

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Is Paul Ryan's years-long dream of gutting Medicare about to come true?
With Republicans set to control both houses of Congress and the White House, Ryan (R-Wis.), who will serve another term as House speaker, "senses his moment," as Salon observes.
The Donald Trump transition website states that the administration will "modernize Medicare"--a euphemism, according to Jonathan Cohn and Jeffrey Young at the Huffington Post, that corresponds exactly to what Ryan has in mind.
Speaking Thursday on Fox News's "Special Report," Ryan said, "Medicare is going broke, Medicare is going to have price controls because of Obamacare," adding, "You have to deal with those issues if you are going to repeal and replace Obamacare. Medicare has serious problems [because of] Obamacare."
Those statements are false, Michael Hiltzik writes at the Los Angeles Times:
Medicare faces fiscal problems, but it's not going broke, and according to both the Medicare trustees and the Congressional Budget Office, the Affordable Care Act [also known as Obamacare] has in fact alleviated those problems rather than caused them. The trustees reported in 2010 that passage of Obamacare had postponed the projected exhaustion date of the Medicare trust fund by 12 years--to 2029 from 2017. Projections of Medicare spending growth have consistently come down, year after year, at least in part due to changes in the program imposed through Obamacare.
The program's fiscal situation would be "substantially improved," the trustees said, because the ACA instituted new cost controls and provided new tax revenues for the program. Both those features would disappear if the GOP repeals the ACA, as is its intention.
Simply put, economist Dean Baker writes, Ryan's plan "will require seniors to deal with insurance companies who will profit by denying them care."
"Ryan's plan," Gary Legum adds at Salon,
is to replace the totally-not-going-broke Medicare with what he calls "premium price supports." This is fancy wonk-speak for "vouchers that would be used to buy private insurance but would not keep up with the cost of inflation, thereby saddling seniors with enormous additional health care expenses out of their own pockets." Good luck stretching out those Social Security checks, folks! Assuming Ryan doesn't gut that next.
Josh Marshall adds at TPM:
I've heard a few people say that it's not 100% clear here that Ryan is calling for Medicare Phase Out. It is 100% clear. Ryan has a standard, openly enunciated position in favor of Medicare Phase Out. It's on his website. It's explained explicitly right there.
Given the likely threat to the broadly supported program, Jeet Heer argues at New Republic that Democrats should mount "a pre-emptive attack on the Ryan Plan" with "Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Keith Ellison" at the helm of an organizing committee.
He adds:
It's essential to hang Ryan around the neck of Trump, to make Trump feel the political cost of going along with Ryan's agenda. This should be a part of a larger message designed to challenge Trump's populist pretenses, pointing out all the policies he supports that go against the interest of the working class or enrich the wealthy.
Baker similarly argues it should be used as a "pressure point" and that "[w]e have to do our best to make everyone know that this is the Republican agenda."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Is Paul Ryan's years-long dream of gutting Medicare about to come true?
With Republicans set to control both houses of Congress and the White House, Ryan (R-Wis.), who will serve another term as House speaker, "senses his moment," as Salon observes.
The Donald Trump transition website states that the administration will "modernize Medicare"--a euphemism, according to Jonathan Cohn and Jeffrey Young at the Huffington Post, that corresponds exactly to what Ryan has in mind.
Speaking Thursday on Fox News's "Special Report," Ryan said, "Medicare is going broke, Medicare is going to have price controls because of Obamacare," adding, "You have to deal with those issues if you are going to repeal and replace Obamacare. Medicare has serious problems [because of] Obamacare."
Those statements are false, Michael Hiltzik writes at the Los Angeles Times:
Medicare faces fiscal problems, but it's not going broke, and according to both the Medicare trustees and the Congressional Budget Office, the Affordable Care Act [also known as Obamacare] has in fact alleviated those problems rather than caused them. The trustees reported in 2010 that passage of Obamacare had postponed the projected exhaustion date of the Medicare trust fund by 12 years--to 2029 from 2017. Projections of Medicare spending growth have consistently come down, year after year, at least in part due to changes in the program imposed through Obamacare.
The program's fiscal situation would be "substantially improved," the trustees said, because the ACA instituted new cost controls and provided new tax revenues for the program. Both those features would disappear if the GOP repeals the ACA, as is its intention.
Simply put, economist Dean Baker writes, Ryan's plan "will require seniors to deal with insurance companies who will profit by denying them care."
"Ryan's plan," Gary Legum adds at Salon,
is to replace the totally-not-going-broke Medicare with what he calls "premium price supports." This is fancy wonk-speak for "vouchers that would be used to buy private insurance but would not keep up with the cost of inflation, thereby saddling seniors with enormous additional health care expenses out of their own pockets." Good luck stretching out those Social Security checks, folks! Assuming Ryan doesn't gut that next.
Josh Marshall adds at TPM:
I've heard a few people say that it's not 100% clear here that Ryan is calling for Medicare Phase Out. It is 100% clear. Ryan has a standard, openly enunciated position in favor of Medicare Phase Out. It's on his website. It's explained explicitly right there.
Given the likely threat to the broadly supported program, Jeet Heer argues at New Republic that Democrats should mount "a pre-emptive attack on the Ryan Plan" with "Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Keith Ellison" at the helm of an organizing committee.
He adds:
It's essential to hang Ryan around the neck of Trump, to make Trump feel the political cost of going along with Ryan's agenda. This should be a part of a larger message designed to challenge Trump's populist pretenses, pointing out all the policies he supports that go against the interest of the working class or enrich the wealthy.
Baker similarly argues it should be used as a "pressure point" and that "[w]e have to do our best to make everyone know that this is the Republican agenda."
Is Paul Ryan's years-long dream of gutting Medicare about to come true?
With Republicans set to control both houses of Congress and the White House, Ryan (R-Wis.), who will serve another term as House speaker, "senses his moment," as Salon observes.
The Donald Trump transition website states that the administration will "modernize Medicare"--a euphemism, according to Jonathan Cohn and Jeffrey Young at the Huffington Post, that corresponds exactly to what Ryan has in mind.
Speaking Thursday on Fox News's "Special Report," Ryan said, "Medicare is going broke, Medicare is going to have price controls because of Obamacare," adding, "You have to deal with those issues if you are going to repeal and replace Obamacare. Medicare has serious problems [because of] Obamacare."
Those statements are false, Michael Hiltzik writes at the Los Angeles Times:
Medicare faces fiscal problems, but it's not going broke, and according to both the Medicare trustees and the Congressional Budget Office, the Affordable Care Act [also known as Obamacare] has in fact alleviated those problems rather than caused them. The trustees reported in 2010 that passage of Obamacare had postponed the projected exhaustion date of the Medicare trust fund by 12 years--to 2029 from 2017. Projections of Medicare spending growth have consistently come down, year after year, at least in part due to changes in the program imposed through Obamacare.
The program's fiscal situation would be "substantially improved," the trustees said, because the ACA instituted new cost controls and provided new tax revenues for the program. Both those features would disappear if the GOP repeals the ACA, as is its intention.
Simply put, economist Dean Baker writes, Ryan's plan "will require seniors to deal with insurance companies who will profit by denying them care."
"Ryan's plan," Gary Legum adds at Salon,
is to replace the totally-not-going-broke Medicare with what he calls "premium price supports." This is fancy wonk-speak for "vouchers that would be used to buy private insurance but would not keep up with the cost of inflation, thereby saddling seniors with enormous additional health care expenses out of their own pockets." Good luck stretching out those Social Security checks, folks! Assuming Ryan doesn't gut that next.
Josh Marshall adds at TPM:
I've heard a few people say that it's not 100% clear here that Ryan is calling for Medicare Phase Out. It is 100% clear. Ryan has a standard, openly enunciated position in favor of Medicare Phase Out. It's on his website. It's explained explicitly right there.
Given the likely threat to the broadly supported program, Jeet Heer argues at New Republic that Democrats should mount "a pre-emptive attack on the Ryan Plan" with "Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Keith Ellison" at the helm of an organizing committee.
He adds:
It's essential to hang Ryan around the neck of Trump, to make Trump feel the political cost of going along with Ryan's agenda. This should be a part of a larger message designed to challenge Trump's populist pretenses, pointing out all the policies he supports that go against the interest of the working class or enrich the wealthy.
Baker similarly argues it should be used as a "pressure point" and that "[w]e have to do our best to make everyone know that this is the Republican agenda."