For Immediate Release
Daniel Schuman
202-580-6922
dschuman@constitutionproject.org
Administration Decision on 'Enemy Combatant' Definition Expected Today
Key Question of Whether Obama Administration Will Retain Bush Administration's Broad Definition of "Enemy Combatant" in Its Court Filing Responding to Lawsuits Brought by Guantanamo Detainees
WASHINGTON - Today, the Obama administration is expected to file its
response to a federal judge's order to define whom it may hold as an "enemy
combatant." U.S. District Judge John Bates is overseeing habeas lawsuits filed by Guantanamo
detainees challenging their detention.
Judge Bates said he will not allow the trials to proceed
without a definition of "enemy combatant" and asked the Obama administration to
clarify by March 13 whether it will "refine" the Bush administration's definition
of the term. In his order, Judge Bates explained that courts "must have a
clear, uniform understanding of the key legal standard to be applied" before
the trial on the merits of the case can begin.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
For background information on the
lawsuits, and a reaction once the Obama administration files its response, the
Constitution Project is pleased to make available Stephen Abraham, who is
available from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. EST at 949-878-8608.
A member of the Constitution
Project's Liberty
and Security Committee, Mr. Abraham retired from the U.S. Army with the rank of
Lieutenant Colonel after 26 years of active and reserve service. He was the
first officer to criticize publicly the operation of the Combatant Status
Review Tribunals, filing an affidavit before the U.S. Supreme Court in the Guantanamo detainee habeas case Boumediene v. Bush. He currently practices law in California.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
The Constitution Project is a politically independent think tank established in 1997 to promote and defend constitutional safeguards. More information about the Constitution Project is available at http://constitutionproject.org/.
