For Immediate Release


Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Air Power: "Deadly Inaccurate"

WASHINGTON - Independent journalists David Enders and Rick Rowley interviewed Iraqi
witnesses the day after the July 2007 attack shown in military video
released this week by Wikileaks.
The leaked video shows Iraqis, including people working for Reuters,
attacked -- and then shows people in a van attempting to rescue the
wounded being fired upon.

Rear Admiral Hal Pittman, director of communications at Central
Command, said in a statement to Reuters on Thursday: "Central Command
has no current plans to reinvestigate or review this combat action."

CENTCOM this week made public a redacted series of records on the case;
according to the First Air Cavalry Brigade, the military concluded
shortly after the attack that the aircrew "accurately assessed that the
criteria to find and terminate the threat to friendly forces were met
in accordance with the law of armed conflict and rules of engagement."

Enders, who spent over 18 months covering the war in Iraq, is author of the book Baghdad Bulletin. Rowley, who has covered the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for Big Noise Films, was interviewed Thursday on "Democracy Now." The segment features video of him and Enders interviewing civilians the day after the attack.


The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.

Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.

Enders said today: "The [leaked] video clearly supports Iraqi
eyewitness accounts of what happened and contradicts the military
account. This is common -- the military press releases and statements
rarely gel with Iraqi eyewitness accounts. In the case of any
helicopter strike, footage exists, and the military could resolve
disputes by simply releasing it. Instead, the military relies on
'investigations' that rarely, if ever, go beyond asking questions of
the unit involved. Iraqis are never independently interviewed."

Rowley said today: "Essentially the U.S. military tried to blame
the reporters for causing this. There is no reason to conclude that any
of the people in that picture are insurgents. You can see two men with
weapons, but this is 2007 in Baghdad. This is the height of the civil
war, when dozens of bodies a day were being picked up from the street.
Every neighborhood in Baghdad organized its own protection force."

Rowley has also reported from Afghanistan. He added: "Everyone in
the U.S. military -- from General McChrystal on down -- publicly
recognizes the problem of civilian casualties from air strikes. But
fundamentally, you need air power -- either planes or helicopters or
drones run out of Nevada -- to control a country of many millions when
you only have one or two hundred thousand troops. And the nature of air
power is that it's deadly inaccurate.'"


We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

Please select a donation method:

A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.

Share This Article

More in: