

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
At least 15 of the 73 watchdog jobs across the federal
government are vacant or filled by temporary officials, and more
openings could be added under the Senate's financial regulatory reform
legislation, according to an analysis by the Center for Public
Integrity.
The Center's story, "Where are the Watchdogs?" found openings include
inspectors general positions at the State Department, Central
Intelligence Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Labor Department,
and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Also unfilled are the top jobs
at the Office of Special Counsel, which protects federal whistleblowers,
and at the Government Accountability Office, Congress' main
investigative arm.
Over the years, government watchdogs have produced some memorable
investigations, uncovering $434 hammers and $600 toilet seats at the
Pentagon, revealing that federal housing vouchers were still being paid
to dead Americans, and disclosing the FBI's illegal gathering of phone
records. On a daily basis, their offices investigate more mundane
contracting fraud and employee misconduct and conduct annual audits of
agencies' accounting books. The inspectors general jobs have come to
symbolize the government's commitment to accountability and
transparency.
"Inspectors general play an important role in protecting taxpayer
dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse. I am troubled by even a single
prolonged vacancy," said Rep. Ed Towns, D-N.Y., the chairman of the
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that is one of Congress'
main oversight bodies. "I encourage the Obama administration to act
expeditiously in filling these vacancies, and to nominate a new Special
Counsel without delay."
Many of the watchdog job vacancies have languished for a year or more,
despite calls by President Barack Obama and other politicians for more
accountability in government. The Senate's legislation to overhaul
financial regulation would convert five independently hired inspector
generals at financial oversight agencies to political appointees,
requiring them to be confirmed by a Senate that has been slow to act on
countless nominations. The current holders of those jobs are fighting
the change, suggesting it would jeopardize the political independence
they have enjoyed in aggressively pursuing wrongdoing inside their
agencies.
During his first year in office, the president succeeded in getting
inspectors generals confirmed at NASA, the Education Department, the
Small Business Administration, and the Pentagon. However, his nominee
for inspector general at the EPA has been pending six months and has yet
to be confirmed by the Senate.
The watchdogs' own conduct has also come under scrutiny in recent years.
For example, then-State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard
resigned in December 2007 after a congressional committee questioned his
independence and his oversight of spending in Iraq. A successor has yet
to be nominated. And former U.S. Special Counsel Scott Bloch, whose
office investigates whistleblower's allegations and protects them from
reprisal, was removed in October 2008 amidst investigations into his own
conduct. He pleaded guilty in April in federal court to one count of
criminal contempt for withholding information from Congress. That job
also remains vacant.
Here's a summary of the 15 watchdog openings, and positions newly
filled:
PRESIDENTIALLY APPOINTED AND VACANT
1.) State Department - Vacant since early 2008. No nominee.
2.) CIA - Vacant since March 2009. No nominee.
3.) Labor Department - Vacant since mid-2008. No nominee.
4.) Export-Import Bank - Vacant since October 2009. No nominee.
5.) Office of Special Counsel - Vacant since October 2008. No nominee.
6.) Comptroller General of the United States - Vacant since March 2008.
No nominee. White House awaiting candidates from congressional
leadership.
7.) Interior Department - Has had acting inspector general since
February 2009. No nominee.
PRESIDENTIALLY APPOINTED, AWAITING
CONFIRMATION
8.) EPA - Arthur Elkins nominated Nov. 18, 2009, pending before full
Senate.
9.) Corporation for National and Community Service - Jon
Hatfield nominated Feb. 22, 2010, may be reported out of Senate labor
committee this week.
10.) Federal Housing Finance Agency - Steve Linick nominated April 12,
2010, pending before Senate Banking Committee.
INDEPENDENTLY HIRED AND VACANT
11.) National Endowment for the Arts
12.) Federal Communications Commission
13.) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
14.) Federal Labor Relations Authority
15.) House of Representatives Inspector General
RECENTLY FILLED BY PRESIDENT OBAMA:
Pentagon - Gordon Heddell confirmed on July 10, 2009
Small Business Administration - Peggy Gustafson confirmed Sept. 24, 2009
NASA - Paul Martin confirmed on Nov. 20, 2009
Education Department - Kathleen Tighe confirmed on March 10, 2010
The Center for Public Integrity is a nonprofit organization dedicated to producing original, responsible investigative journalism on issues of public concern. The Center is non-partisan and non-advocacy. We are committed to transparent and comprehensive reporting both in the United States and around the world.
"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," said one critic.
Conservative commentator Dave Rubin, who for months has been a top booster of President Donald Trump's illegal war with Iran, was inundated with mockery on Sunday after a viral video exposed months' worth of his failed predictions about the conflict.
The video, which was posted on social media Saturday, begins with Rubin telling viewers to not listen to any of the prognostications being made by critics of the war, which Trump launched in late February without any authorization from Congress.
"I'm pretty good with predictions," Rubin says. "And my prediction here is that everything the media is now going to say about Iran—it's going to close the Strait of Hormuz, and energy prices are going to go crazy—none of this is going to come to pass."
Iran war: greatest hits from the last 12 weeks pic.twitter.com/9pgXyvmsgF
— Dave Rubin Clips II (Parody) - Retired Jan.20/2025 (@DaveClips) May 24, 2026
The video then cuts to Rubin wrongly predicting that gas prices during the conflict "will continue to come down," before switching to claims that Iran lacks the military capability to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed in the face of US military power.
"If the United States wants to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, which it does," says Rubin, "and Donald Trump says we'll escort ships through if we have to, it's going to stay open."
From there, the video shows Rubin hyping of the prospect of Iranian dissident Reza Pahlavi swooping in to take over the country after the war, and then getting fooled by a fake artificial intelligence-generated video of Iranians giving thanks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for bombing their country.
The video compilation of Rubin's failed predictions drew immediate ridicule from critics.
"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," joked Krystal Ball.
Commentator Adam Mockler wrote of Rubin that "it’s brutal watching him make failed predictions week after week."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald argued that the video should be the last nail in the coffin of whatever credibility Rubin had left.
"Imagine having sat through and listened to all of this Israeli propaganda, which turned out to be (predictably and completely) false," commented Greenwald, "and then thinking there was some value in continuing to listen to this person."
The Bulwark's Tim Miller said that while he knew Rubin was "a smooth-brained hack," he still "couldn’t even fathom how bad these war takes would be."
Political analyst Omar Baddar, meanwhile, said the video should erase any doubt that Rubin is "the dumbest man on the internet."
The Trump administration last week sued Minnesota after it passed a law banning prediction markets from operating in the state.
A Sunday report in The New York Times revealed how the Trump administration is using a key government agency to shut down any efforts to regulate online betting markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
According to the Times, the administration has stacked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with industry insiders who have systematically "mowed down" staffers at the agency who have expressed interest in providing oversight on prediction markets.
Among other things, the report documented how multiple officials at CTFC have been put on leave simply for asking questions about the betting markets' ties to members of President Donald Trump's family or for having past experience enforcing regulations related to cryptocurrencies.
What's more, the Times found that even being an industry insider isn't enough to guarantee good standing in the agency. Brian Quintenz, who was tapped by Trump to lead CTFC last year, saw his nomination withdrawn after he drew the ire of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss for refusing to support their cryptocurrency exchange's complaint against the agency.
Revelations about industry insiders rolling over regulators at CTFC come as the Trump administration is fighting any attempts by states to regulate prediction markets.
As explained in a Thursday report from CNBC, the Trump administration is "fighting a multi-front battle to stop the state actions and assert its regulatory authority," with CTFC arguing that it is "the only entity that can regulate" betting platforms.
16 different states are engaged in legal proceedings against the platforms, and Minnesota last week passed a law to ban them outright, which immediately drew a lawsuit from the administration.
The new Minnesota law, which is scheduled to take effect in August, bans prediction markets "from hosting, creating or advertising in the state," according to ABC News.
In an interview with ABC, Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman (D-63B) said she authored the legislation because she has grown increasingly concerned about young people in the state seeing their finances drained from placing online bets.
"We're seeing studies come out that say [the companies] are targeting 18- to 21-year-olds," said Greenman, "and we are seeing gambling starting younger and younger."
CFTC Chair Michael Selig last month warned states against trying to regulate prediction markets, which he said would "circumvent the clear directive of Congress."
"Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others," said Selig. "If you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you."
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz," said one critic of the war.
President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that he is mulling a deal that would end his illegal war with Iran, and some hawks within the Republican Party are expressing alarm.
According to a Sunday report in The New York Times, many details of the agreement to end the war remain murky, with the fate of Iran's enriched uranium up in the air. US and Iranian officials have also given contradictory messages about the proposed deal's contents, suggesting there is much work still to be done before any agreement is finalized.
Regardless, three hawkish GOP senators on Saturday raised major concerns about the contents of the deal, warning against accepting any agreement that will leave Iran in a stronger position than before Trump illegally launched a war against it without any authorization from Congress in late February.
"If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq," wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who lobbied Trump to attack Iran repeatedly before the start of the war. "A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the [Strait of Hormuz] in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another longtime Iran hawk, said he was "deeply concerned" about what he's been hearing about the deal and expressed particular worry about Iran getting relief from US sanctions while still maintaining the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
"If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America'—now receiving billions of dollars," Cruz wrote, "being able to enrich uranium and develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake."
Sen. Roger Wicker (D-Miss.) was even blunter in his condemnation of the reported agreement.
"The rumored 60-day ceasefire—with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith—would be a disaster," Wicker wrote. "Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!"
Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama, challenged Wicker's claims that Trump's illegal war had achieved anything of value.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury," Rhodes wrote, "except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz."
Rhodes' criticism was echoed by Stephen Wertheim, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who wrote that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury is already for naught."
Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, accused the Iran hawks of being delusional for thinking further bombing would force Iran to capitulate.
"DC's Iran hawks got two wars, nearly every conceivable sanction designation, a blockade, threw a wrench in global economy," Vaez wrote, "and will still claim that just a little more pressure and a touch more bombing will magically yield the concessions they still won't be satisfied with."