A coalition of 80 U.S. agricultural, consumer, environmental, public health, and worker groups sent a letter Thursday to key figures in the Biden administration calling for them to \u0022respect Mexico\u0026#039;s sovereignty and refrain from interfering with its right to enact health-protective policies\u0022—specifically, the phaseout of the herbicide glyphosate and the cultivation of genetically modified corn.\u0022It is completely unacceptable for U.S. public agencies to be doing the bidding of pesticide corporations like Bayer.\u0022—Kristin Schafer, PANNA\u0022Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador quietly rocked the agribusiness world with his New Year\u0026#039;s Eve decree,\u0022 Timothy A. Wise of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (ITAP) noted earlier this year. \u0022His administration sent an even stronger aftershock two weeks later, clarifying that the government would also phase out GM corn imports in three years and the ban would include not just corn for human consumption but yellow corn destined primarily for livestock.\u0022\u0022Mexico imports about 30% of its corn each year, overwhelmingly from the United States,\u0022 Wise added. \u0022Almost all of that is yellow corn for animal feed and industrial uses. López Obrador\u0026#039;s commitment to reducing and, by 2024, eliminating such imports reflects his administration\u0026#039;s plan to ramp up Mexican production as part of the campaign to increase self-sufficiency in corn and other key food crops.\u0022The groups\u0026#039; letter on the Mexican policies and U.S. interference—published in English (pdf) and Spanish (pdf)—is addressed to recently confirmed U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai. Its lead author is Kristin Schafer, executive director of Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA).\u0022We call on Secretary Vilsack and Trade Representative Tai, as key leaders in the new administration, to respect Mexico\u0026#039;s decision to protect both public health and the integrity of Mexican farming,\u0022 Schafer said in a statement. \u0022It is completely unacceptable for U.S. public agencies to be doing the bidding of pesticide corporations like Bayer, who are solely concerned with maintaining their bottom-line profits.\u0022BREAKING: 80 orgs deliver letter to @USDA, @USTradeRep opposing U.S. interference in Mexico\u0026#039;s glyphosate phaseout https://t.co/m7M2o4sFmB— PAN North America (@pesticideaction) April 29, 2021Fernando Bejarano, director of Pesticide Action Network in Mexico, explained that \u0022we are part of the No Maize No Country Campaign, a broad coalition of peasant organizations, nonprofit NGOs, academics, and consumers which support the presidential decree and fight for food sovereignty with the agroecological transformation of agricultural systems that guarantee the right to produce and consume healthy, nutritious food, free of pesticides and transgenics.\u0022\u0022We reject the pressure from corporations such as Bayer-Monsanto—and their CropLife trade association—which are working in both the United States and Mexico to undermine the presidential decree that phases out the use of glyphosate and transgenic corn,\u0022 Bejarano said.The letter highlights Guardian reporting on U.S. government documents obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity through a Freedom of Information Act request. The documents revealed that CropLife America and Bayer AG—which acquired glyphosate-based herbicide developer Monsanto in 2018—worked with U.S. officials to lobby against Mexico\u0026#039;s plans.According to journalist Carey Gillam\u0026#039;s mid-February report:The emails reviewed by the Guardian come from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and other U.S. agencies. They detail worry and frustration with Mexico\u0026#039;s position. One email makes a reference to staff within López Obrador\u0026#039;s administration as \u0022vocal anti-biotechnology activists,\u0022 and another email states that Mexico\u0026#039;s health agency (Cofepris) is \u0022becoming a big time problem.\u0022Internal USTR communications lay out how the agrochemical industry is \u0022pushing\u0022 for the U.S. to \u0022fold this issue\u0022 into the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) trade deal that went into effect July 1. The records then show the USTR does exactly that, telling Mexico its actions on glyphosate and genetically engineered crops raise concerns \u0022regarding compliance\u0022 with USMCA.Citing discussions with CropLife, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) joined in the effort, discussing in an inter-agency email \u0022how we could use USMCA to work through these issues.\u0022The Guardian also noted correspondence involving the Foreign Agricultural Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).As the letter to Vilsack and Tai points out: \u0022This interference and pressure from the agrochemical industry is continuing. On March 22nd, industry representatives sent a letter directed to your attention as leaders of USTR and USDA, identifying Mexico\u0026#039;s planned phaseout of glyphosate and genetically modified corn as a \u0026#039;leading concern\u0026#039; for agribusiness interests and the pesticide industry (represented by the pesticide industry\u0026#039;s trade group, CropLife America).\u0022\u0022We strongly object to any interference by U.S. government officials or agribusiness interests in a sovereign state\u0026#039;s right to enact policy measures to protect the health and well-being of its people,\u0022 the letter states. \u0022We urge your agencies to resist and reject these ongoing efforts.\u0022\u0022We welcome the administration\u0026#039;s stated commitment to listening to the science, improving public health, protecting the environment, and limiting exposure to dangerous chemicals and pesticides, while holding polluters accountable and prioritizing environmental justice, particularly for communities of color and low-income communities,\u0022 it adds. \u0022We trust that these stated commitments, as well as your dedication to \u0026#039;fairness for farmers,\u0026#039; extend equally to other countries and include respect for other nations\u0026#039; and peoples\u0026#039; rights to self-determination.\u0022Other signatories to the letter include the American Sustainable Business Council, Beyond Pesticides, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace USA, Indigenous Environmental Network, ITAP, and Organic Consumers Association.