October, 22 2008, 03:44pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Colleen French, Canadian Council for Refugees, 514-277-7223 ext. 1,
514-476-3971 (cell), cfrench@ccrweb.ca;
Beth Berton-Hunter, Amnesty
International Canada: 416-363-9933 ext. 32, 416-904-7158 (cell);
Jen
Nessel, Center for Constitutional Rights, 212-614-6449,
jnessel@ccrjustice.org;
Nell McGarity, Glover Park Group, 202-292-6973;
Jennifer Daskal, Human Rights Watch, 202-612-4349, 202-365-3758 (cell),
daskalj@hrw.org
Canada Urged to Offer Refugee Resettlement to Detainee at Guantanamo
Human rights groups today urged Canada to offer refugee resettlement
without delay to Djamel Ameziane, an Algerian who has been unlawfully
detained for more than six years at Guantanamo and who has strong ties
to Canada. The Anglican Diocese of Montreal has applied to resettle
Mr. Ameziane through the Private Sponsorship of Refugees Program.
MONRTEAL
Human rights groups today urged Canada to offer refugee resettlement
without delay to Djamel Ameziane, an Algerian who has been unlawfully
detained for more than six years at Guantanamo and who has strong ties
to Canada. The Anglican Diocese of Montreal has applied to resettle
Mr. Ameziane through the Private Sponsorship of Refugees Program.
"The refugee sponsorship of Djamel Ameziane is part of the church's
mission of justice and compassion in the world," said The Right
Reverend Barry B. Clarke, Anglican Bishop of Montreal. "Having read
what Djamel has suffered and the risk he would face if returned to
Algeria, I am convinced that sponsoring him is the right thing to do."
The sponsorship is supported by the Canadian Council for
Refugees, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the New
York-based Center for Constitutional Rights, who call on the
Canadian government to process Mr. Ameziane's case on an urgent basis,
given his ongoing arbitrary detention at Guantanamo.
"Canada can and should resettle Mr. Ameziane on an urgent basis, in
order to free him from continued arbitrary imprisonment," said Janet
Dench, Executive Director of the Canadian Council for Refugees.
"Canadian law recognizes that refugees at risk of violence, torture and
arbitrary imprisonment are in urgent need of protection: this is
clearly Mr. Ameziane's case."
Mr. Ameziane was sent to Guantanamo after he was sold to the U.S. by
bounty hunters in 2001. He has been imprisoned there without charge or
a fair hearing for more than six and a half years. He has been
subjected to various forms of torture and ill-treatment during his
imprisonment, and was held in solitary confinement in a small
windowless cell for over a year. He cannot be returned to Algeria
because of a risk of serious human rights violations, based on the
stigma of having been suspected of terrorism related activities and
detained in Guantanamo.
"Amnesty International is calling for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay
detention camp and for lawful solutions to be found for all the
detainees," said Anne Sainte-Marie, Amnesty International. "It is
imperative that countries such as Canada be a part of the solution.
Mr. Ameziane should be immediately released from detention and provided
with protection in Canada."
Canada is the most appropriate country of resettlement for Mr. Ameziane
because he previously lived and worked in Montreal for five years. He
also has a brother in Canada.
"After seven long years of unjustified detention, we - I, his brother,
his entire family, and his friends - are impatient to have him back
with us," said Mr. Ameziane's brother. "Djamel, who is so precious to
us, has never known what violence is in his whole life. He has never
even hurt a fly. Unfortunately, bad luck put him on a path where people
sold him for a few dollars. We so dearly hope that he is freed and
finds his dignity again as a man who is very respectful of others."
Mr. Ameziane has never been alleged by the U.S. government to have engaged in any acts of terrorism or hostilities.
"Mr. Ameziane left Algeria 16 years ago in search of a safe haven and a
better life," said Pardiss Kebriaei, staff attorney at the Center for
Constitutional Rights. "In conditions at Guantanamo that would break
most of us, he remains hopeful of someday having the chance to build
that life in Canada."
BACKGROUNDER
October 2008
About Djamel Ameziane
Djamel Ameziane is an ethnic Berber from Algeria who fled his home
country 16 years ago in order to escape persecution and seek a better
life. He lived in Austria and then, from 1995, in Canada, where he
made a refugee claim which was rejected in 2000. With few options and
facing forced return to Algeria, he traveled to Afghanistan, one of the
few countries he could enter without a visa. Following the 2001
military offensive against the Taliban, as a foreigner he was an easy
target for corrupt local police who captured him while he was trying to
cross the border into Pakistan as he fled the fighting. Mr. Ameziane
was then sold to U.S. military forces for a bounty.
He was taken first to the U.S. Airbase at Kandahar, Afghanistan and
then to Guantanamo in February 2002. Nearly seven years after he was
first captured, he remains imprisoned without charge and without
judicial review of his detention to date.
Mr. Ameziane has never been alleged by the U.S. government to have
engaged in any acts of terrorism or hostilities. At no time has the
United States charged him with any crime, nor accused him of
participating in any hostile action, of possessing or using any
weapons, of participating in any military training activity or of being
a member of any alleged terrorist organization.
Detention in Guantanamo
On his arrival in Guantanamo, Mr. Ameziane was held for two and a half
months in Camp X-Ray, in a 6-feet-by-6-feet wire mesh cell. Later, Mr.
Ameziane was held in solitary confinement for over a year in a small
windowless cell in Camp 6, one of the harshest facilities in Guantanamo.
He has been subjected to brutal acts of physical violence at
Guantanamo. In one violent incident, military guards sprayed his entire
body with cayenne pepper and then hosed him down with water to simulate
the skin-burning effect of pepper spray. They then held his head back
and placed a water hose between his nose and mouth, running it for
several minutes over his face and suffocating him, repeating the
operation several times. In describing that experience he writes, "I
had the impression that my head was sinking in water. Simply thinking
of it gives me the chills."
Following that episode, guards cuffed and chained him and took him to
an interrogation room, where he was left for several hours, writhing in
pain, his clothes soaked while air conditioning blasted in the room,
and his body burning from the pepper spray.
Risk of human rights violations in Algeria
Mr. Ameziane could face incommunicado detention, torture and
ill-treatment, and other human rights violations if he were returned to
his native Algeria. As international human rights NGOs and the U.S.
Department of State itself have reported, torture and ill-treatment are
frequently used in detaining and interrogating persons suspected of
links with terrorism. Other Algerian detainees recently returned from
Guantanamo were all detained immediately upon arrival for questioning
for a period of nearly two weeks, during which they were denied access
to a lawyer and their families.
Refugees in Guantanamo
Mr. Ameziane is one of approximately 50 refugees and other persons in
need of international protection left at Guantanamo with no place to
go. They cannot return to their country of origin, because of a risk of
serious rights abuses on the basis of the stigma of having been at
Guantanamo, in addition to other factors in individual cases. For more
information, see Guantanamo's Refugees, a report of the Center for
Constitutional Rights,
https://ccrjustice.org/files/Guantanamo%20Refugees2nded.pdf
Canadian Private Sponsorship Application
The Anglican Diocese of Montreal has submitted a sponsorship
application on behalf of Djamel Ameziane under the Private Sponsorship
of Refugees Program. The governments of Canada and Quebec are required
to process this application and approve Mr. Ameziane's resettlement in
Canada if he meets the regulatory requirements, i.e. he is a refugee in
need of a durable solution and is not inadmissible to Canada (e.g. on
criminality or security grounds).
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations also defines a
category of applicants for resettlement who are in "urgent need of
protection". These are refugees whose "life, liberty or physical
safety is under immediate threat and, if not protected, the person is
likely to be
(a) killed;
(b) subjected to violence, torture, sexual assault or arbitrary imprisonment; or
(c) returned to their country of nationality or of their former habitual residence." (IRPR 138)
Mr. Ameziane has been subjected to violence and torture in
Guantanamo and continues to be subjected to arbitrary imprisonment, now
lasting nearly seven years, with no prospects of safe release unless he
is resettled to Canada.
He clearly meets the definition and should be processed according to
Citizenship and Immigration Canada's special guidelines for refugees in
urgent need of protection, including through the issuance of a
Temporary Resident Permit if necessary to ensure that his arbitrary
imprisonment is ended as soon as possible.
Petition to Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
In August 2008, Mr. Ameziane filed the first ever petition by a
Guantanamo detainee with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
(IACHR). The petition addresses the torture, abuse, and other human
rights violations perpetrated against him during his six-year history
of near-incommunicado detention at the prison. Mr. Ameziane's claims
include violations of his rights to freedom from arbitrary detention;
freedom from torture and cruel and degrading treatment, including the
denial of necessary medical care, and religious humiliation and abuse;
protection of his personal reputation, and private and family life; as
well as the right to judicial remedy for violations of his rights. The
petition additionally asks the IACHR to instruct the United States not
to return Mr. Ameziane to Algeria.
The New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights and the Center for
Justice and International Law filed the petition on Mr. Ameziane's
behalf. On October 28 in Washington D.C., the IACHR will hear
precautionary measures issued in his case. The full text of the
petition is available at https://tinyurl.com/5p3y6u.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464LATEST NEWS
ABC Anchor Rebuked for Claiming Popular, Cost-Saving Medicare for All Won't Happen
"The D.C. media insists nothing can ever happen," said one progressive journalist. "It's the press corps' Jedi mind trick."
Dec 09, 2024
Advocates for a government-run healthcare program applauded U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna for pushing back during a Sunday morning interview in which ABC News anchor Martha Raddatz casually dismissed Medicare for All as a proposal that has no chance of ever being implemented.
Khanna (D-Calif.) spoke to Raddatz days after the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City—an event that brought to the surface simmering, widespread fury over the for-profit health insurance industry's denial of coverage, high deductibles, and other obstacles placed in the way of Americans when they try to obtain both routine and emergency healthcare.
The congressman said he was "not surprised" by the response to the killing, in which the suspect has yet to be named or found by authorities five days later.
"I mean, people are getting denied cancer treatment," said Khanna. "It's absurd in this country, what's going on."
Raddatz noted that Khanna last week reposted a message from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on the social media platform X, in which the senator pointed to the country's exorbitant spending on healthcare administrative costs—15-25% of total healthcare expenditures, or as much as $1 trillion per year.
"'Healthcare is a human right. We need Medicare for All,'" Raddatz read before adding her own perspective: "That's not really going to happen, so what would you say to those Americans who are frustrated right now?"
Khanna quickly pushed back, saying he believes Sanders is "absolutely right."
"I believe we can make Medicare for All happen," he said, pointing out that Sanders was responding to billionaire Tesla founder Elon Musk, who President-elect Donald Trump has nominated to lead a proposed body called the Department of Government Efficiency, denouncing high healthcare administrative costs last week.
That spending is far higher than the 2% spent by Medicare on administration and results in lower life expectancy, more preventable deaths, high infant and maternal mortality rates, and other poor health outcomes.
Skepticism of the for-profit healthcare system from one of Trump's closest right-wing allies mirrors public support for Medicare for All, which comes from across the political spectrum.
In 2020, a Gallup poll found that 63% of Americans backed at single national health plan to provide coverage for all Americans, including more than a third of Republicans and Independents who lean Republican, and 88% of Democrats. Another American Barometer survey in 2018 found 52% of Republicans supported Medicare for All.
Khanna said Musk's comments indicate that "finally, after years, Sanders is winning this debate and we should be moving towards Medicare for All."
Kenneth Zinn, former political director of National Nurses United, asked, "Who is Martha Raddatz to say" that Medicare for All—which would cost $650 billion less than the current for-profit system, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis—is "not really going to happen."
"This is how the corporate media tries to shut down the discussion or narrow the parameters. The majority of Americans support Medicare for All," said Zinn.
David Sirota of The Leverapplauded Khanna's "direct pushback" against the commonly accepted assumption that expanding the popular and efficient Medicare program to all Americans is an impossibility.
"The D.C. media insists nothing can ever happen," he said. "It's the press corps' Jedi mind trick. Ro called bullshit—which is the right response. [Medicare for All] won't happen overnight, but it CAN eventually happen."
In 2019, Khanna himself slammed "Beltway pundits" for dismissing Medicare for All as "unrealistic and too expensive" even as the U.S. was shown to spend twice as much per capita on healthcare as other countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
"Points well-taken, Congressman," said former Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner on Sunday. "The United States is the only industrialized nation without universal healthcare. It is immoral, unacceptable, and costly not to have Medicare for All."
Keep ReadingShow Less
EPA Bans Known Carcinogens Used in Dry Cleaning, Other Industries
"Both of these chemicals have caused too much harm for too long, despite the existence of safer alternatives," said one environmental campaigner.
Dec 09, 2024
The Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency on Monday announced a permanent ban on a pair of carcinogenic chemicals widely used in U.S. industries, including dry cleaning services and automative work.
According to the Washington Post:
The announcement includes the complete ban of trichloroethylene—also known as TCE—a substance found in common consumer and manufacturing products including degreasing agents, furniture care and auto repair products. In addition, the agency banned all consumer uses and many commercial uses of Perc—also known as tetrachloroethylene and PCE — an industrial solvent long used in applications such as dry cleaning and auto repair.
Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, applauded the move but suggested to the Post that it should have come sooner.
"Both of these chemicals have caused too much harm for too long, despite the existence of safer alternatives," Kalmuss-Katz.
The EPA's decision, reports the New York Times, was "long sought by environmental and health advocates, even as they braced for what could be a wave of deregulation by the incoming Trump administration."
The Timesreports:
TCE is known to cause liver cancer, kidney cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and to damage the nervous and immune systems. It has been found in drinking water nationwide and was the subject of a 1995 book that became a movie, “A Civil Action,” starring John Travolta. The E.P.A. is banning all uses of the chemical under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which was overhauled in 2016 to give the agency greater authority to regulate harmful chemicals.
Though deemed "less harmful" than TCE, the Times notes how Perc has been shown to "cause liver, kidney, brain and testicular cancer," and can also damage the functioning of kidneys, the liver, and people's immune systems.
Environmentalists celebrated last year when Biden's EPA proposed the ban on TCE, as Common Dreamsreported.
Responding to the news at the time, Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), said the EPA, by putting the ban on the table, was "once again putting the health of workers and consumers first."
While President-elect Donald Trump ran on a having an environmental agenda that would foster the "cleanest air" and the "cleanest water," the late approval of EPA's ban on TCE and Perc in Biden's term means the rule will be subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), meaning the Republican-control Senate could reverse the measure.
In his remarks to the Times, Kalmuss-Katz of Earthjustice said that if Trump and Senate Republicans try to roll back the ban, they will be certain to "encounter serious opposition from communities across the country that have been devastated by TCE, in both blue and red states."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Explains Why He's Voting Against the New $850 Billion Pentagon Budget
"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sen. Bernie Sanders writes in a new op-ed.
Dec 08, 2024
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday announced his opposition to an annual military policy bill that would authorize a Pentagon budget of nearly $850 billion, a sum that the progressive senator from Vermont characterized as outrageous—particularly as so many Americans face economic hardship.
"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote in an op-ed for The Guardian after the House and Senate released legislative text for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025.
Sanders continued:
In this moment in history, it would be wise for us to remember what Dwight D. Eisenhower, a former five-star general, said in his farewell address in 1961: "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." What Eisenhower said was true in 1961. It is even more true today.
I will be voting against the military budget.
The senator's op-ed came hours after lawmakers from both chambers of Congress unveiled the sprawling, 1,813-page NDAA for the coming fiscal year. The legislation's topline is just over $895 billion as lawmakers from both parties push annual U.S. military spending inexorably toward $1 trillion, even as the Pentagon fails to pass an audit.
The U.S. currently spends more on its military than the next nine countries combined, and military spending accounts for more than half of the nation's yearly discretionary spending, according to the National Priorities Project.
Sanders wrote Sunday that "very few people who have researched the military-industrial complex doubt that there is massive fraud, waste and cost over-runs in the system." One analysis estimates that over 50% of the Pentagon's annual budget, the subject of aggressive industry lobbying, goes to private contractors.
"Defense contractors routinely overcharge the Pentagon by 40%—and sometimes more than 4,000%," Sanders continued. "For example, in October, RTX (formerly Raytheon) was fined $950 million for inflating bills to the DoD, lying about labor and material costs, and paying bribes to secure foreign business. In June, Lockheed Martin was fined $70 million for overcharging the navy for aircraft parts, the latest in a long line of similar abuses. The F-35, the most expensive weapon system in history, has run up hundreds of billions in cost overruns."
The NDAA could have some trouble getting through the divided Congress—but not because of the proposed size of the Pentagon budget.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a statement that the legislation includes language that would "permanently ban transgender medical treatment for minors" and other provisions that are expected to draw Democratic opposition.
Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement Saturday that "anti-equality House Republican leaders are hijacking a defense bill to play politics with the healthcare of children of servicemembers."
"This cruel and hateful bill suddenly strips away access to medical care for families that members of our armed forces are counting on, and it could force servicemembers to choose between staying in the military or providing healthcare for their children," said Robinson. "Politicians have no place inserting themselves into decisions that should be between families and their doctors. We call on members of Congress to do what's right and vote against this damaging legislation."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular