
A sign warning people about Covid-19 is surrounded by flames during the Hennessey fire near Lake Berryessa in Napa, California on August 18, 2020. (Photo: by Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
A sign warning people about Covid-19 is surrounded by flames during the Hennessey fire near Lake Berryessa in Napa, California on August 18, 2020. (Photo: by Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images)
"We're at the edge of a cliff, and voters must know what direction our next president will take us."
"Voters deserve media coverage that takes the climate crisis as seriously as the science tells us we must."
--43 green groups
That is the message from leaders of 43 climate, environmental, and progressive advocacy groups who on Thursday urged the newly named moderators "to ensure the climate crisis is a central focus of all presidential and vice-presidential debates this year."
The collective call came a day after the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) co-chairs announced the moderators and less than a month before the first face-off between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden, scheduled for September 29. Two other presidential debates--plus one between Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.)--are set to be held in October.
In a letter addressed directly to Chris Wallace of Fox News, Steve Scully of C-SPAN, Kristen Welker of NBC News, and Susan Page of USA Today, the groups declare that "it is imperative the candidates seeking our nation's highest office explain how they will address and prepare us for the current and increasing effects of the climate crisis and how they will combat the environmental injustice that has plagued Black and Brown communities for decades."
"The climate crisis is here," the letter says. "From the rising asthma and cancer rates in frontline communities, predominantly communities of color and low-income communities, who've been subject to toxic air and water, to the increasingly devastating extreme hurricanes, heatwaves, wildfires, and violent storms that have destroyed homes and small businesses, wrecked communities, and killed friends, neighbors, and family--we are living with the consequences of climate change every day."
Repeating the decisions of past moderators and failing to ask about the climate emergency "would be nothing short of negligent and dangerous in 2020. This election will be a defining moment for our country," the letter states. "We are truly at the point of no return if we do not act boldly and immediately starting in 2021."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 We're calling on the @Debates moderators\u2014Chris Wallace, @SteveScully, @KWelkerNBC, @SusanPage\u2014to make #ClimateChange a focus of the upcoming debates.\nThe majority of voters want bold #ClimateAction action.\n\n https://t.co/3TQfCnv73F\u201d— Clean Air Moms Action (@Clean Air Moms Action) 1599143837
"We are a country deep in crises, and how we respond to one crisis magnifies the others," the letter continues, recognizing the need to build back better from the coronavirus pandemic and resulting economic fallout. "Any discussion on the economy, racial justice, public health, democracy, national security, or infrastructure must include the climate crisis. Voters deserve media coverage that takes the climate crisis as seriously as the science tells us we must and as the millions of people across the country who are currently suffering from the impacts deserve."
The letter was spearhead by Climate Power 2020, a project created by the Center for American Progress Action Fund, the League of Conservation Voters, and the Sierra Club. Signatories included leaders of 350 Action, Center for Biological Diversity Action Fund, Climate Hawks Vote, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace USA, Hip Hop Caucus, Indivisible, MoveOn, Physicians for Social Responsibility, People's Action, Sunrise Movement, and Union of Concerned Scientists.
The green groups' message to moderators came after 70 House Democrats issued a similar call in a letter (pdf) on Wednesday to the co-chairs and board members of the CPD. Led by Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.)--who, as an attorney, focused on environmental and energy issues--the lawmakers encouraged the commission's leadership to learn from criticism of previous election cycle events and make the climate crisis "a centerpiece" of the upcoming presidential and VP debates.
"In 2016, there was not a single question on climate change in any of the four presidential and vice-presidential debates. This cannot happen again," says the lawmakers' letter, a point echoed Thursday by the advocacy groups. "Given the dire nature of the crisis, we ask that you break precedent and publicly call on the moderators to include climate in the topics that will be addressed during the debates."
\u201cIn 2016, there wasn\u2019t a single question during the presidential @Debates on the #ClimateCrisis.\n\nNow, as Trump denies science & abdicates leadership, the crisis is much worse.\n\nThank you @MikeLevin for demanding #ClimateChange take center stage.\nhttps://t.co/u7LE2ErGFg\u201d— LCV \u2013 League of Conservation Voters \ud83c\udf0e (@LCV \u2013 League of Conservation Voters \ud83c\udf0e) 1599079755
In the 2016 cycle, when Trump and Pence faced Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and her running mate Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), moderators were heavily criticized for all but ignoring the climate emergency. During the three presidential debates that year, a mere five minutes and 27 seconds--or 2% of the total time--"were spent on climate change and other environmental issues... and that was pretty much all Hillary Clinton talking," according to Grist.
Across all four events, "the closest anyone came was in the second presidential debate, when audience member (and coal-plant operator) Ken Bone asked the candidates: 'What steps will your energy policy take to meet our energy needs while remaining environmentally friendly and minimizing job loss for fossil power plant workers?'" Vox reported in October 2016. "That's not a direct climate question, but it certainly touches on crucial adjacent topics."
\u201cIn a rational world lawmakers wouldn\u2019t have to demand a global crisis impacting the lives of every person on the planet be discussed during a presidential debate. . . but after moderators asked no climate question in 2016, this is where we are.\n\nhttps://t.co/D6JnLsCjDu\u201d— Ari Rabin-Havt (@Ari Rabin-Havt) 1599142985
Both the green groups and House Democrats pushed back against framing the planetary crisis as a partisan issue, with the lawmakers writing that "Republicans, Democrats, Independents, and politically unaffiliated Americans have all told us that climate change and its consequences to their health, pocketbooks, and safety are a major concern for them in this election year."
"Climate change is no longer an issue that is looming in the distance," the letter continues, pointing to recent and ongoing extreme weather events that are "threatening lives and livelihoods" as well as "the grave environmental injustices impacting people of color, who often experience the effects of climate change first and most acutely."
"We understand there are four central crises that the presidential and vice-presidential candidates must address: the ongoing pandemic, a struggling economy, racial injustice, and the climate crisis," says the lawmakers' letter. "But of these four, there is one which will exacerbate each of the other three, if not addressed immediately."
"We need a dedicated discussion on the climate crisis," the letter concludes, "that matches the importance of this moment."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"We're at the edge of a cliff, and voters must know what direction our next president will take us."
"Voters deserve media coverage that takes the climate crisis as seriously as the science tells us we must."
--43 green groups
That is the message from leaders of 43 climate, environmental, and progressive advocacy groups who on Thursday urged the newly named moderators "to ensure the climate crisis is a central focus of all presidential and vice-presidential debates this year."
The collective call came a day after the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) co-chairs announced the moderators and less than a month before the first face-off between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden, scheduled for September 29. Two other presidential debates--plus one between Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.)--are set to be held in October.
In a letter addressed directly to Chris Wallace of Fox News, Steve Scully of C-SPAN, Kristen Welker of NBC News, and Susan Page of USA Today, the groups declare that "it is imperative the candidates seeking our nation's highest office explain how they will address and prepare us for the current and increasing effects of the climate crisis and how they will combat the environmental injustice that has plagued Black and Brown communities for decades."
"The climate crisis is here," the letter says. "From the rising asthma and cancer rates in frontline communities, predominantly communities of color and low-income communities, who've been subject to toxic air and water, to the increasingly devastating extreme hurricanes, heatwaves, wildfires, and violent storms that have destroyed homes and small businesses, wrecked communities, and killed friends, neighbors, and family--we are living with the consequences of climate change every day."
Repeating the decisions of past moderators and failing to ask about the climate emergency "would be nothing short of negligent and dangerous in 2020. This election will be a defining moment for our country," the letter states. "We are truly at the point of no return if we do not act boldly and immediately starting in 2021."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 We're calling on the @Debates moderators\u2014Chris Wallace, @SteveScully, @KWelkerNBC, @SusanPage\u2014to make #ClimateChange a focus of the upcoming debates.\nThe majority of voters want bold #ClimateAction action.\n\n https://t.co/3TQfCnv73F\u201d— Clean Air Moms Action (@Clean Air Moms Action) 1599143837
"We are a country deep in crises, and how we respond to one crisis magnifies the others," the letter continues, recognizing the need to build back better from the coronavirus pandemic and resulting economic fallout. "Any discussion on the economy, racial justice, public health, democracy, national security, or infrastructure must include the climate crisis. Voters deserve media coverage that takes the climate crisis as seriously as the science tells us we must and as the millions of people across the country who are currently suffering from the impacts deserve."
The letter was spearhead by Climate Power 2020, a project created by the Center for American Progress Action Fund, the League of Conservation Voters, and the Sierra Club. Signatories included leaders of 350 Action, Center for Biological Diversity Action Fund, Climate Hawks Vote, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace USA, Hip Hop Caucus, Indivisible, MoveOn, Physicians for Social Responsibility, People's Action, Sunrise Movement, and Union of Concerned Scientists.
The green groups' message to moderators came after 70 House Democrats issued a similar call in a letter (pdf) on Wednesday to the co-chairs and board members of the CPD. Led by Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.)--who, as an attorney, focused on environmental and energy issues--the lawmakers encouraged the commission's leadership to learn from criticism of previous election cycle events and make the climate crisis "a centerpiece" of the upcoming presidential and VP debates.
"In 2016, there was not a single question on climate change in any of the four presidential and vice-presidential debates. This cannot happen again," says the lawmakers' letter, a point echoed Thursday by the advocacy groups. "Given the dire nature of the crisis, we ask that you break precedent and publicly call on the moderators to include climate in the topics that will be addressed during the debates."
\u201cIn 2016, there wasn\u2019t a single question during the presidential @Debates on the #ClimateCrisis.\n\nNow, as Trump denies science & abdicates leadership, the crisis is much worse.\n\nThank you @MikeLevin for demanding #ClimateChange take center stage.\nhttps://t.co/u7LE2ErGFg\u201d— LCV \u2013 League of Conservation Voters \ud83c\udf0e (@LCV \u2013 League of Conservation Voters \ud83c\udf0e) 1599079755
In the 2016 cycle, when Trump and Pence faced Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and her running mate Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), moderators were heavily criticized for all but ignoring the climate emergency. During the three presidential debates that year, a mere five minutes and 27 seconds--or 2% of the total time--"were spent on climate change and other environmental issues... and that was pretty much all Hillary Clinton talking," according to Grist.
Across all four events, "the closest anyone came was in the second presidential debate, when audience member (and coal-plant operator) Ken Bone asked the candidates: 'What steps will your energy policy take to meet our energy needs while remaining environmentally friendly and minimizing job loss for fossil power plant workers?'" Vox reported in October 2016. "That's not a direct climate question, but it certainly touches on crucial adjacent topics."
\u201cIn a rational world lawmakers wouldn\u2019t have to demand a global crisis impacting the lives of every person on the planet be discussed during a presidential debate. . . but after moderators asked no climate question in 2016, this is where we are.\n\nhttps://t.co/D6JnLsCjDu\u201d— Ari Rabin-Havt (@Ari Rabin-Havt) 1599142985
Both the green groups and House Democrats pushed back against framing the planetary crisis as a partisan issue, with the lawmakers writing that "Republicans, Democrats, Independents, and politically unaffiliated Americans have all told us that climate change and its consequences to their health, pocketbooks, and safety are a major concern for them in this election year."
"Climate change is no longer an issue that is looming in the distance," the letter continues, pointing to recent and ongoing extreme weather events that are "threatening lives and livelihoods" as well as "the grave environmental injustices impacting people of color, who often experience the effects of climate change first and most acutely."
"We understand there are four central crises that the presidential and vice-presidential candidates must address: the ongoing pandemic, a struggling economy, racial injustice, and the climate crisis," says the lawmakers' letter. "But of these four, there is one which will exacerbate each of the other three, if not addressed immediately."
"We need a dedicated discussion on the climate crisis," the letter concludes, "that matches the importance of this moment."
"We're at the edge of a cliff, and voters must know what direction our next president will take us."
"Voters deserve media coverage that takes the climate crisis as seriously as the science tells us we must."
--43 green groups
That is the message from leaders of 43 climate, environmental, and progressive advocacy groups who on Thursday urged the newly named moderators "to ensure the climate crisis is a central focus of all presidential and vice-presidential debates this year."
The collective call came a day after the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) co-chairs announced the moderators and less than a month before the first face-off between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden, scheduled for September 29. Two other presidential debates--plus one between Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.)--are set to be held in October.
In a letter addressed directly to Chris Wallace of Fox News, Steve Scully of C-SPAN, Kristen Welker of NBC News, and Susan Page of USA Today, the groups declare that "it is imperative the candidates seeking our nation's highest office explain how they will address and prepare us for the current and increasing effects of the climate crisis and how they will combat the environmental injustice that has plagued Black and Brown communities for decades."
"The climate crisis is here," the letter says. "From the rising asthma and cancer rates in frontline communities, predominantly communities of color and low-income communities, who've been subject to toxic air and water, to the increasingly devastating extreme hurricanes, heatwaves, wildfires, and violent storms that have destroyed homes and small businesses, wrecked communities, and killed friends, neighbors, and family--we are living with the consequences of climate change every day."
Repeating the decisions of past moderators and failing to ask about the climate emergency "would be nothing short of negligent and dangerous in 2020. This election will be a defining moment for our country," the letter states. "We are truly at the point of no return if we do not act boldly and immediately starting in 2021."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 We're calling on the @Debates moderators\u2014Chris Wallace, @SteveScully, @KWelkerNBC, @SusanPage\u2014to make #ClimateChange a focus of the upcoming debates.\nThe majority of voters want bold #ClimateAction action.\n\n https://t.co/3TQfCnv73F\u201d— Clean Air Moms Action (@Clean Air Moms Action) 1599143837
"We are a country deep in crises, and how we respond to one crisis magnifies the others," the letter continues, recognizing the need to build back better from the coronavirus pandemic and resulting economic fallout. "Any discussion on the economy, racial justice, public health, democracy, national security, or infrastructure must include the climate crisis. Voters deserve media coverage that takes the climate crisis as seriously as the science tells us we must and as the millions of people across the country who are currently suffering from the impacts deserve."
The letter was spearhead by Climate Power 2020, a project created by the Center for American Progress Action Fund, the League of Conservation Voters, and the Sierra Club. Signatories included leaders of 350 Action, Center for Biological Diversity Action Fund, Climate Hawks Vote, Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace USA, Hip Hop Caucus, Indivisible, MoveOn, Physicians for Social Responsibility, People's Action, Sunrise Movement, and Union of Concerned Scientists.
The green groups' message to moderators came after 70 House Democrats issued a similar call in a letter (pdf) on Wednesday to the co-chairs and board members of the CPD. Led by Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.)--who, as an attorney, focused on environmental and energy issues--the lawmakers encouraged the commission's leadership to learn from criticism of previous election cycle events and make the climate crisis "a centerpiece" of the upcoming presidential and VP debates.
"In 2016, there was not a single question on climate change in any of the four presidential and vice-presidential debates. This cannot happen again," says the lawmakers' letter, a point echoed Thursday by the advocacy groups. "Given the dire nature of the crisis, we ask that you break precedent and publicly call on the moderators to include climate in the topics that will be addressed during the debates."
\u201cIn 2016, there wasn\u2019t a single question during the presidential @Debates on the #ClimateCrisis.\n\nNow, as Trump denies science & abdicates leadership, the crisis is much worse.\n\nThank you @MikeLevin for demanding #ClimateChange take center stage.\nhttps://t.co/u7LE2ErGFg\u201d— LCV \u2013 League of Conservation Voters \ud83c\udf0e (@LCV \u2013 League of Conservation Voters \ud83c\udf0e) 1599079755
In the 2016 cycle, when Trump and Pence faced Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and her running mate Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), moderators were heavily criticized for all but ignoring the climate emergency. During the three presidential debates that year, a mere five minutes and 27 seconds--or 2% of the total time--"were spent on climate change and other environmental issues... and that was pretty much all Hillary Clinton talking," according to Grist.
Across all four events, "the closest anyone came was in the second presidential debate, when audience member (and coal-plant operator) Ken Bone asked the candidates: 'What steps will your energy policy take to meet our energy needs while remaining environmentally friendly and minimizing job loss for fossil power plant workers?'" Vox reported in October 2016. "That's not a direct climate question, but it certainly touches on crucial adjacent topics."
\u201cIn a rational world lawmakers wouldn\u2019t have to demand a global crisis impacting the lives of every person on the planet be discussed during a presidential debate. . . but after moderators asked no climate question in 2016, this is where we are.\n\nhttps://t.co/D6JnLsCjDu\u201d— Ari Rabin-Havt (@Ari Rabin-Havt) 1599142985
Both the green groups and House Democrats pushed back against framing the planetary crisis as a partisan issue, with the lawmakers writing that "Republicans, Democrats, Independents, and politically unaffiliated Americans have all told us that climate change and its consequences to their health, pocketbooks, and safety are a major concern for them in this election year."
"Climate change is no longer an issue that is looming in the distance," the letter continues, pointing to recent and ongoing extreme weather events that are "threatening lives and livelihoods" as well as "the grave environmental injustices impacting people of color, who often experience the effects of climate change first and most acutely."
"We understand there are four central crises that the presidential and vice-presidential candidates must address: the ongoing pandemic, a struggling economy, racial injustice, and the climate crisis," says the lawmakers' letter. "But of these four, there is one which will exacerbate each of the other three, if not addressed immediately."
"We need a dedicated discussion on the climate crisis," the letter concludes, "that matches the importance of this moment."