January, 30 2009, 11:46am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Rachel Myers, ACLU, (212) 549-2689 or 2666; media@aclu.org
Sharon Singh, Amnesty International USA, (202) 544-0200 x289; ssingh@aiusa.org
Krista Minteer, Human Rights First, (212) 845-5207; minteerk@humanrightsfirst.orgÂ
Jennifer Daskal, Human Rights Watch, (202) 612-4349; daskalj@hrw.org Â
Leading Human Rights Groups Request Full Access To Guantanamo Prison
Four
leading human rights and civil liberties organizations asked President
Obama to grant them full access to the Guantanamo Bay detention center
so that they can review the conditions of confinement and make
recommendations for revising U.S. detention policies. The American
Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International USA, Human Rights First
and Human Rights Watch have had permission to observe the military
commissions at Guantanamo since August 2004, but have thus far only
been offered a guided tour of the detention camp without access to
detainees.
NEW YORK
Four
leading human rights and civil liberties organizations asked President
Obama to grant them full access to the Guantanamo Bay detention center
so that they can review the conditions of confinement and make
recommendations for revising U.S. detention policies. The American
Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International USA, Human Rights First
and Human Rights Watch have had permission to observe the military
commissions at Guantanamo since August 2004, but have thus far only
been offered a guided tour of the detention camp without access to
detainees.
On January 22, President Obama
issued an executive order requiring a review of detention conditions at
Guantanamo to ensure compliance with the Geneva Conventions and all
other applicable laws. According to today's letter, also allowing the
groups full access to the prison "will be welcomed as another break
from the prior administration's policies on detainees, and set an
example that will help advance human rights worldwide."
The full text of the letter is as follows and available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/38600res20090130.html
January 30, 2009
Dear President Obama,
As heads of four prominent civil
liberties and human rights organizations, we greatly appreciate your
decisive action in restoring U.S. commitment to the rule of law and
respect for human rights by issuing executive orders to close
Guantanamo, suspend the military commissions, prohibit CIA prisons, and
enforce the ban on torture. We eagerly await your continued actions to
renew American justice.
Today, we write to request full
access to the Guantanamo Bay detention camps so that we may
independently review and report on the conditions of confinement there
and make concrete recommendations for change. In August 2004, our four
organizations were granted observer status to observe the military
commissions, but for years the Bush administration has denied our
organizations' repeated requests for full access to the detention
camps. We have only been offered the VIP tour to observe a model
Guantanamo detention camp, which was far from adequate access.
Section 6 of your January 22, 2009
executive order, "Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Closure of Detention Facilities,"
addresses the issue of conditions of confinement and orders Secretary
of Defense Gates to "immediately undertake a review of the conditions
of detention at Guantanamo to ensure full compliance with [Common
Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions]."
Our presence can assist this effort.
We will provide an outside assessment of current conditions and, as
improvements are made, credibly, independently, and publicly report
them to the world. Such access and reporting would further the
objectives of the current Department of Defense (DoD) review and
amplify the international benefits of improving conditions at the
camps. Our presence itself will be welcomed as another break from the
prior administration's policies on detainees, and set an example of
transparency that will help advance human rights worldwide.
We ask you to reconsider our
organizations' request for full access to the Guantanamo Bay detention
camps and honor it in light of the current DoD review. According to
your executive order, the DoD review "shall be completed within 30 days
and any necessary corrections shall be implemented immediately
thereafter." We ask that, if granted full access, our independent
review should take place within the next few weeks, to allow time for
us to finalize our report and recommendations before the completion of
the DoD's review.
The Bush administration's past
policy of secrecy regarding detention conditions at Guantanamo makes it
critically important for your administration to open Guantanamo to
independent review as part of a new government policy of transparency.
Full and independent review of conditions of confinement by human
rights organizations is urgently needed because of the secrecy
regarding detention conditions at Guantanamo Bay as a whole. The ACLU
and other organizations continue to struggle for production of
materials requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
regarding Guantanamo Bay. The Bush administration denied full access
to several UN independent human rights experts who insisted on
confidential interviews with the detainees as dictated by UN protocol
for such visits.
While the International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC) has had access to Guantanamo detainees, its access
has been restricted in the past and the extent of its current access is
unclear to us. A leaked version of the Camp Delta Standard Operation
Procedures (SOP) from March 2003 revealed that the ICRC was denied
access to various groups of detainees at the camp, and a leaked version
of the SOP manual from 2004 revealed continued restrictions on ICRC
access.
Regardless of the ICRC's present
level of access, its role is distinct from that of our organizations.
While the ICRC plays an important role in visiting prisoners under the
Geneva Conventions, the ICRC maintains full confidentiality in order to
preserve the exclusively humanitarian nature of its work. The role of
our human rights organizations in reviewing and reporting on conditions
at Guantanamo would be distinct and equally important.
Granting human rights organizations
full and unfettered access to a detention facility where torture and
abuse have occurred will send a powerful message to the world regarding
your administration's commitment to transparency and openness,
consistent with your January 21, 2009 FOIA directive, which noted, "A
democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires
transparency." Opening Guantanamo to full review by human rights
organizations would help to restore American legitimacy and standing in
the world, and place pressure on other governments to open their
detention centers for independent inspections.
Furthermore, independent review of
conditions of confinement by human rights organizations will assist
your administration in revising its policies and improving detention
conditions in the camps. If granted full access, our independent human
rights delegation would include experts on detention conditions and
medical professionals, and would offer your administration concrete
recommendations on how to improve conditions of confinement in order to
comply with relevant national and international standards and
guidelines on persons in detention.
We hope that you will act quickly on this matter in the interest of transparency and the protection of human rights.
Sincerely,
Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union
Larry Cox, Executive Director, Amnesty International USA
Elisa Massimino, Executive Director, Human Rights First
Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch
cc:
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
White House Counsel Gregory B. Craig
LATEST NEWS
GOP State AGs Ask EPA to 'Eviscerate' Crucial Environmental Justice Tool
"Many of the states that have signed the petition have historically allowed these harmful facilities to be placed in predominantly Black and brown communities," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
Led by Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, Republican leaders in 23 states on Tuesday filed a petition making clear their aim to allow petrochemical companies and other corporations to continue operating pollution-causing facilities without regard for the "disparate impact" they can have on low-income communities of color.
The attorneys general of states including Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas wrote to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan, asking him to amend Title VI under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The law prohibits recipients of federal funds from discriminating against residents based on race and national origin and allows residents to petition the EPA arguing that state agencies have intentionally discriminated or disparately impacted a particular community.
Title VI has underpinned hundreds of legal cases, including recent EPA investigations into the 85-mile stretch of land in Louisiana known as Cancer Alley, where dozens of petrochemical plants have been built and health experts have observed a disproportionate number of cancer cases and other medical problems among the predominantly Black population.
The attorneys general said they object to the Biden administration's use of Title VI to "advance what it calls 'environmental justice,'" and complained that the EPA aims to create "a condition in which no racially or economically defined group experiences adverse environmental impacts."
Andre Segura, vice president of litigation at the environmental legal group Earthjustice, said Wednesday that the Republican attorneys general aim to "eviscerate civil rights protections just to make it easier for industrial polluters to continue with business as usual."
"Everyone should be alarmed by these outrageous efforts," said Segura. "The fact is, many of the states that have signed the petition have historically allowed these harmful facilities to be placed in predominantly Black and brown communities, without regard for the health and safety of residents."
Manuel Fernandez, president of Miami-Dade County Democrats in Florida, said the effort was "embarrassing" and called on Moody to resign.
The petition was filed three months after U.S. District Court Judge James Cain Jr., an appointee of former President Donald Trump in Louisiana, ruled that Title VI requirements amount to "government overreach."
The EPA halted its Title VI investigation into the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) last year a month after Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a Republican, sued the agency over its Title VI regulations. The EPA had been probing whether the LDEQ placed the historically Black town of St. John the Baptist Parish at risk by allowing companies to build petrochemical plants nearby.
There are more than 50 pending cases regarding Title VI violations, Earthjustice said.
"These decades-old Title VI regulations are critical tools for the federal government to use to ensure that funding is not used to perpetuate this toxic legacy," said Segura, "and the EPA should swiftly reject this petition."
Keep ReadingShow Less
GOP Governors Show 'How Scared They Are' of Workers Organizing With UAW
Congressman Greg Casar said the Republicans behind a new joint statement "sound more like corporate lobbyists than governors."
Apr 17, 2024
As Volkswagen workers in Tennessee began voting on whether to join the United Auto Workers, progressive critics on Wednesday continued to call out six Southern GOP governors for jointly saying they "are highly concerned about the unionization campaign driven by misinformation and scare tactics that the UAW has brought into our states."
Govs. Kay Ivey of Alabama, Brian Kemp of Georgia, Tate Reeves of Mississippi, Henry McMaster of South Carolina, Bill Lee of Tennessee, and Greg Abbott of Texas issued their statement in response to "the largest organizing drive in modern American history," which the UAW launched after major contract wins following a strike targeting the Big Three automakers—General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis—last year.
"As governors, we have a responsibility to our constituents to speak up when we see special interests looking to come into our state and threaten our jobs and the values we live by," the Republican leaders said, claiming that "unionization would certainly put our states' jobs in jeopardy" and the UAW is "making big promises to our constituents that they can't deliver on."
"We have serious reservations that the UAW leadership can represent our values. They proudly call themselves democratic socialists and seem more focused on helping President [Joe] Biden get reelected than on the autoworker jobs being cut at plants they already represent," the governors added, nodding to the union's January endorsement of the Democrat—UAW president Shawn Fain also called the presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, a "scab."
What actually threatens American workers?\n\u274c Anti-union, anti-worker propaganda like this\n\ud83d\udcb0 Corps that put profits over people\n\u26d1\ufe0f Safety standards not being met\n\n@GovAbbott & @GovernorKayIvey sound more like corporate lobbyists than governors here. @UAW backs American workers!— (@)
The Economic Policy Institutesaid Wednesday that the governors' anti-union statement "clearly shows how scared they are that workers organizing with UAW to improve jobs and wages will upend the highly unequal, failed anti-worker economic development model of Southern states."
Responding to the statement on social media, the Congressional Labor Caucus declared that "we speak up when we see threats to workers' rights. Workers must be allowed to choose whether to form a union on their own—free from influence from their employers or politicians. Shame on these governors for putting out this anti-union propaganda."
After Ivey shared the statement on social media, Nina Turner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy, asked, "Better wages and working conditions are against the values of your state?"
MSNBC's Chris Hayes was even snarkier, jokingly calling the statement "yet more evidence of the populist, pro-worker turn of the Trump-era GOP."
The UAW vote in Chattanooga, Tennessee is set to wrap up on Friday. Then, attention is expected to shift to Vance, Alabama. Workers at a nonunion Mercedes-Benz plant there submitted a petition to the National Labor Relations Board earlier this month requesting an election to join the union.
Noting Ivey's social media post about the statement, Diana Hussein, who does communications work for the UAW, said: "She's mad cuz she wants to keep the Alabama discount that leaves workers behind. No more! #StandUpUAW."
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, also took aim at Ivey, saying, "You used Alabama taxpayers' money to have state troopers escort out-of-state scabs to break the strike of YOUR constituents."
Nelson explained that she was referring to the "hardworking" United Mine Workers of America members employed by Warrior Met, "who were fighting for the right to see their families more than a few days a year."
More Perfect Union told Ivey that "unions only threaten your values if you value denying workers a living wage and good benefits."
In contrast with the Republican governors, around two-thirds of the Senate Democratic Caucus in January wrote to 13 nonunion automakers—including Mercedes and Volkswagen—urging them not to illegally block UAW organizing at their plants.
"We are concerned by reporting at numerous automakers that management has acted illegally to block unionization efforts," the senators stressed, citing multiple examples. "These retaliatory actions are hostile to workers' rights and must not be repeated if further organizing efforts are made by these companies' workers. We therefore urge you all to commit to implementation of a neutrality agreement at your manufacturing plants."
Welcoming their letter, Fain said that "every autoworker in this country deserves their fair share of the auto industry's record profits, whether at the Big Three or the Nonunion 13. We applaud these U.S. senators for standing with workers who are standing up for economic justice on the job."
"It's time for the auto companies to stop breaking the law and take their boot off the neck of the American autoworker," the union leader added, "whether they're at Volkswagen, Toyota, Tesla, or any other corporation doing business in this country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'My Child Is Human': Palestinian American Mother Disrupts Austin Testimony
"Secretary Austin, why are you denying Israel's genocide in Gaza?" advocates asked the defense secretary at a hearing.
Apr 17, 2024
A week after Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told lawmakers that the U.S. has no "evidence of genocide being created" in Gaza, peace activists disrupted the Pentagon chief's testimony on the Biden administration's 2025 budget request and demanded he acknowledge the humanity of Palestinian children.
"My child is human!" said Nasbeebah Hajjaj, a Palestinian-American woman who held up her 16-month-old son, Hamza. "Stop killing Palestinian children!"
The anti-war group CodePink said Hajjaj immigrated to the U.S. with her family when she was two months old, and has lost approximately 20 family members to Israel's bombardment of Gaza since October.
The group targeted Austin's testimony a month after the Biden administration released its 2025 budget request—a proposal that includes $1.1 trillion in military-related spending. Despite growing calls from U.S. lawmakers and rights advocates, the White House has not announced conditions for military aid to Israel, which has been widely accused of human rights violations as it has assaulted Gaza and blocked humanitarian aid from reaching Palestinians.
Israel's bombardment has killed at least 33,899 Palestinians so far, and more than two dozen people have died of starvation in recent months as international experts have warned parts of northern Gaza are facing famine.
At least 13,000 children have been killed, and the United Nations reported in February that 70% of those killed overall have been women and children—even as Israel and the U.S. have insisted Israeli forces are targeting Hamas.
The International Court of Justice issued a preliminary ruling in January saying Israel is "plausibly" committing genocide in Gaza, and lawmakers including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) have expressed support for the ruling—but the U.S. has dismissed the court's findings, including at Austin's hearing last week.
While Hajjaj held up her son at Wednesday's hearing, another protester, identified by CodePink as Helen, addressed the defense secretary.
"Secretary Austin, why are you denying Israel's genocide in Gaza? Why are you denying genocide in Gaza?" said Helen, who was arrested after being led out of the hearing. "The whole world sees it! You know the laws of war! You know you have blood on your hands! You have blood on your hands! We have blood on our hands."
The advocates chanted, "Shame on you!" as they were led out of the hearing room.
Outside the hearing room, Hajjaj emphasized that the Biden administration has "the power to stop" Israel's attacks on Gaza by cutting off its military aid—of which the U.S. is the largest international supplier. The Foreign Assistance Act stipulates that the U.S. cannot provide military funding to countries that block American humanitarian aid.
"They just want to continue to arm death and destruction," said Hajjaj.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular