Despite President Joe Biden\u0026#039;s promise to phase out federal leasing for fossil fuel extraction, his administration approved more permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in its first year than the Trump administration did in 2017.\r\n\r\n\u0022Biden\u0026#039;s runaway drilling approvals are a spectacular failure of climate leadership.\u0022\r\n\r\nThat\u0026#039;s according to the Center for Biological Diversity\u0026#039;s new analysis of federal data released Friday, which shows that the Biden White House rubber-stamped 3,557 permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in 2021—a 34% increase over former President Donald Trump\u0026#039;s administration, which greenlit 2,658 drilling permits in its first year.\r\n\r\nOf the drilling authorized by the Biden administration in the past year, almost 2,000 permits were approved for public lands in New Mexico, followed by 843 in Wyoming, 285 in Montana and North Dakota, and 191 in Utah. In California, Biden signed off on 187 permits—more than twice as many as the 71 that Trump approved for drilling on the Golden State\u0026#039;s public lands during his first year in office.\r\n\r\n\u0022Biden\u0026#039;s runaway drilling approvals are a spectacular failure of climate leadership,\u0022 the Center for Biological Diversity\u0026#039;s Taylor McKinnon said Friday in a statement. \u0022Avoiding catastrophic climate change requires ending new fossil fuel extraction, but Biden is racing in the opposite direction.\u0022\r\n\r\nOne year ago, Biden issued an executive order suspending new oil and gas leasing. The president\u0026#039;s pause of the federal leasing program was meant to give the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) time to conduct a comprehensive review of the \u0022potential climate and other impacts associated with oil and gas activities on public lands or in offshore waters.\u0022\r\n\r\nHowever, a group of Republican attorneys general awash in $4.5 million of campaign cash from the fossil fuel lobby sued the Biden administration in March, arguing that its moratorium violated a federal law requiring quarterly lease sales. In June, a Trump-appointed federal judge sided with them and issued a preliminary injunction.\r\n\r\nWhile the U.S. Department of Justice challenged the ruling—and ultimately said in August that the judge\u0026#039;s decision to invalidate the pause does not compel the Biden administration to immediately resume new fossil fuel lease sales—the DOI backed down and took steps to resurrect the then-frozen oil and gas leasing program.\r\n\r\nIn November—just days after Biden professed Washington\u0026#039;s alleged commitment to decarbonization at the COP26 climate summit—the White House held Lease Sale 257, an auction condemned as ecologically irresponsible for offering up 80 million acres of the Gulf of Mexico\u0026#039;s seabed to the highest-bidding oil and gas companies.\r\n\r\nDespite Biden\u0026#039;s pledge to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in half by the end of this decade, his administration also plans to allow fossil fuel corporations to purchase drilling rights for hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands.\r\n\r\nAs Food \u0026amp; Water Watch explained last month, the Biden administration has \u0022acknowledged that it has many other legal mechanisms to prohibit new oil and gas leasing aside from\u0022 the disputed moratorium, which undermines its claim that \u0022its hands were tied\u0022 by a right-wing judge.\r\n\r\nEarlier this week, as Common Dreams reported, a coalition of more than 360 progressive advocacy groups submitted a petition calling on the Biden administration to use its executive authority to phase out oil and gas production on public lands and in offshore waters.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThe petition comes equipped with a regulatory framework to wind down oil and gas production by 98% by 2035. According to the coalition, the Biden administration can achieve this goal by using long-dormant provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, and the National Emergencies Act.\r\n\r\n\u0022Biden squandered precious time seeking climate action from a broken Congress,\u0022 McKinnon said Friday, referring to the Build Back Better Act that has been put on the shelf due to obstructionism from corporate Democrats and Republicans. \u0022We need executive action now to meet the climate emergency with the urgency it demands, starting with ending the fossil fuel extraction the president controls.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022We need executive action now to meet the climate emergency with the urgency it demands, starting with ending the fossil fuel extraction the president controls.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe U.S. Geological Survey has estimated that roughly 25% of the nation\u0026#039;s total carbon emissions can be attributed to fossil fuel extraction on public lands and waters, and according to the DOI, the social costs of burning oil and gas obtained by drilling and fracking on government-owned parcels—including rising sea levels, extreme weather disasters, and adverse public health effects—range from $357 million to over $4 billion.\r\n\r\nNevertheless, the DOI\u0026#039;s long-awaited review of its oil and gas leasing program largely ignored the climate crisis, leading environmental justice campaigners to describe the November report as a \u0022shocking capitulation to the needs of corporate polluters.\u0022\r\n\r\nAccording to the Center for Biological Diversity, \u0022Federal fossil fuels that have not been leased to industry contain up to 450 billion tons of potential climate pollution; those already leased to industry contain up to 43 billion tons.\u0022\r\n\r\nPeer-reviewed research, meanwhile, has estimated that a nationwide ban on federal fossil fuel leasing would reduce carbon emissions by 280 million tons per year.\r\n\r\n\u0022Without such action,\u0022 the Center for Biological Diversity explained Friday, \u0022it will become increasingly difficult for the United States to meet its pledge to help avoid 1.5°C of warming and its unprecedented social, environmental, and economic damage.\u0022\r\n\r\nAccording to a recent analysis by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the worldwide transition to renewable energy is far behind schedule—with fossil fuel use projected to increase this decade even as annual reductions in coal, oil, and gas production are necessary to avoid the worst consequences of the climate emergency.\r\n\r\nIf countries—starting with the rich polluters most responsible for exacerbating extreme weather—fail to rapidly and drastically slash greenhouse gas pollution, UNEP warned last fall, the planet is on pace for a \u0022catastrophic\u0022 2.7°C temperature rise by the end of this century.\r\n\r\nScientists have repeatedly made the case that averting such dangerous levels of heating requires halting new coal, oil, and gas projects. Ramping up drilling, as Biden has done, defies evidence-based recommendations made by the International Energy Agency, the\u0026nbsp;Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and others to keep fossil fuels in the ground.