
The Avenue of the Giants is surrounded by Humboldt Redwoods State Park--which has the largest remaining stand of old-growth redwoods in the world--in Humboldt County, California. (Photo: Kirt Edblom/flickr/cc)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
The Avenue of the Giants is surrounded by Humboldt Redwoods State Park--which has the largest remaining stand of old-growth redwoods in the world--in Humboldt County, California. (Photo: Kirt Edblom/flickr/cc)
A coalition of environmental groups on Tuesday delivered more than 122,000 public comments calling on the Biden administration to protect old-growth forests on public lands from logging as a key component of U.S. climate policy.
"There is no question that mature and old-growth trees are vital to the current health and livable future of our planet."
"Logging is the greatest immediate threat to the beautiful old trees and forests on our public lands," Randi Spivak, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's public lands program, said in a statement.
"Tens of thousands of people have told the Biden administration that they want these carbon-storing giants protected," she added. "By letting old-growth and mature trees grow, we'll be safeguarding carbon, clean water and air, and biodiversity. Our climate and future generations depend on it."
Blaine Miller-McFeeley, senior legislative representative at the advocacy group Earthjustice, said that "there is no question that mature and old-growth trees are vital to the current health and livable future of our planet. In the face of the worsening climate crisis, a federal rule must be established to protect these trees for future generations."
The deluge of public comments came in response to an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in April aimed at conserving and restoring the nation's forests, a directive that the climate advocacy group Food & Water Watch called "grossly inadequate" because it did not address fossil fuel extraction. The order required the government to "define, identify, and complete an inventory of old-growth and mature forests on federal lands."
"As thousands have clearly expressed during this comment period, creating a simple definition is a key first step, and the administration should now move forward swiftly to protect these giants from logging and all threats, before they are gone," Miller-McFeeley asserted.
\u201cBREAKING: Over 122,000 people have urged the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to protect mature and old-growth forests and trees on federal #publiclands from logging as a cornerstone of U.S. climate policy. \n\nhttps://t.co/aP2Sud8WEP\u201d— WildEarth Guardians (@WildEarth Guardians) 1661878348
The public messages call on the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Interior Department to define such mature and old-growth trees as at least 80 years old--by which time they have stored decades worth of planet-heating carbon--and declare them off-limits to logging, with limited exceptions for non-commercial use, from activities by Indigenous groups to fire prevention.
"The solution is simple and needs to be implemented as quickly as possible. We must protect our mature trees from logging and let them grow in our federal forestland," said Ellen Montgomery, director of the public lands campaign at Environment America.
"We urge the federal agencies to move quickly to create a durable rule that will enhance our forests' capacity to store carbon and conserve biodiversity," she added. "Our forests do it all. They filter our air and water, provide habitat for hundreds of species, and help us fight climate change. Our older forests are the real champs, performing all of these functions better than their younger counterparts. If we leave our 80-year-old trees and forests standing, they'll become more valuable every decade."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just hours away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A coalition of environmental groups on Tuesday delivered more than 122,000 public comments calling on the Biden administration to protect old-growth forests on public lands from logging as a key component of U.S. climate policy.
"There is no question that mature and old-growth trees are vital to the current health and livable future of our planet."
"Logging is the greatest immediate threat to the beautiful old trees and forests on our public lands," Randi Spivak, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's public lands program, said in a statement.
"Tens of thousands of people have told the Biden administration that they want these carbon-storing giants protected," she added. "By letting old-growth and mature trees grow, we'll be safeguarding carbon, clean water and air, and biodiversity. Our climate and future generations depend on it."
Blaine Miller-McFeeley, senior legislative representative at the advocacy group Earthjustice, said that "there is no question that mature and old-growth trees are vital to the current health and livable future of our planet. In the face of the worsening climate crisis, a federal rule must be established to protect these trees for future generations."
The deluge of public comments came in response to an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in April aimed at conserving and restoring the nation's forests, a directive that the climate advocacy group Food & Water Watch called "grossly inadequate" because it did not address fossil fuel extraction. The order required the government to "define, identify, and complete an inventory of old-growth and mature forests on federal lands."
"As thousands have clearly expressed during this comment period, creating a simple definition is a key first step, and the administration should now move forward swiftly to protect these giants from logging and all threats, before they are gone," Miller-McFeeley asserted.
\u201cBREAKING: Over 122,000 people have urged the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to protect mature and old-growth forests and trees on federal #publiclands from logging as a cornerstone of U.S. climate policy. \n\nhttps://t.co/aP2Sud8WEP\u201d— WildEarth Guardians (@WildEarth Guardians) 1661878348
The public messages call on the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Interior Department to define such mature and old-growth trees as at least 80 years old--by which time they have stored decades worth of planet-heating carbon--and declare them off-limits to logging, with limited exceptions for non-commercial use, from activities by Indigenous groups to fire prevention.
"The solution is simple and needs to be implemented as quickly as possible. We must protect our mature trees from logging and let them grow in our federal forestland," said Ellen Montgomery, director of the public lands campaign at Environment America.
"We urge the federal agencies to move quickly to create a durable rule that will enhance our forests' capacity to store carbon and conserve biodiversity," she added. "Our forests do it all. They filter our air and water, provide habitat for hundreds of species, and help us fight climate change. Our older forests are the real champs, performing all of these functions better than their younger counterparts. If we leave our 80-year-old trees and forests standing, they'll become more valuable every decade."
A coalition of environmental groups on Tuesday delivered more than 122,000 public comments calling on the Biden administration to protect old-growth forests on public lands from logging as a key component of U.S. climate policy.
"There is no question that mature and old-growth trees are vital to the current health and livable future of our planet."
"Logging is the greatest immediate threat to the beautiful old trees and forests on our public lands," Randi Spivak, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's public lands program, said in a statement.
"Tens of thousands of people have told the Biden administration that they want these carbon-storing giants protected," she added. "By letting old-growth and mature trees grow, we'll be safeguarding carbon, clean water and air, and biodiversity. Our climate and future generations depend on it."
Blaine Miller-McFeeley, senior legislative representative at the advocacy group Earthjustice, said that "there is no question that mature and old-growth trees are vital to the current health and livable future of our planet. In the face of the worsening climate crisis, a federal rule must be established to protect these trees for future generations."
The deluge of public comments came in response to an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in April aimed at conserving and restoring the nation's forests, a directive that the climate advocacy group Food & Water Watch called "grossly inadequate" because it did not address fossil fuel extraction. The order required the government to "define, identify, and complete an inventory of old-growth and mature forests on federal lands."
"As thousands have clearly expressed during this comment period, creating a simple definition is a key first step, and the administration should now move forward swiftly to protect these giants from logging and all threats, before they are gone," Miller-McFeeley asserted.
\u201cBREAKING: Over 122,000 people have urged the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to protect mature and old-growth forests and trees on federal #publiclands from logging as a cornerstone of U.S. climate policy. \n\nhttps://t.co/aP2Sud8WEP\u201d— WildEarth Guardians (@WildEarth Guardians) 1661878348
The public messages call on the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Interior Department to define such mature and old-growth trees as at least 80 years old--by which time they have stored decades worth of planet-heating carbon--and declare them off-limits to logging, with limited exceptions for non-commercial use, from activities by Indigenous groups to fire prevention.
"The solution is simple and needs to be implemented as quickly as possible. We must protect our mature trees from logging and let them grow in our federal forestland," said Ellen Montgomery, director of the public lands campaign at Environment America.
"We urge the federal agencies to move quickly to create a durable rule that will enhance our forests' capacity to store carbon and conserve biodiversity," she added. "Our forests do it all. They filter our air and water, provide habitat for hundreds of species, and help us fight climate change. Our older forests are the real champs, performing all of these functions better than their younger counterparts. If we leave our 80-year-old trees and forests standing, they'll become more valuable every decade."