January, 30 2009, 11:46am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Rachel Myers, ACLU, (212) 549-2689 or 2666; media@aclu.org
Sharon Singh, Amnesty International USA, (202) 544-0200 x289; ssingh@aiusa.org
Krista Minteer, Human Rights First, (212) 845-5207; minteerk@humanrightsfirst.org
Jennifer Daskal, Human Rights Watch, (202) 612-4349; daskalj@hrw.org
Leading Human Rights Groups Request Full Access To Guantanamo Prison
Four
leading human rights and civil liberties organizations asked President
Obama to grant them full access to the Guantanamo Bay detention center
so that they can review the conditions of confinement and make
recommendations for revising U.S. detention policies. The American
Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International USA, Human Rights First
and Human Rights Watch have had permission to observe the military
commissions at Guantanamo since August 2004, but have thus far only
been offered a guided tour of the detention camp without access to
detainees.
NEW YORK
Four
leading human rights and civil liberties organizations asked President
Obama to grant them full access to the Guantanamo Bay detention center
so that they can review the conditions of confinement and make
recommendations for revising U.S. detention policies. The American
Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International USA, Human Rights First
and Human Rights Watch have had permission to observe the military
commissions at Guantanamo since August 2004, but have thus far only
been offered a guided tour of the detention camp without access to
detainees.
On January 22, President Obama
issued an executive order requiring a review of detention conditions at
Guantanamo to ensure compliance with the Geneva Conventions and all
other applicable laws. According to today's letter, also allowing the
groups full access to the prison "will be welcomed as another break
from the prior administration's policies on detainees, and set an
example that will help advance human rights worldwide."
The full text of the letter is as follows and available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/38600res20090130.html
January 30, 2009
Dear President Obama,
As heads of four prominent civil
liberties and human rights organizations, we greatly appreciate your
decisive action in restoring U.S. commitment to the rule of law and
respect for human rights by issuing executive orders to close
Guantanamo, suspend the military commissions, prohibit CIA prisons, and
enforce the ban on torture. We eagerly await your continued actions to
renew American justice.
Today, we write to request full
access to the Guantanamo Bay detention camps so that we may
independently review and report on the conditions of confinement there
and make concrete recommendations for change. In August 2004, our four
organizations were granted observer status to observe the military
commissions, but for years the Bush administration has denied our
organizations' repeated requests for full access to the detention
camps. We have only been offered the VIP tour to observe a model
Guantanamo detention camp, which was far from adequate access.
Section 6 of your January 22, 2009
executive order, "Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Closure of Detention Facilities,"
addresses the issue of conditions of confinement and orders Secretary
of Defense Gates to "immediately undertake a review of the conditions
of detention at Guantanamo to ensure full compliance with [Common
Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions]."
Our presence can assist this effort.
We will provide an outside assessment of current conditions and, as
improvements are made, credibly, independently, and publicly report
them to the world. Such access and reporting would further the
objectives of the current Department of Defense (DoD) review and
amplify the international benefits of improving conditions at the
camps. Our presence itself will be welcomed as another break from the
prior administration's policies on detainees, and set an example of
transparency that will help advance human rights worldwide.
We ask you to reconsider our
organizations' request for full access to the Guantanamo Bay detention
camps and honor it in light of the current DoD review. According to
your executive order, the DoD review "shall be completed within 30 days
and any necessary corrections shall be implemented immediately
thereafter." We ask that, if granted full access, our independent
review should take place within the next few weeks, to allow time for
us to finalize our report and recommendations before the completion of
the DoD's review.
The Bush administration's past
policy of secrecy regarding detention conditions at Guantanamo makes it
critically important for your administration to open Guantanamo to
independent review as part of a new government policy of transparency.
Full and independent review of conditions of confinement by human
rights organizations is urgently needed because of the secrecy
regarding detention conditions at Guantanamo Bay as a whole. The ACLU
and other organizations continue to struggle for production of
materials requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
regarding Guantanamo Bay. The Bush administration denied full access
to several UN independent human rights experts who insisted on
confidential interviews with the detainees as dictated by UN protocol
for such visits.
While the International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC) has had access to Guantanamo detainees, its access
has been restricted in the past and the extent of its current access is
unclear to us. A leaked version of the Camp Delta Standard Operation
Procedures (SOP) from March 2003 revealed that the ICRC was denied
access to various groups of detainees at the camp, and a leaked version
of the SOP manual from 2004 revealed continued restrictions on ICRC
access.
Regardless of the ICRC's present
level of access, its role is distinct from that of our organizations.
While the ICRC plays an important role in visiting prisoners under the
Geneva Conventions, the ICRC maintains full confidentiality in order to
preserve the exclusively humanitarian nature of its work. The role of
our human rights organizations in reviewing and reporting on conditions
at Guantanamo would be distinct and equally important.
Granting human rights organizations
full and unfettered access to a detention facility where torture and
abuse have occurred will send a powerful message to the world regarding
your administration's commitment to transparency and openness,
consistent with your January 21, 2009 FOIA directive, which noted, "A
democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires
transparency." Opening Guantanamo to full review by human rights
organizations would help to restore American legitimacy and standing in
the world, and place pressure on other governments to open their
detention centers for independent inspections.
Furthermore, independent review of
conditions of confinement by human rights organizations will assist
your administration in revising its policies and improving detention
conditions in the camps. If granted full access, our independent human
rights delegation would include experts on detention conditions and
medical professionals, and would offer your administration concrete
recommendations on how to improve conditions of confinement in order to
comply with relevant national and international standards and
guidelines on persons in detention.
We hope that you will act quickly on this matter in the interest of transparency and the protection of human rights.
Sincerely,
Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union
Larry Cox, Executive Director, Amnesty International USA
Elisa Massimino, Executive Director, Human Rights First
Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch
cc:
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
White House Counsel Gregory B. Craig
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular