For Immediate Release
Matthew Allee, (202) 580-6922 or firstname.lastname@example.org
9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Overbroad State Secrets Claim by Federal Government
WASHINGTON - The Constitution Project welcomes today's decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejecting the Executive Branch's claim that the "very subject matter" of a case alleging torture is a state secret. The Court reversed the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit, and held that the case, Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, can proceed. The court held that the state secrets privilege is an evidentiary doctrine, and the question for courts "is only which evidence is secret and may not be disclosed in the course of a public trial."
"The Ninth Circuit's decision recognizes that the state secrets privilege is not an immunity doctrine that can enable the Executive Branch to shield its conduct from any judicial review," said Constitution Project Senior Counsel Sharon Bradford Franklin. "We are thrilled that the decision preserves the role of the courts as an independent check on the Executive Branch's conduct."
The suit alleges that defense contractor Jeppesen knowingly flew five people to a foreign country where they were tortured as part of the CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program. The trial court must now evaluate which evidence in the case is actually subject to the state secrets privilege and whether there is sufficient non-privileged evidence available to fully litigate the case.
Before the February oral argument in the case, the Constitution Project called on Attorney General Holder to reverse the litigation position previously taken by the Bush administration in this case, and to consent to have the trial judge review the evidence at issue.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Our Summer Campaign Is Underway
Support Common Dreams Today
Independent News and Views Putting People Over Profit
"Although the Justice Department failed to change its position in this case and recognize the role of the courts in reviewing state secrets claims, we are pleased that the court has now required such a review. We call on the Justice Department to follow the Ninth Circuit's ruling, and permit the case to proceed," added Ms. Franklin.
In 2007, the Constitution Project released a report signed by a bipartisan coalition that endorsed reforming the state secrets privilege. To view the report, go to:
To view the letter sent to Attorney General Holder, please visit:
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
The Constitution Project is a politically independent think tank established in 1997 to promote and defend constitutional safeguards. More information about the Constitution Project is available at http://constitutionproject.org/.