observing "blatant violation of international humanitarian law on a mass scale" by Israeli forces in Gaza.
Palestinian and international officials say that since the Hamas-led October 7 attacks on Israel, Israeli bombs and bullets have killed at least 32,552 Palestinians—most of them women and children—while wounding nearly 75,000 others. At least 7,000 more Palestinians are missing and feared dead and buried beneath the rubble of hundreds of thousands of bombed-out buildings. Approximately 90% of Gaza's 2.3 million people have been forcibly displaced.
Keep ReadingShow Less
House Dems Tell Biden to 'Enforce US Law' as Israel Obstructs Gaza Aid
"Israel’s restriction of this aid and Prime Minister Netanyahu's refusal to address U.S. concerns on this issue is absolutely unacceptable," wrote six House Democrats.
Mar 28, 2024
While United Nations experts and human rights groups around the world continue to call on U.S. President Biden to end his support for Israel as it bombards Gaza and blocks aid, six House Democrats told the president that his policy in the region is a straightforward violation of U.S. law, and must change immediately.
Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) led lawmakers including Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), and Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) in calling on Biden to "enforce U.S. law" with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu government.
With Israel continuing to block aid to Gaza—even as the International Food Security Phase Classification initiative (IPC) warns that parts of northern Gaza are already facing famine—the lawmakers said Netanyahu is "repeatedly interfering in U.S. humanitarian operations in direct violation of the Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act—Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961."
The Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act states that the U.S. cannot provide military aid to any country that is prohibiting or restricting the delivery of U.S. assistance into an area.
Despite State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller's claim this week that Israel is complying with international humanitarian law "when it comes to the conduct of the war or the provision of humanitarian assistance," the International Court of Justice on Thursday ordered Israel to ensure the delivery of urgently needed aid and warned that "famine is setting in" due to Israel's actions.
"The need to deliver humanitarian aid by any means possible has never been more pressing," wrote the lawmakers on Thursday. "This fact was emphasized by your administration's decision to begin airdropping supplies into Gaza in recent weeks, and your announcement of U.S. participation in constructing a temporary port in Gaza to expand the flow of aid."
"Israel's restriction of this aid and Prime Minister Netanyahu's refusal to address U.S. concerns on this issue is absolutely unacceptable," they said.
The letter follows similar calls from U.S. senators and more than two dozen human rights groups who earlier pointed out that Biden need look no further than the Foreign Assistance Act to know that the U.S. can no longer provide Israel with military support.
"This law is very straightforward," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told NPR earlier this month. "It's clearly triggered by the facts on the ground in Gaza, where we now have kids who have literally died of starvation, and hundreds of thousands of people on the verge of starvation, with 4 out of the 5 hungriest people in the world today in Gaza."
McCollum and her colleagues wrote that Biden must also "reassess how our assistance is provided to Israel" if it moves forward with plans to launch a ground offensive in Rafah, "a move that would put the 1.5 million Palestinians displaced from other parts of Gaza in imminent danger and exacerbate the rate of disease, starvation, and death in the conflict."
"We echo our colleagues in the U.S. Senate in imploring you to enforce U.S. law with the Netanyahu government," wrote McCollum and her colleagues. "Mr. President, the situation in Gaza is dire. Immediate action from the United States is necessary to stop further loss of civilian life, and we urge you to use every tool at your disposal to end the suffering in this crisis and to keep this conflict from expanding."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Progressives Praise New US Guidelines for Government AI Use
"Today, the OMB's guidance takes us one step further down the path of facing a technology-rich future that begins to address its harms," said Maya Wiley.
Mar 28, 2024
U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris announced on Thursday a Office of Management and Budget guidance regarding how the federal government will utilize new artificial intelligence tools going forward, and it received praise from some progressives.
The guidance focuses on how federal agencies can benefit from utilizing AI tools but also the risks involved in putting them to use.
"The order directed sweeping action to strengthen AI safety and security, protect Americans' privacy, advance equity and civil rights, stand up for consumers and workers, promote innovation and competition, advance American leadership around the world, and more," says a White House fact sheet.
At the first-ever Global AI Summit last year, I laid out our vision for a future where AI advances the public interest.
To help build that future, I am announcing our first government-wide policy to promote the safe, secure, and responsible use of AI. https://t.co/6NPXLWn8Oc
— Vice President Kamala Harris (@VP) March 28, 2024
The guidance says all federal agencies will now have a senior leader in charge of the use of AI tools, agencies will have to publicly report how they're using AI, agencies will be required to create "concrete safeguards" to protect the rights of citizens, and more.
Damon T. Hewitt, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, called it "a significant step to implement meaningful safeguards on the government's use of artificial intelligence."
Maya Wiley, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said it's necessary to make sure technology "serves us," rather than "harms us," and it should "advance our democracy rather than disrupt it."
"Today, the OMB's guidance takes us one step further down the path of facing a technology-rich future that begins to address its harms," Wiley said. "The guidance puts rights-protecting principles of the White House's historic AI Bill of Rights into practice across agencies, and it is an important step in advancing civil rights protections in AI deployment at federal agencies. It extends existing civil rights protections, helping to bring them into the era of AI."
The Biden administration released an AI Bill of Rights blueprint in 2022, which is an outline for how new AI tools should be utilized and developed to protect consumers. It also secured a voluntary AI safeguard agreement with seven major AI developers in July of last year.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular