SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Paul Ryan vs. the People
The GOP's new House speaker says he "trusts the American people," but his budget takes direct aim at them.
Nov 04, 2015
Paul Ryan paints himself as a champion of "the people" over "Washington."
But the "people" the new House speaker defends are corporations. And the "Washington" he attacks is the one that does deliver for real people.
For the past five years, Ryan has authored the budget passed by the House of Representatives. His imprint is so great that each document is commonly known as the "Ryan budget."
Every year, those budgets reliably propose sharp cuts to social services alongside steep tax discounts for the rich. His caucus demands these cuts, Ryan claims, because "we trust the American people." After all, he adds, "Who knows better? The people or Washington?"
But when you look beyond these sound-bite politics at the actual choices Ryan makes in his budget, it's easy to see whom he really trusts -- and whom he really works for.
How, for example, does cutting $89 billion in Pell grants for college -- as his budget last year did -- put more trust in working families who are struggling to give their children a college education?
Then there's his $125 billion in proposed cuts to food stamps for the upcoming fiscal year. Isn't Ryan breaking the trust we have as people -- through our government in Washington -- with a mother who relies on food assistance to feed her children because her employer pays her a poverty wage?
Ryan pretends that the heroes in his story are "the people," but his budget takes direct aim at them. And when he makes "Washington" the villain, he's covering up for the super-rich campaign contributors bankrolling the assault.
Ryan's latest budget would slash $759 billion from infrastructure, medical research, and virtually every other service and investment ordinary people rely on to help provide security and opportunity. Are there any real people who don't need good roads, bridges, and health care?
On health care, Ryan's proposed repeal of the Affordable Care Act would end regulations that stop insurance companies from denying care because of pre-existing conditions. Are "the people" that Ryan puts his trust in health insurance executives?
On taxes, Ryan would eliminate tax credits for 13 million working families, including 25 million children, by an average of $1,073 a year. At the same time, instead of ending tax breaks for corporations that ship profits overseas, he'd make them permanent.
It doesn't have to be this way. There actually are representatives in Congress who do work for working families, not CEOs. This past May, 96 House lawmakers voted for the People's Budget -- and against Ryan's proposal.
Developed by the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the People's Budget invests in infrastructure, renewable energy, and schools to create 8 million jobs in the next three years.
Instead of cutting back on vital services for families, it helps families secure debt-free college, child nutrition, and affordable housing. Instead of more money for Pentagon contractors and less for veterans, it reduces spending for outdated weapons and increases support for vets. It ends tax giveaways for corporations that ship jobs and profits overseas, and it taxes Wall Street speculation.
The People's Budget also includes a small-donor campaign finance system, so members of Congress could run for office without taking any large contributions from the super-rich or corporations. That might help put real people back in charge of "the people's house."
The real conflict isn't Washington vs. the people. It's the super-rich vs. the rest of us. And Republicans are rallying behind a House speaker who's built his career representing the rich and powerful.
Americans need to rally behind a different kind of politician -- the folks who will really stand up for people.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Richard Kirsch
Richard Kirsch is a Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute and the author of Fighting for Our Health: The Epic Battle to Make Health Care a Right in the United States, published in February 2012 by the Rockefeller Institute Press. He is also Senior Adviser to USAction and an Institute Fellow at the Rockefeller institute.
Paul Ryan paints himself as a champion of "the people" over "Washington."
But the "people" the new House speaker defends are corporations. And the "Washington" he attacks is the one that does deliver for real people.
For the past five years, Ryan has authored the budget passed by the House of Representatives. His imprint is so great that each document is commonly known as the "Ryan budget."
Every year, those budgets reliably propose sharp cuts to social services alongside steep tax discounts for the rich. His caucus demands these cuts, Ryan claims, because "we trust the American people." After all, he adds, "Who knows better? The people or Washington?"
But when you look beyond these sound-bite politics at the actual choices Ryan makes in his budget, it's easy to see whom he really trusts -- and whom he really works for.
How, for example, does cutting $89 billion in Pell grants for college -- as his budget last year did -- put more trust in working families who are struggling to give their children a college education?
Then there's his $125 billion in proposed cuts to food stamps for the upcoming fiscal year. Isn't Ryan breaking the trust we have as people -- through our government in Washington -- with a mother who relies on food assistance to feed her children because her employer pays her a poverty wage?
Ryan pretends that the heroes in his story are "the people," but his budget takes direct aim at them. And when he makes "Washington" the villain, he's covering up for the super-rich campaign contributors bankrolling the assault.
Ryan's latest budget would slash $759 billion from infrastructure, medical research, and virtually every other service and investment ordinary people rely on to help provide security and opportunity. Are there any real people who don't need good roads, bridges, and health care?
On health care, Ryan's proposed repeal of the Affordable Care Act would end regulations that stop insurance companies from denying care because of pre-existing conditions. Are "the people" that Ryan puts his trust in health insurance executives?
On taxes, Ryan would eliminate tax credits for 13 million working families, including 25 million children, by an average of $1,073 a year. At the same time, instead of ending tax breaks for corporations that ship profits overseas, he'd make them permanent.
It doesn't have to be this way. There actually are representatives in Congress who do work for working families, not CEOs. This past May, 96 House lawmakers voted for the People's Budget -- and against Ryan's proposal.
Developed by the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the People's Budget invests in infrastructure, renewable energy, and schools to create 8 million jobs in the next three years.
Instead of cutting back on vital services for families, it helps families secure debt-free college, child nutrition, and affordable housing. Instead of more money for Pentagon contractors and less for veterans, it reduces spending for outdated weapons and increases support for vets. It ends tax giveaways for corporations that ship jobs and profits overseas, and it taxes Wall Street speculation.
The People's Budget also includes a small-donor campaign finance system, so members of Congress could run for office without taking any large contributions from the super-rich or corporations. That might help put real people back in charge of "the people's house."
The real conflict isn't Washington vs. the people. It's the super-rich vs. the rest of us. And Republicans are rallying behind a House speaker who's built his career representing the rich and powerful.
Americans need to rally behind a different kind of politician -- the folks who will really stand up for people.
Richard Kirsch
Richard Kirsch is a Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute and the author of Fighting for Our Health: The Epic Battle to Make Health Care a Right in the United States, published in February 2012 by the Rockefeller Institute Press. He is also Senior Adviser to USAction and an Institute Fellow at the Rockefeller institute.
Paul Ryan paints himself as a champion of "the people" over "Washington."
But the "people" the new House speaker defends are corporations. And the "Washington" he attacks is the one that does deliver for real people.
For the past five years, Ryan has authored the budget passed by the House of Representatives. His imprint is so great that each document is commonly known as the "Ryan budget."
Every year, those budgets reliably propose sharp cuts to social services alongside steep tax discounts for the rich. His caucus demands these cuts, Ryan claims, because "we trust the American people." After all, he adds, "Who knows better? The people or Washington?"
But when you look beyond these sound-bite politics at the actual choices Ryan makes in his budget, it's easy to see whom he really trusts -- and whom he really works for.
How, for example, does cutting $89 billion in Pell grants for college -- as his budget last year did -- put more trust in working families who are struggling to give their children a college education?
Then there's his $125 billion in proposed cuts to food stamps for the upcoming fiscal year. Isn't Ryan breaking the trust we have as people -- through our government in Washington -- with a mother who relies on food assistance to feed her children because her employer pays her a poverty wage?
Ryan pretends that the heroes in his story are "the people," but his budget takes direct aim at them. And when he makes "Washington" the villain, he's covering up for the super-rich campaign contributors bankrolling the assault.
Ryan's latest budget would slash $759 billion from infrastructure, medical research, and virtually every other service and investment ordinary people rely on to help provide security and opportunity. Are there any real people who don't need good roads, bridges, and health care?
On health care, Ryan's proposed repeal of the Affordable Care Act would end regulations that stop insurance companies from denying care because of pre-existing conditions. Are "the people" that Ryan puts his trust in health insurance executives?
On taxes, Ryan would eliminate tax credits for 13 million working families, including 25 million children, by an average of $1,073 a year. At the same time, instead of ending tax breaks for corporations that ship profits overseas, he'd make them permanent.
It doesn't have to be this way. There actually are representatives in Congress who do work for working families, not CEOs. This past May, 96 House lawmakers voted for the People's Budget -- and against Ryan's proposal.
Developed by the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the People's Budget invests in infrastructure, renewable energy, and schools to create 8 million jobs in the next three years.
Instead of cutting back on vital services for families, it helps families secure debt-free college, child nutrition, and affordable housing. Instead of more money for Pentagon contractors and less for veterans, it reduces spending for outdated weapons and increases support for vets. It ends tax giveaways for corporations that ship jobs and profits overseas, and it taxes Wall Street speculation.
The People's Budget also includes a small-donor campaign finance system, so members of Congress could run for office without taking any large contributions from the super-rich or corporations. That might help put real people back in charge of "the people's house."
The real conflict isn't Washington vs. the people. It's the super-rich vs. the rest of us. And Republicans are rallying behind a House speaker who's built his career representing the rich and powerful.
Americans need to rally behind a different kind of politician -- the folks who will really stand up for people.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.